TABLE OF CONTENTS


UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.      )

Filed by the Registrant   

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant   ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨

    Preliminary Proxy Statement​

¨Statement

☐    Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

    Definitive Proxy Statement​

¨Statement

    Definitive Additional Materials​

¨Materials

    Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12​

American International Group, Inc.

under §240.14a-12

American International Group, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified Inin Its Charter)   ​

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

    No fee required.

¨    Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.​

(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:​
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:​
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):​
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

​(5)Total fee paid:

¨

    Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐    Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a6(i)(1) and 0-11.



01_424782-1_Covers_V2_fc.jpg



01_424782-1_Covers_V23.jpg



¨ 
A Letter from our Chairman &
Chief Executive Officer
05_424782-1_photo_letter_zaffino.jpg
Peter Zaffino
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Check box if anyDear Fellow Shareholders:
I am very pleased with the progress AIG made in 2023 and will highlight our significant achievements throughout the year. Our sustained financial performance over the last several years has enabled us to continue to position AIG as a top-performing global insurer. Over the course of the year, we made significant strategic, operational and financial advancements, which created substantial value for AIG’s colleagues, clients, and shareholders, and provided significant momentum as we enter 2024.
Our very strong financial results last year were led by excellent underwriting performance, expense discipline as we continued investing for the future, increased investment income, and execution of a balanced capital management strategy. In 2023, we delivered exceptional underwriting profitability that surpassed our 2022 results and delivered a second consecutive year of underwriting income in excess of $2 billion. To put this in context, AIG had significant underwriting losses from 2008-2018, making today’s performance even more impressive. Now, we are well positioned with our breadth and depth of expertise and talent in underwriting, operational capabilities, and claims service to drive AIG’s continued progress.
During 2023, we also reached several important milestones by simplifying our business, executing on several divestitures that further re-positioned our portfolio, and significantly reducing volatility. We made remarkable progress towards the separation of Corebridge, completing three secondary offerings that generated approximately $2.9 billion in proceeds. At year end, our ownership stake in Corebridge was approximately 52%, and we expect to continue reducing our ownership of Corebridge in 2024, subject to market conditions. When we are not the majority owner of Corebridge and no longer control its board, we will no longer consolidate our financial results, and this will enable us to be positioned as a leading global property and casualty insurer.
Our outstanding performance and strategic positioning in 2023 enabled the execution of our thoughtful and balanced capital management strategy. We increased financial flexibility while reducing debt by $1.4 billion and returning approximately $4 billion to AIG shareholders through $3 billion of common stock repurchases and $1 billion of common stock dividends, including a 12.5% increase in the second quarter of 2023. We finished 2023 with very strong parent liquidity of $7.6 billion, giving us ample capacity to continue executing on our capital management priorities going forward.
AIG entered 2024 with strong momentum and we have introduced AIG Next, our future-state business model that will create additional value by weaving a leaner, more unified company together. AIG Next will result in further expense reductions and will support our progress toward achieving our Adjusted Return on Common Equity target of 10% plus, while also creating a less complex company. We are able to deliver multiple high-quality outcomes while moving with pace thanks to the commitment and teamwork of our AIG colleagues around the world.
As you will hear from the Board’s Lead Independent Director, John Rice, we enhanced our governance practices in 2023, anchored by active engagement with AIG’s investors and continued refreshment of our Board of Directors. Since our last shareholder meeting in May 2023, the Board welcomed two highly accomplished and eminently qualified Directors, Jimmy Dunne and Chris Inglis.
The Board encourages you to read this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Annual Report, and we welcome you to join AIG’s virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2024, on May 15, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time.
AIG is well positioned to help our clients and partners solve a vast array of risk issues while working closely with our stakeholders to navigate an increasingly complex global socioeconomic environment. All of our stakeholders have recognized that we are now setting the standards in the global insurance industry.
I thank you for your continued investment of capital and support, and I look forward to continuing to build on the progress we have made as we create the AIG of the future and provide exceptional value to our stakeholders.
Sincerely,
05_424782-3_sig_zaffino.jpg
Peter Zaffino
Chairman & CEO
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT1


A Letter from our Lead
Independent Director
05_424782-3_photo_johnrice.jpg
John G. Rice
Lead Independent Director
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
I joined AIG’s Board in 2022 and have been honored to serve as Lead Independent Director since January 1, 2023.
AIG management and the Board communicate openly and candidly so that the Board can effectively perform its role. Our meeting agendas are established with the Chairman and CEO and designed to ensure we spend time on the most important matters including both opportunities and challenges. We have executive sessions as part of every meeting, and there is regular director interaction between meetings so questions can be posed, and ideas can be shared.
The Board makes an effort to engage consistently and productively with shareholders. This engagement was substantial again this year, with outreach to investors representing 68.9% of shares outstanding and resulting meetings with those representing 54.3% of shares outstanding. Following feedback from investors at these meetings, the feeBoard completed a comprehensive review and update of AIG’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which led to broader duties for the Lead Independent Director.
We have added two new directors who will be standing for reelection, along with the rest of the Board, at this year’s Annual Meeting. With the addition of Jimmy Dunne and Chris Inglis, the Board stands to benefit from these executives’ business acumen, diverse experience in complex strategic initiatives, and deep commitment to the company. These individuals bring complementary skillsets while also understanding that the Board, as a whole, must be greater than the sum of its parts. Simply stated, our job is offsetto work as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)a team to represent your interests and identifysupport the filing for whichmanagement team.
As Peter has shared, AIG’s strategic, operational and financial momentum continues, thanks to the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identifyhard work of the previous filing by registration statement number, orleadership team and their colleagues around the Form or Scheduleworld. In Peter Zaffino, we have an exceptional leader who is building the team, and the dateCompany, for the future. Your Board will continue to evolve by regularly assessing our performance, seeking shareholder feedback, and working to ensure our efforts are commensurate with what our shareholders expect.
Thank you for your continued support of its filing.AIG. The Board encourages you to read this Proxy Statement and welcomes you to join AIG’s virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2024 on Wednesday, May 15, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time.
Sincerely,
05_424782-3_sig_RiceJ.jpg
John G. Rice
Lead Independent Director

2  AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT


Notice of
Annual Meeting
of Shareholders
(1)Amount Previously Paid:
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held Virtually:
This year’s meeting will be held in a virtual format only. Please visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2024
Date and Time:
May 15, 2024
11:00 a.m. Eastern Time

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:

April 2, 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Matters to be Voted On:
1.Election of the Ten Director Nominees Named in this Proxy Statement
2.Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation
3.Ratify Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) to Serve as Independent Auditor for 2024
4.Consideration of the Two Shareholder Proposals in this Proxy Statement, if Properly Presented at the Annual Meeting
5.Other business, if Properly Presented at the Annual Meeting
Your vote is very important. We encourage you to vote.
Who May Vote:
If you owned shares of American International Group, Inc.

2021 (AIG Parent) common stock at the close of business on March 18, 2024 (the record date), you are entitled to receive this Notice of the 2024 Annual Meeting and to vote at the 2024 Annual Meeting, either during the virtual meeting or by proxy.

How to Participate:
To participate in the 2024 Annual Meeting via the website (www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2024), enter the 16-digit voting control number found on your proxy card, voting instruction form, notice of internet availability of proxy materials, or email notification. You can find detailed instructions on page 99 of this Proxy Statement.
Please carefully review this Proxy Statement

and vote in one of the four ways identified on this page under “How to Vote.”

By Order of the AIG Board of Directors.

CB Electronic Signature (002).jpg
Chris Banthin
Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary
How to Vote:
By Telephone
Call the telephone number on your proxy card or voting instruction form or in other communications
pg2-icon_telehpone.jpg
By the Internet
Go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions
pg2-icon_internet.jpg
By Mail
Sign, date and mail your proxy card or voting instruction form in the enclosed envelope
pg2-icon_mail.jpg
Online During the Meeting
Attend the 2024 Annual Meeting online. See page TABLE OF CONTENTS100

for instructions on how to attend and vote online

March 30, 2021

Dear Fellow AIG Shareholder,

AIG’s

pg2-icon_onlinemeeting.jpg
The Board of Directors Executive Leadership Team and global workforce are maintaining significant momentum and a continued sense of urgency on(the Board) is soliciting proxies to be voted at our path to becoming a top performing company.

AIG is effectively managing through COVID-19 and its collateral effects on the global economy because of the strong foundation we have been building since late 2017. The company is well positioned for long-term, sustainable, and profitable growth.

AIG has instilled a culture of underwriting excellence, adjusted risk tolerances, implemented best-in-class reinsurance programs, strengthened its vast global footprint, de-risked the balance sheet and maintained a diversified investment portfolio.

Our announced intention to separate the Life and Retirement business from AIG, which we believe will enable each entity to achieve a more appropriate and sustainable valuation, was made possible by the team’s tremendous progress strengthening General Insurance in particular and positioning each of our businesses as a market leader.

Despite the challenges presented by COVID-19, the company accelerated the execution of AIG 200, our enterprise-wide transformation designed to position AIG for the future.

Over the last year, we prioritized the well-being of AIG colleagues, who showed resilience and attentiveness in service of all stakeholders despite unprecedented disruptions. We also enhanced our efforts to promote value creation in our communities and continue to make progress with respect to diversity, equity, and inclusion across AIG.

On March 1, 2021, we seamlessly transitioned into our new roles as Executive Chair and Lead Independent Director, respectively, and know that the company is in great hands with Peter Zaffino as President and Chief Executive Officer of AIG.

The Board would like to thank Henry Miller, who is retiring as a Director, for his service and valuable contributions since 2010. In addition, we were pleased to welcome James Cole, Jr. to the Board on March 15, 2021.

We invite you to attend the virtual 20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Wednesday, May 12, 2021,15, 2024, and at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

any postponed or reconvened meeting. We also encourage youexpect that the proxy materials and notice of internet availability will be mailed and made available to read this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report, and to vote as we recommendshareholders beginning on the enclosed proposals in advance of the meeting. Please vote in advance of the meeting even if you plan to participate virtually. Every vote matters.

Thank you for your investment in AIG. We remain focused on delivering value for you as we strive to become a leading insurance franchise.

Sincerely,

or about April 2, 2024.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT3


Table of Contents
A Letter from our Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Brian DuperreaultDouglas M. Steenland
Executive ChairA Letter from our Lead Independent Director

March 30, 2021

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. (AIG)
175 Water Street, New York, N.Y. 10038

Time and Date*11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on Wednesday, May 12, 2021.
Access*Meeting live via the Internet—please visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2021.
Mailing DateThis Proxy Statement, 2020 Annual Report and proxy card or voting instructions were either made available to you over the Internet or mailed to you on or about March 30, 2021.
Items of Business1.    To elect the thirteen nominees recommended by our Board of Directors as directors of AIG to hold office until the next annual election and until their successors are duly elected and qualified
2.    To vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, to approve executive compensation
3.    To vote on a proposal to approve the American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan
4.    To act upon a proposal to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as AIG’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2021
5.    To vote on a shareholder proposal to give shareholders who hold at least 10 percent of AIG’s outstanding common stock the right to call special meetings
6.    To transact any other business that may properly come before the meeting
Record DateYou can vote if you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on March 17, 2021.
Admission
To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on your proxy card.
AdditionalAdditional information regarding the matters to be acted on during the Annual Meeting is included in this Proxy Statement.
Proxy VotingYou can vote your shares before the Annual Meeting over the Internet or by telephone. If you received a paper proxy card by mail, you may also vote by signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the envelope provided. You may also vote your shares during the Annual Meeting by logging into the virtual meeting site using the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy card, or voting instruction form.
A-1

* In light of COVID-19, for the safety and well-being of our shareholders and employees, and taking into account the protocols of local, state and federal governments, we have determined that the 2021 Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only, via the Internet, with no physical in-person meeting. We believe that the virtual meeting format affords our shareholders an opportunity for meaningful participation, and we have taken steps to ensure that shareholders will be able to attend, vote and submit questions from any location via the Internet. For more details regarding how to participate in the virtual meeting, please see “Voting Instructions and Information.”

By order of the Board of Directors,

ROSE MARIE E. GLAZER
Corporate Secretary

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held virtually via the Internet on May 12, 2021. This15, 2024. The Notice of the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement, the 2020as well as our 2023 Annual Report, are available free of charge at www.proxyvote.com or at www.aig.com. References in either document to our website are for the convenience of readers, and information available at or through our website is not a part of, nor is it incorporated by reference in, the Proxy Statement or Annual Report.
Our principal executive offices are located at 1271 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, 10020-1304.
Note: In this Notice of the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and other materials are available inProxy Statement, we use the Investors section of AIG’s corporate website at www.aig.com.

terms the "Company," "AIG," "we," "us" and "our" to refer to AIG and its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context refers to AIG Parent only.

Table of Contents

4AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT





Executive Summary

Executive Summary

This summary highlights information contained in this Proxy Statement. It does not contain all of the information you should consider in making a voting decision, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting. These proxy materials are first being sent to shareholders of American International Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (AIG), commencing on or about March 30, 2021.

VOTING MATTERS AND VOTE RECOMMENDATION

Matter
Voting Matters and Vote RecommendationBoard Vote
Recommendation
Board’s
recommendation
For
More Information, see:
information
Management
Proposals
Item 1Election of the Ten Director Nominees Named in this Proxy StatementFOR each Director Nominee
Page 12
1.Item 2Election of thirteen directorsAdvisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer CompensationFOR EACH DIRECTOR
NOMINEE
2.Item 3Advisory vote on executive compensationFORPage 114
3.Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the 2021 Plan)FORPage 116
4.RatificationRatify Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to Serve as AIG’s independent registered public accounting firmIndependent Auditor for 20212024FOR
Shareholder ProposalProposalsItem 4Proposal Requesting an Independent Board Chair PolicyAGAINST
Page 94
5.Item 5Proposal Requesting a Director Election Resignation By-LawAGAINST
What's New
nCorporate Governance Enhancements
Updates to give shareholders who hold at least 10 percentCorporate Governance Guidelines – Completed a comprehensive review and update of our outstanding common stockCorporate Governance Guidelines, including broadening the rightLead Independent Director duties (see page 24)
Updates to call special meetingsBoard committee charters – Completed a thorough review of each Board committee charter, which included benchmarking charters against certain companies in the Fortune 100 (see page 29
)
nEnhanced Disclosure - In response to shareholder feedback, we have enhanced our disclosures on the items below
Topics discussed during shareholder engagement, such as executive compensation, including one-time awards and talent succession (see page AGAINST35
)
CEO succession planning (see page Page 13127)
Board self-evaluation process (see page 25)
Board continuing education (see page 25)

 

AIG believes that the virtual meeting format affords our shareholders an opportunity for meaningful participation, including the ability to vote and ask questions electronically during the meeting. For detailed information on the voting process and how to attend the AIG Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held virtually via the Internet on May 12, 2021 (Annual Meeting), or any adjournment or postponement thereof, please see “Voting Instructions and Information” beginning on page 136.

2021 Proxy Statement1

Executive Summary

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT5

ABOUT AIG

AIG is


Proxy Statement Summary About Us
About Us
We are a leading global insurance organization. We provide a wide range of property casualty insurance life insurance, retirement solutions that help businesses and other financial services to customersindividuals in approximately 80190 countries and jurisdictions.

2020 HIGHLIGHTS

In 2020, AIG effectively managedjurisdictions protect their assets and manage risks through COVID-19our operations and its collateral effects on the global economy thanks to the strong foundation created since late 2017 to instill a culture of underwriting excellence, adjust risk tolerances, implement a best-in-class reinsurance program, de-risk our balance sheet and maintain a balanced investment portfolio. We continue this momentum and embark on an important phase of our journey to becoming a top performing company with our proactive leadership transition and planned corporate structure changes.

 

network partners.
2
World-Class Insurance Franchises that are among the leaders in their geographies and segments, providing differentiated service and expertise.
 
Breadth of Loyal Customersincluding millions of clients and policyholders ranging from multi-national Fortune 500 companies to individuals throughout the world.
2021 Proxy Statement
Broad and Long-Standing Distribution Relationshipswith brokers, agents, advisors, banks and other distributors strengthened through our dedication to quality.

Executive Summary

 

*
Highly Engaged Global Workforceof more than 25,000 colleagues committed to excellence who are providing insurance solutions that help businesses and individuals in approximately 190 countries and jurisdictions protect their assets and manage risks through our operations and network partners.
Accident Year Combined Ratio, As Adjusted is a non-GAAP financial measure. AIG’s 2020, 2019
Balance Sheet Strength and 2018 Calendar Year Combined ratio was 104.3%, 99.6%Financial Flexibilityas demonstrated by approximately $45 billion in shareholders’ equity and 111.4%, respectively. See Appendix A for a reconciliation showing how this metric is calculated from our consolidated financial statements.AIG Parent liquidity sources of $12.1 billion as of December 31, 2023.
**
6AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Proxy Statement Summary 2023 Highlights
2023 Highlights
We delivered an outstanding year in 2023, producing strategic, operational and financial achievements that demonstrate continued strength in executing multiple, complex initiatives simultaneously and with quality.
Execution of Multiple, Highly Complex Strategic Initiatives
nRepositioned our portfolio of businesses for sustainable, profitable growth with the divestitures of Validus Reinsurance, Ltd. (Validus Re) and Crop Risk Services, Inc. (CRS) and the transfer of Private Client Select to an independent Managing General Agent platform
nClosed sale of Validus Re, including AlphaCat Managers Ltd. and the Talbot Treaty reinsurance business, for $3.3 billion in cash including pre-closing dividend
nClosed sale of CRS for gross proceeds of $234 million
nUnited the General Insurance and parent company leadership teams and their organizations
nDebuted AIG Next, creating a leaner future-state business model and establishing enterprise-wide standards to drive better outcomes for all stakeholders
On October 26, 2020, AIG announced its intention to separate its Life
Continued Balanced Capital Management Supporting Financial Strength, Growth and Retirement business from AIG. See “—AnnouncementShareholder Return
nRepurchased $3.0 billion of Planned Lifeour common stock and Retirement Separation.”paid $1.0 billion of common and preferred stock dividends
nReduced weighted average diluted shares outstanding by 8 percent, reaching 725.2 million shares
nIncreased quarterly common stock dividend payments by 12.5 percent $0.36 per share during the second quarter of 2023
nReduced general borrowings by $1.4 billion
***RBC is a formula designed to measure the adequacy
Strong Performance Resulting from Significant Improvement in Underwriting Income
nGeneral Insurance achieved $2.3 billion in underwriting income, up 15 percent year over year
n2023 combined ratio of an insurer’s statutory surplus90.6 compared to 91.9 in 2022, and sub-100 in every quarter of 2023
n2023 accident year combined ratio, as adjusted* of 87.7 improved 1.0 point compared to 88.7 in 2022
Continued Progress Towards Deconsolidation and Separation of Corebridge Financial, Inc. (Corebridge)
nWe sold 159.75 million shares of Corebridge common stock in secondary public offerings with gross proceeds of $2.9 billion
nCorebridge repurchased 17.2 million shares of its common stock from AIG for an aggregate purchase price of $315 million
nCorebridge distributed dividends on Corebridge common stock totaling $1.1 billion to AIG
nOur ownership of Corebridge reduced to 52.2 percent as of December 31, 2023
nCorebridge closed the risks inherent tosale of Laya Healthcare Limited for €691 million ($731 million) and announced the business. The inclusionsale of RBC measures is not intendedAIG Life Limited for the purposeconsideration of ranking any insurance company or for use in connection with any marketing, advertising or promotional activities.

2021 Proxy Statement3
£460 million

Executive Summary

AIG’S RESPONSE TO COVID-19

AIG acted quickly in early 2020 to respond to the COVID-19 crisis, with a focus on supporting our colleagues and communities and on business resiliency.

 

4 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive Summary

ANNOUNCEMENT OF PLANNED LIFE AND RETIREMENT SEPARATION

Planned initial disposition of up to 19.9% interest
Seek to unlock value for shareholders and other stakeholders
Made possible due to strengthening of General Insurance business since 2017

In October 2020, AIG announced its intention to separate its Life and Retirement business

*Accident year combined ratio, as adjusted is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Appendix A for a reconciliation showing how this metric is calculated from AIG. This decision followed a comprehensive review by the Board of Directors (Board) and management of AIG’s composite structure and was made possible by significant work done since 2017 to strengthen the fundamentals of AIG’s General Insurance business. Any separation transaction, which is currently contemplated to include an initial disposition of up to a 19.9 percent interest in our Life and Retirement business, will be subject to the satisfaction of various conditions and approvals, including approval by the Board, receipt of insurance and other required regulatory approvals, and satisfaction of any applicable requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Board intends to accomplish the separation in a way that unlocks value for our shareholders and other stakeholders and establishes two strong, market-leading companies.

No assurance can be given regarding the structure of the initial disposition of up to a 19.9 percent interest in the Life and Retirement business or the specific terms or timing thereof, or that a separation will in fact occur.

EXECUTION OF THOUGHTFUL, WELL-COORDINATED SUCCESSION PLAN

On October 26, 2020, audited financial statements.

AIG announced that Peter Zaffino would become President and Chief 2024 PROXY STATEMENT7

Proxy Statement Summary Executive Officer, Brian Duperreault would become Compensation Highlights
Executive Chair and Douglas Steenland would become Lead Independent Director, in each case effective March 1, 2021. Mr. Zaffino also joined the Board on October 26, 2020. This transition reflects the execution of a thoughtful, well-coordinated Chief Executive Officer succession plan overseen by the Board with support from theCompensation Highlights
The Compensation and Management Resources Committee (CMRC) oversees our compensation programs, which are designed to reward performance against our strategic priorities and align executive pay with performance.
Our 2023 short-term incentive and long-term incentive program metrics reflected key areas of focus for our Company for relevant periods, including driving underwriting and operational excellence to improve profitability and setting the stage for transformative transactions.
1.CEO incentive-based compensation for 2023 is 100 percent performance based in consultation with the Chairform of Performance Share Units (PSUs) and stock options
2.Majority of our named executives’ 2023 compensation is variable and at-risk
3.Majority of non-CEO named executives' 2023 long-term incentive compensation is performance-based in the form of PSUs and stock options
Our 2023 compensation programs, including the compensation decisions for each of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (NCGC). The Board determined that Mr. Zaffino was the right choice to become AIG’s next Chief Executive Officer on the basis of the success he demonstrated as AIG’s President and Global Chief Operating Officer and his leadership over the turnaround of AIG’s General Insurance business as its Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Duperreault’s extensive experience and established relationships with AIG’s directors and stakeholders enable him to lead the Board in overseeing the company through the transition of a new Chief Executive Officer and major transformative transactions, including the separation of AIG’s Life and Retirement business. Mr. Duperreault’s term as Executive Chair will end on December 31, 2021, at which time he will become a non-officer employee of AIG for one year, providing assistance and advice to the extent requested by the Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Steenland leverages his extensive business experience and leadership to ensure continued robust, independent oversight of management by the independent directors.

2021 Proxy Statement5

Executive Summary

2021 PRIORITIES

 

6 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive Summary

COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

The onset of the COVID-19 crisis and its collateral effects on the global economy in the first quarter of 2020 required the CMRC to pivot and adapt its approach to executive compensation to address AIG’s changing priorities, while continuing to reinforce the importance of transformation initiatives.

Important aspects of our 2020 executive compensation framework remained consistent with the framework for 2019:
Short-term incentive (STI) awards continued to be based on a combination of Business and Individual Performance Scores combined on a multiplicative basis, meaning if either element is zero, no STI award is earned;
The Individual Performance Score component of STI awards continued to assess performance under four pillars—Financial, Strategic, Operational and Organizational—which reflect various important initiatives for AIG including employee engagement, well-being, and diversity, equity and inclusion;
Long-term incentive (LTI) awards continued to be granted in a combination of performance share units (PSUs) (50%), stock options (25%) and restricted stock units (RSUs) (25%);
2020 PSUs continued to be subject to performance measures combining financial, operational and total shareholder return (TSR) metrics; and
Performance requirements for the 2018 and 2019 PSUs granted to our named executives, remained unchanged and the CMRC did not use discretion when adjudicating the performance of the 2018 PSU awards for our named executives.
However, other aspects of our 2020 program and some of the underlying details changed to align with our priority focus areas within the context of an uncertain operating environment as a result of the COVID-19 crisis:
The Business Performance Score component of the 2020 STI plan was assessed on a company-wide basis rather than on a business unit basis, reflecting our enterprise-wide focus on liquidity, capital preservation and de-risking;
Business unit accountability was maintained, but through the Financial pillar of our Individual Performance Score assessment in the STI plan in 2020;
Overall business performance and business unit performance were assessed using a disciplined discretion framework that assessed quantifiable results against internal expectations with respect to AIG’s capital and liquidity position and risk profile in the context of the COVID-19 crisis; and
The 2020 PSUs granted as part of our LTI awards were subject to new performance metrics: Relative Tangible Book Value Per Common Share (BVPS)* growth, AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net General Operating Expense (GOE) Savings* and TSR. Both BVPS and TSR will be measured on a relative basis, mitigating the need to calibrate long-term goals that might ultimately be too challenging or too easy to attain. The AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings* goals were unchanged from those developed as part of AIG 200 when it was announced in 2019.
*We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric to ensure that results properly reflect management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.

2021 Proxy Statement7

Executive Summary

2020 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The 2020 annual target total direct compensation opportunity and pay mix for Mr. Duperreault, our Chief Executive Officer during 2020, is set forth below.

  Annual
Base Salary
 Target
Short-Term
Incentive
 Target
Long-Term
Incentive
 Target
Total Direct
Compensation
Brian Duperreault$1,600,000$4,500,000$12,900,000$19,000,000
Chief Executive Officer*        

*  Mr. Duperreault became Executive Chair, effective March 1, 2021.

AIG’s 2020 compensation programs and the Board and CMRC’s 2020 compensation decisions, which are outlined in detail indetailed under “Executive Compensation—Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 5239, balanced rewarding our named executives for their extraordinary leadership through the unprecedented COVID-19 crisis with taking into account the experience.

Corporate Governance Highlights
Balanced and Independent Board of our shareholders in a year of significant global market volatility. This was demonstrated in particular in the STI decisions made with respect to Mr. Duperreault, our Chief Executive Officer in 2020. In light of AIG’s TSR relative to compensation peers in 2020, the CMRC and Mr. Duperreault determined that the Chief Executive Officer’s 2020 STI award should be paid at target, notwithstanding AIG’s successful navigation of the unprecedented COVID-19 crisis and Mr. Duperreault’s efforts in executing a well-coordinated Chief Executive Officer succession process.

The Board and CMRC remain committed to executive compensation programs that attract, motivate, reward and incentivize highly qualified leaders as AIG continues its transformation to become a leading insurance franchise and a top performing company.

8 2021 Proxy Statement

Directors

Executive Summary

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

BALANCED AND INDEPENDENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS

AIG strivesWe strive to maintain a balanced and independent Board that is committed to representing the long-termlong-term interests of AIG’s shareholders and hasour shareholders. We seek to have a Board that possesses the substantial and diverse skills, experience and attributes necessary to provide strategic oversight of AIG’s journey.guidance on our strategy and oversee management’s approach to addressing the challenges and risks facing the Company. The following table provides summary information about each of our thirteenten director nominees. We are askingThe Board recommends that our shareholders to elect all thirteenten director nominees listed below during the Annual Meeting, to hold office until the next annual election and until their successors are duly elected and qualified or their earlier resignation.Meeting. Each nominee is elected annually by a majority of votes cast.

NameAgeDirector
Since
Occupation/BackgroundIndependentOther Public Boards

Current Board
Committee
Memberships
(1)

James Cole, Jr.522021Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Jasco Group, LLC; Former Delegated Deputy Secretary of Education and General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Education (2) 
W. Don Cornwell732011Former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Granite Broadcasting CorporationNatura &Co Holding S.A.; Viatris Inc.
(Chair)
Brian Duperreault732017Executive Chair of AIG    
John H. Fitzpatrick642011Former Secretary General of The Geneva Association; Former Chief Financial Officer, Head of the Life and Health Reinsurance Business Group and Head of Financial Services of Swiss Re 
William G. Jurgensen692013Former Chief Executive Officer of Nationwide Insurance

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.    

 

 

 


(Chair)
Christopher S. Lynch632009Former National Partner in Charge of Financial Services of KPMG LLPTenet Healthcare Corporation
(Chair)
  
Linda A. Mills712015Former Corporate Vice President of Operations of Northrop Grumman CorporationNavient Corporation
(Chair)
Thomas F. Motamed722019Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial CorporationKairos Acquisition Corp 
Peter R. Porrino 642019Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of XL Group Ltd 
(Chair)
Amy L. Schioldager582019Former Senior Managing Director and Global Head of Beta Strategies at BlackRock, Inc.     
Douglas M. Steenland,
Lead Independent Director
692009Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Northwest Airlines Corporation  American Airlines Group Inc.; Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.(3) 
Therese M. Vaughan642019Former Chief Executive Officer of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners; Executive in Residence and Former Visiting Distinguished Professor and Dean of the College of Business and Public Administration at Drake UniversityVerisk Analytics, Inc.; West Bancorporation, Inc.  
Peter S. Zaffino 542020President and Chief Executive Officer of AIG    

Under our By-Laws, directors in an uncontested election must receive more votes “for” their election than “against.” Under the Corporate Governance Guidelines, each nominee has submitted an irrevocable resignation that becomes effective upon (1) Committeesthe nominee’s failure to receive the required vote and (2) the Board's acceptance of the resignation. The Board (Board Committees)

Audit CommitteeRisk and Capital Committee
Compensation and Management Resources CommitteeTechnology Committee
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

(2)  Mr. Cole has been appointed to serve as a memberwill accept that resignation unless the NCGC recommends, and the Board determines, that the best interests of the AuditCompany and Technology Committees, effectiveits shareholders would not be served by doing so.

All directors are independent, except for Mr. Zaffino.
8AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Proxy Statement Summary Corporate Governance Highlights
Director
Since
Current Committee Memberships*
Director NomineeAgeOccupation and BackgroundAuditCMRNCGRisk
pg9-photo_bergamaschi.jpg 
Paola Bergamaschi622022Former Global Banking and Capital Markets Executive at State Street Corporation, Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs
 M 
 M 
05_424782-3_photo_j-cole_small.jpg
 
James Cole, Jr.552021Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of The Jasco Group, LLC; Former Delegated Deputy Secretary of Education and General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Education C 
 M 
05_424782-3_photo_j-jimmydunne.jpg
James (Jimmy) Dunne III672023Vice Chairman and Senior Managing Principal, Piper Sandler
05_424782-3_photo_johnchrisinglis.jpg
John (Chris) Inglis692024Strategic Advisor at Paladin Capital Group; Former National Cyber Director
05_424782-3_photo_L-mills-small.jpg
Linda A. Mills742015Former Corporate Vice President of Operations, Northrop Grumman Corporation C 
 M 
pg9-photo_murphy.jpg
Diana M. Murphy672023Managing Director, Rocksolid Holdings LLC

 M 
 M 
05_424782-3_photo_P-Porrino-small.jpg
Peter R. Porrino672019Former Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, XL Group Ltd C  C 
05_424782-3_photo_RiceJ.jpg
John G. Rice
Lead Independent Director
672022Former Non-Executive Chairman, GE Gas Power; Former President & Chief Executive Officer, GE Global Growth Organization
 M 
 M 
pg9-photo_wittman.jpg
Vanessa A. Wittman562023Former Chief Financial Officer, Glossier, Inc.
 M 
 M 
05_424782-1_photo_letter_zaffino.jpg
Peter Zaffino572020Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, AIG
KEY TO COMMITTEES
CMR Compensation and Management Resources NCG Nominating and Corporate Governance
CChair MMember
*Mr. Dunne and Mr. Inglis joined the Board in December 2023 and March 31, 2021.

(3)  Mr. Steenland, as Lead Independent Director, is an ex-officio, non-voting member of all Board Committees.

2021 Proxy Statement9

2024, respectively. They have not yet received any committee assignments.

Executive Summary

We believe our nominees’ diverse and complementary skills, experience and attributes promote a well-functioning, highly qualified and independent Board. AIG hasWe have undertaken significant Board refreshment in recent years to ensure that the directors are positioned to provide strategic guidance to AIGand oversight as we continue to make meaningful progress on strategic priorities, such as the continued separation of Corebridge and the repositioning of our journey to becoming a top performing company.

DIRECTOR NOMINEE SKILLS, EXPERIENCE AND ATTRIBUTES

 

portfolio for sustainable, profitable growth.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT9

Proxy Statement Summary Corporate Governance Highlights
Nominee Highlights
Tenure
8796093023753
Age
8796093023814
Gender
8796093023834
Race/Ethnicity
8796093024290
Board Meetings and Attendance in 2023
10
95%
Average attendance by directors at the Board meetings held during 2023
 
10
Board meetings
2021
22
Committee meetings
96%
Average attendance by directors at committee meetings
In conjunction with each regularly scheduled Board and committee meeting, the independent directors meet in sessions without management. These sessions are led by the Lead Independent Director and committee chairs following Board and committee meetings, respectively.
Under the Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. Each of the directors who stood for election at the 2023 Annual Meeting participated in that meeting.
10AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Proxy Statement Summary Corporate Governance Highlights
Shareholder Engagement
During the spring and fall of 2023 as well as early 2024, we continued our efforts to engage consistently and productively with our shareholders. Our Lead Independent Director and CMRC Chair participated in some of these engagement meetings, joined by our General Counsel, Chief Human Resources and Diversity Officer, Corporate Secretary, Head of Executive Compensation, Head of Investor Relations and Chief Sustainability Officer, as appropriate.

By the Numbers: Engagement in 2023 and Early 2024
Reached out to
33 top shareholders,
representing
03_424782-3_bar_meeting.jpg
of shares outstanding
Held
31 meetings with shareholders,
representing
03_424782-3_bar_topshareholders.jpg
of shares outstanding
Met with
ISS and Glass Lewis
during Fall Engagement
Lead Independent Director and CMRC Chair participated in meetings with shareholders representing
03_424782-3_bar_chairmeeting.jpg
of shares outstanding


Executive Summary

 

 

2021 Proxy Statement
Shareholders Provided Feedback on the Key Topics Below
nChairman & CEO performance, expressing high regard
nExecutive compensation, including one-time awards
nLong-term incentive equity mix for CEO
n2023 say-on-pay vote outcome
nTalent succession planning
nRecent corporate governance enhancements
nBoard leadership structure
Icon_convo.jpg
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT11


Proposal 1
Election of Directors
What am I voting on?
The Board is seeking your support for the election of the ten individuals nominated to serve on the Board until the 2025 Annual Meeting or until a successor is duly qualified and elected.
Our director nominees hold and have held senior positions as leaders of various large and complex global businesses. Our nominees have been chief executive officers and chief financial officers, senior executives with financial services, insurance, media, private equity and industrial firms, senior government officials and a military officer. Through these roles, our nominees have developed expertise in such areas as insurance, financial services, international business operations, risk management, corporate governance, M&A, technology, cybersecurity and human capital management. With this blend of skills and experience, our nominees bring fresh perspectives and a seasoned and practical approach to Board deliberations and oversight. Each director nominee is independent, except for our Chairman & Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Mr. Zaffino.
Detailed biographical information for each director nominee follows. We have included the key experiences, qualifications and skills, including other public company directorships, that our nominees bring to the Board. Each director nominee is currently a director on the Board and has consented to being named as a nominee in the proxy materials and to serve if elected.
Voting Recommendation  pg9-graphics_votingcheck.jpg
The Board unanimously recommends a voteFOR each of the nominees for election to the Board at the 2024 Annual Meeting.
Board Composition and Refreshment Process
We prioritize effective and aligned Board composition, supplemented by a thoughtful approach to refreshment. Over the past several years, the Board, with significant support from the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (NCGC), has undertaken a thorough evaluation of the size and composition of the Board and its committees, resulting in a diverse Board with near gender parity. The Board and the NCGC take into account the characteristics and qualifications of existing directors, potential director departures and our evolving strategic objectives and business environment when evaluating Board composition.
The NCGC identifies candidates in several ways: current and former directors and senior management may recommend suitable candidates; any shareholder may recommend a director candidate by writing to AIG’s Corporate Secretary (see page 103 for contact information); and the NCGC may engage third-party search firms to ensure that there is a large and diverse pool of suitable candidates.
12AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors Board Composition and Refreshment Process
Criteria for Board Membership
The Board and the NCGC conduct a rigorous review, taking into consideration the criteria set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board considers the following attributes essential for all directors:
nHigh personal and professional ethics, values and integrity
nThe ability to work as part of an effective, collegial group
nA commitment to representing the long-term interests of the Company and our shareholders
nThe skills, expertise, background and experience with businesses and other organizations that the Board deems relevant
nThe interplay of the candidate’s experience with the experience of other Board members
nDiversity, including diversity of personal background and professional experience, skills and qualifications as well as race, gender, ethnicity, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation and cultural background
nThe contribution of the candidate’s skills and experience to ensuring that the Board has the necessary tools to perform its oversight function effectively
nThe ability and willingness to devote the time necessary to fulfill a director's duties
Key Skills, Experience and Expertise
The NCGC regularly reviews with the Board the essential skills, experience and expertise that are most important in selecting candidates to serve as directors, considering our complex businesses, regulatory environment and the mix of capabilities and experience already represented on the Board. To this end, the Board and the NCGC have identified the following key skills and areas of expertise as essential for effective oversight in light of our businesses and strategy:
pg13-icon_insurance.jpg
InsuranceExperience working in the insurance industry, particularly property and casualty
pg13-icon_financial.jpg
Financial Services Experience in the non-insurance financial services industry, including banking and financial markets
pg13-icon_business.jpg
Business TransformationExperience leading or overseeing successful long-term business transformations and corporate restructurings at scale or significant acquisitions and integrations
pg13-icon_public.jpg
Public Company Executive Leadership Experience in a significant leadership position at a public company, such as a chief executive officer, chief financial officer or other senior leadership role
pg13-icon_riskmanagement.jpg
Risk ManagementExperience with the identification, assessment and oversight of enterprise risk management programs and best practices, including those relating to operational risks and cyber risks

Executive Summary
pg13-icon_regulatory.jpg
Regulatory/GovernmentExperience working in highly regulated industries and/or as a regulator or other government official
pg13-icon_accounting.jpg
Financial Reporting/AccountingExperience with financial reporting, accounting or auditing processes and standards
pg13-icon_international.jpg
International ExperienceExperience managing or overseeing businesses outside the U.S. and/or working or living in countries outside the U.S.
pg13-icon_technology.jpg
Technology/Cyber Experience with oversight, development and adoption of technology and management of related issues and risks, including information security, cybersecurity and data management
pg13-icon_digital.jpg
DigitalKnowledge of or experience with digital transformations and digital workflows, as well as related issues and risks
pg13-icon_esg.jpg
ESG/Sustainability Experience with environmental, sustainability and governance (ESG)-related issues

ROBUST CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES 

AIG’s robust corporate governance policies

Diversity
We strive to maintain a diverse Board. While the Board has not adopted a specific policy on diversity, we believe that diversity — including with regard to race, gender, ethnicity, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation, veteran status and practices promotecultural background — is an important consideration in the director search and nomination process. Additionally, when considering Board effectivenesscomposition and accountabilitydirector refreshment, the Board and NCGC consider diversity in a broad sense, including work experience, skills and perspectives. The total mix of all these considerations contributes to more meaningful Board deliberations and oversight and is critical to our long-term success. Our director nominees include six men and four women, one nominee who is African American/Black, one nominee who is LGBTQ+ and one nominee who is a military veteran. Half of our four standing committees are chaired by a diverse director based on race or gender.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT13

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors     Board Composition and Refreshment Process
We have undertaken significant Board refreshment in recent years. We believe our nominees’ diverse and complementary skills, experiences and attributes promote a well-functioning, highly-qualified Board to provide appropriate guidance and independent oversight. In the nominees’ biographies beginning on page 16— as well as the summary graphic below — we highlight each nominee's key skills, experience and areas of expertise.
Skills, Experience and ExpertiseDiversity
Director Nominee and Title
Director
Since
pg9-graphics_regulatory.jpg 
pg9-graphics_business.jpg  
pg9-graphics_public.jpg 
pg9-graphics_accounting.jpg  
pg9-graphics_riskmanagement.jpg  
  pg9-graphics_financial.jpg
pg9-graphics_international.jpg  
pg9-graphics_technology.jpg  
pg9-graphics_digital.jpg  
pg9-graphics_esg.jpg 
African
American/
Black
 pg9-graphics_insurance.jpg
Gender
(M/F)
LGBTQ+
Paola Bergamaschi
Former Global Banking and Capital Markets Executive at State Street Corporation, Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs
2022¢¢¢¢¢¢F
James Cole, Jr.
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of The Jasco Group, LLC; Former Delegated Deputy Secretary of Education and General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Education
2021¢¢¢¢¢¢¢M¢
James (Jimmy) Dunne III
Vice Chairman and Senior Managing Principal, Piper Sandler
2023

¢


¢

M
John (Chris) Inglis
Strategic Advisor at Paladin Capital Group; Former National Cyber Director
2024¢¢¢¢¢¢¢M
Linda A. Mills
Former Corporate Vice President of Operations, Northrop Grumman Corporation
2015¢¢¢¢¢¢¢F
Diana M. Murphy
Managing Director, Rocksolid Holdings LLC
2023¢¢¢¢¢F
Peter R. Porrino
Former Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, XL Group Ltd
2019¢¢¢¢¢M
John G. Rice
LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR
Former Non-Executive Chairman, GE Gas Power; Former President & Chief Executive Officer, GE Global Growth Organization
2022¢¢¢¢¢¢¢M
Vanessa A. Wittman
Former Chief Financial Officer, Glossier, Inc.
2023¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢F
Peter Zaffino
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, AIG
2020¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢M
Total Skills, Experience and Expertise and Diversity7767637664416M/4F1
14AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors     Director Nominees
Director Nominees
The Board, on the recommendation of the NCGC, has nominated for election to the Board the ten individuals presented in the Proxy Statement beginning on page 16. All are incumbent directors and were elected by the shareholders at the 2023 Annual Meeting, other than Mr. Dunne, who joined the Board in December 2023 and Mr. Inglis, who joined the Board in March 2024. An executive officer identified Mr. Dunne and a third-party executive recruitment firm that assisted with recruitment efforts identified Mr. Inglis. Both Mr. Dunne and Mr. Inglis were interviewed by our directors and were subject to the Board's customary due diligence and evaluation procedures.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and By-Laws do not impose term limits because, in certain circumstances, the Board believes that a director who serves for an extended period could be uniquely positioned to provide insight and perspective regarding the Company's operations and strategic direction. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that directors retire at the annual meeting after reaching age 75, unless, at the NCGC’s recommendation, the Board waives this limitation for a period of one year if it is deemed to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

The Board made such an exception for Mr. Cornwell in 2023, whose service on the Board will expire on the day of the 2024 Annual Meeting in accordance with the Corporate Governance Guidelines.
As previously disclosed, Therese M. Vaughan retired from the Board in January 2024. We thank Mr. Cornwell and Ms. Vaughan for their service and valuable contributions as directors.
In light of the recent retirements and Board refreshment efforts, the average tenure of the director nominees is 2.6 years.
Director Independence
Independent, Diverse
All of our non-management directors are independent under the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards and Qualifiedour independence standards, which are set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines available on our website (www.aig.com). To be considered independent, a director must have no disqualifying relationships, as defined by the NYSE, and the Board must affirmatively determine that he or she has no material relationships with the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of another organization that has a relationship with the Company.·
All directorsdirector nominees are independent except for ourthe Chairman & Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Chair
·All Board Committee members are independent
·Lead Independent Director role has clearly defined responsibilities and oversees meeting materials, agendas and schedules
·Independent directors meet in executive session in conjunction with each regularly scheduled Board meeting
·Three of AIG’s independent director nominees are women and two are ethnically and/or racially diverse
·The NCGC continuously reviews the composition of our Board, taking into consideration the skills, experience and attributes of the existing directors, both individually and as a group
Effective Board Policies and Practices·Directors’ interests are aligned with those of our shareholders through robust director stock ownership requirements
·The Board, through the NCGC, conducts annual evaluations of the Board, the Lead Independent Director and other individual directors, and all Board Committees conduct annual self-evaluations
·No director attending less than 75 percent of meetings for two consecutive years will be re-nominated
·Directors generally may not stand for election after reaching age 75
·All directors may contribute to the agenda for Board meetings
·All directors are prohibited from serving on more than three other public company boards with additional restrictions for AIG’s Chief Executive Officer and directors who are executive officers of other public companies
·Board Committee Chair positions generally rotate every five years to ensure diverse perspectives
Strong Shareholder Rights Hold Board Accountable·Directors are elected annually by a majority of votes cast (in uncontested elections)
·AIG’s amended and restated by-laws (By-laws) include a proxy access right for shareholders
·AIG’s By-laws provide shareholders the ability to call a special meeting at appropriate levels
·AIG has an extensive shareholder engagement program with participation by independent directors
Key Matters Overseen by the Board·The Board oversees robust management succession planning, with support from the CMRC, in consultation with the Chair of the NCGC
·The Board, through the CMRC, oversees diversity, equity and inclusion matters and monitors AIG’s progress on related initiatives
·The Board, through the NCGC, oversees sustainability, including climate-related issues, corporate social responsibility and lobbying and public policy matters
·The Board provides strong risk management oversight, including through the Risk and Capital Committee, Audit Committee and other Board Committees
·The Board, through the Technology Committee, oversees AIG’s cybersecurity risks, policies, controls and procedures

12 2021 Proxy Statement

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Before joining the Board, and annually thereafter, each director completes a questionnaire seeking information about relationships and transactions that may require disclosure, that may affect the director's independence determination or that may affect the heightened independence standards that apply to members of the CMRC and Audit Committee.

The NCGC's assessment of independence considers all known relevant facts and circumstances about the relationships bearing on the independence of a director or nominee. This assessment considers sales of Company insurance products and services, in the ordinary course of business and on the same terms made available to third parties, to companies or charitable organizations where a director (or immediate family members) may have relationships pertinent to the independence determination. The NCGC also considers fees paid to companies where directors are employed or affiliated that are less than 1% of such companies' total revenues. The NCGC reviews these relationships to assess their materiality and determines if any such relationship would impair the independence and judgment of the relevant director.
The Board, on the recommendation of the NCGC, has determined that, each director nominee other than Mr. Zaffino does not have a direct or indirect material relationship with the Company, or any direct or indirect material interest in any transactions involving the Company and, therefore, satisfies the independence criteria in the NYSE's listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Mr. Cornwell, who will not stand for re-election at the 2024 Annual Meeting, and Ms. Vaughan, who retired from the Board in January 2024, were each also determined by the Board, on the recommendation of the NCGC, to be independent under the NYSE listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines during 2023.
With regard to the former directors who did not stand for re-election at the 2023 Annual Meeting — Douglas Steenland, William Jurgensen and Thomas Motamed — the Board, on the recommendation of the NCGC, determined that they were independent under the NYSE listing standards for the period during which they served on the Board in 2023.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT15

Proposal 1—1 – Election of Directors

Proposal 1—Election of Directors

Proposal 1—Election of Directors

What am I voting on?
We are asking shareholders to elect thirteen directors to hold office until the next annual election.

Voting Recommendation

 FOR the election of each director nominee. The Board believes that, if elected, the nominees will continue to provide effective oversight of AIG’s business and continue to advance our shareholders’ interests by drawing upon their collective qualifications, skills, experience and attributes, as summarized on pages 10-11 and below.

AIG's Board currently consists of fourteen directors. All directors serve a one-year term. Mr. Miller is not standing for re-election and is retiring from theDirector Nominees
Director Nominee Biographies
We strive to maintain a balanced and independent Board that is committed to representing the long-term interests of our shareholders. We seek to have a Board that possesses the diverse skills, experience and attributes necessary to provide guidance on our strategy and to oversee management’s approach to addressing the challenges and risks facing the Company.
The following table provides summary information about each of our ten director nominees. The Board recommends that our shareholders elect all ten director nominees listed below at the Annual Meeting because he has reached the age of 75, which is the general retirement age under AIG's Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board would like to thank Mr. Miller, whose term will end at the Annual Meeting, for his service and valuable contribution as a director. We are asking our shareholders to re-elect the remaining thirteen directors at the Annual Meeting, to hold office until the next annual election and until their successors are duly elected and qualified or their earlier resignation.
Thirteen director nominees
All independent other than Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chair
Elected by majority of votes cast
One year terms

It is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote for the election of the nominees. All of the nominees are currently members of AIG’s Board. It is not expected that any of the nominees will become unavailable for election as a director, but if any should become unavailable prior to the Annual Meeting, proxies will be voted for such other persons as the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy may determine in their discretion. Alternatively, the Board may reduce its size.

Directors will beMeeting. Each nominee is elected annually by a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders of AIG’s common stock, which votes are cast either “for” or “against” election. Pursuant to AIG’s By-laws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, each nominee has submitted to the Board an irrevocable resignation from the Board that would become effective upon (1) the failure of such nominee to receive the required vote at the shareholder meeting and (2) Board acceptance of such resignation. In the event that a nominee fails to receive the required vote, the NCGC will then make a recommendation to the Board on the action to be taken with respect to the resignation. The Board will accept such resignation unless the NCGC recommends, and the Board determines, that the best interestsin uncontested elections.

Paola Bergamaschi
pgxx-photo_bergamaschi.jpg
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
nState Street Corporation (financial services company)
Senior Managing Director, Head of EMEA Asset Owners Sector Solutions, 2013 to 2014
Senior Managing Director, Head of Client Relationship Management, Global Markets, 2011 to 2013
Senior Managing Director, Global Head of Equity Distribution, 2008 to 2010
Various positions, 2003 to 2008
nCredit Suisse First Boston
Director, Equity Sales, 1998 to 2003
nSanpaolo IMI S.p.A
Director, Head of Equities, 1995 to 1998
nGoldman Sachs
Executive Director, Equity Research, 1989 to 1995
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS
nNone
OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
nBoard Advisor, Quantexa since 2021
nDirector, Bank of New York Mellon International Limited, since 2017
nDirector, Wells Fargo Securities International Limited, 2017 to 2023
nDirector, ARCA Fondi SGR, since 2015
¢Independent
Age: 62
Director since: 2022
COMMITTEES
nAudit (Financial Expert)
nRisk
Key Experience and Qualifications: In light of Ms. Bergamaschi’s experience as a financial services executive with deep international expertise in capital markets, global banking, financial reporting and risk and international regulatory oversight, the Board has concluded that Ms. Bergamaschi should be re-elected.
16AIG and its shareholders would not be served by doing so.

Below are biographies of each of the nominees for director, including the principal occupation or affiliation and public company directorships held by each nominee during the past five years. We believe our director nominees have the right mix of skills, experience and attributes and background to provide strategic guidance to AIG, particularly as the Board oversees AIG through its continued transformation to becoming a top performing insurance company. For additional details on the Board’s approach to Board composition and refreshment, see “Corporate Governance—Board Composition and Refreshment.”

RECOMMENDATION 

Your Board 2024 PROXY STATEMENT


Proposal 1 – Election of Directors     unanimously recommends a vote FOR this resolution.

Director Nominees
2021 Proxy Statement13

Proposal 1—Election of DirectorsJames Cole, Jr.

 

Director since: 2021
Age: 52
Committees:
 Audit*
 Technology*

Other Directorships:
None
* Effective March 31, 2021

05_424782-3_photo_j-cole.jpg

JAMES COLE, JR.

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
nThe Jasco Group, LLC (investment management firm)
Chairman and& Chief Executive Officer, since 2017
nU.S. Department of The Jasco Group, LLC; Former Education
Delegated Deputy Secretary of Education and& General Counsel, of the U.S. Department of Education

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS 

Mr. Cole founded and has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Jasco Group, LLC, a multidimensional investment management firm, since January 2017. He previously served at the U.S. Department of Education as Delegated Deputy Secretary of Education and 2016 to 2017

General Counsel, from January 2016 to January 2017, General Counsel, a U.S. Senate confirmed seat, from December 2014 to January 2017 and
Senior Advisor to the Secretary, from August 2014 to December 2014. As Deputy Secretary, Mr. Cole served as the chief operating officer of the
nU.S. Department of Education and oversaw a broad range of operational, management, policy, legal and program functions. From November 2011 to August 2014, Mr. Cole served as Transportation
Deputy General Counsel, of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Prior2011 to joining the Department of Transportation, Mr. Cole was a corporate law partner at 2014
nWachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz with a primary focus on Mergers & Acquisitions
Partner, 2004 to 2011
Associate, 1996 to 2004
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS
nNone
OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
nNational Board of Directors, Jumpstart for Young Children, since 2017
nSenior Advisor, National Student Legal Defense Network, since 2021
nDirector, Entrepreneurs of Tomorrow, 2021 to 2023
nTrustee, Prep for Prep, 2005 to 2011
nDirector, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, 2004 to 2011
¢Independent
Age: 55
Director since: 202
1
COMMITTEES
nNominating and Corporate Governance. Mr. Cole began his career as a financial analyst at GE Capital Corporation.

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

Governance (Chair)

nRisk
Key Experience and Qualifications: In light of Mr. Cole’s considerable public policy and government experience, as well as his professional experience as a corporate lawyer advising multinational corporations on their strategic transactions and corporate governance matters, AIG’sthe Board has concluded that Mr. Cole should be re-elected to the Board. 

re-elected.
James (Jimmy) Dunne III
05_424782-3_photo_j-jimmydunne-small.jpg
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
nPiper Sandler Co. (investment bank)
Vice Chairman and Senior Managing Principal, since 2020
nSandler O'Neill & Partners, L.P.
Founding Partner, 1988 to 2020
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS
nNone
OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
nDirector, PGA Tour Board, since 2023
nDirector, Chime Financial, Inc., since 2022
nTrustee, University of Notre Dame, since 2010


 

¢Independent
Age: 67
Director since:
2011
Age: 73
Board Committees:

•   Compensation 2023


Key Experience and Management Resources (Chair)

  Nominating and Corporate Governance

Other Directorships:

  Current: Natura &Co Holding S.A.; Viatris Inc.

  Former (past 5 years) Pfizer Inc.; Avon Products, Inc.

W. DON CORNWELL

Former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Granite Broadcasting Corporation

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS 

Mr. Cornwell is the former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Granite Broadcasting Corporation, which he founded in 1988, serving from 1988 until his retirement in August 2009, and Vice Chairman until December 2009. Mr. Cornwell spent 17 years at Goldman, Sachs & Co. where he served as Chief Operating Officer of the Corporate Finance Department from 1980 to 1988 and Vice President of the Investment Banking Division from 1976 to 1988.

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS 

Qualifications:In light of Mr. Cornwell’sDunne’s expertise in investment banking, management and financial sector services and three decades of experience in significant finance and strategic business transformations, as well as his professional experience across the financial services industry, AIG’s Board has concluded that Mr. CornwellDunne should be re-elected to the Board.

elected.

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT17

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors     Director Nominees
14 2021 Proxy Statement

Proposal 1—Election of DirectorsJohn (Chris) Inglis

 

Director since:2017
Age: 73
Other Directorships:

  Former (past 5 years): Johnson Controls International plc (formerly Tyco International, plc)

05_424782-3_photo_johnchrisinglis.jpg

BRIAN DUPERREAULT

Executive Chair of AIG

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Mr. Duperreault has been

nPaladin Capital Group (cyber venture capital investment firm)
Senior Strategic Advisor, since 2023
nU.S. National Cyber Director, 2021 to 2023
nCommissioner, U.S. Cyberspace Solarium Commission, 2019 to 2020
nNational Security Agency
Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer, 2006 to 2014
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS
nHuntington Bancshares Inc., 2016 to 2021 and since 2023
FORMER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS
nFedEx Corporation, 2015 to 2021
nKEYW Holding Corp., 2016 to 2019
OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
nFormer Visiting Professor of Cyber Studies, U.S. Naval Academy
nFormer Member, U. S. Department of Defense Science Board, the Executive ChairU.S. Director of AIG’s Board since March 1, 2021. He previously served as AIG’s Chief Executive Officer since May 2017, when he also joinedNational Intelligence’s Strategic Advisory Group, the National Intelligence University’s Board of Directors. He also served as AIG’s President from May 2017 until January 2020. Previously, Mr. Duperreault was the Chief Executive Officer of Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd., a Bermuda-based holding company of propertyVisitors
¢Independent
Age: 69
Director since: 2024

Key Experience and casualty insurance and reinsurance operations in Bermuda, the U.S. and the U.K., from December 2013 to May 2017, and served as Chairman of Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. from February 2016 to May 2017. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. from February 2008 until his retirement in December 2012. Before joining Marsh & McLennan Companies, he served as non-executive Chairman of ACE Limited from 2006 until 2008, as Chairman of the Board from 2004 to 2006, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 1999 to 2004, and as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer from 1994 to 1999. Prior to joining ACE, Mr. Duperreault served in various senior executive positions with AIG and its affiliates from 1973 to 1994.

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS 

Qualifications: In light of Mr. Duperreault’s deepInglis’s broad and considerable experience in the insurance industry, his history with AIGtechnology, cybersecurity and his management of large, complex, international institutions, AIG’sinformation security, public policy and government, the Board has concluded that Mr. DuperreaultInglis should be re-elected to the Board.

elected.
Linda A. Mills

Director since:2011
Age: 64
Board Committees:

  Audit

  Technology

Other Directorships:

  None

05_424782-3_photo_L-mills.jpg

JOHN H. FITZPATRICK

Former Secretary General of The Geneva Association; Former Chief Financial Officer, Head of the Life and Health Reinsurance Business Group and Head of Financial Services of Swiss Re

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Mr. Fitzpatrick has been Chairman of Oak Street Management Co.,

nCadore Group, LLC an insurance/management consulting company,(management and Oak Family Advisors, LLC, a registered investment advisor, since 2010. He was Chairman of White Oak Global Advisors LLC, an asset management firm lending to small- and medium-sized companies, from SeptemberIT consulting)
President, 2015 to September 2017. In 2014, Mr. Fitzpatrick completed a two-year term as Secretary General of The Geneva Association. From 2006 to 2010, he was a partner at Pensionpresent
nNorthrop Grumman Corporation and a director of Pension Insurance Corporation Ltd. From 1998 to 2006, Mr. Fitzpatrick was a member of Swiss Re’s Executive Board Committee and served at Swiss Re as Chief Financial Officer, Head of the Life and Health Reinsurance Business Group and Head of Financial Services. From 1996 to 1998, Mr. Fitzpatrick was a partner in insurance private equity firms sponsored by Zurich Financial Services, Credit Suisse and Swiss Re. From 1990 to 1996, Mr. Fitzpatrick served as the Chief Financial Officer and a Director of Kemper Corporation. Mr. Fitzpatrick is a Certified Public Accountant and a Chartered Financial Analyst.

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS 

In light of Mr. Fitzpatrick’s broad experience in the insurance, reinsurance and financial services industries, as well as his professional experience in insurance policy and regulation, AIG’s Board has concluded that Mr. Fitzpatrick should be re-elected to the Board. 

2021 Proxy Statement15

Proposal 1—Election of Directors

 

Director since:2013

Age: 69

Board Committees:

 Risk and Capital (Chair)

 Nominating and Corporate Governance

Other Directorships:

 Current: Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.

 Former (past 5 years): Conagra Foods, Inc.

WILLIAM G. JURGENSEN

Former Chief Executive Officer of Nationwide Insurance

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Mr. Jurgensen is the former Chief Executive Officer of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Financial Services, Inc., serving from May 2000 to February 2009. During this time, he also served as director and Chief Executive Officer of several other companies within the Nationwide enterprise. Prior to his time in the insurance industry, he spent 27 years in the commercial banking industry. Before joining Nationwide, Mr. Jurgensen was an Executive Vice President with BankOne Corporation (now a part of JPMorgan Chase & Co.) where he was responsible for corporate banking products, including capital markets, international banking and cash management. He managed the merger integration between First Chicago Corporation and NBD Bancorp, Inc. and later was Chief Executive Officer for First Card, First Chicago’s credit card subsidiary. At First Chicago, he was responsible for retail banking and began his career there as Chief Financial Officer in 1990. Mr. Jurgensen started his banking career at Norwest Corporation (now a part of Wells Fargo & Company) in 1973.

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

In light of Mr. Jurgensen’s deep experience in insurance, financial services and his executive experience managing a large, complex, institution, AIG’s Board has concluded that Mr. Jurgensen should be re-elected to the Board. 

 

Director since:2009
Age: 63
Board Committees:

  Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)

  Audit

  Risk and Capital

Other Directorships:

  Current: Tenet Healthcare Corporation

  Former (past 5 years): Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

CHRISTOPHER S. LYNCH

Former National Partner in Charge of Financial Services of KPMG LLP

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Mr. Lynch has been an independent consultant since 2007, providing a variety of services to public and privately held companies, including enterprise strategy, corporate restructuring, risk management, governance, financial accounting and regulatory reporting, and troubled-asset management. Prior to that, Mr. Lynch was the former National Partner in Charge of KPMG LLP’s Financial Services Line of Business. He held a variety of positions with KPMG over his 29-year career, including chairing KPMG’s Americas Financial Services Leadership team and being a member of the Global Financial Services Leadership and the U.S. Industries Leadership teams. Mr. Lynch was an audit signing partner under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and served as lead or client service partner for some of KPMG’s largest financial services clients. He also served as a Partner in KPMG’s National Department of Professional Practice and as a Practice Fellow at the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Mr. Lynch is a member of the Audit Committee Chair Advisory Council of the National Association of Corporate Directors and a former member of the Advisory Board of the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS 

In light of Mr. Lynch’s extensive experience in finance, accounting and strategic business transformations, as well as his professional experience across the financial services industry, AIG’s Board has concluded that Mr. Lynch should be re-elected to the Board. 

16 2021 Proxy Statement

Proposal 1—Election of Directors

 

Director since:2015
Age: 71
Board Committees:

  Technology (Chair)

  Audit

  Compensation and Management Resources

Other Directorships:

  Current: Navient Corporation

LINDA A. MILLS

Former

Corporate Vice President, of Operations, of Northrop Grumman Corporation

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Ms. Mills is the former 2013 to 2015

Corporate Vice President of Operations for Northrop Grumman Corporation, with responsibility for operations, including risk management, engineering and information technology. During her 12 years with Northrop Grumman, from 2002 to 2015, Ms. Mills held a number of operational positions, including Corporate Vice& President, and President of Information Systems and Information Technology sectors; sectors, 2008 to 2012
President of the Civilian Agencies Group; and Group, 2006 to 2007
Vice President of Operations and Process, in the firm’s Information Technology Sector. PriorSector, 2003 to joining Northrop Grumman, Ms. Mills was2006
nTRW, Inc.
Various positions, 1979 to 2002, including Vice President of Information Systems and Processes at TRW, Inc. She began her career as an engineer at Bell Laboratories, Inc.

KEY

OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS
nNavient Corporation (non-executive chair), since 2014
OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

nBoard Member Emeritus, Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum, since 2012
nMember, Board of Visitors, University of Illinois, College of Engineering, 2009 to 2019
nSenior Advisory Group and Board Member, Northern Virginia Technology Council, 1990 to 2020
¢Independent
Age: 74
Director since: 2015
COMMITTEES
nCompensation and Management Resources (Chair)
nRisk
Key Experience and Qualifications: In light of Ms. Mills’ in-depth experience with large and complex international operations, risk and financial management, information technology and cybersecurity, and her prior management of a significant line of business, at Northrop Grumman, AIG’sthe Board has concluded that Ms. Mills should be re-electedre-elected.
18AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors     Director Nominees
Diana M. Murphy
pgxx-photo_murphy.jpg
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
nRocksolid Holdings, LLC (private equity)
Managing Director, 2007 to present
nUnited States Golf Association
President, 2016 to 2018
Vice President, 2014 to 2015
Treasurer, 2013 to 2014
nGeorgia Research Alliance Venture Fund
Managing Director, 2012 to 2015
nChartwell Capital Management Co., Inc.
Managing Director, 1997 to 2007
nTribune Media Company, 1979 to 1995
Chief Revenue Officer and Senior Vice President, Advertising and Marketing, The Baltimore Sun Company, 1992 to 1995
Various positions, 1979 to 1992
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS
nAtlanta Braves Holdings, Inc., since 2023
nSynovus Financial Corp., since 2017
nLandstar System, Inc. (non-executive chair), since 1998
FORMER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS
nCTS Corporation, 2010 to 2020
OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
nDirector, First Tee of Southeast Georgia, since 2018
nDirector and Member, Executive Committee of the Board.

College of Coastal Georgia Foundation, since 2015
nDirector, Boys and Girls Clubs of Southeast Georgia, since 2007

 

¢Independent
Age: 67
Director since:
2019
Age: 72
Board Committees:

2023

COMMITTEES
nCompensation and Management Resources

  Risk

nNominating and Capital

Other Directorships:

  Current: Kairos Acquisition Corp.

  Former (past 5 years)Corporate Governance

Key Experience and Qualifications: CNA Financial Group; Verisk Analytics, Inc.

THOMAS F. MOTAMED

Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Mr. Motamed was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation, an insurance holding company, from 2009 to 2016. Prior to CNA, Mr. Motamed spent 31 years at The Chubb Corporation, an insurance company, where he began his career as a claims trainee and rose to Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer. He is a past Chairman of the Insurance Information Institute and is Chair Emeritus for Adelphi University.

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

In light of Mr. Motamed’s deep experienceMs. Murphy’s significant business acumen, including her expertise in insurance,management development and risk management and management of insurance organizations, AIG’sexperience in leading complex companies through strategic and organizational change, her experience as a seasoned public company director, as well as her background in media, communications and marketing, the Board has concluded that Mr. MotamedMs. Murphy should be re-elected to the Board.

re-elected.

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT19

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors     Director Nominees
2021 Proxy Statement17

Proposal 1—Election of DirectorsPeter R. Porrino

 

Director since: 2019
Age: 64

Board Committees:

  Audit (Chair)

  Risk and Capital

Other Directorships:

  None

05_424782-3_photo_P-Porrino.jpg

PETER R. PORRINO

Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of XL Group Ltd

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Mr. Porrino is the former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of

nXL Group Ltd a global insurance(insurance and reinsurance company, a role which he held from 2011 to 2017. He was reinsurance)
Senior Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer, at XL Group from 2017 to 2018. Prior2018
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, 2011 to joining XL Group, Mr. Porrino served as the 2017
nErnst & Young LLP
Global Insurance Industry Leader, at Ernst & Young LLP from 1999 through 2011 where he was responsible for Ernst
nConsolidated International Group
President & Young’s Americas and Global insurance industry practices and served as the lead partner on Ernst & Young’s largest insurance account until his departure. Prior to Ernst & Young, Mr. Porrino served as President and Chief Executive Officer, of Consolidated International1998 to 1999
nZurich Insurance Group and as
Chief Financial Officer and& Chief Operating Officer of Zurich Re Centre, a subsidiary of Zurich Insurance Group focused on property and casualty reinsurance. Mr. Porrino began his career as an auditor at 1993 to 1998
nErnst & Young.

KEYYoung LLP

Auditor, 1978 to 1993
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS
nNone
OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

nChair, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, since 2022
¢Independent
Age: 67
Director since: 2019
COMMITTEES
nAudit (Chair)
nRisk (Chair)
Key Experience and Qualifications: In light of Mr. Porrino’s considerable professional experience related to the global insurance industry, as well as his experience in finance, accounting and risk management, AIG’sthe Board has concluded that Mr. Porrino should be re-elected to the Board.

re-elected.
John G. Rice
05_424782-3_photo_RiceJ.jpg
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
nGeneral Electric Company (multinational conglomerate)
Non-Executive Chairman, GE Gas Power, 2018 to 2020
Vice Chairman, GE, 2005 to 2018
President & Chief Executive Officer, GE Global Growth Organization, 2010 to 2017
Various other senior positions, including:
President & Chief Executive Officer, GE Technology Infrastructure, 2005 to 2010
Vice Chairman, GE Industrial, 2005 to 2007
President and Chief Executive Officer, GE Energy, 2000 to 2005
Senior Vice President, GE Power Systems, 2000 to 2003
Vice President, GE Transportation Systems, 1997 to 1999
OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS
nBaker Hughes Company, since 2017
OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
nGlobal Advisory Board Chair, Cambodian Children’s Fund, since 2023
nDirector, Li & Fung Limited, 2018 to 2020
nDirector, CDC Foundation, 2010 to 2015
nTrustee, Emory University, since 2006
nTrustee, Hamilton College, since 2003

 

¢Lead Independent Director
Age: 67
Director since
: 2019
Age: 58
Board Committees:

  Audit

since: 2022

COMMITTEES
nNominating and Corporate Governance

  Technology

Other Directorships:

  None

nCompensation and Management Resources
Key Experience and Qualifications: In light of Mr. Rice’s leadership experience, including leading complex, global organizations and his experience in finance, operations, business transformation and technology, the Board has concluded that Mr. Rice should be re-elected.
20AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors     Director Nominees
Vanessa A. Wittman
pgxx-photo_wittman.jpg

AMY L. SCHIOLDAGER

Former Senior Managing Director and Global Head of Beta Strategies at BlackRock, Inc.

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Ms. Schioldager is the former Senior Managing Director and Global Head

nGlossier, Inc. (consumer products)
Chief Financial Officer, 2019 to 2022
nOath Inc. (a subsidiary of Beta Strategies at BlackRock,Verizon Communications)
Chief Financial Officer, 2018 to 2019
nDropbox, Inc., a global investment management corporation. In this role, which she held from 2006
Chief Financial Officer, 2015 to 2017, Ms. Schioldager was responsible for managing the Index Equity business across seven global offices. During her more than 25 years at BlackRock, Ms. Schioldager held various other leadership positions and also served as a member2016
nMotorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. (a subsidiary of the Global Executive Committee fromGoogle, Inc.)
Chief Financial Officer, 2012 to 2017 and2014
nMarsh & McLennan Companies
Executive Vice Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee fromPresident & Chief Financial Officer, 2008 to 2015. She also founded and led BlackRock’s Women’s Initiative. Ms. Schioldager began her career as a fund accountant at Wells Fargo Investment Advisors.

KEY2012

OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS
nOscar Health, Inc., since 2021
nBooking Holdings Inc., since 2019
FORMER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS
nUlta Beauty, Inc., 2014 to 2019
nSirius XM Holdings, Inc. 2011 to 2018
OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

nDirector, Impossible Foods, Inc., since 2019
¢Independent
Age: 56
Director since: 2023
COMMITTEES
nAudit (Financial Expert)
nRisk
Key Experience and Qualifications: In light of Ms. Schioldager’s broadWittman’s experience as a seasoned public company director and senior financial executive in corporate governance,global organizations across a range of industries, including insurance, consumer products and technology, and managing international businesses, as well as her professional experience in investments, global asset management and financial services, AIG’sthe Board has concluded that Ms. SchioldagerWittman should be re-elected to the Board. 

re-elected.

18 2021 Proxy Statement

Proposal 1—Election of DirectorsPeter Zaffino

 

Director since: 2009

Age: 69
Board Committees:

•   As Lead Independent Director, Mr. Steenland is an ex-officio, non-voting member of all Board Committees

Other Directorships:

  Current:

05_424782-1_photo_letter_zaffino.jpg
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
nAmerican AirlinesInternational Group, Inc.; Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.

  Former (past 5 years): Performance Food Group Company; Travelport Worldwide Limited

DOUGLAS M. STEENLAND

Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Northwest Airlines Corporation

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Mr. Steenland is the former Chief Executive Officer of Northwest Airlines Corporation, serving from 2004 to 2008, and President, serving from 2001 to 2004. Prior to that, he served in a number of Northwest Airlines executive positions after joining Northwest Airlines in 1991, including Executive Vice President, Chief Corporate Officer and Senior Vice President and General Counsel. Mr. Steenland retired from Northwest Airlines upon its merger with Delta Air Lines, Inc. Prior to joining Northwest Airlines, Mr. Steenland was a senior partner at a Washington, D.C. law firm that is now part of DLA Piper.

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

In light of Mr. Steenland’s notable experience in managing a large, complex institution and his experience in strategic business transformations, AIG’s Board has concluded that Mr. Steenland should be re-elected to the Board.

 

Director

Chairman, since: 2019

Age: 64
Board Committees:

  Compensation and Management Resources

  Risk and Capital

Other Directorships:

  Current: Verisk Analytics, Inc.; West Bancorporation, Inc.

  Former (past 5 years): Validus Holdings, Ltd.

THERESE M. VAUGHAN

Former Chief Executive Officer of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners; Executive in Residence and Former Visiting Distinguished Professor and Dean of the College of Business and Public Administration at Drake University

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Ms. Vaughan is currently an Executive in Residence at Drake University, where she was previously the Robb B. Kelley Visiting Distinguished Professor of Insurance and Actuarial Science from 2017 to 2019 and served as the Dean of the College of Business and Public Administration from 2014 to 2017. From 2009 to 2012, she served as the Chief Executive Officer of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). During her time at NAIC, Ms. Vaughan also served as a member of the Executive Committee of the International Association of Insurance Supervisors and the steering committee for the U.S./E.U. Insurance Dialogue Project. In 2012, she chaired the Joint Forum, a Basel, Switzerland-based group of banking, insurance, and securities supervisors. Additionally, Ms. Vaughan was the first female Insurance Commissioner for the State of Iowa, a role which she held for over ten years.

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

In light of Ms. Vaughan’s considerable experience in the insurance industry as well as her professional experience in insurance regulation, education, research and corporate governance, AIG’s Board has concluded that Ms. Vaughan should be re-elected to the Board. 

2021 Proxy Statement19

Proposal 1—Election of Directors

 

Director since: 2020

Age: 54

Other Directorships:

•   None

PETER ZAFFINO

President and Chief Executive Officer of AIG

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Peter Zaffino has been AIG’s

Chief Executive Officer, since March 1, 2021 and joined AIG’s Board in October 2020. He joined AIG in July 2017 as 2021; President, since 2020
Executive Vice President—President & Global Chief Operating Officer, and was also appointed 2017 to 2021
Chief Executive Officer, General Insurance, in November 2017 and President of AIG in January 2020. Prior to joining AIG, he served in various executive roles at 2019
nMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., a global professional services firm, including as Chief Executive Officer of Marsh, LLC from 2011 to 2017 and as (professional services)
Various senior positions, including:
Chairman for the Risk and Insurance Services segment, 2015 to 2017
Chief Executive Officer of Marsh, & McLennan Companies from 2015LLC, 2011 to 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Zaffino served as 2017
President and& Chief Executive Officer of Guy Carpenter, a risk and insurance-focused subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies. Prior2008 to joining 2011
Guy Carpenter, he held several senior positions, most recently serving in an executive role with a 2001 to 2008
nGE Capital, portfolio company that specialized in alternative risk insurance and reinsurance.

KEY1995 to 2001

OTHER CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS
nCorebridge Financial, Inc. (chair), since 2021
OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

nDirector, The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, since 2016
nDirector, New York Police and Fire Widows’ and Children’s Benefit Fund, since 2013
¢Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Age: 57
Director since: 2020
Key Experiences and Qualifications: In light of Mr. Zaffino’s significant experience indeep insurance expertise, leadership capabilities, financial and operational skills, and his continued exceptional performance as the insurance industry, including his leadershipCEO of AIG, the turnaround of AIG’s General Insurance business, AIG’s Board has concluded that Mr. Zaffino should be re-elected to the Board. 

re-elected.

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT21


20 2021 Proxy Statement
Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance

Our Continuing Commitment to Effective and Robust Corporate Governance Practices

Corporate Governance

OUR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

The AIG Board is committed to good corporate governance. Our strongeffective corporate governance policiespractices that are designed to maintain high standards of oversight, accountability, integrity and ethics while promoting the long-term interests of our shareholders. The Board continuously reviews and considers these practices are set forthto enhance its effectiveness.
Our governance framework enables independent, experienced and accomplished directors to provide advice, insight and oversight that will advance the interests of the Company and our shareholders. We have long strived to maintain sound governance standards, as reflected in our Amended and RestatedBy-Laws, Certificate of Incorporation, By-laws,Director, Officer and Senior Financial Officer Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters, our systematic approach to risk management and Board Committee Charters, among other documents. AIG’sin our commitment to transparent financial reporting and strong internal controls. The Board regularly reviews theseour corporate governance documents and makes modifications from time to time based on corporate governanceto reflect recent developments and shareholderinvestor feedback to ensure their continued effectiveness.

What we do:
The NCGC continuously reviews the composition of the Board to ensure the Board has the substantial and diverse skills, experience and attributes necessary to evaluate and oversee AIG’s strategy and performance
Directors are elected annually by a majority of votes cast (in uncontested elections)
All directors are independent except for our Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Chair, and independent directors meet in executive session in conjunction with each regularly scheduled Board meeting
All Board Committee members are independent
Lead Independent Director role has clearly defined responsibilities and oversees meeting materials, agendas and schedules
Directors’ interests are aligned with those of our shareholders through robust stock ownership requirements
The Board, through the NCGC, conducts annual evaluations of the Board, the Lead Independent Director and other individual directors, and all Board Committees conduct annual self-evaluations
All directors may contribute to the agenda for Board meetings
Corporate Governance Guidelines include sound policy on directors’ service on other public company boards
Board Committee structure organized around key strategic issues and designed to facilitate dialogue and efficiency
The Board, with support from the Board Committees, oversees key matters, including robust management succession planning; diversity, equity and inclusion; sustainability (including climate-related issues), corporate social responsibility and lobbying and public policy matters; risk management; and cybersecurity
Extensive shareholder engagement program with participation by independent directors
By-laws include a proxy access right for shareholders
By-laws provide shareholders the ability to call a special meeting at appropriate levels
What we don’t do:
xAny director attending less than 75% of meetings for two consecutive years will not be re-nominated
xDirectors generally may not stand for election after reaching age 75
xBoard Committee Chairs generally do not serve for longer than a five-year term
xNo supermajority voting requirements in charter or By-laws
xDirectors may not serve on more than three other public company boards with additional restrictions for AIG’s Chief Executive Officer and directors who are executive officers of other public companies

2021 Proxy Statement21

Corporate GovernanceDirector Independence

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

All directors independent other than Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chair
Lead Independent Director

AIG aims to maintainIn 2023, the Board completed a balanced and independent Board that is committed to representing the long-term interests of AIG’s shareholders and has the substantial and diverse expertise necessary to oversee AIG’s strategic and business planning as well as management’s approach to addressing significant risks and challenges facing AIG.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE ASSESSMENT

The Board, on the recommendationcomprehensive review of the NCGC, determined that each of AIG’s eleven independent director nominees—Mss. Mills, Schioldagercommittee charters and Vaughan and Messrs. Cole, Cornwell, Fitzpatrick, Jurgensen, Lynch, Motamed, Porrino and Steenland—are independent under the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards. Messrs. Duperreault and Zaffino are the only director nominees who hold AIG management positions and, therefore, are not independent directors. Mr. Miller, who is not standing for re-election to the Board, and Ms. Nora Johnson, who did not stand for re-election at the 2020 Annual Meeting, were also determined by the Board, on the recommendation of the NCGC, to be independent under the NYSE listing standards for the period that they served on the Board.

In making the independence determinations, the NCGC and the Board considered relationships arising from: (1) in the case of certain directors, contributions by AIG to charitable organizations with which they are affiliated; (2) in the case of certain directors, investments and insurance products AIG provides to them and/or entities they are affiliated with in the ordinary course of business and on the same terms made available to third parties; and (3) in the case of Mr. Lynch, the employment of his son by AIG. None of these relationships exceeded the thresholds set forth in the NYSE listing standards.

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

Flexible leadership structure reviewed regularly
New leadership structure created in 2021, consistent with thoughtful, well-coordinated succession plan

AIG’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provideto broaden the Board with flexibility to select the appropriate leadership structure for the company. The Board regularly reviews its leadership structure, taking into account many factors, including the specific needs of AIG and its businesses, corporate governance best practices, shareholder feedback and succession planning. The Board believes it is in the best interests of AIG and our shareholders to retain this flexibility in determining the appropriate leadership structure, recognizing that different structures may be appropriate in different circumstances.

LEADERSHIP TRANSITION IN 2021

Effective March 1, 2021, in connection with the execution of AIG’s thoughtful, well-coordinated Chief Executive Officer succession plan, the Board created a new leadership structure for the company. Mr. Duperreault became our newly appointed Executive Chair upon stepping down as AIG’s Chief Executive Officer; Mr. Zaffino succeeded Mr. Duperreault as the new Chief Executive Officer; and Mr. Steenland, who previously served as our Independent Chair, took on our newly created Lead Independent Director role. The Board believes this current leadership structure is in the best interests of AIG and its shareholders. With Mr. Duperreault in the Executive Chair role, AIG continues to leverage his significant industry expertise and effective working relationship with the Board to focus the Board’s attention on strategic matters and facilitate effective communication between the Board and management. Mr. Duperreault’s term as Executive Chair will end on December 31, 2021, at which time he will become a non-officer employee of AIG for one year, providing assistance and advice to the extent requested by the Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Zaffino, who became a director in October 2020, will also serve as a bridge between the Board and management while focusing on developing and implementing AIG’s business initiatives. In a Lead Independent Director role with clearly defined responsibilities Mr. Steenland continues to ensure robust independent oversight of the company by the Board. The Board is confident that AIG has the right team to lead AIG through the next phase of our journey.

22 2021 Proxy Statement

Corporate GovernanceBoard Effectiveness

LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR ROLE

In his role as Lead Independent Director, Mr. Steenland has clearly defined duties as set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, including:

Calling, setting the agenda for and chairing periodic executive sessions and meetings of the independent directors;
Consulting on and approving, in consultation with the Executive Chair and Chief Executive Officer, the agendas for and the scheduling of meetings of the Board;
Chairing meetings of the Board in the absence of the Executive Chair;
Serving as a liaison between the Executive Chair and the independent directors;
Reviewing and approving, in consultation with the Executive Chair, the quality, quantity, appropriateness and timeliness of information provided to the Board;
Communicating with shareholders, stakeholders, and government officials in consultation with the Executive Chair and Chief Executive Officer; and
Conferring regularly with the Executive Chair on matters of importance that may require action or oversight by the Board.

The Board believes that its leadership structure is well-aligned with the current needs of AIG and its shareholders. Mr. Duperreault’s extensive experience and established relationships with AIG’s directors and stakeholders will enable him to lead the Board in overseeing the company through the transition to a new Chief Executive Officer and major transformative transactions, including the separation of AIG’s Life and Retirement business. Mr. Steenland will leverage his extensive business experience and leadership to ensure continued robust, independent oversight of management by the independent directors.

BOARD EFFECTIVENESS

ATTENDANCE AT BOARD AND BOARD COMMITTEE MEETINGS 

12 Board meetings and 30 Board Committee meetings during 2020
Executive sessions at all regularly scheduled Board meetings
All directors attended at least 75% of relevant Board and Board Committee meetings

The Board considers director attendance at Board and Board Committee meetings an essential duty of a director. As a result, AIG’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that any director who, for two consecutive calendar years, attends fewer than 75 percent of the total regular meetings of the Board and the meetings of all Board Committees of which such director is a voting member will not be nominated for re-election at the annual meeting in the next succeeding calendar year, absent special circumstances that may be taken into account by the Board and the NCGC in making its recommendations to the Board.

There were 12 meetings of the Board during 2020. The independent directors meet in executive session, without the Chief Executive Officer present, in conjunction with each regularly scheduled Board meeting. Mr. Steenland, in his prior role as Chair of the Board, presided at the executive sessions. There were a total of 30 meetings of the Board Committees during 2020. For 2020, all of the directors attended at least 75 percent of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and of the Board Committees on which they served.

Pursuant to AIG’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, all directors are generally expected to attend the Annual Meeting. All directors who stood for election at the 2020 Annual Meeting attended the 2020 Annual Meeting.

2021 Proxy Statement23

Corporate Governance   Board Composition and Refreshment

DIRECTOR AND BOARD ACCOUNTABILITY AND EVALUATIONS

The Board believes that self-evaluations of the Board, the Board Committees and individual directors are important elements of corporate governance and essential to ensure a well-functioning Board. Pursuant to AIG’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board, acting through the NCGC and under the general oversight of the Lead Independent Director and Executive Chair, conducts an annual self-evaluationstrengthen our corporate governance practices, as described below.

We encourage you to visit the Leadership and an evaluationGovernance page of each memberour website (www.aig.com) where you can access information about our corporate governance.
Highlights of our governance framework follow.
The Board is Accountable and Committed to Shareholder Rights
nAll directors are elected annually
nMajority voting for directors in uncontested elections
nShareholders have proxy access
nShareholders can act by written consent
nShareholders holding 25 percent of voting stock can call special meetings
nStringent share ownership requirements for directors and senior management
nNo hedging, short sales or pledging of AIG securities
nClawback policies that provide protections beyond those required by NYSE
nAnnual advisory vote on executive compensation
nActive and ongoing shareholder engagement
nShareholders have equal voting rights per share
nCertificate of Incorporation and By-Laws do not impose supermajority voting requirements
nAnnual Board, committee and director evaluations
nDirectors are subject to limitations on board service at other public companies
nDirectors' equity awards are not paid until they retire from the Board. ThroughoutBoard
nNo director attending less than 75 percent of regular Board and applicable committee meetings for two consecutive years will be re-nominated
nDirectors generally may not stand for election after reaching age 75
22AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Corporate GovernanceBoard Leadership Structure
The Board is Independent, Diverse and Qualified
nAll director nominees are independent, except for our Chairman & CEO, Mr. Zaffino
nAll standing committees are comprised entirely of independent directors
nIndependent directors meet regularly without management in conjunction with regularly scheduled Board and committee meetings
nLead Independent Director role with explicit responsibilities
nOf the year, each standing Board Committee also conducts its own annual self-evaluation.

 

BOARD COMPOSITION AND REFRESHMENT

Balanced and effective Board composition, supplemented by a thoughtful approach to refreshment,ten director nominees, four are women, one is racially diverse, one is a priority for AIG. The selection of a qualified group of directors with an appropriate mix of skills, experiencemilitary veteran and attributes is essential to the Board’s successful oversight of AIG’s complex business, particularlyone identifies as the Board provides strategic oversight of AIG’s journey. The Board manages Board composition and refreshment with significant support from the NCGC.

LGBTQ+

nThe NCGC continuously reviews the composition of our Board, taking into consideration the characteristicsskills, experience and attributes of the existing directors, both individually and as a group. group
The Board and its Committees are Actively Engaged in Oversight
nThe Board, through its committees, oversees our strategic, capital and financial plans as well as our enterprise risk management (ERM) practices, including cybersecurity and climate risks
nThe Board, through the CMRC, annually evaluates CEO performance, oversees executive compensation and human capital management practices and programs, including retention, talent development, compensation and benefits and diversity, equity and inclusion
nThe Board, through the NCGC, considersoversees succession planning for the Chairman & CEO and our policies, practices and reporting with respect to current and emerging public policy issues of significance to the Company, including issues relating to climate, sustainability, corporate social responsibility, government relations and lobbying
nThe Board, through the Audit Committee, oversees financial risk exposures and our Internal Audit function
nThe Board, through the Risk Committee, oversees our ERM and risk framework, and operational risks, including climate risk, concentration risk, cyber risk, and data and information security risk
Board Leadership Structure
Peter Zaffino Holds the Combined Role of Chairman and CEO
The Board elected Peter Zaffino to the additional position of Chairman of the Board, effective January 1, 2022. The Board does not have a policy about whether the roles of Chairman of the Board and CEO should be separate or combined. Rather, the Board believes that the present structure, which includes a Lead Independent Director with well-defined responsibilities, provides the Company and the Board with exemplary leadership, appropriate independent oversight of management, and continuity of experience that complements ongoing Board refreshment and aligns with the importance of maintaining a single voice in lightleadership communications to shareholders, the investor community, employees and other stakeholders.
Under the terms of various factors, including expected director departures,our 2022 employment agreement with Mr. Zaffino, for the Board’s mixduration of the agreement's five-year term, Mr. Zaffino is being nominated to serve as a member of the Board, and, interplay of skills, experienceif elected by the shareholders, will serve as the Chairman.
The Lead Independent Director Has Well-Defined Responsibilities
As required by our By-Laws and attributes, including diversity, and individual director performance.

24 2021 Proxy Statement

Corporate GovernanceBoard Composition and Refreshment

DIRECTOR RECRUITMENT PROCESS

The NCGC has a robust director recruitment process. New director candidates are identified through various channels, including third-party search firms, other directors, shareholders and members of management. Once a candidate has been identified, the NCGC conducts a rigorous review, taking into consideration the criteria set forth in AIG’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, including:

because our Chairman is not independent, the Board selected a non-management director, Mr. Rice, to serve as Lead Independent Director. The Board believes that a Lead Independent Director with well-defined responsibilities enhances the effectiveness of the independent directors, improves risk management and oversight, and provides a channel for independent directors to candidly raise issues or concerns for the Board’s consideration. In 2023, the Lead Independent Director’s responsibilities were further broadened to ensure the role has a strong voice.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT23

Corporate Governance     Board Leadership Structure
Chairman and Lead Independent Director Responsibilities
Responsibilityskill, expertise, diversity, background, and experience with businesses and other organizations that the Board deems relevant;ChairmanLead Independent
Director
the contribution represented by the individual’s skills, experience and attributes to ensuring that the Board has the necessary tools to perform its oversight function effectively;
the interplay of the individual’s experience with the experience of other Board members;
high personal and professional ethics, values and integrity;
ability to work together as part of an effective, collegial group;
ability and willingness to commit adequate time to AIG over an extended period of time;
commitment to representing the long-term interests of AIG; and
the extent to which the individual would otherwise be a desirable additionProvide leadership to the Board in its oversight of managementn
Chair meetings of the Board and the annual shareholder meetingn
Communicate with shareholders, government officials and other stakeholdersnn
Set agendas for, and schedule meetings of, the Boardnn
Review and approve agendas for each committee of the Board and coordinate with the committee chairs to schedule committee meetingsn
Review the quality, quantity, appropriateness and timeliness of information provided to the Boardnn
Confer regularly with the Lead Independent Director on matters of importance, including with respect to management, operational and other business developments that may require action or oversight by the Boardn
Provide advice, guidance and assistance to the Chairmann
Call and chair the executive sessions of the independent directors, in conjunction with each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board, and call and chair additional executive sessions and meetings of the independent directors, as neededn
Coordinate with the chair of the NCGC with respect to identifying and evaluating candidates qualified to serve as directors on the Boardnn
Coordinate with the chair of the NCGC with respect to the format and process for the performance evaluations of the Board and its committeesnn
Chair meetings of the Board in the absence of the Chairmann
Serve as a liaison and facilitate communication between the Chairman and the Independent Directorsn
Confer regularly with the Chairman on matters of importance that may require action or oversight by the Boardn
Carrying out such other duties as are requested by the independent directors, the Board, or any Board Committees.of its committees from time to timen

Following this review,

We Generally Limit Service on Other Company Boards
The Board values the experience directors bring from other public company boards on which they serve, but acknowledges that such service may also present significant demands on a director’s time and availability and may present other conflicts. In these circumstances, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a director must obtain the consent of the Chairman & CEO and chair of the NCGC recommends potentialbefore joining the board of another company. In addition, absent special circumstances, the Board generally imposes the following limits:
nA director may not serve on the boards of more than three other public companies (other than AIG or a company in which AIG has a significant equity interest) that requires substantial time commitments
nA director who is an executive officer of another public company may not serve on the board of more than one public company (other than AIG and the public company for which such director serves as an executive officer)
nA member of the Audit Committee may not serve on more than two audit committees of other public companies
nThe AIG CEO may not serve on the board of more than one public company, other than a company in which AIG has a significant equity interest
All of our director nominees meet these guidelines.
24AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Corporate Governance     Board Leadership Structure
Director Orientation and Continuing Education
Director education is vital to the ability of directors to fulfill their roles and supports Board members in their continuous learning. To that end, the full Board for approval of their appointment or election by our shareholders.

Six new directors added in last two years – 50% of whom are women or ethnically and/or racially diverse

The NCGC oversaw the identification, recruitment and review of Mr. Cole, who was appointed to our Board in 2021. Mr. Cole was identified and recommended to the NCGC by our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chair. The NCGC retained a global search firm to interview Mr. Cole and compile information about his attributes, experience, skills and independence to help them assess his suitability for our Board. Mr. Cole brings considerable experience in public policy and government and is a seasoned legal advisor on strategic transactions. The NCGC also oversaw the identification, recruitment and review of one new director—Mr. Zaffino—in 2020 and four new directors—Messrs. Motamed and Porrino and Mss. Schioldager and Vaughan—in 2019. Messrs. Motamed, Porrino and Zaffino and Ms. Vaughan each have considerable insurance industry experience, and Mr. Zaffino serves as a bridge between the Board and management. Ms. Schioldager has substantial experience in investments and global asset management. Further, the additions of Mr. Cole and Mss. Schioldager and Vaughan enhanced the diversity of our Board.

DIRECTOR ORIENTATION

Corporate Governance Guidelines encourage director education. All new directors participate in a comprehensive director orientation program. This program includes one-on-one meetingsand meet with key members of management, and fellow directors as well asand our independent auditor, and receive extensive written materials to help familiarize them with the new director with AIG’s business,Company’s businesses and strategic priorities, the insurance industry, strategy,our accounting practices and the Company’s culture, policies, practices and practices. Each new director ishistory. Management also pairedprovides a continuing education program for all directors regarding matters relevant to AIG, including with an existing directorrespect to help integrate them during the course of their first year on the Board. Further, each new director isits risks and other appropriate subjects.

Directors are encouraged to attend outside continuing education programs and are reimbursed by the meetingsCompany for the cost of all Board committees, including those on which they do not sit, during their first year on the Board.

DIRECTOR TENURE 

such programs and related expenses.
Average tenure: Five years
Retirement age: 75

The Board’s Self-Evaluation Process

The Board believes that ita thorough and constructive self-evaluation process is desirablean important element of good corporate governance to maintain a mix of longer-tenured, experienced directorspromote Board effectiveness and newer directors with fresh perspectives.continuous improvement. In addition to regularly reviewing its leadership structure, the Board and its committees perform an annual formal self-evaluation process developed and administered by the NCGC. The average tenureBoard, acting through the NCGC, oversees the performance evaluations of the independent director nominees is five years. In addition, under AIG’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board Committee Chairs generally do not serve for longer than a five-year term. No individual may stand for election as a director after reaching the age of 75. The Board may waive this requirement if, on the recommendation of the NCGC, it determines such waiver to be in the best interests of AIG.

2021 Proxy Statement25

Corporate GovernanceBoard Composition and Refreshment

DIVERSITY CONSIDERATION

Three independent directors are women
Two independent directors are ethnically and/or racially diverse

The Board strives to maintain a diverse Board and diversity continues to be an important consideration inits committees. The format and process for the NCGC’s director search and nomination process. As set forth in AIG’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, while the Board has not adopted a specific diversity policy, the Board believes that important diversity characteristics include race, gender identity, ethnicity, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation and cultural background. Additionally, in assessing each director candidate, the NCGC considers diversity in a broad sense, including a candidate’s work experience, skills and perspective. Three of AIG’s independent director nomineesperformance evaluations are women and two are ethnically and/or racially diverse.

DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATIONS BY SHAREHOLDERS

The NCGC considers shareholder feedback when determining whether to recommend that the Board nominate a director for re-election and takes into account the views of interested shareholders as appropriate when filling a vacancy on the Board. The AIG Corporate Governance Guidelines include characteristics that the NCGC considers important for director nominees and information for shareholders with respect to director nominations. The NCGC will consider director nominees recommended by shareholders and will evaluate those shareholder nominees on the same basis as all other nominees. Shareholders who wish to recommend nominees for director for considerationdetermined by the NCGC in coordination with the Chairman & CEO and the Lead Independent Director and may do so by submitting namesbe conducted with or without a third-party facilitator. The self-evaluation process is designed to facilitate ongoing, systematic examination of the Board’s and supporting information to: Chair, Nominatingcommittees’ effectiveness and accountability, and to identify opportunities for improving operations and procedures.

How it Worked in 2023
nIn 2023, the NCGC engaged a third-party facilitator to lead the self-evaluation process.
nThe third-party facilitator, who specializes in corporate governance, interviewed each director to obtain anonymous feedback regarding Board performance and effectiveness, with the objective of identifying areas of strength and opportunities for improvement.
nThe third-party facilitator presented his findings to the Board and facilitated a conversation with the directors wherein they reviewed and discussed the findings, including Board composition, structure, work processes, leadership and culture.
How Self-Evaluations Contribute to Board Performance
nThe self-evaluations are intended to collect the perspectives of each director and assess various indicators of effective governance, including Board size and composition, communication among directors, Board dynamics and director onboarding.
nThe self-evaluation process has in the past led to Board refreshment actions, further evolved the evaluation process, and streamlined Board and committee meeting materials and agendas.
nThe recent self-evaluation led to increased succession planning at all management levels, the appointment of two new directors, improved timeliness of the distribution of meeting materials and a review and redesign of director onboarding and education opportunities.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT25

Corporate Governance     Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, American International Group, Inc., 175 Water Street, New York, New York 10038. NominationsAreas of director candidates made pursuant to AIG’s By-laws must comply with the requirements set forth in our By-laws. See “Other Matters—Shareholder Proposals for the 2022 Annual Meeting.”

PROXY ACCESS

AIG’s By-laws also permit eligible shareholders with a significant long-term interest in AIG to include their own director nominees in AIG’s proxy statement for the annual meeting. The Board believes such proxy access is an additional mechanism forOversight

Areas of Board accountability and for ensuring that Board nominees are supported by AIG’s long-term shareholders.

Under the proxy access by-law, a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning three percent or more of AIG common stock continuously for at least three years may nominate and include in AIG’s annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20 percent of the Board, so long as the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in AIG’s By-laws. Qualifying shareholders who wish to submit director nominees for election at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the proxy access by-law may do so in compliance with the procedures described in “Other Matters—Shareholder Proposals for the 2022 Annual Meeting.”

26 2021 Proxy Statement

Oversight
Corporate GovernanceAreas of Board Oversight

AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

The Board fulfills its oversight role with respect to AIG’s strategyour strategic priorities through year-round discussions and presentations covering company-wideCompany-wide and business unit-specific updates. The Board, through its committees, also provides oversight with respect tooversees other key areas, including management succession planning, humanmanagement’s development and implementation of our strategic, capital management (including diversity, equity, and inclusion), sustainability (including climate-related issues), corporate social responsibility, lobbying and public policy,financial plans, as well as our enterprise risk management practices and cybersecurity.

MANAGEMENT SUCCESSION PLANNING

risk framework and matters related to our aggregate risk profile and risk appetite, including cybersecurity and climate risks.
Board Oversight of Risk Management
We consider risk management an integral part of our business strategy and a key element of our approach to corporate governance. We have an integrated process for managing risks throughout our organization in accordance with our firm-wide risk appetite.
Management has the day-to-day responsibility for assessing and managing our risk exposure, and the Board and its committees provide oversight in connection with those efforts, with particular focus on reviewing our most significant existing and emerging risks.
Committee Risk Oversight ResponsibilitiesPeter Zaffino appointed Chief Executive Officer effective March 1, 2021
Audit Committee
nDiscusses with management our major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including risk assessment and risk management policies
The Board oversees the management of risk, including those related to market conditions, reserves, catastrophes, investments, liquidity, capital, climate and cybersecurity, through the complementary functioning of the committees
The Board, directly or through its committees, oversees the Company’s risk management policies and practices, including the Company’s risk appetite statement, and regularly discusses risk-related issues
Risk CommitteeResult
nAssists the Board in overseeing and reviewing information regarding enterprise risk management and overall risk framework, risk appetite and management’s identification, measurement, management, monitoring and reporting of execution of thoughtful, well-coordinated succession plankey risks facing the Company, including climate risk, concentration risk, cyber risk and data and information security risk

In October 2020, AIG announced that Mr. Zaffino was named Chief Executive Officer, effective March 1, 2021. Mr. Zaffino was also appointed to serve as a director, effective at the time of the announcement. This transition reflects the execution of a thoughtful, well-coordinated Chief Executive Officer succession plan overseen by the Board with support from the CMRC in consultation with the Chair of the NCGC. One of the key strengths that the Board considered when appointing Mr. Duperreault to lead AIG in 2017 was his proven track-record for developing talent and grooming successors internally. The Board determined that Mr. Zaffino was the right choice to become AIG’s next Chief Executive Officer on the basis of the success he demonstrated as AIG’s President and Global Chief Operating Officer and his leadership over the turnaround of AIG’s General Insurance business. This leadership transition is supported by Mr. Duperreault’s continued service to AIG as Executive Chair.

The Board continues to recognize the importance of planning for management succession and oversees succession planning with support from the CMRC, in consultation with the Chair of the NCGC. In accordance with AIG’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and the CMRC’s charter, at least annually:

Compensation and Management Resources Committee
nOversees the Chief Executive Officer reports to the CMRC and the Chairassessment of the NCGCrisks related to our compensation programs and policies, including the administration of policies regarding the recoupment, repayment or forfeiture of compensation
nReceives periodic reports from our Chief Risk Officer on plans for succession for both the Chief Executive Officer rolerisk assessments of our compensation programs and other senior management roles; andpolicies
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committeethe CMRC
nOversees and reports to the Board on its view of those plans.risks related to director independence and related party transactions, public policy and lobbying activities, and sustainability-related issues

Pursuant

26AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Corporate Governance     Areas of Board Oversight
Board Oversight of Cybersecurity
Like other global companies, we continue to witness the CMRC’sincreased sophistication and NCGC’s charters,activities of unauthorized parties attempting cyber and other computer-related penetrations such as "denial of service" attacks, phishing, untargeted but sophisticated and automated attacks, and other disruptive software in an effort to compromise systems, networks and obtain sensitive information. Cybersecurity risks may also derive from unintentional human error or intentional malice on the Chairpart of employees or third parties who have authorized access to our systems or information. We require employees to complete periodic training on cyber education.
We also maintain a documented Information Security Program (the Program) that includes risk assessments regularly conducted by the NCGC also consults withCompany and third-party experts to evaluate potential security threats that may have a negative impact on the CMRC with respectorganization, to Chief Executive Officer succession.

2021 Proxy Statement27

detect potential vulnerabilities, and to mitigate any identified security risks. The Program is informed by industry standards and frameworks and is designed to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets and systems that store, process, or transmit information.
Corporate Governance   Areas of Board Oversight

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

OurThe Board oversees the Program and management of risks from cybersecurity threats and reviews and monitors business and technology strategy, including the policies, processes and practices that the Company’s management implements to address risks from cybersecurity threats. The Board believes that all directors are responsible for oversight of these matters given the increasing importance of cybersecurity to our risk profile, as well as the significant role the Company’s technology strategy plays in its strategic priorities. The Chief Information Officer, Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) and Chief Risk Officer provide updates to the Board as appropriate.

The Company has an established issue escalation protocol for technology incidents, including cyber related incidents. In the event of a major strengthmaterial cybersecurity incident, the Board will receive prompt information and ongoing updates about the incident. At least once each year, the Board discusses the Company’s approach to cybersecurity risk management with the Company’s CISO. The CISO and regional/country information security officers also regularly present to the Company’s regional and country leadership boards on material cyber risks and the Company’s information security posture and strategy.
Board Oversight of AIGHuman Capital Management
We believe that our people are our greatest asset. To this end, we place significant focus on human capital management; namely, retaining, developing and attracting high caliber talent committed to our journey to becoming a top performing company and fostering an inclusive environment in which we actively seek and embrace diverse thinking.
The CMRC is the dedication, commitment, and loyalty of our colleagues. AIG’s keyresponsible for overseeing human capital management objectives include attracting, developingpractices and retainingprograms, including retention, talent development, compensation and benefits, and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). Management periodically reports to the highest quality talent. The CMRC oversees AIG’s initiatives and progress on our various human capital management effortsinitiatives and metrics, including diversity, equity and inclusion.

To improve our employee experience and assess the health of our organization, we periodically undertake cultural and employee engagement surveys. In August 2019, AIG conducted an Organizational Health Index survey, which was responded to by approximately 80 percent of our workforce and which covered topics across multiple dimensions, including leadership, business operations and effectiveness, diversity, equity and inclusion and customer focus. In response to this feedback, many of our colleagues’ ideas and suggestions have been applied across AIG and informed the development of the AIG 200 operational programs. In January 2021, we launched our second Organizational Health Index survey to give our colleagues another opportunity to share their insights, gather input on how AIG has progressed over the past year and continue to help make AIG a more rewarding place to work.

metrics. We believe that we foster a constructive, inclusive and healthy work environment for our employees. Some examples

Management Succession Planning
The Board recognizes the importance of key programsmanagement succession planning. To this end, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Chief Executive Officer periodically presents a management succession plan for our policy-making officers, which includes readiness assessments and initiatives thatcareer development opportunities, to the Board. Our recent review and update to our Board committee charters and Corporate Governance Guidelines included placing Chairman & CEO succession planning within the remit of the NCGC.
Our Board, together with management, has developed steps to address emergency CEO planning in extraordinary circumstances. Our emergency CEO succession planning is intended to enable our Company to respond to unexpected position vacancies, including those resulting from a major catastrophe, by continuing our Company’s safe and sound operation and minimizing potential disruption or loss of continuity to our Company’s business and operations.
We are designedfocused on raising the profile of high performing employees and assisting our top leaders to develop skills, behaviors and leadership acumen to continue the successful transformation of the business.
Competitive Compensation and Benefits
The Company seeks to align compensation with individual and company performance and provide the appropriate market-competitive incentives to retain, attract develop and retainmotivate employees to achieve outstanding results.
Management and the CMRC engage the services of third-party compensation consultants to help monitor the competitiveness of our diverse workforce include:

 Competitive Compensation and Benefits
AIG seeks to provide competitive compensation opportunities and benefits that attract and retain highly skilled employees for our various business needs.

     Performance-driven compensation structure that consists of base salary and short- and long-term incentive awards.

     Subsidized health care plans, life insurance and disability.

     Wellness and mental health benefits.

     Liberal paid time off and parental leave policies.

     Matching 401(k) contributions.

 Health and Safety
AIG prioritizes the health and safety of its employees, which was apparent in our response to the COVID-19 crisis.

     90 percent of our employees quickly and effectively transitioned to remote work.

     Cross-functional COVID-19 Task Force created to ensure that AIG implemented best practices to protect the safety of colleagues while continuing to serve clients, distribution partners and other stakeholders.

     Return-to-office planning is informed by a Return to Workplace survey recently completed by our employees.

     Employee Assistance Program provides employees with mental health resources, including counseling sessions and webinars.

 Career Development
AIG believes that professional development is a positive investment in our talent and has created numerous programs to foster leadership, growth and development opportunities for our employees.

     Library of on-demand learning options, combined with immersive learning experiences to build skills, available at all levels.

     Tuition and certification and training reimbursement programs to encourage employees to enhance their education, skills and knowledge for their continued growth.

     Annual review of talent development and succession plans for each of our functions and operating segments, to identify and develop a pipeline of diverse talent for positions at all levels of the organization.

28 2021 Proxy Statement

Corporate Governance   Areas of Board Oversight

 Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
AIG is committed to creating an inclusive workplace focused on attracting, retaining and developing diverse talent that fosters a culture of belonging for all employees.

     Diversity, equity and inclusion objective embedded into each executive officer’s individual performance goals tied to their annual short-term incentive awards.

     Executive Diversity Council established in September 2020, tasked with ensuring that diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives are an integral part of AIG’s business strategies.

     New Chief Diversity Officer appointed in October 2020 to coordinate AIG’s efforts in making meaningful strides as it relates to diversity, equity and inclusion.

     Three leadership programs targeted at our diverse talent pool.

     Women’s Executive Leadership Initiative and the Executive Men’s Development Initiative (for men of color) seek to hone executive leadership skills of high-potential employees.

     Accelerated Leadership Development program matches mid-level men and women of color in AIG’s leadership pipeline with senior executive mentors and coaches them on essential senior management and executive leadership skills.

     In 2020, more than 17,000 global colleagues participated in Courageous Conversations, a training program about unconscious bias and systemic racism. 

Spotlight on AIG’s Robust Network of ERGs

ERGs are groups of employees who come together based on a shared interest in a specific dimension of diversity. The ERGs are a cornerstone of our diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, with significant employee participation. Our ERGs represent and support our diverse workforce, facilitate networking and connections with peers, and create a culture of inclusion and engagement within AIG.

 

2021 Proxy Statement29

Corporate Governance   Areas of Board Oversight

SUSTAINABILITY AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

AIG’s Sustainability Priorities
Community resilience
Financial security
Sustainable operations
Sustainable investing

AIG believes that the challenges we face in the world today are as serious as they are complex. As risk managers, insurers, and investors, weincentive programs. We have a unique roleperformance-driven compensation structure that consists of base salary and, for eligible employees, short- and long-term incentives. We also offer comprehensive benefits to playsupport the health, wellness, work-life balance and

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT27

Corporate Governance     Areas of Board Oversight
retirement preparedness/savings needs of our employees, including subsidized health care plans, life and disability insurance, wellness and mental health benefits, legal assistance plan, paid time off, paid volunteer time off, 2:1 matching grants for eligible charitable donations, parental and bonding leave and both matching and Company 401(k) contributions for eligible employees.
Talent Development
Equipping our employees with the skills and capabilities to be successful and to contribute is another priority. We do this by giving our employees access to meaningful tools and resources to assist in their professional development, including through courses and training that help employees build a strong foundation of core skills such as communication, collaboration, change agility and problem solving. In addition, we believe managers and leaders are critical in developing talent for organizational success. To that end, we use distinct leadership assessment tools, including 360-degree feedback, which help to develop self-awareness and build personalized leadership development goals. We also place significant importance on promoting internal talent and succession planning. We use a globally consistent streamlined process to support succession planning, which helps identify a pipeline of talent for positions at all levels of the organization, and the actions needed to support their development. In 2023, 33 percent of all our open positions were filled with internal talent.
Health and Wellness
We prioritize the health and safety of our employees. For example, nearly every country in which we operate has an employee assistance program that provides employees with confidential counselling, mental health resources and information to help employees and their dependents through times of stress and anxiety. In addition, Our Compassionate Colleagues Fund has helped more than 1,600 employees overcome serious financial hardships and disasters through financial support funded by contributions by the Company and other employees.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
We strive to create an inclusive workplace that provides equal opportunities for all colleagues. We believe in building a more sustainable, secure world. To that end, AIG has developed a sustainability agenda intendedculture where everyone is valued and celebrated for who they are and where all perspectives are welcome. Beginning with 2019 data, we have published our consolidated EEO-1 reports on our website to help future-proofpromote transparency about our communities—a unified sustainability approach that supports our business strategy and addresses expectations from manydiverse U.S. workforce.
Board Oversight of our key stakeholders including investors, regulators, clients, and employees. AIG’s four sustainability priorities (community resilience, financial security, sustainable operations and sustainable investing) align with our core business strategy and focus on the future proofing communities.

Sustainability Matters

We assess the potential impact from climate-related issues on our business, strategy and financial planning over short-, medium- and long-term time horizons. We consider abiding by and upholding sustainability principles as a part of our strategic priority to become a top performing company and promote value creation; to help protect businesses, families and individuals against the impacts of unexpected losses; to advance the discipline of reducing uncertainty in the world; and to further establish our leadership in insurance, investments and business.
We consider both direct physical impacts and indirect effects that may emerge through transition risks, particularly those driven by new legal and regulatory requirements. We also consider evolving investor, client and broker expectations.
Our four sustainability priorities (community resilience, financial security, sustainable operations and sustainable investing) align with our core strategic priorities and focus on future proofing communities.
AIG’s Sustainability
Priorities
nCommunity resilience
nFinancial security
nSustainable operations
nSustainable investing
The NCGC oversees and reports to the Board as necessary with respect to sustainability, (including climate-related issues), corporate social responsibility and lobbying and public policy matters. AIG’s Chief Sustainability Officer is responsible for leading the development and implementation of AIG’s company-wide sustainability strategy. Our Chief Sustainability Officer sits within AIG’s Global Legal, Compliance & Regulatory Group, which provides visibility and influence with AIG’s executive leadership. The NCGC receives regular reports from our Chief Sustainability Officer on sustainability-related matters.

Under the leadership of the Chief Sustainability Officer, cross-functional teams and working groups have been established to drive integration and advancement of AIG’s sustainability priorities into all lines of business. Each working group is sponsored by one of AIG’s Executive Officers to cascade the tone at the top throughout the entire organization.

 

30 2021 Proxy Statement

Corporate Governance   Areas of Board Oversight

Recent Sustainability Milestones
Performed AIG’s first materiality assessment to identify and prioritize ESG issues that are most significant for AIG’s long-term value creation and of most importance to our key stakeholders
Developed a unified position on climate change risks and strategy recommendation
Launched AIG’s Employee Sustainability Network to provide an opportunity for employees to get involved in sustainability initiatives on a more local, grassroots level, while also helping advance AIG’s sustainability agenda
Published a second Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) report and became a TCFD supporter
Became a Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) investor signatory and continued to report on CDP’s Climate Investor Questionnaire for 11 consecutive years
Became a member of the UN Global Compact, committing to align with the UN Global Compact principles and to support the UN Sustainable Development Goals

Additional Information Available in ESG Reports

For more information on how we identify and address sustainability, DEI and governance topics, please see our 2022 ESG Report issued in July 2023, which can be found on our Sustainability Site

To reviewwebsite at www.aig.com. This report showcases various ESG efforts across the Company and how we see them as strategically important building blocks to support a cleaner and healthier environment, to uphold our TCFDcommitment to supporting the communities where we live and work and to make these efforts accountable, scalable and repeatable. We will release our 2023 report and detailed information about AIG’s philosophy and practices regarding sustainability (including climate change projects) and corporate responsibility (including philanthropy, volunteerism and diversity, equity and inclusion), please visit our sustainability site at www.aig.com/about-us/sustainability. The reports and any other information onlater this website are not incorporated by reference in, and do not form part of, this Proxy Statement or any other SEC filing.

RISK MANAGEMENT

year.

28AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Corporate Governance     Board Committees
Board Committees
The Board oversees the management of risk (including, for example, risks related to market conditions, reserves, catastrophes, investments, liquidity, capital and cybersecurity) through the complementary functioning of the Risk and Capital Committee and thehas four committees: Audit, Committee and interacting and coordinating with other Board Committees. The Risk and Capital Committee oversees AIG’s ERM practices as one of its core responsibilities and reviews AIG’s risk assessment and risk management policies. The Audit Committee also evaluates and oversees the guidelines and policies governing AIG’s risk assessment and management processes relating to financial reporting as well as the risk control framework. The Audit and Risk and Capital Committee Chairs then coordinate with each other and the Chairs of the other Board Committees with the aim to ensure that each Board Committee has received the information that it needs to carry out its responsibilities with respect to risk management. Both the Risk and Capital Committee and the Audit Committee report to the Board with respect to relevant risk management issues. The CMRC, in conjunction with AIG’s Chief Risk Officer, is responsible for reviewing the relationship between AIG’s risk management policies and practices and the incentive compensation arrangements applicable to senior executives. For further information regarding the annual risk assessment of compensation plans, see “Executive Compensation—Report of the Compensation and Management Resources, Committee.”

CYBERSECURITY

The TechnologyNominating and Corporate Governance, and Risk. Each of these committees is composed exclusively of independent directors. Committee reviews AIG’s cybersecurity risks, policies, controlsmeetings are generally held in conjunction with scheduled Board meetings and procedures, including: (1) AIG’s procedures to identify and assess internal and external cybersecurity risks, (2) AIG’s controls to protect from cyberattacks, unauthorized access or other malicious acts and risks, (3) AIG’s procedures to detect, respond to, mitigate negative effects from and recover from cybersecurity attacks, (4) AIG’s controls and procedures for fulfilling applicable regulatory reporting and disclosure obligations related to cybersecurity risks, costs and incidents and (5) AIG’s cybersecurity practicesadditional meetings are held as compared to industry practices. Management reports to the Technology Committee on cybersecurity matters at every meetingneeded, including meetings of the TechnologyAudit Committee to review quarterly and year-end earnings reports.

Each committee operates under a written charter – all of which meets at least two times a yearare available on our website (www.aig.com). Each charter is reviewed annually by the respective committee. Under those charters, each committee has the authority to retain independent advisors to assist in accordance with the Technology Committee charter. At least once a year, AIG’s Chief Information Security Officer also meetsperformance of their respective responsibilities. Each committee reviews reports from senior management and reports its actions to, and discusses its recommendations with, the full Board.
In 2023, the Board undertook an in-depth review of each committee charter, which included a benchmarking exercise. Significant changes to report on AIG’s internalthe Board committee charters included (i) elevating oversight of capital, liquidity and externalother financing matters to the full Board, (ii) streamlining the duties of the Risk Committee, enabling it to give more attention to operational risks, including cybersecurity and climate risks, and our actions(iii) moving succession planning for the Chairman & CEO to the Nominating and responses.

2021 Proxy Statement31

Corporate Governance Committee.
Corporate Governance   Board Committees

BOARD COMMITTEES

AIG’s Board Committee structure is organized around key strategic issues. Board Committee Chairs regularly coordinate with one another to ensure appropriate information sharing. To further facilitate information sharing, all Board Committees provide a summary of significant actionsAll committee chairs are appointed at regular meetings ofleast annually by the Board. As required under AIG’sThe Corporate Governance Guidelines each standing Board Committee conducts an annual self-assessmentprovide that a committee chair should generally serve for not less than three years and review of its charter.

not more than five consecutive years.

The following table sets forthtables below reflect the current membership and the number of committee meetings held in 20202023.
Audit Committee
MEMBERS
05_424782-3_photo_porrino.jpg
Peter R. Porrino, Chair
Paola Bergamaschi
W. Don Cornwell
Vanessa A. Wittman
7 MEETINGS HELD IN 2023
PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES
nAssists the Board in its oversight of the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence, and the performance of our internal audit function
nReviews and discusses with management major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including risk assessment and risk management policies
nAssists the Board in its evaluation of the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditor, including responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the firm's work
nAssists the Board in its oversight of the performance of our internal audit function, including responsibility for the appointment, replacement, reassignment or dismissal of, and being involved in the performance reviews of, our chief internal auditor
nAssists the Board in its oversight of compliance with regulatory requirements, including reviewing periodically with management any significant legal, compliance and regulatory matters that have arisen or that may have a material impact on our business, financial statements or compliance policies, relations with regulators and governmental agencies and any material reports or inquiries from regulators and government agencies
nApproves regular, periodic cash dividends on AIG Parent common stock and preferred stock consistent with Board-approved dividend policies
The Board has determined, on the recommendation of the NCGC, that each standing current Audit Committee member is: (i) financially literate in accordance with NYSE listing standards and (ii) an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and regulations.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT29

Corporate Governance     Board Committee. Messrs. DuperreaultCommittees
Compensation and Zaffino do not serve on any Board Committees.Management Resources Committee
MEMBERS
05_424782-3_photo_mills.jpg
Linda A. Mills, Chair
Diana M. Murphy
John G. Rice
6 MEETINGS HELD IN 2023


PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES
nOversees our executive compensation and benefits philosophy and policies generally, including reviewing and recommending to the Board the adoption, amendment and termination of any incentive compensation and equity-based programs that require Board approval
nReviews and approves incentive award performance goals, objectives and metrics for Section 16 officers and evaluating their performance in light of those goals, objectives and metrics and, based on recommendations from the Chairman & CEO, approving the compensation of Section 16 officers, including salary, incentive or equity compensation, and any special benefits and executive perquisites; and any hiring and severance or similar termination payments proposed to be made to any prospective, current or former Section 16 officer
nReviews and approves annual corporate goals, objectives and metrics relevant to the compensation of the Chairman & CEO and evaluates the Chairman & CEO’s performance in light of those goals, objectives and metrics and determines and recommends that the Board approve the Chairman & CEO's compensation based on its evaluation
nEstablishes and reviews compliance with stock ownership guidelines for Section 16 officers
nOversees the assessment of the risks related to compensation programs and policies
nOversees human capital management practices and programs, including retention, talent development, compensation and benefits and DEI initiatives
nEngages the services of an independent compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters
The CMRC may delegate its authority to one or more subcommittees consisting solely of one or more members of the CMRC when it deems it appropriate. The CMRC may delegate to the Chairman & CEO the authority to make grants to employees other than Section 16 officers under equity compensation plans as the CMRC deems appropriate and in accordance with the terms of such plans.
Compensation and Management Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Ms. Mills, Ms. Murphy, Mr. Steenland servesJurgensen and Ms. Vaughan served as CMRC members during 2023. No CMRC member is or ever was an ex-officio, non-votingofficer or employee of the Company. None of our executive officers is, or was during 2023, a member of each Board Committee. Mr. Cole joined our Board effective March 15, 2021 and thus did not attend any Boardthe board of directors or Board Committee meetingscompensation committee of another company that has, or had during 2020.

 Audit
Committee
Compensation
and
Management
Resources
Committee
Nominating
and
Corporate
Governance
Committee
Risk and
Capital
Committee
Technology
Committee
Director     
James Cole, Jr.(1)     
W. Don Cornwell C  
Brian Duperreault     
John H. Fitzpatrick   
William G. Jurgensen  C 
Christopher S. Lynch C 
Henry S. Miller   
Linda A. Mills  C
Thomas F. Motamed   
Peter R. PorrinoC   
Amy L. Schioldager  
Douglas M. Steenland
Therese M. Vaughan   
Peter Zaffino     
Number of meetings in 202079554

C= Chair 

■= Member 

♦ Mr. Steenland, as Lead Independent Director (formerly Independent Chair), is2023, an ex-officio, non-voting member. 

(1) Mr. Cole has been appointed to serveexecutive officer serving as a member of the AuditBoard or the CMRC.

30AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Corporate Governance     Board Committees
Nominating and Technology Committees, effective March 31, 2021.

32 2021 Proxy Statement

Corporate GovernanceBoard Committees

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Primary responsibilities

Assists the Board in its oversight of AIG’s financial statements, including internal control over financial reporting.

Reviews and discusses with senior management the guidelines and policies by which AIG assesses and manages risk.

Coordinates with the Risk and Capital Committee to help ensure the Board and each Board Committee has received the information it needs to carry out their responsibilities with respect to oversight of risk assessment and risk management.

Assists the Board in its oversight of the qualifications, independence and performance of AIG’s independent registered public accounting firm, including responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the firm.

Assists the Board in its oversight of the performance of AIG’s internal audit function, including responsibility for the appointment, replacement, reassignment or dismissal of, and being involved in the performance reviews of, AIG’s chief internal auditor.

Assists the Board in its oversight of AIG’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including reviewing periodically with management any significant legal, compliance and regulatory matters that have arisen or that may have a material impact on AIG’s business, financial statements or compliance policies, AIG’s relations with regulators and governmental agencies, and any material reports or inquiries from regulators and government agencies.

Approves regular, periodic cash dividends on AIG common stock and preferred stock consistent with Board-approved dividend policies and with support from the Risk and Capital Committee to confirm adequacy of AIG’s capital and liquidity.

Reviews and discusses any significant topics raised at the audit committee meetings of AIG’s material foreign subsidiaries.
HELD 7MEETINGS IN 2020
MEMBERS
05_424782-3_photo_colejr.jpg
James Cole, Jr., Chair
W. Don Cornwell
Diana M. Murphy
John G. Rice
5 MEETINGS HELD IN 2023
PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES
nIn consultation with the Chairman & CEO and the Lead Independent Director, identifies and evaluates candidates qualified to serve as directors, consistent with criteria set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and recommends these individuals to the Board for nomination, election or appointment as members of the Board and committees
nMakes recommendations to the Board regarding committee and committee chair assignments and makes recommendations to the Board as to determinations of director independence
nReviews the appropriate size and composition of the Board and its committees and, where appropriate, recommends changes to the Board
nOversees and reports to the Board on succession planning with respect to the Chairman & CEO
nOversees the performance evaluation of the Board and its committees
nReviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the form and amount of independent director compensation and the minimum stock ownership guidelines for independent directors
nOversees our policies, practices and reporting with respect to current and emerging public policy issues of significance to the Company, including issues relating to climate, sustainability, corporate social responsibility and social and governance activities
Risk Committee

MEMBERS
05_424782-3_photo_P-Porrino-small.jpg
Peter R. Porrino, Chair
John H. Fitzpatrick
Christopher S. Lynch
Paola Bergamaschi
James Cole, Jr.
Linda A. Mills
Amy L. Schioldager
Douglas M. Steenland (ex-officio, non-voting member) 

Vanessa A. Wittman
4 MEETINGS HELD IN 2023
INDEPENDENCE

The

PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES
nAssists the Board has determined, onin overseeing and reviewing information regarding our enterprise risk management and overall risk framework, risk appetite and management’s identification, measurement, management, monitoring and reporting of key risks facing the recommendationCompany, including climate risk, concentration risk, cyber risk and data and information security risk
nReceives reports from the Chief Risk Officer with respect to management’s communication of risk management policies throughout the NCGC, that all membersCompany, the structure for the assignment of the Audit Committee are independent under both NYSE listing standardsresponsibility for risks and the SEC rules. 

FINANCIAL LITERACY

The Board has determined, onmanagement of our risks from the recommendationperspective of relevant constituencies, including rating agencies and regulators

nCoordinates with the NCGC, that all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate and have accounting or related financial management expertise, each as defined by NYSE listing standards. 

FINANCIAL EXPERTS

The Board has determined, on the recommendation of the NCGC, that Messrs. Fitzpatrick, Lynch, Porrino and Steenland (as an ex-officio member) are audit committee financial experts, as defined under SEC rules. 



2021 Proxy Statement33

Corporate Governance   Board Committees

COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT RESOURCES COMMITTEE

Primary responsibilities

Oversees AIG’s compensation programs generally.

Reviews and approves incentive award performance metrics and goals relevant to the compensation of AIG’s Chief Executive Officer, evaluates the Chief Executive Officer’s performance and determines and approves the compensation awarded to the Chief Executive Officer (subject to ratification or approval by the Board).

Reviews and approves the incentive award performance metrics relevant to the compensation of the other senior executives under its purview (which includes all of the named executives listed in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table) and, based on the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer, approves the compensation of each such senior executive.

Reviews reports about the compensation of other key corporate officers of AIG, as the CMRC deems appropriate.

Oversees AIG’s management development and succession planning programs for the Chief Executive Officer and his direct reports and consults with the Chair of the NCGC with respect to Chief Executive Officer succession planning.

Reviews and approves compensation-related disclosures for inclusion in AIG’s annual Proxy Statement.

Oversees the assessment of the risks related to AIG’s compensation policies and programs.

Reviews periodic updates from management on initiatives and progress in the area of human capital, including diversity, equity and inclusion.

Engages the services of an independent compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters.

The foregoing responsibilities may not be delegated to persons who are not members of the CMRC.

HELD 9MEETINGS IN 2020
MEMBERS
W. Don Cornwell, Chair
Henry S. Miller
Linda A. Mills
Thomas F. Motamed
Therese M. Vaughan
Douglas M. Steenland (ex-officio, non-voting member)
INDEPENDENCE
The Board has determined, on the recommendation of the NCGC, that all memberschair of the CMRC to help ensure that our compensation arrangements are independent under both NYSE listing standardsdesigned to provide incentives that are consistent with the interests of our stakeholders and SEC rules.
COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT
RESOURCES COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND
INSIDER PARTICIPATION
During his or her service on the CMRC, no member served as an officer or employee of AIG at any time or had any relationship with AIG requiring disclosure as a related-party transaction under SEC rules. During 2020, none of AIG’s executive officers served as a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the CMRC; and none of AIG’s executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a member of AIG’s Board or on the CMRC.do not encourage senior executives to take excessive risks


34 2021 Proxy Statement

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT31


Corporate Governance   Board Committees

NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
Director Compensation

Primary responsibilities

Identifies individuals qualified to become Board members, consistent with criteria approved by the Board, and recommends these individuals to the Board for nomination, election or appointment as members of the Board and Board Committees.

Considers board refreshment in light of various factors, including expected director departures, the Board’s mix and interplay of skills, experience and attributes, including diversity, and individual director performance.

Oversees the annual evaluation of the Board, individual directors and Board Committees.

Periodically reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the form and amount of independent director compensation.

Receives reports from the NCGC Chair relating to succession planning for the Chief Executive Officer.

Reviews and reports to the Board with respect to (1) AIG’s position, policies, practices and reporting with respect to sustainability, (2) current and emerging corporate social responsibility issues of significance to AIG and its stakeholders, including the manner in which AIG conducts its public policies, social and environmental practices, climate-related activities, government relations activities, and other issues, (3) public policy issues of significance to AIG and its stakeholders and (4) AIG’s relationships with public interest groups, legislatures, government agencies and the media, as well as AIG stakeholders, and how those constituencies view AIG as those relationships relate to issues of public policy and social responsibility.
Director Compensation
HELD 5MEETINGS IN 2020
MEMBERS

Christopher S. Lynch, Chair
W. Don Cornwell
William G. Jurgensen
Amy L. Schioldager
Douglas M. Steenland (ex-officio, non-voting member) 

INDEPENDENCE
The Board has determined that all members of the NCGC are independent under NYSE listing standards and SEC rules.


2021 Proxy Statement35

Corporate Governance    Board Committees

RISK AND CAPITAL COMMITTEE

Primary responsibilities

Assists the Board in overseeing and reviewing information regarding AIG’s ERM practices, including the significant policies, procedures, and practices employed to manage liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk, operational risk and insurance risk.

Provides strategic guidance to management as to AIG’s capital structure and financing, the allocation of capital to its businesses, methods of financing its businesses and other related strategic initiatives.

Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to AIG’s financial and investment policies.

Approves issuances, investments, dispositions and other transactions and matters as authorized by the Board.

Advises the Audit Committee with respect to AIG’s capital and liquidity position to support the Audit Committee’s approval of regular, periodic cash dividends on AIG common and preferred stock.

Coordinates with the Board, the CMRC and the Audit Committee to help ensure that the Board and each Board Committee has received the information it needs to carry out their responsibilities with respect to risk management.
HELD 5MEETINGS IN 2020
MEMBERS
William G. Jurgensen, Chair
Christopher S. Lynch
Thomas F. Motamed
Peter R. Porrino
Therese M. Vaughan
Douglas M. Steenland (ex-officio, non-voting member)
INDEPENDENCE

The Board has determined, on the recommendation of the NCGC, that all members of the Risk and Capital Committee are independent under NYSE listing standards and SEC rules.



TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE

Primary responsibilities

Assists the Board in its oversight of AIG’s information technology projects and initiatives.

Reviews the financial, tactical and strategic benefits of proposed significant information technology-related projects and initiatives.

Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding significant information technology investments in support of AIG’s information technology strategy.

Reviews AIG’s risk management and risk assessment guidelines and policies regarding information technology security, including the quality and effectiveness of AIG’s information technology security, business continuity management capabilities and disaster recovery capabilities.

Reviews AIG’s cybersecurity risks, policies, controls and procedures.
HELD 4MEETINGS IN 2020
MEMBERS
Linda A. Mills, Chair
John H. Fitzpatrick
Henry S. Miller
Amy L. Schioldager
Douglas M. Steenland (ex-officio, non-voting member)
INDEPENDENCE
The Board has determined, on the recommendation of the NCGC, that all members of the Technology Committee are independent under NYSE listing standards and SEC rules.


36 2021 Proxy Statement

Corporate Governance    Compensation of Directors

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Highlights of our
Director Compensation
Program
nNo fees for Board meeting attendance
nEmphasis on equity, aligning director interests with shareholders
nFormulaic annual equity grants with immediate vesting to support independence
nBenchmarking against peers with advice from independent compensation consultant
nNo compensation is payable to non-independent directors for their service as directors
nStringent director stock ownership guidelines

We use a combination of cash and deferred stock-based awards to attractretain and retainattract qualified candidates to serve as independent directors on our Board.directors. In setting director compensation, the NCGC considers the significant amount of time that members of the Board spend in fulfilling their duties, to AIG, as well as the diverse and complementary skills, experience and attributes of our directors. The following table describes the compensation structure
2023 Compensation Structure for AIG’s independent directors in 2020.

2020 COMPENSATION STRUCTURE FOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

Independent Directors
Base Annual Retainer($)
Cash Retainer125,000
Deferred Stock Units (DSUs) Award(1)Award170,000185,000 
Annual Lead Independent ChairDirector Cash Retainer(2)Retainer260,000
Annual Board Committee Chair Cash Retainers

Audit Committee40,000
Risk and Capital Committee40,000
Compensation and Management Resources Committee30,000
Other Board CommitteesNominating and Corporate Governance Committee20,000

(1)DSUs granted in 2020 were granted under the AIG 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (2013 Plan). Going forward, DSUs will be granted under the 2021 Plan, subject to shareholder approval of such plan.

(2)This Independent Chair Cash Retainer became a Lead Independent Director Retainer effective March 1, 2021 concurrent with the effective date of the changes to AIG’s leadership structure. No Lead Independent Director Retainer was paid in 2020.

Annual Cash Retainers
The base annual cash retainer, of $125,000, as well as any cash retainers due for service as Independent Chair/Lead Independent Director or a Board Committee Chair,retainer and committee chair retainers are payable in four equal installments on the first business day of each quarter in arrears of service for the preceding quarter. The annual grant of $170,000 in DSUs is made for prospective service, at the time of AIG’s Annual Shareholder Meeting, for the upcoming one-year term. UnlessEach year, independent directors have made a special deferral election for their DSUs (discussed below), DSUs vest on the last trading day of the month in which the independent director ceases to be a director of AIG.

Independent directors are also eligible for the AIG Matching Grants Program, through which AIG provides a two-for-one match on charitable donations in an amount of up to $10,000 per employee or director annually (the same terms and conditions that apply to AIG employees). For 2020 only, the maximum amount of AIG’s charitable donation match was increased to $12,000 per employee or director annually.

Independent directors may elect to receive their base annual, Independent Chair/Lead Independent Director and Board Committee Chaircommittee chair cash retainer amountsretainers, as applicable, in the form of DSUs. The number of DSUs receivedgranted is based on the closing sale price of AIG Parent common stock on the date the cash retainer would otherwise be payable.

2021 Proxy Statement37

Corporate Governance     Compensation

The annual grant of Directors

Each$185,000 in the form of DSUs is made for prospective service and granted at the time of our Annual Meeting for the upcoming one-year term. A pro-rated DSU provides that one share of AIG common stock will be delivered when the independent director ceases to be a member ofaward is made for directors who join the Board andbetween annual meetings. Each DSU includes dividend equivalent rights that entitle the independent director to a quarterly payment, in the form of additional DSUs, equal to the amount of any regular quarterly dividend that would have been paid by AIG Parent if the shares of AIG Parent common stock underlying the DSUs had been outstanding. Annually, directorsoutstanding at that time. DSUs are settled in shares of AIG Parent common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Directors may elect to defer the settlementpayment date of 100 percentthe DSUs granted for a calendar year – including any DSUs that were accepted instead of theircash. Deferred DSUs received inwill be paid ratably over five years after service on the following year. In addition, no less thanBoard ends. Directors may also make subsequent deferral elections at least 12 months prior to retirement, retiring directors may make an election to defer the settlement of 100 percent ofbefore any DSUs not previously deferred pursuantare due to be paid. Without a deferral election, the DSUs will be paid promptly after the last trading day of the month in which service on the Board ends.
Matching Grants Program
Independent directors are also eligible for the AIG Matching Grants Program, through which we provide a two-for-one match on charitable donations in an annual election and/or any previously deferred DSUs.

amount of up to $10,000 per director annually on the same terms and conditions that apply to employees.

32AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Corporate Governance     Compensation of Directors
Stock Ownership Guidelines
Under our director stock ownership guidelines, independent directors should own a number ofare required to retain any shares of AIG Parent common stock received as a result of the exercise, vesting or settlement of any stock option or DSU granted by us until such time as they own shares of AIG Parent common stock (including deferred stock and DSUs) with a value equal to at least five times the base annual retainer for independent directors.

AIG’sretainer.

Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging
Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits directors from engaging in hedging transactions with respect to any AIG securities, including by trading in any derivative security relating to AIG’s securities. In particular, other than pursuant to an AIGa Company compensation or benefit plan or dividend distribution, directors may not acquire, write or otherwise enter into an instrument that has a value determined by reference to AIG securities, whether or not the instrument is issued by AIG. Examples include put and call options, forward contracts, collars and equity swaps relating to AIG securities. In addition, AIG’sthe Insider Trading Policy prohibits directors from pledging AIG securities and none of AIG’sthe directors have pledged any AIG securities.

Messrs. Duperreault and Zaffino, who are not independent directors, were not eligible to receive any compensation for their service as directors.

Frederic W. Cook & Co. (FW Cook) provided advice to the NCGC with respect to AIG director compensation and related market practices. Both the cash and equity components of independent director compensation remain subject to the shareholder-approved limits established in the 2013 Plan and will be subject to such limits established in the 2021 Plan. 

38 2021 Proxy Statement

Corporate Governance      Compensation of Directors

The following table contains information with respect to the compensation of the individuals who served as independent directors of AIG for all or part of 2020.

2020 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Independent Members of the
Board in 2020
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)(1)
Stock
Awards ($)(2)
All Other
Compensation ($)(3)
Total ($)
W. Don Cornwell155,000169,97710,000334,977
John H. Fitzpatrick125,000169,9770294,977
William G. Jurgensen165,000169,9770334,977
Christopher S. Lynch145,000169,9770314,977
Henry S. Miller125,000169,97710,000304,977
Linda A. Mills145,000169,97712,000326,977
Thomas F. Motamed125,000169,9770294,977
Suzanne Nora Johnson60,2880060,288
Peter R. Porrino150,385169,97712,000332,362
Amy L. Schioldager125,000169,9770294,977
Douglas M. Steenland385,000169,9770554,977
Therese M. Vaughan125,000169,9779,980304,957

(1)This column represents annual retainer fees, Independent Chair retainer fees and Board Committee Chair retainer fees. For Mr. Jurgensen, the amount includes (i) a prorated Board Committee Chair retainer fee for his service as Chair of the Audit Committee until the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting; and (ii) a prorated Committee Chair retainer fee for his service as Chair of the Risk and Capital Committee, effective as of the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting. For Mr. Porrino, the amount includes a prorated Board Committee Chair retainer fee for his service as Chair of the Audit Committee, effective as of the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting. For Ms. Nora Johnson, the amount includes prorated annual retainer fees for her service as director and as Chair of the Risk and Capital Committee until the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting. For Ms. Nora Johnson, the amount does not include (i) $813,153.06, which represents the value of shares of AIG common stock delivered when she ceased to be a member of the Board as of the 2020 Annual Meeting in accordance with the terms of DSUs previously granted; and (ii) $2,247.90, which represents a cash payment with respect to warrant equivalents granted to her related to DSUs granted prior to the distribution of warrants to all holders of AIG common stock in January 2011.

(2)This column represents the grant date fair value of DSUs granted in 2020 to independent directors determined in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC) Topic 718, based on the closing sale price of AIG common stock on the date of grant.

(3)This column represents charitable contributions disbursed by AIG during 2020 under AIG’s Matching Grants Program, through which AIG provides a two-for-one match on charitable donations in an amount of up to $10,000 per independent director annually. For 2020 only, the maximum amount of AIG’s charitable donation match was increased to $12,000 per employee or director annually.

2021 Proxy Statement39

2023.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2023 Independent Director Compensation

Corporate Governance     Corporate Governance Materials Available

Independent Directors
During 2023
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)(1)
Stock
Awards
($)(2)(3)
All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
Total
($)
Paola Bergamaschi$125,000 $184,977 $0 $309,977 
James Cole, Jr.$137,858 $184,977 $10,000 $332,835 
W. Don Cornwell$125,000 $184,977 $10,000 $319,977 
James (Jimmy) Dunne III$10,530$84,639$0$95,169
William G. Jurgensen(5)
$59,383 $0 $0 $59,383 
Linda A. Mills$155,000 $184,977 $10,000 $349,977 
Thomas F. Motamed(5)
$7,987 $0 $0 $7,987 
Diana M. Murphy$99,306 $213,334 $0 $312,640 
Peter R. Porrino$190,714 $184,977 $10,000 $385,691 
John G. Rice$392,198 $184,977 $10,000 $587,175 
Douglas M. Steenland(5)
$44,987 $0 $0 $44,987 
Therese M. Vaughan(5)
$125,000 $184,977 $0 $309,977 
Vanessa A. Wittman$99,306 $213,334 $0 $312,640 
(1)This column represents annual retainer fees, Lead Independent Director retainer fees and committee chair retainer fees, as applicable. For Mr. Cole, the amount includes a prorated committee chair fee for his service as Chair of the NCGC, effective upon his appointment to such position on Our Website

The following table sets forth information with respectMay 10, 2023. For Mr. Dunne, the amount includes a prorated Board retainer fee for his service as a director upon appointment to the stock awards outstanding atBoard, effective December 31, 20201, 2023. For Mr. Jurgensen, the amount includes prorated annual retainer fees for his service as director and as Chair of the independent directorsRisk Committee until the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting, and does not include $1,824,272.73, which represents the value of shares of AIG during 2020. None of the independent directors hold option awards.

OUTSTANDING STOCK AWARDS AT DECEMBER 31, 2020

Independent Members of the Board in 2020Deferred
Stock Units(1)
W. Don Cornwell30,856
John H. Fitzpatrick29,603
William G. Jurgensen25,785
Christopher S. Lynch31,016
Henry S. Miller31,016
Linda A. Mills20,675
Thomas F. Motamed15,529
Suzanne Nora Johnson0
Peter R. Porrino16,105
Amy L. Schioldager11,886
Douglas M. Steenland31,016
Therese M. Vaughan11,886

(1)DSUs shown include DSUs awarded in 2020 and prior years, any cash retainer amounts that a director elected to receive in DSUs and DSUs awarded as dividend equivalents. Receipt of shares of AIG common stock underlying DSUs is deferred until the director ceases to be a member of the Board unless the director has made an election to defer settlement to a later date. DSUs granted prior to May 15, 2013 were granted under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan and DSUs granted on or after May 15, 2013 were granted under the 2013 Plan.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON OUR WEBSITE

The following documents are available in the About Us—Leadership and Governance—Corporate Governance Documents section of AIG’s corporate website at www.aig.com or in print by writing to American International Group, Inc., 175 Water Street, New York, New York 10038, Attention: Investor Relations:

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

By-laws

Charters of the Audit Committee, the CMRC, the NCGC, the Risk and Capital Committee and the Technology Committee

Corporate Governance Guidelines

AIG’s Diversity/Equal Opportunity Policy

Related-Party Transactions Approval Policy

Social Media Guidelines

AIG’s Director, Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officer Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Employee Code of Conduct

Supplier Code of Conduct

Third Party Code of Conduct

Any amendment to AIG’s Director, Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officer Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and any waiver applicable to AIG’s directors, executive officers or senior financial officers will be posted on AIG’s website within the time period required by the SEC and the NYSE. Information on our website is not, and will not be deemedParent common stock delivered when he ceased to be a partmember of this Proxy Statement or incorporated into anythe Board as of our other filings.

40 2021 Proxy Statement

the 2023 Annual Meeting in accordance with the terms of the DSUs previously granted. For Mr. Motamed, the amount includes a prorated Board retainer fee for his service as a director until his retirement from the Board, effective January 23, 2023, and does not include $1,015,186.76, which represents the value of shares of AIG Parent common stock delivered when he retired from the Board in accordance with the terms of the DSUs previously granted. For Mses. Murphy and Wittman, the amounts include a prorated Board retainer fee for their service as a director upon appointment to the Board, effective March 16, 2023. For Mr. Porrino, the amount includes a prorated committee chair fee for his service as Chair of the Risk Committee, effective upon his appointment to such position on May 10, 2023. For Mr. Rice, the amount includes a prorated committee chair fee for his service as Chair of the NCGC until the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting. For Mr. Steenland, the amount includes a prorated Board retainer fee for his service as a director until the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(2)This column represents the grant date fair value of DSUs granted in 2023 to independent directors determined in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC) Topic 718, based on the closing sale price of AIG Parent common stock on the date of grant.
Year-Round Shareholder Engagement     Year-Round Shareholder Engagement Program

Year-Round

(3)At December 31, 2023, directors had outstanding stock awards as follows: (i) Paola Bergamaschi — 4,882; (ii) James Cole, Jr. — 11,353; (iii) W. Don Cornwell — 43,951; (iv) James (Jimmy) Dunne III — 1,283; (v) William G. Jurgensen — 34,531; (vi) Linda A. Mills — 35,837; (vii) Thomas F. Motamed — 29,542; (viii) Diana M. Murphy — 4,134; (ix) Peter R. Porrino — 38,146; (x) John G. Rice — 9,411; (xi) Douglas M. Steenland — 41,431; (xii)Therese M. Vaughan — 23,548; and (xiii) Vanessa A. Wittman — 4,134.
(4)This amount includes charitable contributions disbursed during 2023 under AIG’s Matching Grants Program, through which we provide a two-for-one match on charitable donations in an amount of up to $10,000 annually per independent director.
(5)Messrs. Jurgensen and Steenland did not stand for election at the 2023 Annual Meeting. Mr. Motamed retired from the Board of Directors in January 2023 and Ms. Vaughan retired from the Board of Directors in January 2024.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT33

Corporate Governance     Shareholder Engagement

Fostering long-term relationships with our shareholders and maintaining their trust is a priority for the Board. Direct engagement with shareholders helps us gain useful feedback on a wide variety of topics, including corporate governance, executive compensation, sustainability and corporate responsibility, human capital management matters, business strategy and performance and related matters.

Shareholder feedback also helps to better tailor the public information we disclose to address the interests and inquiries of shareholders.

YEAR-ROUND SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM

AIG hasEngagement

We have developed a robustsubstantial engagement program that ensures an active, year-round, openconstructive and ongoing dialogue with shareholders and other stakeholders.stakeholders throughout the year. These meetings strengthen AIG’sour relationship with our shareholders and reinforce our commitment to incorporate shareholder feedback into various decisions made by the Board and management.

Year Round Shareholder Engagement Program
2021 Proxy Statement
Annual Meeting
icon_arrow-right.jpg
41
icon_arrow-down.jpg
SummerFallWinterSpring
nAnalyze results of our annual meeting and review the key takeaways from proxy season engagement
nIdentify developments in corporate governance, executive compensation, other matters and voting trends
nManagement and Lead Independent Director conduct engagement meetings with shareholders
nObtain feedback on governance, executive compensation, sustainability and other matters
nReview feedback with meetings with shareholders to inform the Board's continuous review of governance and executive compensation
nImplement appropriate governance and compensation practice changes
nFile proxy statement, disclosing changes based on shareholder feedback
nConduct follow-up conversations with shareholders to address important annual meeting matters, as needed

Year-Round Shareholder Engagement     2020 Shareholder Engagement

2020 SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

During 2020, we continued our efforts to engage consistentlyOur Board prioritizes fostering and productivelysustaining long-term, positive relationships with our shareholders. Our then Independent Chairshareholders and maintaining their trust. Direct engagement with shareholders helps us gain useful feedback on a wide variety of topics, including corporate governance and Board practices, executive compensation, succession planning, business strategy and performance and related matters. Shareholder feedback also helps us better tailor our disclosure to address the Chairinterests and inquiries of shareholders.

In addition, our CMRC participated in some of theseshareholder engagement meetings, alongside our General Counsel, Chief Human Resources Officer, Corporate Secretary, Head of Executive Compensation, Head of Investor Relations and Chief Sustainability Officer.

These efforts are complementary to outreach conducted by members of senior management through AIG’sour Investor Relations department as they regularly meet with shareholders and participate in investor conferences in the U.S. and abroad.


34AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Corporate Governance     Shareholder Engagement
2023 Shareholder Engagement
During the spring and fall of 2023 as well as 2024, we continued our efforts to engage consistently and productively with our shareholders. Our Lead Independent Director participated in some of these engagement meetings, alongside our General Counsel, Chief Human Resources & Diversity Officer, Head of Executive Compensation, Head of Investor Relations and Chief Sustainability Officer. These meetings were intended to strengthen our relationship with our shareholders and develop a regular cadence for sustained outreach that positions us to engage consistently and productively with shareholders.
Reached out to 33 investors representing
68.9%
of our shares outstanding
Held 31meetings with investors owning more than
54.3%
of our shares outstanding
During 2023, we met with
each shareholder
who accepted our invitation
Lead Independent Director and CMRC Chair
participation
In 2020,addition to engagement with respect to governance, executive compensation and sustainability topics, in 2023, our Investor Relations department led over 200500 meetings with over 250150 equity shareholders representing approximately 5370 percent of our shares outstanding. Investor presentations are made available in the Investors—Webcasts and Presentations section of AIG’s corporateour website at www.aig.com.

www.aig.com.
42
icon_arrow-down.jpg
 
icon_arrow3-down.jpg
2021 Proxy Statement

icon_arrow-down.jpg
Year-Round Shareholder Engagement     2020 Shareholder Engagement

TOPICS COVERED DURING 2020 SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

Our engagement with shareholders in 2020 covered a broad set of topics, including corporate strategy, AIG’s response to the COVID-19 crisis, corporate governance, environmental and social issues, Board and management succession planning and executive compensation. Some key messages we heard, and examples of actions we took in response to this feedback, included:

Key MessagesAIG Actions
Concerns
ObjectivesKey Topics DiscussedKey Messages from shareholders about the stock price performance of AIG’s common stockShareholdersAnnounced in October 2020 that AIG is evaluating alternatives for the separation of our Life and Retirement business in a manner intended to unlock value for shareholders and other stakeholders and establish two strong, market-leading companies (See “Executive Summary—2020 Highlights—Announcement of Planned Life and Retirement Separation”)Board Responsiveness

Requests from

nFoster, promote and maintain positive relationships with shareholders for updates
nSolicit feedback on the Board’s plan with respecttopics that are of interest to management succession

our shareholders
Announced in October 2020 that Mr. Zaffino would become Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Duperreault would become Executive Chair and Mr. Steenland would become
nCorporate governance enhancements
nRole of Lead Independent Director each effective March 1, 2021 (See “Executive Summary—2020 Highlights—Executionand combined Chairman & CEO role
nTalent and succession planning
nExecutive compensation, 2023 say-on-pay vote outcome
nLong-term incentive equity mix for Chairman & CEO
nSustainability
nExpressed very high regard for Chairman & CEO performance
nNoted that negative 2023 say-on-pay vote reflected concerns with quantum and structure of Thoughtful, Well-Coordinated Succession Plan”)one-time award to Chairman & CEO
nResponded positively to enhanced Lead Independent Director responsibilities and revised committee charters and governance guidelines
nEncouraged more disclosure regarding talent and succession planning
nGenerally pleased with our compensation philosophy and program
nGenerally supported our sustainability-related projects and commitments
Strong interest
nCommitted that special, one-time awards will not be used absent extraordinary circumstances, such as in disclosures describing AIG’s response to the COVID-19 crisis, in particularconnection with respect to the impactstrategic transactions, contract extensions/renewals and for executive recruitment "make whole" awards, sign on both business strategybonuses and human capital management
Provided robust disclosures in this Proxy Statement relating to AIG’s response to the COVID-19 crisis (See “Executive Summary—2020 Highlights—AIG’s Response to COVID-19”)

Positive feedback related to the publication of AIG’s second TCFD reportpromotions

nEnhanced disclosure regarding talent and requests for expanded sustainability reporting

Performed AIG’s first materiality assessment to identify and prioritize ESG issues that are most significant for AIG’s long-term value creation and of most importance to our key stakeholders, which we see as an initial step towards expanded sustainability disclosures (See “Corporate Governance—Areas of Board Oversight—Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility”)
Support for AIG’s diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and requests for increased disclosure of demographic data and goals to help shareholders assess the success of those initiativesAgreed to publish our official consolidated EEO-1 Report on our website beginning with the 2019 and 2020 Reports, which are due in April 2021; and augmented disclosures in this Proxy Statement relating to the diversity of our Board to provide self-identified diversity information for each individual director (See “Executive Summary—Director Nominee Skills, Experience and Attributes”)succession planning

Our engagement meetings in 2020 also provided us with an opportunity to further understand our shareholders’ views with respect to our executive compensation programs, although shareholders inquired about the subject less frequently than in recent years. For details on the executive compensation-related feedback we heard from shareholders and how we responded see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Engagement with Shareholders on Executive Compensation Topics.”

Shareholder feedback is communicated directly to our directors and helps inform Board which, in turn informs the Board’s discussions on a rangevariety of key areas. AIGtopics. The Company and the Board remain committed to consistent and substantive shareholder engagement and to incorporating shareholder perspectives in our governance and compensation discussions and corporate responsibility initiatives.

2021 Proxy Statement43

decisions.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT35


Corporate Governance     Ownership of Certain Securities

Beneficial Owners

Ownership of Certain Securities

Beneficial Owners

The following table contains information regarding the only persons who, to theour knowledge, of AIG, beneficially own more than five percent of AIG Parent common stock at January 31, 2021.

Name and AddressShares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
NumberPercent
(%)
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
76,696,098(1)8.9
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
100 E. Pratt Street
Baltimore, MD 21202
64,038,129(2)7.4
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
80,337,158(3)9.3
2024.
Shares of AIG Parent Common Stock Beneficially Owned
Name and Address(1)Number of SharesBased on a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 5, 2021 by %
BlackRock, Inc. reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2020. Item 4 to this Schedule 13G/A provides details as to the voting and investment power of BlackRock, Inc. as well as the right to acquire AIG common stock within 60 days. All information provided in “Ownership of Certain Securities” with respect to this entity is provided based solely on information set forth in the Schedule 13G/A. This information may not be accurate or complete, and AIG takes no responsibility therefor and makes no representation as to its accuracy or completeness as of the date hereof or any subsequent date.
50 Hudson Yards
New York, NY 10001
62,640,753(1)
9.2%

Capital Research Global Investors
333 South Hope Street, 55th Fl
Los Angeles, CA 90071
41,770,175(2)
Based on a Schedule 13G filed on February 16, 2021 by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2020. Item 4 to this Schedule 13G provides details as to the voting and investment power of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. as well as the right to acquire AIG common stock within 60 days. All information provided in “Ownership of Certain Securities” with respect to this entity is provided based solely on information set forth in the Schedule 13G. This information may not be accurate or complete, and AIG takes no responsibility therefor and makes no representation as to its accuracy or completeness as of the date hereof or any subsequent date.6.1%

(3)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 10, 2021 by
The Vanguard Group reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2020. Item 4 to this Schedule 13G/A provides details as to the voting and investment power of The
100 Vanguard Group as well as the right to acquire AIG common stock within 60 days. All information provided in “Ownership of Certain Securities” with respect to this entity is provided based solely on information set forth in the Schedule 13G/A. This information may not be accurate or complete, and AIG takes no responsibility therefor and makes no representation as to its accuracy or completeness as of the date hereof or any subsequent date.Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
71,962,174(3)
10.5%

(1)All information provided with respect to this entity is based solely on information disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 25, 2024, by BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock) reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2023. Item 4 to this Schedule 13G/A provides details as to the voting and investment power of BlackRock as well as the right to acquire AIG Parent common stock within 60 days.
(2)All information provided with respect to this entity is based solely on information disclosed in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2024, by Capital Research Global Investors reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2023. Item 4 to this Schedule 13G provides details as to the voting and investment power of Capital Research Global Investors as well as the right to acquire AIG Parent common stock within 60 days.
(3)All information provided with respect to this entity is based solely on information disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024, by The Vanguard Group reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2023. Item 4 to this Schedule 13G/A provides details as to the voting and investment power of The Vanguard Group as well as the right to acquire AIG Parent common stock within 60 days.
From time to time, we engage in ordinary course, arms-lengtharm’s-length transactions with entities or affiliates of entities that are the beneficial ownerowners of more than five percent of our outstanding common stock.

44 2021 Proxy Statement

36AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Corporate Governance     Ownership of Certain Securities

Beneficial Owners

The following table summarizes the ownership of AIG Parent common stock by (1) each of our current directors, (2) each of our named executive officers included in the 20202023 Summary Compensation Table in “Executive“2023 Executive Compensation—2020 Compensation”2023 Summary Compensation Table” and (3) our current directors and executive officers as a group.

 AIG Common Stock Owned Beneficially
as of January 31, 2021
 
Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership(1)(2)
Percent (%) of
Class
 
James Cole, Jr.0 
W. Don Cornwell31,121(3) 
Douglas A. Dachille260,1270.03 
Brian Duperreault1,091,7670.13 
Lucy Fato93,9140.01 
John H. Fitzpatrick29,857(3) 
William G. Jurgensen61,0070.01 
Christopher S. Lynch34,438(3) 
Mark D. Lyons114,8560.01 
Henry S. Miller31,283(3) 
Linda A. Mills20,853(3) 
Thomas F. Motamed41,503(3) 
Peter R. Porrino17,353(3) 
Amy L. Schioldager11,988(3) 
Douglas M. Steenland36,083(3) 
Therese M. Vaughan12,988(3) 
Peter Zaffino526,7160.06 
All current directors and current executive officers of AIG as a group (23 individuals)2,868,4320.33 
The directors, named executive officers, and executive officers, have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock listed.
AIG Parent Common Stock Owned Beneficially as of January 31, 2024
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership(1)
Amount% of equity securities shown includes (i) shares of AIG common stock subject to options which may be exercised within 60 days as follows: Dachille—133,256 shares, Duperreault—851,170 shares, Fato—65,321 shares, Lyons—112,379 shares, Zaffino—466,256 shares and allClass
Paola Bergamaschi4,907*
James Cole, Jr.11,411*
W. Don Cornwell44,181*
James (Jimmy) Dunne III1,289*
Lucy Fato(2)
627,809*
Shane Fitzsimons(3)
366,159*
Kevin T. Hogan718,128*
John (Chris) Inglis— *
Mark D. Lyons(4)
— *
David McElroy535,876*
Linda A. Mills36,020*
Diana M. Murphy4,155*
Peter R. Porrino39,089*
Sabra R. Purtill77,112*
John G. Rice19,461*
Claude Wade32,050*
Vanessa A. Wittman4,155*
Peter Zaffino1,935,013*
All current directors and current executive officers of AIG as a group—1,830,711group (24 individuals)4,144,313*
*None of the directors, the named executive officers or the directors and executive officers together as a group owned more than one percent of our common stock as of January 31, 2024.
(1)Amount of equity securities shown includes (i) shares of AIG Parent common stock subject to options which may be exercised within 60 days as follows: Fato445,473 shares; Fitzsimons —209,928 shares; Hogan—450,697 shares; McElroy—359,180 shares; Purtill—68,794 shares; Wade—23,496 shares and Zaffino—1,429,593 shares and all current directors and current executive officers as a group—2,782,730 shares; and (ii) DSUs granted to each independent director with delivery of the underlying AIG Parent common stock deferred until such director ceases to be a member of the Board, as follows: Bergamaschi—4,907 shares; Cole—11,411 shares; Cornwell—44,181 shares; Dunne —1,289 shares; Mills—36,020 shares; Murphy—4,155 shares; Porrino39,089 shares; Rice—9,461 shares and Wittman— 4,155 shares.
(2)Ms. Fato ceased being an executive officer of AIG on September 30, 2023.
(3)Mr. Fitzsimons left the Company for medical reasons, effective July 1, 2023. The amount of equity securities shown are based on his holdings as of such date, as adjusted to reflect the subsequent settlement of certain outstanding equity awards under our LTI plan.
(4)Mr. Lyons' employment terminated on January 24, 2023.
Corebridge Common Stock Owned Beneficially as of January 31, 2024
Amount and (ii) DSUs grantedNature of
Beneficial Ownership(1)
% of Class
Kevin T. Hogan184,206*
Sabra R. Purtill87,707*
All current directors and current executive officers as a group (2 individuals)271,913*
*Neither of the named executive officers or the two executive officers together owned more than one percent of Corebridge's common stock as of January 31, 2024.
(1)Amount of equity securities shown includes shares of Corebridge common stock subject to options which may be exercised within 60 days as follows: Hogan—54,024 shares.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT37


Proposal 2
Advisory Vote to each independent director with deliveryApprove Named Executive Officer Compensation
What am I voting on?
We are asking shareholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the 2023 compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.
Voting Recommendation pg34-graphics_votingcheck.jpg
The Board unanimously recommends a voteFORthe underlying AIG common stock deferred until such director ceases to be a member2023 compensation of the Board as follows: Cornwell—31,121 shares, Fitzpatrick—29,857 shares, Jurgensen—26,007 shares, Lynch—31,283 shares, Miller—31,283 shares, Mills—20,853 shares, Motamed—16,503 shares, Porrino—17,353 shares, Schioldager—11,988 shares, Steenland—31,283 shares and Vaughan—11,988 shares.our named executives.

(2)Amount of equity securities shown excludes the following securities owned by or held in trust for members of the named individual’s immediate family as to which securities such individual has disclaimed beneficial ownership: Fitzpatrick—100 shares.

(3)Less than .01 percent.

2021 Proxy Statement45

DelinquentThis advisory vote to approve executive compensation is commonly referred to as the "say-on-pay" vote and is being requested in accordance with the requirements of Section 16(a) Reports

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a)14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange(the Exchange Act) requires directors, certain officers, and greater than ten percent holdersthe related rules of AIG common stock to file reports with respect to their ownership of AIG equity securities. Based solelythe SEC. This advisory vote is not binding on the reviewBoard or the Company. However, the CMRC will consider the outcome of the Forms 3, 4 and 5 and amendments thereto furnished to AIG and certain representations made to AIG, AIG believes thatvote when considering future executive compensation arrangements. We currently hold our say-on-pay votes on an annual basis, which is consistent with the only filing deficiency under Section 16(a) by our directors, officers and greater than ten percent holders during 2020 was a late filing by amendment toresults of the original Form 3 filed by Kevin T. Hogan in 2013 relating solely to the number of AIG warrants held directly by Mr. Hoganmost recent vote at the time he became an AIG executive officer.

Relationships and Related-Party Transactions

RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS APPROVAL POLICY

The Board2019 Annual Meeting on the frequency of AIG has adopted a related-party transactions approval policy. Under this written policy, any transaction between AIG or any of its subsidiaries and any director or executive officer, or their related persons that involves more than $120,000 and would be required to be disclosed in AIG’s Proxy Statement must be approved by the NCGC (or, in certain circumstances where it is impractical or undesirable to seek the approval of the full NCGC, by its Chair, acting on behalf of the full NCGC). In determining whether or not to approve a related-party transaction, the NCGC or its Chair, as applicable, considers:

Whether the terms of the transaction are fair to AIG and on termsour say-on-pay vote. This practice will continue at least as favorable as would apply ifuntil the other party was not or did not have an affiliation with a director, executive officer or employeenext vote on the frequency of AIG;

Whether there are demonstrable business reasons for AIG to enter into the transaction;

Whether the transaction would impair the independence of a director; and

Whether the transaction would present an improper conflict of interest for any director, executive officer or employee of AIG, taking into account the size of the transaction, the overall financial position of the director, executive officer or employee, the direct or indirect nature of the interest of the director, executive officer or employee in the transaction, the ongoing nature of any proposed relationship and any other factors the NCGC or its Chair, as applicable, deems relevant.

AIG did not have any related-party transactions in 2020.

46 2021 Proxy Statement

Our Executive Officers

Our Executive Officers

Each of AIG’s executive officers is elected to a one-year term and servesfuture say-on-pay votes, which will occur at the pleasure of the Board. There are no arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which the executive officer was elected to such position. Information concerning the executive officers of AIG as of the date hereof is set forth below.

NameTitle and Biographical InformationAgeServed
as
Officer
Since

BRIAN DUPERREAULT

 

 

Executive Chair

For information on Mr. Duperreault’s experience, please see “Proposal 1—Election of Directors.”

732017

PETER ZAFFINO

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

For information on Mr. Zaffino’s experience, please see “Proposal 1—Election of Directors.”

542017

MARK D. LYONS

 

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Mark D. Lyons joined AIG in June 2018 as Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary and was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in December 2018. From 2012 until joining AIG, Mr. Lyons served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer at Arch Capital Group, Ltd., a Bermuda-based global insurance company. Prior to that role, Mr. Lyons had served in various capacities within Arch Insurance U.S. operations, including as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Arch Worldwide Insurance Group. Prior to joining Arch Capital Group, Mr. Lyons held various positions at Zurich U.S., Berkshire Hathaway and AIG.

 

642018

2021 Proxy Statement47

2025 Annual Meeting.

Our Executive Officers

NameTitle and Biographical InformationAgeServed
as
Officer
Since

DOUGLAS A. DACHILLE

 

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer

Douglas A. Dachille joined AIG in September 2015 as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer. Mr. Dachille served as Chief Executive Officer of First Principles Capital Management, LLC (First Principles), an investment management firm, from September 2003 until its acquisition by AIG in September 2015. Prior to co-founding First Principles, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Zurich Capital Markets. Mr. Dachille began his career at JPMorgan Chase, where he served as Global Head of Proprietary Trading and Co-Treasurer.

562015

LUCY FATO

 

 

Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Global Head of Communications and Government Affairs

Lucy Fato joined AIG in October 2017 as Executive Vice President & General Counsel and also served as Interim Head of Human Resources from October 2018 to July 2019. She took on additional responsibilities as Global Head of Communications and Government Affairs in November 2020. From October 2016 until joining AIG, she was Managing Director, Head of the Americas and General Counsel at Nardello & Co. LLC, a global private investigative firm, where she remains on the Advisory Board. Previously, she worked at S&P Global (formerly known as McGraw Hill Financial), a financial information and analytics corporation, where she served as Executive Vice President & General Counsel from August 2014 to October 2015, and as a Consultant from October 2015 to October 2016. Prior to that, Ms. Fato was Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. from 2005 to 2014. Ms. Fato began her legal career at Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP where she spent fourteen years, including five as a partner in the Capital Markets Group.

 

542017

SHANE FITZSIMONS

 

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer

Shane Fitzsimons joined AIG as Global Head of Shared Services in July 2019 and currently serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer. He also oversees AIG’s Shared Services, Financial Planning and Analysis and Corporate Real Estate groups. Prior to joining AIG, he was Group Synergy Officer at TATA Group, an Indian multinational conglomerate from April 2018 to June 2019. Previously, Mr. Fitzsimons served in various operational and financial leadership roles at General Electric Company from March 1994 to September 2017. Prior to his time at General Electric Company, Mr. Fitzsimons spent seven years in public accounting in Ireland and the Netherlands.

 

532020

48 2021 Proxy Statement

Our Executive Officers

NameTitle and Biographical InformationAgeServed
as
Officer
Since

KEVIN T. HOGAN

 

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer, Life and Retirement

Kevin Hogan joined AIG as Chief Executive Officer of Global Consumer Insurance in October 2013 and currently serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer, Life and Retirement. Prior to joining AIG, Mr. Hogan was Chief Executive Officer, Global Life for Zurich Insurance Group. Prior to Zurich, Mr. Hogan was previously employed by AIG where he began his career and held various positions in Property Casualty and Life and Retirement.

 

582013

KAREN LING

 

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer

Karen Ling joined AIG as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer in July 2019. From July 2014 until joining AIG, she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer at Allergan plc., a pharmaceutical company. Prior to Allergan, Ms. Ling was Senior Vice President, Human Resources, for Merck & Co., Inc.’s Global Human Health and Consumer Care businesses worldwide. She previously served as Group Vice President, Global Compensation & Benefits at Schering-Plough Corporation prior to its acquisition by Merck & Co., Inc. Prior to joining Schering-Plough Corporation, Ms. Ling held various positions at Wyeth, LLC.

 

572019

DAVID MCELROY

 

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer, General Insurance

David McElroy joined AIG in October 2018 as President and Chief Executive Officer of Lexington Insurance Company and was promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer of North America General Insurance in June 2019. He was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer, General Insurance in August 2020. Prior to joining AIG, Mr. McElroy served as Executive Chairman of Arch Insurance Group Inc. from January 2018 to July 2018 and as Vice Chairman of Arch Worldwide Insurance Group from October 2017 to December 2017. He previously served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Arch Worldwide Insurance Group from September 2012 to September 2017. Arch Insurance Group, Inc. and Arch Worldwide Insurance Group are divisions of Arch Capital Group, Ltd., a Bermuda based global insurance company. Prior to joining Arch Capital Group, Mr. McElroy served in various leadership roles at The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Reliance National Insurance Company and The Chubb Corporation.

 

622020

2021 Proxy Statement49

Our Executive Officers

NameTitle and Biographical InformationAgeServed
as
Officer
Since

NAOHIRO MOURI

 

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Auditor

Naohiro Mouri joined AIG in July 2015 as Senior Managing Director of Asia Pacific Internal Audit and was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Auditor in March 2018. From November 2013 to July 2015, he was a Statutory Executive Officer, Senior Vice President and Chief Auditor for MetLife Japan and, from July 2007 to November 2013, he was Chief Auditor at JP Morgan Chase for Asia Pacific. He has also held chief auditor positions at Shinsei Bank, Morgan Stanley Japan and Deutsche Bank Japan.

 

622018

JOHN P. REPKO

 

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer

John P. Repko joined AIG in September 2018 as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer. Additionally, he leads Global Sourcing. Prior to joining AIG, he was Vice President and Global Chief Information Officer of Johnson Controls International plc, a technology and industrial company, taking up this position with the merger of Johnson Controls, Inc. and Tyco International plc. Previously, he worked at Tyco International plc as Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer and Enterprise Transformation Leader from 2012 to 2016. Prior to joining Tyco International plc, Mr. Repko held various chief information officer roles at Covance Inc., SES Global and General Electric’s GE Americom division.

 

582018

50 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive Compensation     Letter from the Compensation and Management Resources Committee

Executive Compensation

LETTER FROM THE COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT RESOURCES COMMITTEE

The Board and the CMRC remain committed to overseeingbelieve that our executive compensation programsprogram has effectively aligned pay with performance, while facilitating the retention of highly talented executives who are critical to our long-term success. Accordingly, the Board recommends that attract, motivate, reward and incentivize highly qualified leaders, to working with management on initiatives and progress related to human capital management, including diversity, equity and inclusion and to taking into accountshareholders vote FOR the experience and feedback of our shareholders.

Uponfollowing resolution:

RESOLVED: that the onsetshareholders of the COVID-19 crisis and its collateral effects on the global economy in the first quarter of 2020, we pivoted quickly and adapted our approach to executive compensation to address AIG’s changing priorities, while continuing to reinforce the importance of AIG’s in-flight transformation initiatives. The CMRC increased our meeting cadence in 2020, meeting nine times during the year, and deferred taking certain critical compensation-related actions, so that we could monitor the evolving crisis in real-time to ensure we made prudent, informed decisions in a challenging year.

While the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the global economy raised challenges for AIG and the price of our common stock of AIG Parent approve, on an advisory basis, the strong business fundamentals and substantial work done to de-risk the company’s balance sheet since 2017 leftcompensation of AIG well-positioned to navigate the crisis with remarkable strength and resiliency. In 2020, theParent’s named executives continued to work to strengthen AIG’s core businesses and leverage our financial position to strategically deploy our capital in alignment with three strategic priorities: liquidity, capital preservation and de-risking. The named executives also drove significant accomplishments across the company, including:

Implemented a robust response to the COVID-19 crisis that provided critical support to our clients, policyholders, partners and communities and prioritized the health, safety and mental well-being of our employees.

Took concrete actions to support our diverse employees and position AIGexecutive officers, as an ally with movements for racial equality following eventsdisclosed in the summer of 2020 that exposed the depth of racial injustice that continues to exist in the U.S. and around the world.

Executed a thoughtful, well-coordinated succession plan, leading to Mr. Zaffino becoming President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Duperreault becoming Executive Chair and Mr. Steenland becoming Lead Independent Director, in each case effective March 1, 2021.

Completed a comprehensive review of AIG’s composite structure, leading to the October 2020 announcement of AIG’s intention to separate its Life and Retirement business from AIG, which we hope will unlock value for our shareholders.

The CMRC’s 2020 compensation decisions, which are outlined in detail in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, that follows, balanced rewarding our named executives for their extraordinary leadership through the unprecedented COVID-19 crisis with taking into accountcompensation tables and in the experience of our shareholdersrelated narrative disclosures contained in a year of significant global market volatility.

Looking ahead, the CMRC will continue to refine and evolve its compensation programs to ensure alignment with our transformation to become a leading insurance franchise and a top performing company.

Compensation and Management Resources Committee
American International Group, Inc.

W. Don Cornwell (Chair)

Henry S. Miller

Linda A. Mills

Thomas F. Motamed

Therese M. Vaughan

2021 Proxy Statement51

this Proxy Statement.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

38AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT


Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion
and Analysis

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OUR COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AT A GLANCE

Named Executives in 202052
At a Glance
AIG’s Journey | Aligning AIG’s Compensation Programs with our Transformation Journey | The Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on our
Our Philosophy | Compensation Best Practices | Balanced Compensation Framework | Use
2020 Target Direct Compensation | 2020
2021
Role of the CMRC | The Annual Process |
70

NAMED EXECUTIVES IN 2020

Named ExecutiveTitle as of December 31, 2020
Brian DuperreaultChief Executive Officer(1)
Named Executives in 2023(1)
Mark D. Lyons
05_424782-1_photo_letter_zaffino.jpg
Peter Zaffino
Chairman & Chief
Executive Officer
05_424782-1_photo_sabrapurtill.jpg
Sabra R. Purtill
Executive Vice President and& Chief
Financial Officer
Peter Zaffino
05_424782-1_Photo_HoganK.jpg
Kevin T. Hogan(2)
President and Global& Chief Operating Officer(2)Executive Officer,
Corebridge Financial, Inc.
Douglas A. Dachille
pg36-photo_DavidM.jpg
David McElroy
Executive Vice President and& Chief InvestmentExecutive Officer, General Insurance
Lucy Fato
05_424782-1_photo_claudewade.jpg
Claude Wade
Executive Vice President, General Counsel &Chief Digital Officer and Global Head of Communications and Government Affairs(3)
(1)Mr. Duperreault became Executive Chair, effective March 1, 2021.

(2)Mr. Zaffino was promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer, effective March 1, 2021.

(3)Ms. Fato’s role was expanded to include Global Head of Communications and Government Affairs, effective September 10, 2020.

52 2021 Proxy StatementBusiness Operations

Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

AIG’s Journey

AIG demonstrated resiliency in 2020 made possible by work to strengthen fundamentals since late 2017
As the COVID-19 crisis spread, AIG pivoted to focus on liquidity, capital preservation and de-risking

Beginning in late 2017, AIG undertook significant foundational work under a committed new leadership team to instill a culture of underwriting excellence(1)Our former executive officers who are 2023 named executives are Shane Fitzsimons and adjustMark D. Lyons, our risk tolerances to minimize volatility. As a result of that work, AIG delivered improved financialformer Chief Financial Officer and TSR performance in 2019Interim Chief Financial Officer, respectively, and entered 2020 in a robust capital and liquidity position. As 2020 began, the leadership team turned their focus to further strengtheningLucy Fato, our balance sheet, unlocking shareholder value and pursuing strategic change through our multi-year operational transformation initiative, AIG 200.

In the first quarter of 2020, the COVID-19 crisis manifested as an unprecedented catastrophe with uncertain severity and duration and had a significant effect on the global economy. Our strong business fundamentals and substantial work done to de-risk the company’s balance sheet left AIG well-positioned to navigate the crisis with remarkable strength and resiliency. Early on in the crisis, the Board and management identified three priority focus areas for AIG—liquidity, capital preservation and de-risking—aimed at protecting and strengthening our balance sheet to enable AIG to effectively manage through the COVID-19 crisis and its collateral effects.

former Vice Chair.
Focusing on liquidity and capital preservation provided financial flexibility to weather the volatility of the global capital markets and the ramifications of the COVID-19 crisis on our various lines of business.

Focusing on de-risking enabled our operating companies to maintain their financial strength by reducing market risk exposures, optimizing reinsurance programs, accelerating remediation actions on unprofitable lines of business, divesting legacy liabilities and leveraging transformational initiatives to maximize short-term expense reductions.

Early on in the crisis, the global markets suffered an extreme downturn and AIG’s stock price reflected this turmoil, erasing the emerging positive effects of our transformational efforts. However, we continued to work to strengthen our core businesses and leverage our financial position to strategically deploy our capital. Beyond AIG’s focus on maintaining balance sheet strength, AIG implemented a robust response to the COVID-19 crisis by providing critical support to our employees. AIG prioritized the health and safety of our employees by quickly and effectively transitioning 90 percent of our employees to remote work, providing a $500 grant to all employees globally in March 2020, establishing a pandemic loan program and providing employees with two additional paid holidays in April and October 2020 to help them focus on mental health and well-being. Additionally, following events in the summer of 2020 that exposed the depth of racial inequality that(2)Mr. Hogan continues to exist inbe an executive officer because Corebridge is the U.S. and around the world, AIG took concrete actions to support its diverse employees and position AIG as an ally with movementsholding company for racial equality.

Over the course of 2020, we also undertook a comprehensive review of our composite structure as both a property and casualty company and a life and retirement company. We concluded that, over time, a separation of these two businesses could unlock value for our shareholders that could be greater than maintaining our current structure. As such, in October 2020, we announced our intent to separate the Life and Retirement business from AIG. Asand Life and Retirement remains a resilient AIG emerges from this period of uncertainty, we remain focused on our strong capital positionprincipal business unit and AIG 200, enabling the pursuit of longer-term strategies while delivering superior valueconsolidated segment. Mr. Hogan reports to our clients, distribution partners, shareholdersMr. Zaffino.

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT39

Compensation Discussion and other stakeholders.

In October 2020, AIG also executed on a thoughtful, well-coordinated succession plan, announcing that Mr.Analysis     Executive Summary

Executive Summary
Our Named Executive Officers
Current Named Executives
Peter Zaffino would become, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Sabra R. Purtill, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Kevin T. Hogan, President and Chief Executive Officer, Corebridge Financial, Inc.
David McElroy, Executive Vice President & Chief Executive Officer, General Insurance
Claude Wade, Executive Vice President, Chief Digital Officer and Global Head of Business Operations
Former Executive Officers
Shane Fitzsimons, Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Mark Lyons, Former Interim Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Global Chief Actuary and Head of Portfolio Management
Lucy Fato, Former Vice Chair
Chief Financial Officer Transitions
During 2023, three individuals held the role of Principal Financial Officer at AIG Parent, as described below.
nOn January 1, 2023, Mr. Duperreault would becomeFitzsimons was serving as Executive ChairVice President and Chief Financial Officer. In January 2023, Mr. Steenland would become Lead Independent Director,Fitzsimons began a temporary medical leave of absence. Effective July 1, 2023, Mr. Fitzsimons left the Company for medical reasons. Mr. Fitzsimons passed away on October 27, 2023.
nMr. Lyons was appointed Interim Chief Financial Officer effective January 10, 2023, in each caseaddition to his role as Executive Vice President, Global Chief Actuary and Head of Portfolio Management. On January 24, 2023, we terminated Mr. Lyons' employment after we became aware that he violated his confidentiality/non-disclosure obligations to the Company. These violations were unrelated to our financial statements, financial reporting generally and related disclosure controls and procedures, or reserves.
nMs. Purtill was appointed Interim Chief Financial Officer effective MarchJanuary 25, 2023. When Mr. Fitzsimons stepped down from his position due to medical reasons, Ms. Purtill was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on a permanent basis, effective July 1, 2021. The Board is confident2023.
40AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     Executive Summary
2023 Executive Compensation At-a-Glance
Chairman & CEO Annual Target Direct Compensation as of December 31, 2023Average Annual Target Direct Compensation of Other Current Named Executives as of December 31, 2023
03_424782-3_pie_executivecompataglance.jpg
2023 Short-Term Incentive (STI) Program
Target Short-Term Incentive Award ($)
x.jpg
Business Performance Score (0-150%)
x.jpg
Individual Performance Score (0-150%)
equals.jpg
Actual Short-Term Incentive Award ($) (up to 200%)
Business Performance ScorecardsIndividual Performance Scorecards: Four Core Areas
General InsuranceCorebridgeCorporate
1.Financial
2.Strategic
3.Operational
4.Organizational

nAccident Year Combined Ratio (AYCR), as adjusted*
nCalendar Year Combined Ratio
nDiluted Normalized Adjusted After-tax Income (AATI) Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders Per Share*
nCorebridge Normalized Adjusted Return on Average Equity (RoAE)*
nCorebridge General Operating Expenses (GOE)*
nCorebridge Normalized Reported Adjusted After-tax Operating Income (AATOI) Attributable to Corebridge Common Shareholders Per Share*
nWeighted average of GI and Corebridge Performance
nDiluted Normalized AATI Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders Per Share*
nAdjusted Return on Common Equity (ROCE)*
nAIG Parent General Operating Expenses (GOE)
All awards are subject to an overall cap of 200% of target


*Items in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis that AIG has the right teamare marked with an asterisk are non-GAAP financial measures which are used as performance measures in our incentive compensation programs. We make adjustments to lead AIG through the next phaseU.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of our journey.

Please see “Executive Summary—2020 Highlights” beginning on page 2these metrics. See Appendix A for an overviewexplanation and/or a reconciliation of AIG’s key 2020 performance highlights.

2021 Proxy Statement53

how these metrics are calculated from our audited financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT41

Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Aligning AIG’s

Compensation Programs with our Transformation Journey

AsDiscussion and Analysis     Executive Summary

2023 Annual Long-Term Incentive (LTI) Award Allocation(1)(2)

04 424782-3_gfx_LTIncentiveAward_Opt-2_A_A.jpg
(1)Reflects LTI award allocations to current named executives.
(2)In 2023, Mr. Hogan's awards consisted of 50 percent Performance Share Units (PSUs) granted by AIG continues its journey to become a leading insurance franchiseParent, and a top-performing company, the CMRC refines and evolves the compensation programs to ensure alignment. This was particularly true in 2020, as the COVID-19 crisis led the CMRC to approve changes to our compensation programs to ensure they reflected our strategic priorities in an uncertain operating environment and the effective alignment of pay and performance.

54 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

The Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on our Executive Compensation Programs

The onset of the COVID-19 crisis and its collateral effects on the global economy in the first quarter of 2020 required the CMRC to pivot and adapt its approach to executive compensation to address AIG’s changing priorities, while continuing to reinforce the importance of transformation initiatives. Per its usual timelines, target compensation levels were approved in the first months of the new year with incentive plan goals due to be approved in March. However, by March, uncertainties and growing concerns about the magnitude of the potential impact of the COVID-19 crisis led the CMRC to delay the finalization of the STI plan and PSU performance metrics, while proceeding with the grant25 percent each of stock options and RSUs granted by Corebridge.

42AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     Executive Summary
2023 Performance and Pay Alignment Highlights
We continued to execute on key strategic initiatives in order2023 while continuing to project stability to the leadership teamdeliver exceptional operational and employee base. This bifurcated incentive issuance process provided AIG with time to better assess and forecast the potential impact of the COVID-19 crisis on AIG’s short-, medium- and long-term business strategies, and develop metrics that supported our most urgent corporate priorities. The CMRC revisited the STI plan and PSU design and metrics at four meetings between March and July. In May, the CMRC approved the performance metrics for our STI program, which were aligned with AIG’s three priority focus areas of liquidity, capital preservation and de-risking. The CMRC designed a disciplined discretion framework for the STI program, so that overall business performance and business unit performance would be measured by assessing quantifiable results against internal expectations in the context of the COVID-19 crisis. In July, as AIG and the CMRC had better insight into the broad range of potential long-term impacts of the COVID-19 crisis on our business, the CMRC approved metrics for the 2020 PSUs, incorporating Relative Tangible BVPS and relative TSR metrics, to mitigate the need to calibrate absolute long-term goals in the midst of continued uncertainty, and an absolute metric relating to AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings*. While the operating environment remained uncertain, these areas of focus are integral to AIG’s long-term, sustainable growth and resiliency.

financial results.
Three-year Total Shareholder Return (TSR) of 92.1% ranking in the top quartile relative to peers and outperforming the S&P 500
Important aspects
Execution of Multiple, Highly Complex Strategic Initiatives
We repositioned our 2020 executive compensation framework remained consistentportfolio of businesses for sustainable, profitable growth with the frameworkdivestitures of Validus Re. for 2019:total cash consideration of $3.3 billion and CRS for gross proceeds of $234 million as well as the transfer of Private Client Select to an independent Managing General Agent platform.
Collectively these transactions streamline our business models, simplify our portfolios and reduce our volatility.
Strong Performance in General Insurance resulting from Significant Improvement in Underwriting Income
Our continued discipline and commitment to underwriting excellence yielded outstanding results. Our 2023 combined ratio of 90.6 improved as compared to 91.9 in 2022; AYCR, as adjusted* of 87.7 improved 1.0 point compared to 88.7 in 2022; General Insurance achieved $2.3 billion in underwriting income, up 15 percent year over year.
Continued Balanced Capital Management Supporting Financial Strength, Growth and Shareholder Return
In 2023, we repurchased $3.0 billion of AIG Parent common stock and paid $1.0 billion in dividends. We also increased our quarterly cash dividend by 12.5 percent to $0.36 per share in the second quarter.
We reduced general borrowings by $1.4 billion.
Continued Progress Towards Deconsolidation and Separation of Corebridge
We completed three secondary offerings of Corebridge common stock in 2023, resulting in gross proceeds of $2.9 billion. Also in 2023, Corebridge made $315 million of common stock share repurchases from AIG. Our ownership of Corebridge was reduced to 52.2 percent as of December 31, 2023.
STI awards continued to be based on a combination of Business and Individual Performance Scores combined on a multiplicative basis, meaning if either element is zero, no STI award is earned;
The Individual Performance Score component of STI awards continued to assess performance under four pillars—Financial, Strategic, Operational and Organizational—which reflect various important initiatives for AIG including employee engagement, well-being, and diversity, equity and inclusion;
LTI awards continued to be granted in a combination of PSUs (50%), stock options (25%) and RSUs (25%);
2020 PSUs continued to be subject to performance measures combining financial, operational and TSR metrics; and
Performance requirements for the 2018 and 2019 PSUs granted to our named executives remained unchanged and the CMRC did not use discretion when adjudicating the performance of the 2018 PSU awards for our named executives.
However, other aspects of our 2020 program and some of the underlying details changed to align with our priority focus areas within the context of an uncertain operating environment as a result of the COVID-19 crisis:
The Business Performance Score component of the 2020 STI plan was assessed on a company-wide basis rather than on a business unit basis, reflecting our enterprise-wide focus on liquidity, capital preservation and de-risking;
Business unit accountability was maintained, but through the Financial pillar of our Individual Performance Score assessment in the STI plan in 2020;
Overall business performance and business unit performance were assessed using a disciplined discretion framework that assessed quantifiable results against internal expectations with respect to AIG’s capital and liquidity position and risk profile in the context of the COVID-19 crisis; and
The 2020 PSUs granted as part of our LTI awards were subject to new performance metrics: Relative Tangible BVPS* growth, AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings* and TSR. Both BVPS and TSR will be measured on a relative basis, mitigating the need to calibrate long-term goals that might ultimately be too challenging or too easy to attain. The AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings* goals were unchanged from those developed as part of AIG 200 when it was announced in 2019.

2021 Proxy Statement55

Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

2020 Short-Term Incentive Plan

This approach means that:

Financial performance is considered as partOur incentive plans reflect measures of both the business performance assessment on a company-wide basis,success directly aligned to our strategic priorities and the individual performance assessment as it pertains to each named executive’s area of accountability;

No payout is earned if the Business Performance Score is zero (even if the Individual Performance Score is greater than zero); and

Individual Performance Score cannot account for more than one-third of the total amount earned.

2020 Performance Share Units

*We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric to ensure that results properly reflect management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.

56 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

The CMRC believes that these changes collectively resulted in an executive compensation framework for 2020 that appropriately balanced a performance orientation and pay for performance mindsetalignment with the uncertainty that dominated the year, requiring agility from our leaders.

Additional information on the programs in place for 2020 can be found under “—2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes,” beginning on page 66.

Overview of 2020 Compensation Program and Decisions

Our executive compensation program is designed to incentivize and reward performance that supports long-term, sustained value creation, while taking into account the experience of our shareholders. This is achieved through a balanced pay mix that is weighted towards at-risk pay, featuring variable and performance-based pay and a combination of STI and LTIThese achievements, combined with individual performance, metrics that focus on insurance profitability and operational excellence.

The table below summarizes our 2020 compensation program and decisions for each named executive. Ms. Fato was the only named executivecontributed to receive an individual modifier to her target LTI award for 2020. In granting this individual modifier of 125 percent, the CMRC recognized the additional responsibilities she assumed in October 2018 as Interim Head of Human Resources pending the arrival of Karen Ling in July 2019 and was in recognition of her positive performance in that role, including leading the search process that led to the hiring of Ms. Ling.

2020 Compensation ComponentDuperreault Lyons Zaffino Dachille Fato(1)
Target compensation, informed by market practices in our peer group
Base Salary$1,600,000 $1,000,000 $1,400,000 $1,250,000 $1,000,000
Target STI$4,500,000 $1,900,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $1,900,000
Target LTI$12,900,000 $3,300,000 $8,600,000 $4,250,000 $3,300,000
Target Direct Compensation$19,000,000 $6,200,000 $13,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,200,000
Compensation decisions, informed by target compensation and business and individual performance
2020 STI Percent of Target Earned
(Business Performance Score x Individual Score)(2)
 100%(3) 161%  150%  132%  151%
Business Performance Score 107.5%  107.5%  107.5%  107.5%  107.5%
Business Performance Score, as adjusted 100%(3)   100%(4)   
Individual Score 140%(3) 150%  150%  123%  140%
2020 Actual STI Award$4,500,000(3)$3,059,000 $4,500,000 $3,300,000 $2,869,000
2020 LTI Individual Modifier         125%
2020 Target LTI Grant 12,900,000  3,300,000  8,600,000  4,250,000  3,950,000
                
(1)In September 2020, the CMRC approved an increase to Ms. Fato’s target compensation in recognition of her expanded role and responsibilities. Ms. Fato’s base salary increased to $1,000,000, her target STI opportunity increased to $1,900,000 and her target LTI opportunity increased to $3,300,000. The LTI Individual Modifier of 125% was applied to her pre-adjustment target LTI value of $2,600,000.

(2)See the “—2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2020 Short-Term Incentive Awards” for detailed explanation of the underlying performance considered in assessing the Business and Individual Performance Scores.

(3)In light of AIG’s TSR relative to compensation peers in 2020, the CMRC and Mr. Duperreault determined that (i) the Business Performance Score applied to Mr. Duperreault’s 2020 STI award should be 100%; and (ii) the Chief Executive Officer’s 2020 STI award should be paid at target, notwithstanding AIG’s successful navigation of the unprecedented COVID-19 crisis and Mr. Duperreault’s efforts in executing a well-coordinated Chief Executive Officer succession process, resulting in an Individual Performance Score of 140%.

(4)The CMRC and Mr. Zaffino agreed to lower the Business Performance Score applied to Mr. Zaffino’s 2020 STI award from 107.5% to 100%.

As discussed below, the 2018-2020 PSUs wereshort-term incentives being earned at 91an average of 170 percent of target for our current named executives and 2021 PSUs being earned at 200 percent of target.

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT43

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     Executive Summary
Overview of 2023 Executive Compensation Decisions
Annual target compensation for current named executives, informed by market practices in our peer group
2023 Annual Compensation ComponentZaffino
Purtill(1)
Hogan (2)
McElroyWade
Base Salary$1,500,000 $1,000,000 $1,250,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 
Target STI$4,500,000 $1,700,000 $2,250,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 
Target LTI$14,000,000 $1,600,000$4,000,000 $4,000,000 $1,500,000 
Target Direct Compensation$20,000,000 $4,300,000 $7,500,000 $7,500,000 $4,500,000 
Annual compensation decisions, informed by target compensation, business performance and individual performance
Zaffino
Purtill(1)
Hogan (2)
McElroyWade
2023 Actual STI Payment$9,000,000$2,850,000$3,250,000$4,250,000$3,350,000
2023 STI Percent of Target Earned
(Business Performance Score x Individual Performance Score)(3)
200 %168 %144 %170 %168 %
2023 Actual LTI Grant$14,000,000$2,400,000$4,000,000$4,000,000$1,500,000
(1)In connection with no adjustments madeher appointment to the metrics, goals or outcome for our named executives givenrole of Chief Financial Officer, Ms. Purtill's base salary was increased from $950,000 to $1.0 million as of July 1, 2023, her 2023 target STI amount was set at $1.7 million applicable to the long-term naturefull 2023 performance year and her 2024 target LTI amount was set at $2.9 million. Ms. Purtill's 2023 LTI award was granted while she was serving as Interim Chief Financial Officer based on an LTI target of the program.

Additional information on individual pay decisions can be found under “—2020$1.6 million. The amounts do not reflect an additional 2023 RSU award granted to Ms. Purtill in connection with her appointment as permanent Chief Financial Officer. See "—2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes,” beginningOutcomes—2023 Long-Term Incentive Awards" for details on page 66.

2021 Proxy Statement57

these special awards.
Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Alignment(2)In 2023, Mr. Hogan's long-term incentive award consisted of Pay with Shareholder Experience

92% of target pay to our Chief Executive Officer is variable or “at-risk”
22% of target: realized value of performance-based equity awards made to Chief Executive Officer through 2019

Our executive compensation program aligns pay with performance, as demonstrated through a compensation framework where 9250 percent PSUs granted by AIG, and 25 percent each of our Chief Executive Officer’s annual targetstock options and RSUs granted by Corebridge. Amounts above reflect the combined total direct compensation is variable or “at-risk.” We also seek to align pay with shareholder experience by employing metrics and vehicles that provide exposure to stock price movements, and that reward both in-year delivered performance and leading performance indicators critical to long-term success. In 2019, the success of the foundational work undertaken since 2017 was evident in both our financial results and our returns to stockholders, with TSR outperforming the S&P 500 and the median S&P 500 insurance company. Early in 2020, at the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, the global markets suffered a downturn and AIG’s stock price reflected this turmoil, erasing the emerging positive effects of our transformational efforts. Given the performance-based structure of our executive compensation program, this stock performance has impacted equity payouts and realized equity value for our executives, commensurate with returns to our shareholders.

The alignment of pay for performance with the experience of our shareholders is further evidenced through the outcomes earned under our incentive programs over the last four years. In two of the three most recent vesting cycles of PSUs, the earned payout factor was 0 percent. The 2018-2020 PSUs were earned at 91 percent of target, reflecting positive outcomes for two of the three performance metrics as a result of the improved operational performance under our new leadership team. value.

(3)See “—20202023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—Assessment2023 Short-Term Incentive Awards” for a detailed explanation of 2018 Performance Share Units.”

As we continue to improve operational performance to drive transformative growth that will unlock value for our shareholders, realized pay remains low relative to target. This reflects that, while there are improvements in ourthe underlying performance it has not yet translated into meaningful returns to our shareholders, with most stock optionconsidered in assessing the Business and Individual Performance Scores. All awards underwater. If the leadership team is successful in steering AIG through the COVID-19 crisis, executing the separationare capped at a maximum of Life and Retirement from AIG and delivering on AIG 200 these actions should result in share price appreciation for our shareholders, and the pay realized by our named executives should also improve.

PRE-2020 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PAY FOR PERFORMANCE
VALUE OF 2016-2019 PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS (PSUS AND STOCK OPTIONS)
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020*

percent.
Compensation Design
Our Philosophy
Value as of December 31, 2020
*Represents value of all performance-based LTI awards (i.e., PSUs and stock options) granted between 2016 and 2019 as a percentage of target value at grant as of December 31, 2020
Our compensation philosophy is based on performance levels (as applied toa set of foundational principles that guide how we structure our PSUs)compensation programs for our global workforce and our stock price. 2019 PSUs assume target performance. Stock option value based on intrinsic value. Messrs. Duperreault and Zaffino and Ms. Fato joined AIG in 2017 and accordingly received no 2016 LTI awards. Mr. Lyons joined AIG in 2018 and accordingly received no 2016 or 2017 LTI awards. Amounts for Messrs. Duperreault, Lyons and Zaffino include new hire stock options that were granted when they joined AIG.

58 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Special Awards

The CMRC is committed to identifying, attracting, motivating, rewarding and retaining highly qualified leaders who drive AIG’s long-term success. These goals were particularly important to the CMRC in 2020, where the strength and performance of our senior leaders made them attractive targets in a competitive market for talent with turnaround experience.

The CMRC examined the role of our leadership team in our strategic priority areas and assessed the extraordinary efforts of certain named executives assuming new roles and responsibilities. In recognition of their demonstrated performance, the CMRC approved one-time RSU awards for Messrs. Zaffino and Lyons and Ms. Fato having target values of $10 million, $3 million and $1 million, respectively.

In each case, the vesting schedule for the award was aligned with the role of the named executive and the size of the named executive’s award, with Mr. Zaffino’s special award vesting in equal thirds on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. Further details regarding these awards can be found under “—2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—Special Awards” below.

2021 Proxy Statement59

Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

ENGAGEMENT WITH SHAREHOLDERS ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TOPICS

Year-round, proactive engagement
34 meetings with shareholders representing over 50% of shares outstanding
93.9% of votes cast in favor of say-on-pay in 2020

The CMRC views shareholder feedback as an important input into its decisions on executive compensation. AIG has developed a robust shareholder engagement program that ensures an active, year-round, open dialogue with shareholders on various topics. In 2020 we reached out to 57 of our top shareholders and other key stakeholders representing over 79 percent of our shares outstanding with invitations to meet with our management and/or directors. We held 34 meetings with shareholders representing over 50 percent of our shares outstanding.

At our 2020 shareholder meeting, 93.9 percent of votes were cast in favor of our say-on-pay resolution. This reinforced the positive feedback we received during our 2019 engagement for the responsive changes made to our programs and support for the executive leadership team.how we reach decisions. Our engagement in 2020 provided additional insights that were incorporated into the CMRC’s decision-making process this year.

Discussions on the topic of executive compensation during our 2020 engagement meetings primarily focused on the potential impact of the COVID-19 crisis on compensation design and outcomes and on AIG’s employees. Our shareholders acknowledged the unique challenges the macro operating environment presented, and they provided directional input reflective of the broader market sentiment which the CMRC had been monitoring. In particular, our shareholders anticipated that a more discretionary approach would be required in the STI plan to address the difficulties in setting appropriate performance goals tied to changing priorities, and they strongly advised against changes to unvested LTI awards. This feedback was underpinned by a continuing ask for pay that aligns with the shareholder experience and that disclosure regarding the eventual decisions made by the CMRC be clear and transparent.

Executive Compensation Themes DiscussedAIG’s Response to Shareholder Feedback
Many shareholders anticipated that a more discretionary approach would be required in the STI plan as a result of the COVID-19 crisis and expressed a desire for clear disclosures around the CMRC’s decision-making

•  Modified the STI plan approach and metrics, using disciplined discretion to assess performance and determine STI awards

•  Continued commitment to clear and transparent disclosure regarding the application of judgment and discretion in assessing performance outcomes

Shareholders desired fewer changes to LTI programs as a result of the COVID-19 crisis and stressed the need to continue to align long-term awards with the shareholder experience

•  Delayed grant of 2020 PSUs to enable informed review of performance metrics and goal setting following more clarity as to the possible impacts of the COVID-19 crisis on AIG’s long-term strategic priorities

•  Core 2020 PSU goals based on areas of focus integral to AIG’s long-term, sustainable growth

•  Continued use of a three-year relative TSR metric to provide a direct tie to the shareholder experience

Shareholders strongly advised against changes to unvested in-flight LTI award metrics

•  Made no changes to any aspect of the 2018 or 2019 PSUs for the named executives

The Board and CMRC remain committed to an ongoing dialogue with shareholders and view these discussions and feedback as important input into the oversight and design of AIG’s executive compensation programs. Additional information on our year-round shareholder engagement program can be found under “Year-Round Shareholder Engagement” beginning on page 41.

60 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

COMPENSATION DESIGN

Our Philosophy

Long-term oriented
Strategically aligned
Risk-balanced
Talent attracting

Our compensation philosophy is based on a set of foundational principles that guide both how we structure our compensation program and how we reach compensation decisions. It is intended to be long-term oriented and risk-balanced, enabling us to deploy the best talent across our company for our various business needs. In the face of a global pandemic, these principles continued to be relevant and provided a strong grounding for our decision-making.

Consistent with this philosophy, the CMRC evaluates and adjusts the programs annually, balancing our strategic priorities, talent needs, stakeholder feedback and market considerations to ensure the programs continue to meet their intended purpose.

PrincipleComponentHow We Apply It
We attract and retain the best talentOffer market-competitivecompensation opportunities to attract and retain the best talent to address our varied business needs.
The CMRC evaluates and adjusts our programs annually, balancing strategic priorities, talent needs, stakeholder feedback and market considerations to ensure the programs continue to promote desired outcomes.
nLong-term oriented
nStrategically aligned
nRisk-balanced
nTalent attracting
44AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     Compensation Design
PrincipleComponentHow We Apply It to our Named Executives
We retain and attract the best talent
Offer market-competitive compensation to retain and attract the best employees and leaders for our various business needs

ü

nCompensation levels set with reference to market data for talent peers with relevant experience and skillsets in the insurance and financial services industries where we compete for talent

nSpecial awards used to reward exceptional performance, aid in talent attraction and promote retention in extraordinary circumstances, with terms that align with the underlying objectives of such awards
We pay for performance

Create a pay for performanceculture by offering STI and LTI compensation opportunities that reward employees for individual contributions and business performance

Provide a market-competitive, performance-driven compensation structure through a four-part programthat consists of base salary, STI, LTI and benefits

ü

nMajority of all compensation is variable and at-risk

üat risk

nIncentives are tied to AIG performance, business performance and individual contributions

üObjective

nClearly defined objective performance measures and goals used, which are clearly disclosed

üCompensation providesused

nOutcomes provide for significant upside and downside potential for superior and under performance,

as well as significant downside in the event of under-performance
We align interests with our shareholders

Motivate all AIG employees to deliver long-term, sustainable and profitable growth, while balancing risk to create long-term, sustainable value for shareholders

Align the long-term economic interests of key employees with those of our shareholders by ensuring that a meaningful componentof their compensation is provided in equity

Avoid incentives that encourage employees to take unnecessary or excessive risksthat could threaten the value or reputation of AIG by rewarding both annual and long-termlong-term performance

Maintain strong compensation best practicesby meeting evolving standards of compensation governance and complying with regulations applicable to employee compensation

ü

nMajority of compensation delivered inis typically equity-based vehicles

ü

nMajority of annual equity-based compensation is performance-based, in the form of PSUs and stock options; beginning in 2023, annual equity-based compensation of our Chairman & CEO is comprised solely of PSUs and stock options

üNamed executives subject to risk

nRisk management policies apply, including a clawback policy,Financial Restatement Clawback Policy and an additional Clawback Policy that provides protections beyond those required by NYSE, share ownership requirements both during and for a period following employment and anti-hedginganti-hedging and pledging policies

ü

nPerformance goals are set with rigorous standards commensurate with both the opportunity and our risk guidelines

2021 Proxy Statement61

Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion
nAnnual risk assessments evaluate compensation plans to ensure they appropriately balance risk and Analysisreward
nEvolving compensation best-practices are identified through engagement with outside consultants and peer groups

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT45

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     Compensation Design
Compensation Best Practices

AIG is

We are committed to embracing the highest standards of corporate governance. We design our programs to pay for performance in alignment with the expectations of our shareholders and to minimize risk.

pg40-icon_compensationcheck.jpg
What We Do:
pg40-icon_compensationcross.jpg
What We Avoid:

ü

nPay for performance

ü

nDeliver majority of executive compensation in the form of at-risk,at-risk, performance-based pay

ü

nAlign performance objectives with our strategy

üshort-term and long-term strategies

nEngage with our shareholders on matters including executive compensation and governance

ü

nRequire meaningful share ownership and retention during employment and for six months following departure

ü

nProhibit pledging and hedging of AIG securities

ü

nCap payout opportunities under our incentive plans

ü applicable to our named executives

nMaintain a robust clawback policy

üpolicies with protections both in compliance with and beyond those required by the NYSE

nMaintain double-trigger change-in-control benefits

ü

nConduct annual compensation risk assessment

üreview of incentive plans

nEngage an independent compensation consultant

and consult outside legal advisors

û

nNo tax gross-ups other than for tax equalization and relocation benefits

û

nNo excessive perquisites, benefits or pension payments

û

nNo reloading or repricing of stock options or stock appreciation rights

û

nNo equity grants below 100%100 percent of fair market value

û

nNo dividends or dividend equivalents vest unless and until long-term incentivecorresponding LTI awards vest

Balanced Compensation Framework

Our annual compensation program is designed to give appropriate weighting to fixed and variable pay, shortshort-term and long-term performance and business unit and enterprise-wide contributions. We provide three elements of annual totaltarget direct compensation: base salary, an STI award and an LTI award in the form of PSUs, stock options and RSUs.award. Our annual target total direct compensation and mix of components are set with reference to market data for comparable positions at our business and talent competitors. We also provide market-based perquisites and benefits.

62 2021 Proxy Statement

In extraordinary circumstances, we provide special awards in connection with executive recruitment, contract extensions/renewals and strategic transactions.
Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

2021 Proxy Statement63

Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Use of Market Data

Four peer groups
Reflect competitors for talent, business and investors
Aligns peer group with intended purpose

We use data for our relevant peer groups to support the key principles of our compensation philosophy, including attracting and retaining the best talent and paying for performance.

AIG used four peer groups for executive compensation in 2020: one to inform compensation levels and design, and three for measuring relative performance in our LTI program. Each serves a distinct purpose to enhance relevance of the data being considered.

Compensation Peer Group Review

In late 2019, the CMRC conducted a review of the compensation peer group with the support of its independent adviser. Six guiding principles were established to inform peer selection:

64 2021 Proxy Statement

TABLE OF CONTENTS

At Risk
Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Following this analysis, the CMRC approved the following peer group for 2020 compensation decisions:

Those companies removed from the peer group did not sufficiently meet the established guiding principles or were no longer standalone listed companies. We believe the new 2020 group comprises companies our shareholders will consider relevant in assessing AIG’s executive compensation. At the time of assessment, AIG ranked at the 58th percentile on total assets, 38th percentile on market cap, the 57th percentile on revenue and the 36th percentile on headcount among our 2020 compensation peer group.

Long-Term Incentive Peer Groups

The remaining three peer groups are used for the purpose of assessing relative performance under our LTI program. Beginning in 2019, relative TSR was added as an element of the performance metrics applied to PSUs. For the 2020 PSUs, we also changed the previously used BVPS metric to be measured on a relative basis, to mitigate the challenges of setting long-term goals in the current operating environment. To enhance the alignment of payouts with performance, separate peer groups, each consisting of seven companies, were developed for General Insurance and Life and Retirement, with performance for each peer group assessed separately and combined on a weighted basis. This reflects the different BVPS expectations for each business unit both within AIG and observed in the market. The constituent companies of each peer group are longstanding competitor reference points for each business. In assessing relative TSR performance, these two groups of seven companies are then combined with five other composite insurance companies into a single reference group of 19 companies.

2021 Proxy Statement65

Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

For more information on the definitions and operation of these metrics, see “—2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2020 Long-Term Incentive Awards.”

2020 COMPENSATION DECISIONS AND OUTCOMES

2020 Target Direct Compensation

During the first quarter of 2020, the CMRC established target compensation for our named executives, comprising base salary, a target STI opportunity and a target LTI opportunity.

2020 Compensation Component  Duperreault  Lyons  Zaffino  Dachille  Fato(1) 
Base Salary $1,600,000 $1,000,000 $1,400,000 $1,250,000 $1,000,000 
Target STI $4,500,000 $1,900,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $1,900,000 
Target LTI $12,900,000 $3,300,000 $8,600,000 $4,250,000 $3,300,000 
Target Direct Compensation $19,000,000 $6,200,000 $13,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,200,000 

(1)In September 2020, the CMRC approved an increase to Ms. Fato’s target compensation in recognition
At least 77.8 percent of her expanded role and responsibilities. Ms. Fato’s base salary increased from $900,000 to $1,000,000; her target STI opportunity increased from $1,750,000 to $1,900,000 and her target LTI opportunity increased from $2,600,000 to $3,300,000.

Actual STI awards vary from target based on a combination of business and individual scorecard outcomes. Similarly, LTI award grants can vary from target based on the CMRC’s assessment of a range of factors, including prior-year performance and contributions, consideration of the complexity of expected contributions and the desire to enhance retention and/or provide incremental incentive for future success over the three-year performance period. Only Ms. Fato received an individual modifier to her 2020 LTI award grant. See “—2020 Long-Term Incentive Awards.” Further information on the design and outcomes in relation to each of these elements of compensation is described below.

66 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2020 Base Salary

At a Glance:

   Fixed cash compensation

   Represents approximately 8%-16% of aeach current named executive’s annual target direct compensation

   Effective in March is at risk based on performance and subject to our clawback policies.

Long-Term Oriented and Performance-Based
With respect to 2023 compensation, at least one-third of each current named executive’s annual target direct compensation is delivered in LTI, of which at least 75 percent is in the form of performance-based awards (PSUs and stock options) that reward for long-term value creation and performance achievements, and stock price appreciation relative to our trading price per grant. Long-term incentive awards for our Chairman & CEO are in the form of PSUs and stock options only.
Risk Balanced
Our ERM group reviews all incentive plans to ensure the appropriate balance of risk and reward, without encouraging excessive risk-taking.
46AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     Compensation Design
Use of Market Data
The CMRC uses data for relevant peer groups to support the key principles of our compensation philosophy, including retaining and attracting the best talent and paying for performance.
n2023 Compensation Program: Two peer groups were used for the 2023 executive compensation program: one to inform compensation levels and design, and one for measuring relative TSR performance in our LTI program. Each serves a distinct purpose to enhance the relevance of the data being considered. The CMRC periodically reviews our peer groups to ensure continuing relevance.
n2021 LTI Program: In addition, two peer groups were used to measure Relative TSR and Relative Tangible BVPS over the three-year performance period applicable to PSUs granted in 2021. For further detail, see "—2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—Assessment of 2021 Performance Share Units."
nTwo peer groups used for 2023 programs
nTwo peer groups used for 2021 LTI program
nPeer groups reflect competitors for talent and business
nPeer groups align with intended purpose
2023 Compensation Program
Compensation
Peer Group
nProvides perspective and data reflecting compensation levels and insight into pay practices
nComprises companies of a similar size and business model that draw from the same pool of talent as AIG
nTakes into account business model, company size, competitive relevance (e.g., for talent and investors) and data reliability
AIG Relative
TSR Peer Group
nProvides a means to assess long-term shareholder relative value creation
nApplies to PSU awards granted in 2023
2021 LTI Program
Relative Tangible Book Value Per Share Peer Group
nProvides a means to assess business unit performance of General Insurance and Life and Retirement relative to directly comparable peers under our LTI program
AIG Relative
TSR Peer Group
nProvides a means to assess long-term shareholder relative value creation
Compensation Peer Group for 2023 Program
1.The Allstate Corporation (NYSE:ALL)
2.American Express Company (NYSE:AXP)
3.Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC)
4.BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE:BLK)
5.Capital One Financial Corp. (NYSE:COF)
6.Chubb Limited (NYSE:CB)
7.The Cigna Group (NYSE:CI)
8.Citigroup Inc. (NYSE:C)
9.JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM)
10.Manulife Financial Corporation (NYSE:MFC)
11.Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (NYSE:MMC)
12.MetLife, Inc. (NYSE:MET)
13.The Progressive Corporation (NYSE:PGR)
14.Prudential Financial, Inc. (NYSE:PRU)
15.The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE:TRV)
16.U.S. Bancorp (NYSE:USB)
17.Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE:WFC)
Relative TSR Peer Group for 2023 LTI Program
1.AXA S.A. (CS:PA)*
2.Chubb Limited (NYSE:CB)
3.CNA Financial Corporation (NYSE:CNA)
4.The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (NYSE:HIG)
5.Markel Corporation (NYSE:MKL)
6.Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc. (TKS:8766)
7.The Travelers Companies, Inc (NYS:TRV)
8.W. R. Berkley Corporation (NYS:WRB)
*Added in 2023.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT47

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     Compensation Design
Engagement with Shareholders on Executive Compensation Topics
In the spring and fall of 2023 as well as early 2024, we continued to engage in productive discussions with our shareholders on executive compensation topics. Given the result of our 2023 say-on-pay vote, a key focus of our ongoing engagement in 2023 was to further understand the views of our shareholders with respect to our executive compensation programs. Our Lead Independent Director, Chief Human Resources and Diversity Officer, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary, Head of Executive Compensation and Head of Investors Relations participated in these meetings.
By the Numbers: Engagement in 2023 and Early 2024
Reached out to
33 top shareholders,
representing
03_424782-3_bar_meeting.jpg
of shares outstanding
Held
31 meetings with shareholders,
representing
03_424782-3_bar_topshareholders.jpg
of shares outstanding
Met with
ISS and Glass Lewis
during Fall Engagement
Lead Independent Director and CMRC Chair participated in meetings with shareholders representing
03_424782-3_bar_chairmeeting.jpg
of shares outstanding
What We Heard
Shareholders expressed high regard and support for our Chairman & CEO's performance and responded positively to his 2023 long-term incentive award being fully performance based. Shareholders also indicated that they were generally pleased with our compensation philosophy and program.
Shareholders also noted that the negative 2023 say-on-pay vote reflected concerns with the quantum and structure of the one-time award made to our Chairman & CEO in November of 2022.
Our Response to Shareholder Feedback on Executive Compensation
In response to feedback received during our engagement meetings, the CMRC committed not to use special, one-time awards absent extraordinary circumstances, such as strategic transactions, contract extensions/renewals and for executive recruitment "make whole" awards, sign on bonuses and promotions.
See "Corporate Governance—Shareholder Engagement" for more information on our shareholder engagement efforts in 2023.
48AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     Compensation Governance
Compensation Governance
Role of the CMRC
The CMRC is chaired by Ms. Mills and is comprised of three independent directors. The CMRC held six meetings in 2023.
During 2023, the CMRC reviewed its charter and recommended clarifying and simplifying updates which the Board approved. Most notably, these reflected the expansion of the CMRC's purpose to oversee both human capital management and the administration of our clawback policies. The role of the CMRC and its interplay with management and the Board as a whole are set forth below.
pg43-icon_smallbluearrow.jpg

pg43-icon_smallbluearrow.jpg
pg43-icon_smallgrayarrow.jpg
pg43-icon_smallgrayarrow.jpg
ManagementCompensation and Management Resources CommitteeBoard of Directors
nOur Chairman & CEO makes recommendations to the CMRC on compensation for the executive team, including the named executives (other than himself)
nAs appropriate, senior management attends meetings to assist the CMRC with its decision making
nReviews and approves the goals, evaluates performance and reviews and recommends compensation of the Chairman & CEO
nApproves compensation for other senior executives, including all named executives
nOversees compensation and benefit programs
nOversees management development and succession planning programs for executive management
nOversees the assessment of risks related to compensation programs
nOversees human capital management practices and programs, including retention, talent development, compensation and benefits, and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives
nApproves this Compensation Discussion and Analysis report on executive compensation
nEngages an independent consultant
nOversees compliance with stock ownership guidelines
nOversees the administration of and, as appropriate, the enforcement of clawback policies and any recoupment-related activity
nApproves the compensation of the Chairman & CEO
nReviews and approves CMRC recommendations on incentive plans where shareholder approval is required
nApproves this Compensation Discussion & Analysis
In reaching decisions, the CMRC may solicit the opinions of members of the management team, the Company’s outside counsel and the CMRC’s independent compensation consultant. See “Corporate Governance—Board Committees” for more information on the structure, role and activities of the CMRC.
Decision-Making Process
The CMRC has an established process for executive compensation decision-making and in a typical year, during the first quarter, it:
nAssesses short-term incentive plan performance against business goals as well as individual performance of each named executive for the prior year and approves payouts
nAssesses long-term incentive plan performance against three-year goals and approves payouts
nReviews annual base salaries and target compensation levels of each named executive and grants annual LTI awards against a backdrop of the prior year performance and compensation relative to peers with relevant experience and skillsets in the insurance and financial services industries where we compete
nReviews and recommends to the Board approval of compensation decisions for the Chairman & CEO
nReviews and approves the forward-looking performance metrics and goals that will apply to STI awards (including the Chairman & CEO's individual metrics and goals) and PSU grants
Throughout the year, the CMRC receives updates on performance relative to expectations, providing an opportunity to assess potential payouts. In addition, each year, the CMRC reviews or receives an update on various topics, including risk of incentive compensation plans and payments, regulatory compliance with respect to compensation matters, human capital programs, shareholder engagement, pension, savings and employee benefit plans and succession planning for officers other than the Chairman & CEO.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT49

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     Compensation Governance
Qualitative Assessment
A central part of the CMRC’s role involves applying its judgment in making final compensation decisions to ensure outcomes balance appropriately rewarding for performance delivered both on a year-on-year basis and over the long-term, equity across the businesses and forward-looking implications. Beyond the business scorecard objectives that were achieved, the individual performance scorecards provide an opportunity to balance financial and operational achievements with judgments regarding how performance was achieved. This use of judgment ensures appropriate and balanced outcomes once all the facts are known at year-end.
Input from Independent Compensation Consultants
The CMRC continued to engage the services of Pay Governance LLC (Pay Governance) as its independent executive compensation consultant since October 2021. The independent advisor attends CMRC meetings and:
nProvides views on:
How compensation program and proposals for senior executives compare to market practices in the insurance industry, financial services and more broadly
“Best practices” and how they apply to the Company
The design and implementation of current and proposed executive compensation programs and policies
nResponds to questions raised by CMRC members during the executive compensation process
nParticipates in discussions pertaining to compensation and risk, assessing our process and conclusions
nParticipates in discussions on performance goals that are proposed by management for the CMRC’s approval
The CMRC reviews advisor independence annually to understand any relationships with the Company, including CMRC members and the Company’s executive officers. The CMRC assessed Pay Governance’s independence relative to the NYSE listing standards and determined that it remained independent and that its work has not raised any conflicts of interest.
During 2023, the Company engaged Johnson Associates to prepare reports presenting market comparisons of total compensation levels for existing employees, new hires and promotions for positions within the CMRC’s purview. In its capacity as the CMRC’s independent advisor, Pay Governance reviewed these reports before they were considered by the CMRC. This review, coupled with the CMRC's review of Johnson Associates' services, appropriately addressed any potential conflicts of interest raised by Johnson Associates' work or business relationship with the Company.
During 2023, the Company also engaged Davis Polk and Wardwell LLP to provide legal counsel related to our executive compensation program.
2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
2023 Base Salary
At a Glance:
nFixed cash compensation
nRepresents 7.5 to 22.2 percent of a current named executive’s annual target direct compensation
nReviewed annually or onupon a change in role, wherewhen appropriate

nNo salary adjustments for those named executives who were also named executives in 2022
nMs. Purtill's salary increased mid-year by 5.3 percent in connection with her appointment as Chief Financial Officer of AIG

Base salary is intended to fairly compensate the named executiveexecutives for the responsibilities of his or her position,their respective positions and achieve an appropriate balance of fixed and variable pay and provide the executive with sufficient liquidity to discourage excessive risk-taking.pay. The CMRC undertakes an annual review of named executive salaries to determine whether they should be adjusted. In making this determination, the CMRC considers a broad range of factors including, scope of role, scope, experience, skillset, performanceskillsets and salaries for comparable positions within the Compensation Peer Group, as well as internal parity among AIG’s executive officers. The following salaries were approved for 2020.

Named Executive2019 Base Salary2020 Base SalaryPercent Increase 
Brian Duperreault$1,600,000$1,600,0000% 
Mark D. Lyons$1,000,000$1,000,0000% 
Peter Zaffino$1,400,000$1,400,0000% 
Douglas A. Dachille$1,250,000$1,250,0000% 
Lucy Fato$   900,000$1,000,00011.1% 

Mr. Duperreault has

Current Named Executives2022 Year-End Base Salary2023 Year-End Base SalaryPercent Change
Peter Zaffino$1,500,000 $1,500,000 — %
Sabra R. Purtill(1)
$— $1,000,000 — %
Kevin T. Hogan$1,250,000$1,250,000— %
David McElroy$1,000,000 $1,000,000 — %
Claude Wade(2)
$—$1,000,000— %
(1)Ms. Purtill was not received a base salary increase since his appointment in 2017. Ms. Fato was the only named executive receivingin 2022. In connection with Ms. Purtill's appointment as Chief Financial Officer, her salary increased from $950,000 to $1,000,000 on July 1, 2023.
(2)Mr. Wade was not a base salary increasenamed executive in 2020. The CMRC approved the increase to Ms. Fato’s base salary effective September 2020 to reflect the expansion of her role2022.
50AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and responsibilities to include Global CommunicationsAnalysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Government Affairs.

2021 Proxy Statement67

Outcomes
Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis

20202023 Short-Term Incentive Awards

At a Glance:

   Modified design for 2020 to enhance relevance during

nPayouts are based on a periodcombination of uncertainty

   2020 payouts ranged from 100% to 161% of target reflecting:

   The CMRC’s approval of an AIGquantitative business and individual performance

nUnless specifically approved by the CMRC, earned awards equal the applicable Business Performance Score of 107.5% applied(0 percent to the STI decisions for Messrs. Lyons and Dachille and Ms. Fato, reflecting AIG’s significant achievements on our strategic financial priorities against the backdrop of unprecedented market volatility and challenges resulting from the COVID-19 crisis.

   The CMRC’s recognition of significant individual accomplishments by each of the named executives in each of the four strategic pillars—Financial, Strategic, Operational and Organizational.

   A determination by the CMRC and Mr. Duperreault that, in light of AIG’s TSR relative to compensation peers in 2020, (i) the Business Performance Score applied to the 2020 STI decision for Mr. Duperreault should be 100%; and (ii) the Chief Executive Officer’s 2020 STI award should be paid at target, notwithstanding AIG’s successful navigation of the unprecedented COVID-19 crisis and Mr. Duperreault’s efforts in executing a well-coordinated Chief Executive Officer succession process, resulting in an Individual Performance Score of 140%.

   An agreement by the CMRC and Mr. Zaffino to lower the Business Performance Score applied to Mr. Zaffino’s 2020 STI award from 107.5% to 100%.

What’s Unchanged for 2020:

    Payouts based on combination of business and individual performance

    Earned awards equal the Business Performance Score (0% to 150%)150 percent), multiplied by the Individual Performance Score (0%(0 percent to 150%)

150 percent), and payout is subject to an overall cap of 200 percent of target

nIndividual assessments continue to beare based on performance in four core areas (Financial, Strategic, Operational and Organizational)

    Payouts capped at 200%

nAwards are subject to clawback policies (as applicable)
n2023 payouts ranged from 144 percent to 200 percent of target,

    Subject to clawback

reflecting consistently strong financial results in General Insurance, Corebridge and AIG Corporate

Changes for 2020:

    Guiding principle of rewarding for a strong capital position that allows AIG2023:

nUpdated performance metrics and weightings to pursue longer-term strategies that unlock shareholder value

    Business Performance Score in 2020 based on company-wide performance in three strategic priority areas of de-risking, liquidity and capital preservation

    Business performance was measured using a disciplined discretion framework that assessed quantifiable results against internal expectationsalign with respect2023 business priorities

nAdded Calendar Year Combined Ratio metric to the AIG’s capital and liquidity position and risk profileGeneral Insurance scorecard with scorecard weightings rebalanced
nReplaced Investments performance metric with Corebridge Normalized Reported AATOI Attributable to Corebridge Common Shareholders per Share* metric in the context ofCorebridge scorecard
nReplaced AIG 200 metric with Adjusted ROCE* and AIG Parent GOE metrics in the COVID-19 crisis

    Financial pillar of the individual assessment included assessment of supporting quantitative financial metrics for the business unit relevant to each named executive

    Mr. Duperreault’s and Mr. Lyons’ 2020 target opportunities increased to address market alignment shortfalls; Ms. Fato’s target opportunity increased in September 2020 in recognition of the expansion of her duties and responsibilities

Corporate scorecard, with weightings rebalanced

STI awards are designed to drive AIG’s business objectives and strategies and to reward for performance delivered during the year. In 2020 the CMRC determined it was appropriateSTI awards consist of an annual cash target, subject to depart from the design established last year, which was based onresults achieved against quantitative business unit and corporate metrics and an Individual Performance Scorecard. The COVID-19 crisis presented unparalleled uncertainty and resulted in a global economic crisis. Due to the significant work done since 2017 to improve the fundamentals of our businesses and substantially de-risk the company’s balance sheet, AIG was in a strong position entering 2020. The CMRC designed the 2020 STI program to reward for a strong capital position emerging from the COVID-19 crisis with which to

68 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis

pursue longer-term strategies that unlock shareholder value, including the announcement of the planned separation of AIG’s Life and Retirement business from AIG.

The fundamental structure of the STI program is unchanged from 2019: Business and Individual Performance Scores are combined on a multiplicative basis.individual performance scorecard. This combination provides an opportunity to incentivizeof business and rewardindividual performance is consistent with our desire for both leading and lagging indicators of performance with a focus on guiding the organization towards balancing profitability, growth and risk. The payout profile for the 2020 STI Plan is also unchanged, with 50 percent of target payable for threshold performance and 150 percent of target payable for maximum performance in each area. Awards are subject to an overall cap of 200 percent of target. The CMRC applied judgment under the disciplined discretion framework of the 2020 STI plan to determine whether performance constituted ‘threshold’, ‘target’, ‘maximum’, or some other level of performance. For performance deemed to fall below threshold no STI awards would be earned.

 

differentiated pay outcomes.
Target Short-Term Incentive Award ($)*
x.jpg
We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric to ensure that results properly reflect management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.

This approach means that:

·Financial performance is considered as part of both the business performance assessment on a company-wide basis, and the individual performance assessment as it pertains to each named executive’s area of accountability;

·No payout is earned if the
Business Performance Score is zero (even if the (0-150%)
x.jpg
Individual Performance Score is greater than zero); and (0-150%)
=
Actual Short-Term Incentive Award ($) (up to 200%)

Business Performance Scorecards·
Individual Performance Score cannot account for more than one-third of the total amount earned.

2021 Proxy Statement69

Scorecards:
Four Core Areas
Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis
General InsuranceCorebridgeCorporate
1.Financial
2.Strategic
3.Operational
4.Organizational

nAYCR, as adjusted*
nCalendar Year Combined Ratio
nDiluted Normalized AATI Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders Per Share*
nCorebridge Normalized Adjusted RoAE*
nCorebridge GOE*
nCorebridge Normalized Reporting AATOI Attributable to Corebridge Common Shareholders Per Share*
nWeighted average of GI and Corebridge Performance
nDiluted Normalized AATI Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders Per Share*
nAdjusted ROCE*
nAIG Parent GOE
All awards are subject to an overall cap of 200% of target

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT51

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
Business Performance Scorecard

For 2020,Scorecards

The 2023 metrics and goals reflect a continuing commitment to sustaining and rewarding a high-performance culture that supports our business strategies. The CMRC seeks to establish goals and metrics that are quantitative, appropriately rigorous, balanced across the Business Performance Scorecard pivoted fromdifferent business units and compatible with effective risk management so as not to incentivize excessive risk taking.
Each metric has a threshold, target, stretch and maximum performance goal associated with it and a corresponding level of payout with interpolation for achievements between goals:
PerformanceBelow ThresholdThresholdTargetStretchMaximum or Above
Payout (% of target)%50%100%125%150%
The 2023 quantitative performance results for each of the business scorecards are set forth below.
Corporate
Performance MetricThreshold
(50%)
Target
(100%)
Stretch
(125%)
Maximum
(150%)
Actual(3)
% AchievedWeighting% Achieved
(Weighted)
Weighted Business Unit
Performance(1)
Total weighted performance for General Insurance (80%) and Corebridge (20%); see scorecards belowN/A147 %40 %59 %
Diluted Normalized AATI Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders Per Share*(2)
$4.87 $5.00$5.50$6.00 $6.49150 %25 %37.5 %
Adjusted Return on Common Equity*6.5%7.0 %7.5 %8.2%8.9 %150 %25%37.5 %
AIG Parent GOE$850M$800M$750M$700M$738M131 %10 %13 %
Corporate Quantitative Performance Score:147 %
(1)Actual performance represents the weighted average of quantitative performance scores for each business unit metricsas follows: (80 percent x 150 percent) + (20 percent x 139 percent) = 147 percent. Detailed business unit scorecards are set forth below.
(2)Normalized for (better) / worse than 7.5 percent expected Private Equity/Real Estate returns, (better) / worse than 6.0 percent expected Hedge Fund returns, (better) / worse than 4.0 percent expected fair value changes on fixed maturity securities, (better) / worse than expected CAT losses (net of reinsurance), (favorable) / unfavorable annual actuarial update, (favorable) / unfavorable COVID-19 mortality, (favorable) / unfavorable prior year development (PYD) net of reinsurance and premium adjustments, (better) / worse than expected return on business transactions.
(3)Net of incremental STI funding incurred for achieving performance metrics.
General Insurance
Performance MetricThreshold
(50%)
Target
(100%)
Stretch
(125%)
Maximum
(150%)
Actual(2)
% AchievedWeighting% Achieved
(Weighted)
Accident Year Combined Ratio, as adjusted*89.9 %89.1 %88.5 %87.9 %87.8 %150 %40 %60 %
Calendar Year Combined Ratio93.9%93.3 %92.9 %92.5 %90.7 %150 %30 %45 %
Diluted Normalized AATI Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders Per Share*(1)
$4.87$5.00$5.50$6.00$6.51150 %30 %45 %
General Insurance Quantitative Performance Score:150 %
(1)Normalized for (better) / worse than 7.5 percent expected Private Equity/Real Estate returns, (better) / worse than 6.0 percent expected Hedge Fund returns, (better) / worse than 4.0 percent expected fair value changes on fixed maturity securities, (better) / worse than expected CAT losses (net of reinsurance), (favorable) / unfavorable annual actuarial update, (favorable) / unfavorable COVID-19 mortality, (favorable) / unfavorable PYD net insurance and premium adjustments, (better) / worse than expected return on business transactions and over/under budget performance attributable to an assessmentCorebridge's impact on AIG's earnings per share.
(2)Net of company-wideincremental STI funding incurred for achieving performance given the uncertainty posed by the COVID-19 crisis. In May 2020, the CMRC established a program to focusmetrics.

52AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
Corebridge
Performance MetricThreshold
(50%)
Target
(100%)
Stretch
(125%)
Maximum
(150%)
Actual(2)
%
Achieved
Weighting
% Achieved
(Weighted)
Corebridge Normalized Adjusted RoAE*(1)
%10 %11 %12 %12.0 %149 %40 %59.6 %
Corebridge GOE*$1.82B$1.77B$1.72B$1.67B$1.74B116 %30 %34.8 %
Corebridge Normalized Reported AATOI Attributable to Corebridge Common Shareholders Per Share*(1)
$2.75$3.50$4.00$4.25$4.41150 %30 %45 %
Corebridge Quantitative Performance Score:139 %
(1)Normalized for (better) / worse than 7.5 percent expected Private Equity/Real Estate returns, (better) / worse than 6.0 percent expected Hedge Fund returns, (better) / worse than 4.0 percent expected fair value changes on three priority areasfixed maturity securities, removed impact of strategic significance: liquidity, capital preservationannual actuarial update and de-risking. Within each area, potential actions were identifiedlitigation matters, adjusted for management to pursue, although the CMRC purposefully did not establish formal objectives. This deference incentivized management to adopt an agile mindsetimpact of macroeconomic environment on non-operating items (Foreign Exchange gains (losses), embedded derivative gains (losses) and changes in navigating the uncertain environment with a fundamental focusfair value for market risk benefits), (better) / worse than expected return on maintaining the financial strengthbusiness transactions.
(2)Net of the holding and operating companies. In the first quarter of 2021, the CMRC assessedincremental STI funding incurred for achieving performance in each of these three areas as summarized below.

Strategic Priority AreaAchievements
LiquidityLiability Management:Implemented measures to actively increase liquidity in the face of the COVID-19 crisis, uncertain government policies and capital market conditions, including a $4.1 billion senior debt offering
Parent Liquidity:Maintained a strong liquidity position that exceeded all defined limits
Capital PreservationOperating Company Capital:All Material Tier 1 and Tier 2 Entities were operating at or above their operating ranges at year-end
General Insurance Capital Position:General Insurance Companies RBC* ratio of 460%—well above the target operating range; implemented letters of credit to maximize AIG UK and Validus Re’s Tier 2 capital
Life and Retirement Capital Position:Life and Retirement Companies RBC* ratio 433%—well above the operating range; net credit losses were $460 million and net asset downgrades were approximately $700 million of lower excess capital as a result
De-riskingFortitude Holdings:The sale of Fortitude Holdings in June 2020 significantly de-risked AIG’s balance sheet and generated $2.2 billion in net proceeds
Private Client Group (PCG):Significantly de-risked the PCG portfolio through a number of significant actions, including the launch of Syndicate 2019, a partnership with Lloyd’s
Investments: Capitalized on improved market liquidity to make select reductions in risk positions in several sectors
*RBC is a formula designed to measure the adequacy of an insurer’s statutory surplus compared to the risks inherent to the business. The inclusion of RBC measures is not intended for the purpose of ranking any insurance company or for use in connection with any marketing, advertising or promotional activities.

The CMRC reviewed AIG’s significant achievements on these strategic priorities against the backdrop of unprecedented market volatility and challenges resulting from the COVID-19 crisis and approved a 2020 Business Performance Score of 107.5 percent, which was applied to the STI decisions for Messrs. Lyons and Dachille and Ms. Fato.

Notwithstanding the general 2020 Business Performance Score of 107.5 percent, in light of AIG’s TSR relative to compensation peers in 2020, the CMRC and Mr. Duperreault determined that the Business Performance Score applied to the 2020 STI decision for Mr. Duperreault should be 100 percent. The CMRC and Mr. Zaffino also agreed to lower the Business Performance Score applied to Mr. Zaffino’s 2020 STI award from 107.5 to 100 percent.

70 2021 Proxy Statement

metrics.
Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Individual Performance Scorecard

Scorecards

Given the importance of our named executives in making and operationalizing decisions that maintain AIG’s capital strength and position AIGcontinue to set us up for future growth,success, the CMRC retainedalso assesses an individual performance assessment as partscorecard for each named executive. Objectives are structured to reward actions under four core areas: Financial, Strategic, Operational and Organizational.
Individual performance objectives for each of our named executives include a combination of detailed quantitative and qualitative components and take into consideration each named executive’s STI award determinationbusiness objectives and responsibilities. Our named executives distinguished themselves in 2020. The Individual Performance Score is2023 by taking on ambitious objectives and executing on multiple, highly complex strategic initiatives under challenging conditions, including ongoing complexity in addition to the Business Performance Scoreinsurance industry, volatile market conditions and is based on an assessmentgeneral economic uncertainty. For a summary of theirthe goals and related achievements the CMRC considered when determining each named executive’s individual performance in four pillars (Financial, Strategic, Operational and Organizational) for the areas for which they are accountable.

The CMRC tailored specific areas of focus for each named executive to maximize the alignment of pay with their individual performance. As described above, in 2020 the CMRC pivoted to a company-wide performance assessment in determining the Business Performance Score.

To ensure a level of accountability for financial performance at the business unit level was maintained, the Financial pillar portion of the Individual Performance Score in 2020 was based on an assessment of the relevant business financial metrics applicable to the individual’s area of responsibility. These metrics were set based on a thoughtful and deliberate process (See “—Compensation Governance—The Annual Process”). While formal targets were not assigned, the CMRC and Board communicated general expectations for business performance in each area and in the first quarter of 2021 assessed actual performance in the context of those expectations. The financial metrics that each named executive is subject to reflects the scope of responsibility for his or her respective role:

Headquarters performance was considered for Mr. Duperreault, Mr. Lyons, Mr. Zaffino (in combination with General Insurance), and Ms. Fato;

General Insurance performance was considered for Mr. Zaffino (in combination with Headquarters); and

Investments performance was considered for Mr. Dachille.

The Life and Retirement scorecard is included in the table below because it is an indirect component of the Headquarters performance assessment. While the final score for Headquarters and General Insurance2023, see page 54.

Summary of 2023 STI Awards
In summary, 2023 performance resulted in the same numerical outcomefollowing STI awards for our named executives:
Current Named Executives2023 Target Short-Term
Incentive
($)
Business
Performance
Scorecard Result
Individual
Performance
Scorecard Result
Actual Percent of STI Target2023 Actual
Short-Term
Incentive Award
($)
Peter Zaffino(1)
4,500,000 147 %150 %200 %9,000,000 
Sabra R. Purtill1,700,000 147 %114 %168 %2,850,000 
Kevin T. Hogan2,250,000 139 %104 %144 %3,250,000 
David McElroy2,500,000 150 %113 %170 %4,250,000 
Claude Wade2,000,000 147 %114 %168 %3,350,000 
Former Executive Officers(2)
Shane Fitzsimons(3)
900,000 147 %136 %200 %1,800,000 
Lucy Fato(4)
1,900,000 147 %100 %147 %2,800,000 
(1)Mr. Zaffino's business performance score together with his individual performance score resulted in a combined score of 221 percent of target. Pursuant to our STI plan, Mr. Zaffino's STI award is capped at 200 percent of target.
(2)Mr. Lyons was not eligible for a 2023 STI award.
(3)Mr. Fitzsimons' STI award was pro-rated to reflect six months of credited service in 2023.
(4)Pursuant to Ms. Fato's Transition Agreement, dated as the Business Performance Score, thereof September 1, 2023, Ms. Fato is no direct correlationentitled to receive an annual STI award based on her target STI opportunity in effect for this outcome.

2023, without proration, based on achievement of performance objectives. For a description of Ms. Fato's Transition Agreement and any additional payments she is entitled to receive thereunder, see "2023 Executive Compensation—Potential Payments on Termination—Fato Transition Agreement."

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT53

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
Peter Zaffino
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
2021 Proxy Statement
Pillar and Goal Overview71

Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAchievements

BusinessPerformance Metric2020 ActualAssessment*
HeadquartersDirect GOE for full year(1)$1,447 millionTarget
Duperreault, Lyons, Zaffino,
Financial
nDeliver on AIG’s financial objectives
nExecute on AIG’s 2023 Capital Plan
AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings(1)~$400 millionAbove Target
FatoWeighted Average of
nDelivered strong 2023 financial results driven by continued significant improvement and profitable growth in General Insurance
Improved General Insurance Investments and Life and Retirement Performance
N/AAbove target
Headquarters Performance Assessment vs. Expectations107.5%
General InsuranceAccidentyear-over-year Calendar Year Combined Ratio As Adjusted(1)94.1%Above Targetby 130 basis points to 90.6 percent; improved General Insurance AYCR, as adjusted* by 100 basis points to 87.7 percent
Increased General Insurance Net Premiums Written (NPW) 5 percent year-over-year, or 7 percent year-over-year on a comparable basis(1), driven by profitable growth in the Commercial businesses
Marked the third consecutive year of underwriting profit improvement, with 2023 underwriting income improving $301 million to $2.3 billion
nWhile 2023 full-year Net income attributable to AIG common shareholders was $3.6 billion, or $4.98 per diluted common share, AATI attributable to AIG common shareholders* improved to $4.9 billion, or $6.79 per diluted common share, an increase of 33 percent year-over-year or $1.67; increased Book value per common share by 18 percent year-over-year to $65.14
nDelivered successfully against AIG’s 2023 Capital Plan, returning over $4 billion to shareholders through $3 billion of share repurchases and $1 billion in common and preferred stock dividends, including a 12.5 percent increase to the Company’s quarterly cash dividend on its common stock, the first increase since 2016; and reducing $1.4 billion of general borrowings through tender offers
nDrove (i) three secondary offerings of Corebridge common stock, (ii) two direct share repurchases by Corebridge of its common stock, and (iii) two special dividends to Corebridge shareholders, resulting in an aggregate of $3.9 billion in net proceeds to AIG
Zaffino; indirect component
Strategic
nSeparation of Corebridge:
Operational separation
Deconsolidation
Corebridge board composition
nGI underwriting excellence, reinsurance and portfolio optimization and risk capital prioritization
nAIG board composition
nRelationships with key external stakeholders
Underwriting Capital—RBC(2)460%Above target
nSeparation of Corebridge
Successfully advanced to the final stages of operational separation of Corebridge
Reduced AIG's ownership of Corebridge from 77.7 percent at year-end 2022 to 52.2 percent at year-end 2023
Worked closely with the Corebridge independent directors on identifying new board candidates with the appropriate skills and capabilities
nExecuted on multiple strategic divestitures to streamline portfolio:
Designed and negotiated the formation of Private Client select as a Managing General Agent in July 2023
Structured and negotiated the sale of Crop Risk Services to American Financial Group for approximately $240 million, which closed in July 2023
Designed and executed the sale of Validus Re to RenaissanceRe for total consideration of $3.3 billion in cash and approximately $275 million in common stock of Renaissance Re, which closed in October 2023
Oversaw Corebridge’s sale of Laya Healthcare to AXA for €650 million, which closed in October 2023
Oversaw Corebridge’s entry into a definitive agreement to sell its UK Life business, for consideration of £460 million, which is expected to close in the first half of 2024
nDesigned and executed the strategic placement of AIG's 2024 reinsurance program despite a complex and challenging renewal season in the face of volatile market conditions and general economic uncertainty, and improved our ceding commission levels across a range of classes while maintaining the balance with our reinsurance partners to ensure the long-term sustainability of our programs
nLed efforts to broaden and diversify the skills and experience of the AIG Board of Directors through successful recruitment of three new independent directors: Diana Murphy, Vanessa Wittman and Jimmy Dunne
nEnhanced AIG's relationships and reputation with key external partners, including brokers, distributors and clients, as well as regulators, policymakers and investment community through proactive engagement and participation in key industry conferences
of Headquarters
54AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
Pillar and Goal OverviewUnderwriting Capital—Liquidity to Parent$1,318 millionTargetAchievements
Operational
nOperational excellence
nFuture state target operating model
General Insurance Performance Assessment vs. Expectations107.5%
nDrove improvement of key components of Adjusted ROCE*, including improved AIG Parent GOE, to help further strategic target of 10% or greater Adjusted ROCE*
nDesigned and launched AIG Next, our initiative focused on creating a company that’s leaner, less complex and more effective with the appropriate infrastructure and capabilities for the size of the business we will be post-deconsolidation of Corebridge
nLaunched AIG's first-ever generative artificial intelligence (AI), focused on driving growth and reducing cost; established internal AI advisory council to govern AI usage within AIG, creating critical oversight and ensuring ethical practices
nCompleted the IT Modernization Program by retiring our data centers, standardizing employee tools and migrating to cloud-based solutions
nOversaw the launch of refreshed AIG.com website and reimagined myAIG Broker Portal, each representing significant milestones in AIG’s ongoing digital transformation
InvestmentsPerformance relative to Benchmark+31 bpsAbove target
Dachille; indirect componentDirect GOE for full year(1)$386 millionAbove target
Organizational
nAdvance AIG’s workplace of Headquartersthe future
nTalent development
Investments Performance Assessment vs. Expectations115.0%
Life
nEmphasized commitment of the leadership team to a culture of inclusion and Retirement
Normalized Return on Adjusted Segment Common Equity(1)13.6%Target
Indirect componentintegrity in line with AIG's Purpose & Values to promote alignment, collaboration, transparency and improved decision-making through robust engagement with global AIG employees
nContinued development of
GOE (Net)(1)$1,513 millionBelow target
HeadquartersCapital—RBC(2)433%Above target
Capital—Liquidity key personnel to Parent$2,296 millionAbove target
Life and Retirement Performance Assessment vs. Expectations102.5%
*Above Target (101%-150% payout); Target (100% payout); Threshold (50%-99% payout); Below Threshold (0% payout).

(1)We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric to ensure that results properly reflect management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.

(2)RBC is a formula designed to measure the adequacy of an insurer’s statutory surplus compared to the risks inherent to the business. The inclusion of RBC measures is not intended for the purpose of ranking any insurance company or for use in connection with any marketing, advertising or promotional activities.

The following tables summarize the 2020 objectives and describe the achievements considered by the CMRC in assessing each named executive’s performance.

72 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Brian Duperreault | Chief Executive Officer

Area and PurposeAchievements

Financial

Position AIG for long-term, profitable growth

    AIG delivered strong results in key performance areas for 2020, including:

    Accident Year Combined Ratio, As Adjusted* of 94.1%

    Life and Retirement Normalized Return on Adjusted Segment Common Equity* of 13.6%

    Final score was determined with reference to the Headquarters performance assessment detailed above

    Assessed above target—107.5%

Strategic

Successfully execute key business initiatives, build AIG’s brand as a leading global insurance company and ensure robust succession plans for critical roles

    AIG conducted and invested in building a strategic reviewcohesive, collaborative and high performing group of its portfolioour most impactful leaders

nThrough internal promotions and potential levers for unlocking shareholder value while positioning the enterprise for growth that resulted in the October 2020 announcement of the intent to separate the Life and Retirement business from AIG

    AIG completed the sale of a majority interest in Fortitude Holdings, a de-risking priority

    Partnered withexternal hires, built the AIG Board to implement a thoughtful, well-coordinated Chief Executive Officer succession process, resulting in Mr. Zaffino being named asLeadership Team for the incoming Chief Executive Officer effective March 1, 2021

Operational

Lead effective COVID-19 response with a focus on employee safety, drive risk management improvements

    In connection with the COVID-19 crisis, AIG expended significant efforts to support employees following rapid decision to shut down offices and stand-up robust remote working for over 40,000 employees; provided a $500 grant to all employees for unforeseen expenses; created a pandemic loan program; and developed a comprehensive Wellness at AIG program

    AIG continued to drive focus on risk-based decision-making and mindset and advanced risk management and governance frameworks to address emerging risks

Organizational

Foster a rewarding and inclusive culture with a focus on talent development, diversity, equity and inclusion, and employee well-being related to the COVID-19 crisis

    Launched an Executive Diversity Council focused on culture of inclusion and belonging, engaging 17,000 employees in Courageous Conversations and implementing a variety of employee suggested programs and initiatives

Brian Duperreault Individual Performance Score: 140%

*We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric to ensure that results properly reflect management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.

2021 Proxy Statement73

Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Based on these accomplishments, the CMRC determined that Mr. Duperreault exceeded expectations with strong AIG financial performance in light of the unprecedented COVID-19 crisis and his efforts in executing a well-coordinated Chief Executive Officer succession process which culminated in the October 2020 announcement of Mr. Zaffino as the next Chief Executive Officer of AIG, effective March 1, 2021. As a result, the CMRC recommended, and the Board approved, an Individual Performance Score for Mr. Duperreault of 140 percent. In light of AIG’s TSR relative to compensation peers in 2020, the CMRC and Mr. Duperreault determined that the Business Performance Score applied to the 2020 STI decision for Mr. Duperreault should be 100 percent. When combined, these scores resulted in a calculated STI award to Mr. Duperreault of $6,300,000, representing 140 percent of target. However, given AIG’s stock price performance, the CMRC and Mr. Duperreault determined that Mr. Duperreault’s 2020 STI award should be paid at target. Accordingly, Mr. Duperreault’s 2020 STI award was adjusted downward to $4,500,000, representing 100 percent of target.

*   In lightnext era of AIG’s TSR relative to compensation peers in 2020.future
nExtended AIG’s partnership with The CMRC and Mr. Duperreault determinedR&A, such that (i)AIG will remain the Business Performance Score applied to Mr. Duperreault’s 2020 STI award should be 100%; and (ii) the Chief Executive Officer’s 2020 STI award should be paid at target, notwithstanding AIG’s successful navigation of the unprecedented COVID-19 crisis and Mr. Duperreault’s efforts in executing a well-coordinated CEO succession process, resulting in an Individual Performance Score of 140%.

74 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Mark D. Lyons | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Area and Summary
of Goals
Achievements

Financial

Position AIG for long-term, profitable growth

     Determined with reference to the Headquarters performance assessment detailed above

     Assessed above target—107.5%

Strategic 

Provide decision support to execute on key strategies; provide M&A execution support; engage with investors and key ratings agencies; deliver against critical strategic initiatives for Finance

     Participated in a comprehensive review of AIG’s composite structure, including review of strategic, operational, capital and tax implications and developed output that resulted in the October 2020 announcement of intent to separate the Life and Retirement business from AIG

     Led continuous proactive engagement with investors and rating agencies to ensure understanding of AIG’s COVID-19 response and strong capital position against the backdrop of earnings pressures and volatile markets

Operational

Effectively execute against the 2020 Budget and Capital Plan; meet tax and accounting objectives; progress on AIG 200 finance initiatives for 2020; maintain a robust control environment; lead effective crisis response to the COVID-19 crisis regarding business continuity, employee engagement and liquidity

     Successfully executed revised capital plan goals, including a successful raising of $4.1 billion in debt which provided additional financial flexibility in the face of capital market volatility

     Delivered considerable savings through effective tax management solutions, including planning and implementing strategies that protected against the potential expiration of foreign tax credits

     Achieved meaningful accounting outcomes, including the successful implementation of current expected credit losses methodology and progress on the implementation of Long-Duration Targeted Improvements accounting

Organizational

Enhance development and demonstration of leadership competences in interactions within Finance across AIG; continue to develop a best-in class workforce; promote a culture of integrity; improve representation of diverse talent

     Ensured ongoing engagementTitle Sponsor of the AIG Finance functionWomen’s Open through 2030, and increased the 2023 prize fund by over 20 percent to $9 million

nContinued to improve AIG’s industry recognition in a remote work environment through video technology, increased communication, townhallsdiversity and ’skip level’ meetings for informal small group discussions

     Continued best practices, filling more senior roles through internal promotions, increasing the proportionsense of external diverse hires, hosting listening sessions to drive a more inclusive culture, conducting special sessions for high performing employees and early career employees, and furthered early career programs and partnered with Early Careers to increase the diversity of candidate pools

     Active and continued promotion of a culture of integrity through behavior-driven leadership, regular communication and encouraging open dialogue

community; received multiple recognitions, including #35 on DiversityInc.’s Top 50 list
Mark Lyons Individual Performance Score: 150%

Based

(1)Net Premiums Written on these accomplishments,a comparable basis reflects year-over-year comparison on a constant dollar basis adjusted for the CMRC determined that Mr. Lyons provided significant contributions to AIG in 2020 well beyond achievementInternational lag elimination, the sale of his individual goals. In particular,Crop Risk Services, inc. and the CMRC recognized Mr. Lyons’ essential role in meeting AIG’s key strategic prioritiessale of maintaining liquidity and capital preservation. He also led AIG’s engagement with rating agencies and investors, ensuring recognition from these key stakeholders that the COVID-19 crisis was an earnings event and not a capital event for AIG. As a result, the CMRC approved an Individual Performance Score for Mr. Lyons of 150 percent, which, when combined with the Business Performance Score of 107.5 percent, resulted in an STI payment of $3,059,00, representing 161 percent of target.

Validus Re.
2021 Proxy Statement75

Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Peter Zaffino | President and Global Chief Operating Officer

Area and Summary
of Goals
Achievements

Financial

Position AIG for long-term, profitable growth

•     Determined with reference to the Headquarters and General Insurance performance assessments detailed above

•     Both assessed above target—107.5%

Strategic

Execute on General Insurance strategic plan 2020 and drive the planned 2020 AIG 200 actions for operational and financial performance improvement

•     Led a comprehensive review of AIG’s composite structure and development of a strategic plan to unlock shareholder value, that resulted in the October 2020 announcement of intent to separate the Life and Retirement business from AIG, pursuit of which was enabled by strengthening of the General Insurance business since 2017

•     Designed and operationalized continued General Insurance underwriting improvements and strategic portfolio optimization, including improved underwriting discipline in General Insurance’s North America and International businesses; growth in higher margin lines, continued improvement in the overall mix of business despite the impact of the COVID-19 crisis; the launch of Syndicate 2019 in partnership with Lloyd’s; and achieved significant rate improvement across multiple lines

•     Further evolved AIG’s reinsurance program without increasing net exposures and reducing spend enabled by improvements in gross underwriting; purchased additional aggregate protection with favorable terms

Operational

Continue to drive efforts to streamline end-to-end business processes, increase the quality and speed of decision-making, improve data quality and enhance governance processes; lead effective crisis response to the COVID-19 crisis regarding business continuity, employee engagement and liquidity

•     Successfully led the AIG 200 transformational initiative including the accelerated execution of certain programs in a remote working environment resulting in AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings* of approximately $400 million, which exceeded target by 30% 

•     Led AIG’s COVID-19 response, maintaining high employee engagement and productivity through frequent and transparent communications across the organization and deployment of effective technology and collaboration platforms

•     Conducted extensive outreach with regulators, rating agencies and investors to provide assurances regarding AIG’s financial strength and liquidity and ability to manage through the COVID-19 crisis

Organizational

Continue to execute on multi-year General Insurance Human Capital Plan; implement transformation change under AIG 200; promote a culture of integrity; provide leadership to diversity, equity and inclusion actions

•     Aggressively pursued talent development commitment by making critical strategic hires, including diverse talent, and evaluating internal talent across the firm to strengthen the leadership bench, improve succession planning, and place needed skills and capabilities in the right roles

•     Built an exceptional pipeline of senior leaders, transitioning members of the General Insurance leadership team into new roles, including the promotion of a new Chief Executive Officer of General Insurance in August 2020

Peter Zaffino Individual Performance Score: 150%
*We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric to ensure that results properly reflect management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.

76 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Based on these accomplishments, the CMRC determined that Mr. Zaffino significantly exceeded his expected contributions to AIG in 2020. In particular,2023. As a result, the Committee recognized Mr. Zaffino’s exceptional leadership of AIG’s response to the unprecedented COVID-19 crisis in his role as President and Global Chief Operating Officer that enabled AIG to continue to execute on key priorities, including AIG 200CMRC recommended, and the strategic decisionBoard approved, an Individual Performance Score for Mr. Zaffino of 150 percent, which, when combined with the Corporate quantitative Business Performance Score, resulted in 221 percent of target. His earned STI award was capped at 200 percent of target pursuant to separateour STI plan. As such, Mr. Zaffino received an STI payout of $9,000,000.
Target Short-Term Incentive Award
$4,500,000
x.jpg
Business Performance Score Corporate
147%
x.jpg
Individual Performance Score
150%
=
Actual Short-Term Incentive Award
(200% of target)
$9,000,000
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT55

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
Sabra R. Purtill
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Pillar and Goal OverviewAchievements
Financial
nImprove Adjusted ROCE* components on our path to achieving 10%+ Adjusted ROCE*
nExecute AIG’s short and long-term capital management and liquidity strategy
nOptimize the balance sheet through cash management efficiencies
nOversaw execution against AIG’s 2023 Capital Plan returning over $4 billion to shareholders through $3 billion of share repurchases and $1 billion in common and preferred stock dividends, including a 12.5 percent increase to the Company’s quarterly cash dividend, the first increase since 2016
nImproved AIG Parent company liquidity, finishing the year with $7.6 billion in liquidity, and reduced AIG’s Total debt to capital ratio to 27.8 percent at December 31, 2023, a 500 basis point improvement over the prior year
nContinued to strengthen capitalization of insurance company subsidiaries
nSupported two special dividends to Corebridge shareholders and creation of Corebridge’s first share repurchase program
nExecuted on the strategy to improve Adjusted ROCE* through disciplined management of parent company expenses and improved net investment income yields
Strategic
nProgress on deconsolidation of Corebridge
nPromote best-in-class capabilities
nProgressed financial and operational separation of Corebridge to final stages
Supported the completion of (i) three secondary offerings in June, November and December of 2023, and (ii) two direct share repurchases by Corebridge, reducing AIG's ownership of Corebridge from 77.7 percent at year end 2022 to 52.2 percent at year end 2023
Drove continued transformation of Investments function with the (i) transfer to BlackRock of $135 billion of the investment portfolio, including $76 billion of Corebridge assets as of December 31, 2023, (ii) establishment of oversight and monitoring processes for third party investment managers, and (iii) advancement of the implementation of BlackRock’s Aladdin platform
Supported achievement of Corebridge expense savings through continued execution of outsourcing activities
nSupported multiple strategic transactions, including the formation of Private Client Select as Managing General Agent, the sale of Crop Risk Services, Inc., the sale of Validus Re to RenaissanceRe and Corebridge’s sale of Laya Healthcare to AXA for €650 million
nPromoted investment community confidence by engaging directly with shareholders and participating in numerous industry conferences
nLed engagement with rating agencies, resulting in positive rating actions from all four nationally recognized statistical rating agencies
Operational
nProgress operational excellence
nSuccessfully implemented operational improvements within Finance, Internal Audit, Treasury, Tax, Investments and Actuarial teams
nEliminated International GI financial reporting lag for year-end 2022 financial reporting for U.S. GAAP and for first quarter 2023 for U.S. statutory accounting
nSuccessfully achieved financial close acceleration program through the implementation and integration of the global data warehouse, financial sub-ledger and reinsurance management platform
nCompleted implementation of new Treasury management system, which resulted in greater streamlining of cash management processes
nAdvanced Corebridge accounting, financial, and operational separation and supported multi-year project for new LDTI accounting principle
56AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
Pillar and Goal OverviewAchievements
Organizational
nEnhance leadership development & communication
nAttract and retain best-in-class workforce
nPromote risk awareness and risk-management
nSuccessfully integrated Investments and Internal Audit functions within the Finance organization
nConducted talent reviews and succession planning exercises focused on identifying emerging diverse talent for critical roles
nStrengthened internal talent pipelines through movement of internal employees across existing and new roles
nContinued focus on building risk culture across global Finance, in partnership with Risk Management, Internal Audit and Financial Controls
nParticipated in apprenticeship programs that lead to an increase in diverse hires
Sabra R. Purtill Individual Performance Score: 114%
Based on these accomplishments, the Life and Retirement business from AIG. Further, the Committee acknowledged Mr. Zaffino’s leadership of the General Insurance business through most of the year, which saw continued improvementCMRC determined that Ms. Purtill's contributions to AIG in the face of the significant challenges of the global pandemic.2023 exceeded expectations. As a result, the CMRC approved an Individual Performance Score for Mr. Zaffino of 150 percent. The CMRC and Mr. Zaffino agreed to lower114 percent, which, when combined with the Corporate quantitative Business Performance Score, applied to Mr. Zaffino’s 2020 STI award from 107.5 to 100 percent. When combined, these scores, resulted in an STI payment to Mr. Zaffino of $4,500,000,$2,850,000, representing 150168 percent of target.

*  The CMRC and Mr. Zaffino agreed to lower the
Target Short-Term Incentive Award
$1,700,000
x.jpg
Business Performance Score applied to Mr. Zaffino’s 2020 STI award from 107.5% to 100%.

2021 Proxy StatementCorporate
147%
x.jpg
77
Individual Performance Score
114%

=
Actual Short-Term Incentive Award
(168% of target)
$2,850,000
Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Douglas A. Dachille |

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT57

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
Kevin T. Hogan
President & Chief Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer,

Corebridge Financial, Inc.
Area
Pillar and Summary
of GoalsGoal Overview
Achievements

Financial

Position AIG

nAchieve Corebridge's 2023 financial performance goals
nMaintain strong balance sheet and capital management discipline
nDelivered strong 2023 financial results for long-term, profitableCorebridge
Pre-Tax Income was $940 million; Adjusted Pre-Tax Operating Income* was $3.2 billion, an increase of $339 million year-over-year
Delivered RoAE of 10.7 percent; Improved Adjusted RoAE* by 90 basis points year-over-year
Achieved Operating Earnings* of $4.10 per share, exceeding consensus and target
nOversaw proactive balance sheet management supportive of significant growth and capital management objectives
nReturned over $2.2 billion to Corebridge shareholders through Investments performance

•     Determined$589 million in regular dividends, $1.1 billion in special dividends and $498 million of share repurchases

nOpportunistically paid off $1.25 billion of Corebridge’s remaining outstanding $1.5 billion Delayed Draw Term Facility balance using proceeds from Corebridge senior note issuances, reducing interest expense
nMaintained strong Corebridge parent company liquidity, ending the year with reference to the Investment performance assessment detailed above

•     Assessed above target—115%

$1.6 billion

Strategic

Establish best in class

nFully integrate best-in-class partnerships and third-party asset management practicescapabilities
nSuccessfully completed outsourcing strategies, representing approximately $86 million in expense savings
nCompleted integration of third-party asset managers (BlackRock and achieveBlackstone Inc.) into Corebridge’s Investments data environment
nEstablished relationships with key milestones in the strategic plan; complete Fortitude Holdings transaction

stakeholders, including investors, analysts, rating agencies and regulators
Operational
nSimplify Corebridge's operating model
nDeliver on Corebridge Forward, Corebridge's expense savings and modernization initiative

•     Led the

nFacilitated simplification of Corebridge's operating model via completed sale of Laya in October 2023 and entry into a majority interest in Fortitude Holdings, a significant de-risking priority

•     Exceeded newdefinitive agreement to sell Corebridge's UK Life business goal

nReorganized Corebridge operations, including Legal, Compliance and Regulatory and Enterprise Risk Management functions
nOversaw substantial operational and physical separation from AIG and further implemented standalone infrastructure
nExecuted or contracted for third-party asset management with several new client wins, operationalizing the business with a strategic business plan that included clear metrics and deliverables, with a focus on governance

over 85 percent of targeted savings via Corebridge Forward
nSubstantially progressed implementation of BlackRock's Aladdin platform within Investments

Operational

Contribute to operating structure and transformation work in Investments as part of AIG 200; reinforce a

Organizational
nPromote culture of integrity and prudent risk management; lead effective crisis responsemanagement
nRetain and attract leading and diverse talent
nEngaged employees through various internal events, including Corebridge’s second annual Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging Month
nRecruited diverse, industry leading talent to the COVID-19 crisis regarding business continuity, employee engagementexecutive and liquidity

•     Made progress on de-risking the investments portfolio; enhancedsenior leadership roles throughout Corebridge

nInitiated company-wide, multi-year governance frameworks that improve transparency and oversight in a range of areas including vendors

•     Quicklycontrols projects with respect to financial controls, risk management and successfully pivoted investments team to work from home model while maintaining control levels through protocols such as no voice trading; focused on employee engagement and prioritizing wellness through increased communication, access to resources and virtual events

•     Developed and maintained comprehensive COVID-19 stress scenarios

compliance functions

Organizational

Develop a comprehensive Human Capital Management Program to attract, retain, develop and reward top talent; engage teams through cross-functional initiatives; champion diversity efforts to increase representation in under-represented groups

•     Successfully realigned Investments senior leadership team responsibilities focused on building internal talent capabilities

•     Enhanced recruitment strategy to increase diversity and intern and analyst programs aimed at high-potential candidates with diverse backgrounds; launched a mentoring program and manager training program

•     Established a monthly Asset Management Learning Series to promote cross-team collaboration and develop talent and assembled a cross-functional team tasked with developing an ESG Investment framework to address client, consultant and regulatory needs

Douglas Dachille
Kevin T. Hogan Individual Performance Score: 123%104%

Based on these accomplishments, the CMRC determined that Mr. Dachille’sHogan delivered consistent high-quality performance in 2023. As a result, the CMRC approved an Individual Performance of 104 percent, which, when combined with the Corebridge quantitative Business Performance Score, resulted in an STI payment of $3,250,000, representing 144 percent of target.
Target Short-Term Incentive Award
$2,250,000
x.jpg
Business Performance Score Corebridge
139%
x.jpg
Individual Performance Score
104%
=
Actual Short-Term Incentive Award
(144% of target)
$3,250,000
58AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
David McElroy
Executive Vice President & Chief Executive Officer, General Insurance
Pillar and Goal OverviewAchievements
Financial
nAchieve General Insurance's financial objectives
nDelivered strong financial results for General Insurance:
Improved General Insurance year-over-year Calendar Year Combined Ratio by 130 basis points to 90.6 percent; improved General Insurance AYCR, as adjusted* by 100 basis points to 87.7 percent
Global Commercial had a combined ratio of 87.1 percent, a 250 basis point improvement year-over-year; Global Commercial AYCR, as adjusted* was 83.3 percent, a 120 basis point improvement over 2022
Marked the third consecutive year of underwriting profit improvement, with $301 million improvement in 2023
Strategic
nAdvance underwriting excellence
nDrive profitable growth
nSupport AIG’s net zero underwriting commitments
nIncreased General Insurance NPW 5 percent year-over-year, or 7 percent year-over-year on a comparable basis(1), led by 5.4 percent growth in Global Commercial
nDrove margin expansion through prioritizing underwriting excellence and growth in high margin lines
nDrove growth within key business lines, including Lexington, Global Specialty, Retail Property, Programs and Glatfelter, with a continued focus on volatility management
nDeveloped guidelines and transition plans to further the Company's sustainability commitments in underwriting
Operational
nSupport the implementation of AIG’s Target Operating Model and simplification efforts
nSupport the operational separation of Corebridge
nProgressed North America and Europe Standard Commercial Underwriting Platform programs
nAchieved significant milestones in AIG’s ongoing digital transformation, including launch of myAIG Broker Portal, and data management initiatives globally
nDeployed target operating model for North America and International underwriting operations
nServed as senior leader on AIG’s Joint Technology and Operations Steering Committee and liaison to key partners
Organizational
nPromote a culture rooted in AIG's Purpose and Values
nAdvance AIG's inclusive workplace of the future
nServed as interim Chief Underwriting Officer, providing leadership across General Insurance and emphasizing a culture of underwriting excellence
nEnhanced investment in talent through focused succession planning and strengthening of internal talent pipelines for leadership positions
nExpanded training courses for underwriting professionals and increased the breadth of executive leadership development programs
nIncreased representation of diverse hires across the business and enhanced support and direct sponsorship of Employee Resource Groups
(1)Net Premiums Written on a comparable basis reflects year-over-year comparison on a constant dollar basis adjusted for the International lag elimination, the sale of Crop Risk Services and the sale of Validus Re.
David McElroy Individual Performance Score: 113%
Based on these accomplishments, the CMRC determined that Mr. McElroy's contributions to AIG in 20202023 exceeded expectations. In particular, the CMRC recognized that, at a time of unprecedented market volatility, Mr. Dachille focused on AIG’s strategic priority of de-risking to produce net investment income results that exceeded benchmarks. As a result, the CMRC approved an Individual Performance Score for Mr. Dachille of 123113 percent, which, when combined with the General Insurance quantitative Business Performance Score, of 107.5 percent, resulted in an STI payment of $3,300,000,$4,250,000, representing 132170 percent of target.

78
Target Short-Term Incentive Award
$2,500,000
 
x.jpg
2021 Proxy Statement
Business Performance Score General Insurance
150%
x.jpg
Individual Performance Score
113%
=
Actual Short-Term Incentive Award
(170% of target)
$4,250,000

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT59
Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Lucy Fato |


Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
Claude Wade
Executive Vice President, General Counsel &Chief Digital Officer and Global Head of Communications and Government Affairs

Business Operations
Area
Pillar and Summary
of GoalsGoal Overview
Achievements

Financial

Position AIG for long-term, profitable growth

nAchieve financial goals

•     Determined with reference to

nSuccessfully completed Global Business Operations and IT target operating model during 2023, identifying $72 million of exit run-rate savings through organizational optimization efforts
nOversaw the Headquarters performance assessment detailed above

•     Assessed above target—107.5%

reinvestment of savings capacity generated by target operating model into foundational digital capabilities, including the reimagined myAIG Broker Portal

Strategic

Maintain positive relationships with regulators

nPromote best-in-class underwriting capabilities
nSupport separation and policymakers; support strategic transactionsrisk management activities
nDeveloped cross-functional key performance indicators for underwriting operations
nLaunched foundational digital capabilities to enable streamlined underwriting and de-risking initiatives;claims operations
nEstablished internal advisory group for the governance and enable actions to strengthen AIG’s balance sheetoversight of artificial intelligence within AIG
nLaunched first-ever generative AI initiative in AIG, the Underwriter Assist Pilot in North America Financial Lines, focused on driving growth and liquidity position,reducing cost
nCompleted all exit activities from North America data centers and reduce risk, particularly in light of the COVID-19 crisis

•     Oversaw and participated in enhanced engagement efforts with global regulators and policymakers, including real time communication regarding the COVID-19 crisis and its impact on AIG’s businesses, employees, policyholders and remote work environment; and responding to a significantly higher volume of requests for data throughout 2020

•     Led Legal, Compliance & Regulatory efforts on several strategic transactions and de-risking initiatives, including the sale of a majority interest in Fortitude Holdings; the successful raising of $4.1 billion in debt; the launch of Syndicate 2019 through a novel partnership with Lloyd’s; and the announcement of leadership transitions and the plannedoversaw related operational separation of the Life and Retirement business from AIG

•     Favorably resolved a number of legacy and other complex litigation matters

•     Supported the evolution of AIG’s Sustainability agenda and the enhancement of its reporting frameworks; and led AIG’s robust year-round shareholder engagement program, which resulted in meetings with shareholders representing over 50% of AIG’s outstanding shares in 2020

Corebridge

Operational

Support AIG 200 as

nDeliver operational excellence
nLaunched redesigned myAIG digital broker portal in North America enabling single sign-on and multi-factor authentication for users, creating a membersingle front door for broker digital interactions
nSupported modernization of the Steering Committee; and serve as executive sponsor of Organizational Health Initiatives

•     Served as a member of the AIG 200 Steering Committee with a focus on risk and control frameworks, and Organizational Health

•     Oversaw Legal, Compliance & Regulatory support of AIG 200 initiatives, including partnerships with third parties to ensure compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and governance protocolsoperations in the jurisdictions in which AIG operates

•     Led an enterprise-wide initiative to embed Organizational Health programs in AIG 200 workstreams

•     Designed an enhanced internal and external communications strategyJapan

nDelivered contractual productivity savings in connection with the COVID-19 crisis, social unrestAIG’s outsourcing partnerships
nDelivered fully integrated global data warehouse in the U.S. and abroad, AIG 200, and leadership transition announcements

support of financial close acceleration program

Organizational

Promote a culture

nPromotes AIG's Purpose and Values
nAttract and retain top talent
nAdvance AIG's inclusive workplace of integritythe future
nImplemented the Global Business Ops & IT Target Operating Model, focused on aligning the organization to be leaner and risk awareness; supportmore effective
nEstablished the Global Business Operations and IT engagement committee, focusing on communications, networking, volunteer opportunities and health and wellness within the team
nLaunched U.S. apprenticeship program within Underwriting, targeting community colleges to enhance workforce diversity equity,
nFocused on promoting inclusive representation across the organization by actively promoting opportunities and inclusion initiatives; and encourage participation in ERGs and Pro Bono matters

•     Oversaw AIG’s Global Compliance department’s efforts and initiatives designed to maintaindeveloping a robust culturepipeline of integrity and compliance framework, particularly in a remote work environment

•     Promoted AIG’s diversity, equity, and inclusion goals, including by following the “Rooney Rule” with respect to open positions; and encouraged participation in ERGs anddiverse talent development programs, specifically those targeted at developing women and other underrepresented groups

•     Oversaw AIG’s award-winning Pro Bono Program; established a new pillar of the Pro Bono Program focused on criminal and social justice reform; and created a full-time position for a Pro Bono Coordinator to reinforce AIG’s commitment to providing legal and other services to those most in need

Lucy Fato’s
Claude Wade Individual Performance Score: 140%

2021 Proxy Statement79

114%
Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Based on these accomplishments, the CMRC determined that Ms. Fato made significantMr. Wade's contributions to AIG and demonstrated exemplary leadership on key priorities. In particular, the CMRC recognized Ms. Fato’s success at leading the support of AIG’s employees, and promoting transparent communication with key stakeholders, regarding AIG’s response to the COVID-19 crisis.in 2023 exceeded expectations. As a result, the CMRC approved an Individual Performance Score for Ms. Fato of 140114 percent, which, when combined with the Corporate quantitative Business Performance Score, of 107.5 percent, resulted in an STI payment of $2,869,000,$3,350,000, representing 151168 percent of target.

In summary, 2020 performance resulted in the following STI awards to each named executive relative to his or her target:

Named Executive  2020 Target
Short-Term
Incentive Award
  Business
Performance Result
  Individual
Performance
Scorecard Result
  2020 Actual
Short-Term
Incentive
Award
 
Brian Duperreault  $4,500,000  100%(1)  140%$4,500,000(1) 
Mark D. Lyons  $1,900,000  107.5%  150%$3,059,000 
Peter Zaffino  $3,000,000  100%(2)  150%$4,500,000 
Douglas A. Dachille  $2,500,000  107.5%  123%$3,300,000 
Lucy Fato  $1,900,000  107.5%  140%$2,869,000 
Target Short-Term Incentive Award
$2,000,000
(1)
x.jpg
In light of AIG’s TSR relative to compensation peers in 2020, the CMRC and Mr. Duperreault determined that (i) the
Business Performance Score applied to the 2020 STI decision for Mr. Duperreault should be 100%; and (ii) the Chief Executive Officer’s 2020 STI award should be paid at target, notwithstanding AIG’s successful navigation of the unprecedented COVID-19 crisis and Mr. Duperreault’s efforts in executing a well-coordinated Chief Executive Officer succession process, resulting in an Corporate
147%
x.jpg
Individual Performance Score
114%
=
Actual Short-Term Incentive Award
(168% of 140%.
(2)The CMRC and Mr. Zaffino agreed to lower the Business Performance Score applied to Mr. Zaffino’s 2020 STI award from 107.5% to 100%.

80 2021 Proxy Statement

target)
$3,350,000
Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis

2020


60AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
Former Executive Officers
Shane Fitzsimons, Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
The CMRC determined that Mr. Fitzsimons' critical contributions to several strategic initiatives in 2023 including the design of our target operating model and commencement of the implementation of BlackRock's Aladdin platform, exceeded expectations. As a result, the CMRC approved an Individual Performance Score of 136 percent, which, when combined with the Corporate quantitative Business Performance Score, resulted in an STI payment of $1,800,000, representing 200 percent of his pro-rated target.
Lucy Fato, Former Vice Chair
The CMRC determined that Ms. Fato's contributions in 2023 met expectations. As a result, the CMRC approved an Individual Performance Score of 100 percent, which, when combined with the Corporate quantitative Business Performance Score, resulted in an STI payment of $2,800,000, representing 147 percent of target.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT61

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
2023 Long-Term Incentive Awards

At a Glance:

•     Modified PSU metrics for 2020 to increase the use

nChairman & CEO's awards are 100 percent performance-based, consisting of relative metrics given market uncertainty, and incorporate an AIG 200 metric following its launch in 2019

What’s Unchanged for 2020:

•     75% performance-based in PSUs (50%)(75 percent) and stock options (25%); 25%(25 percent)

nOther named executives' awards are 75 percent performance-based, consisting of PSUs (50 percent) and stock options (25 percent), and 25 percent time-based in the form of RSUs

•     All equity awards subject to cliff vesting over a three-year time horizon

•     

nTarget annual award value is established annually and informed by market data

•     Actual target grant can reflect up to 150% of the target value, informed by factors, including extraordinary achievements, to provide an incremental incentive for future success and/or to enhance retention

•     

nPSU payoutpayouts are capped at 200%200 percent of target

•     Subject

nAwards are subject to AIG clawback

policies (as applicable)

Changes
for 2020:

•     Delayed grant of 2020 PSUs until July 2020, providing more time2023:

nChairman & CEO's awards are 100 percent performance-based
nAIG General Operating Expenses metric was added and metric weightings rebalanced
nRelative TSR weighting increased from 10 percent to develop informed metrics20 percent, and set goalsAXA S.A. added to the peer group
nMr. Hogan's awards were granted in a challenging environment

•     PSUs based on two new metrics (Relative Tangible BVPS*combination of AIG and AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings*) and a new more expansive approach to assessing relative TSR (modifier rather than cap)

•     Relative Tangible BVPS* and GOE* metrics assessed on a one-year and three-year basis which, in combination with the use of a relative performance assessment for BVPS and TSR, is intended to most effectively align pay with performance over the next three years

•     Mr. Duperreault’s and Mr. Zaffino’s 2020 target opportunities increased to address market alignment shortfalls; Ms. Fato’s target opportunity increased in September 2020 in recognition of the expansion of her duties and responsibilities

*       We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric to ensure that results properly reflect management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.

Corebridge stock-based awards

Annual LTI awards made in the form of AIG equity awards under the LTI plan,typically represent the largest percentage of a named executive officer’sexecutive’s annual target compensation opportunity and are granted in vehiclesequity-based compensation (i.e., PSUs, stock options and RSUs) that reward long-term value creation, performance achievements and stock price appreciation. In considering awards to named executives, there are several design principles that the CMRC considers, including:

üProviding a risk-balanced portfolio of incentive vehicles

ü
nProviding a risk-balanced portfolio of incentive vehicles
nAligning performance with AIG’s strategic direction and trajectory that are within management control

üSimplicity

Typically, AIG grants LTI awards in March each year. In March 2020, COVID-19 was already impacting global economies and was on the brink of being declared a global pandemic. There was a great deal of uncertainty in the market regarding the impact the COVID-19 crisis would have on global economies, and the outlook for AIG was challenging to project. The CMRC determinedtrajectory that while it was appropriate to proceed with determining the total targetare within management control

nMaintaining simplicity

2023 Annual Long-Term Incentive Award Allocation(1)(2)
04 424782-3_gfx_LTIncentiveAward_Opt-2_A_A.jpg
(1)Reflects LTI award forallocations to current named executives.
(2)In 2023, Mr. Hogan's awards consisted of 50 percent PSUs granted by AIG, and 25 percent each named executive and grantingof stock options and RSUs to provide a degree of continuity and certainty to all participants, it was prudent to delay the grant of PSUs. This provided time to better understand the potential impact of the COVID-19 crisis on our businesses, for global economies to partially stabilize, and to update our performance expectations for the year. In turn this enabled a more informed determination of appropriate long-term performance metrics that would successfully align pay

2021 Proxy Statement81

granted by Corebridge.
Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis

and performance over the next three years as our named executives led AIG through the COVID-19 crisis and its collateral effects on the global economy.

As a result of this review, which spanned four CMRC meetings, two new performance metrics were identified to reflect our priorities in a COVID-19 environment: Relative Tangible BVPS* and AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings*. Changing the measurement of the BVPS metric from an absolute normalized basis to a relative tangible basis against defined peer groups mitigated the need to predict long-term performance and set rigorous absolute goals during an uncertain period. Details of these metrics are summarized below and discussed in more detail under “—2020 Performance Awards—Performance Share Units (50%).��

*We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric to ensure that results properly reflect management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.

All vehicles are subject to a three-year time horizon, with cliff vesting on January 1, 2023, following the three-year period and are covered by AIG’s clawback policy, further enhancing long-term alignment with shareholder interests and retention impact. We believe providingthat this mix of PSUs, stock options and RSUs continues to support maintainingsupports a high-performance culture and attractinghelps retain and retainingattract key talent through competitive compensation opportunities that do not encourage excessive risk-taking.

When determining the appropriateare consistent with market practice.

62AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
Summary of 2023 LTI awards to grant,Awards
Named Executive
2023 Target LTI Value2023 Individual Modifier2023 Target LTI Grant Value
Peter Zaffino$14,000,000 100 %$14,000,000
Sabra R. Purtill(1)
$1,600,000 150 %$2,400,000
Kevin T. Hogan(2)
$4,000,000 100 %$4,000,000
David McElroy$4,000,000 100 %$4,000,000
Claude Wade$1,500,000 100 %$1,500,000
Former Executive Officers(3)
Shane Fitzsimons$3,400,000 100 %$3,400,000
Lucy Fato$3,300,000 100 %$3,300,000
(1)Ms. Purtill's 2023 target LTI value reflects her role as Interim Chief Financial Officer. In recognition of her appointment as Interim Chief Financial Officer, the CMRC considers whether to modify any individualapproved an LTI award grants. The actualmodifier of 150 percent for Ms. Purtill. Following her appointment as Chief Financial Officer, the CMRC approved an additional award of RSUs with a value equal to $1.25 million and increased her target LTI award opportunity for 2024 to $2,900,000. See "—Executive Summary—Our Named Executives—Chief Financial Officer Transitions" for further details.
(2)Mr. Hogan's LTI awards consisted of 50 percent PSUs granted can reflect up to 150by AIG Parent and 25 percent each of an individual’s target value, based on the CMRC’s assessment of a range of factors, including consideration of prior year performancestock options and contributions, the complexity of expected contributions and the desire to enhance retention and/or provide incremental incentive for future success over the three-year performance period.

Ms. FatoRSUs granted by Corebridge.

(3)Mr. Lyons was the only named executivenot eligible to receive a modification to her2023 LTI grant in 2020. This individual modifier of 125 percent reflected additional responsibilities she assumed in October 2018 as Interim Head of Human Resources pending the arrival of Karen Ling in July 2019 and was in recognition of her performance in that role, including leading the search process that led to the hiring of Ms. Ling. Separately, on the expansion of Ms. Fato’s role in September 2020 to include Global Communications and Government Affairs, her annual LTI target value was increased to $3,300,000 resulting in an additional LTI award of $700,000 in September 2020. This represented the incremental additional grant value, prior to the application of the individual modifier. No individual modifier was applied to the September award. This award took the same form in terms of mix and performance metrics as the award received earlier in the year.

82 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In 2020, the CMRC approved the following target LTI values and actual target LTI grants for the named executives:

Named Executive 2020 Target LTI
Value
 2020 Individual
Modifier
 2020 Target LTI
Grant Value
 
Brian Duperreault $12,900,000   $12,900,000 
Mark D. Lyons $3,300,000   $3,300,000 
Peter Zaffino $8,600,000   $8,600,000 
Douglas A. Dachille $4,250,000   $4,250,000 
Lucy Fato(1) $3,300,000  125% $3,950,000 
(1)Total award comprises (i) Ms. Fato’s target LTI opportunity prior to the expansion of her role and responsibilities ($2,600,000), modified by 125% ($2,600,000 x 125% = $3,250,000); and (ii) an additional LTI grant of $700,000 relating to the increase to her target opportunity she received in connection with her role expansion in September 2020, resulting in a total 2020 LTI grant of $3,950,000. Ms. Fato’s total target LTI value for 2020, prior to the application of the individual modifier was $3,300,000.

In making the actualLTI awards, the CMRC approved target dollar amounts that are converted into a number of PSUs, RSUs and stock options. The number of PSUs and RSUs inconstituting an annual grant is based on the average closing price of AIG Parent common stock (or Corebridge common stock for Mr. Hogan's RSUs) over the five trading days preceding the grant date, rounded down to the nearest whole unit. The number of stock options is based on the grant date fair value of a stock option to purchase a share of AIG common stock. In 2020, the annual grant date for RSUs and stock options was in March, and for PSUs was in July. The number of any PSUs or RSUs granted outside of the annual grant process is based on the average closing price of AIGParent common stock over(or Corebridge common stock in the first five trading dayscase of the month of the offer of employment or effective month of a promotion, as applicable.

2020Mr. Hogan).

2023 Annual Performance Awards

Performance Share Units (50%)

The 20202023 PSU awards can be earned based on achievement of performance over a period of three years.years from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025. The approach for 2020 was established with careful consideration toChairman and CEO and Mr. Fitzsimons each received 75 percent of their LTI awards in the uncertain duration and ultimate impactform of PSUs. Other current named executives received 50 percent of their LTI awards in the COVID-19 crisis.form of PSUs. The grant of awards was delayed from March to July, given the lack of visibility as to the true dimensions of the COVID-19 crisis and the related market volatility at the time which made it challenging to establish performance goals in light of evolving strategic priorities. To address concerns regarding goal setting and ensuring the successful alignment of pay with performance the CMRC approved a plan that combines Relative Tangible BVPS* growth on an additive basis with AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings* under our AIG 200 strategy, subject to a relative TSR modifier.

*       We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric to ensure that results properly reflect management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.

2021 Proxy Statement83

Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis

These performance metrics will be criticalthat apply to AIG emerging from the COVID-19 crisis stronger, in2023 PSU awards incentivize delivering long-term profitable growth for our shareholders through a position to unlock further value for shareholders.

culture of underwriting and operational excellence.
 +
 +
 +
Cumulative Diluted Normalized AATI Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders
Per Share*
AIG Parent General Operating Expenses
Accident Year
Combined Ratio, as adjusted*
Relative Total
Shareholder Return
30%25%25%20%
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT63

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes
MetricDescriptionTargetWhy It Matters to AIG
Cumulative Diluted Normalized AATI Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders Per Share*
Achievement of three-year Cumulative Diluted Normalized AATI Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders Per Share*, adjusted for the following:
nRelative Tangible
BVPS(1)
To enhance the alignmentto baseline expectations:
Alternative investment returns
Fair value changes on fixed maturity securities
CAT losses, net of payouts with performance, separate peer groups were developedreinsurance
Return on business transactions
nAnnual actuarial assumption update for General Insurance and Life and Retirement. This reflects the different BVPS expectationsRetirement
nCOVID-19 mortality impact for each, both within AIGLife and observed in the market. To assess aggregate performance, the outcome related to each group will be weighted on a 60% (General Insurance)Retirement
nPrior year loss reserve development, net of reinsurance and 40% (Life and Retirement) basis, reflecting AIG’s portfolio mix.premium adjustments
Measures AIG’s progress as compared to peers on a key performance metric that drives stock performanceour success in creating long-term profitable growth for shareholders
AIG 200Parent General Operating ExpensesAIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings(1)Goals assess continued progress in expense rationalization, with consecutive annual improvement to incentivize continued improvement over the three-year performance periodMeasures theour success in rationalizing our expense base as part of our transformation program’s sustainable impact on AIG’s overall cost structurean effective Corebridge separation and organizational simplification
Accident Year Combined Ratio, as adjusted*Goals assess maintaining sub-90 percent AYCR, as adjusted*, with consecutive average annual improvement to incentivize continued improvement over the three-year performance periodMeasures our underwriting excellence related to our underlying risk selection, expense discipline and profitability
Relative TSR

Cumulative TSR delivered during the three-year performance period from July 1, 2020 ending December 31, 20222025 relative to a custom group of AIG peers(2)

Peer group comprises BVPS peers for General Insurance and Life and Retirement peers, and five additional composite insurance companies

If AIG TSR is in the top quartile, payouts are increased by 10%; if AIG TSR is in the lower quartile, payouts are reduced by 10%.

Property & Casualty peers**
Measures our relative success in delivering market competitive returns to shareholders as compared to peers
(1)We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric to ensure that results properly reflect management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.

(2)TSR calculated based on (i) the average stock prices for the month preceding the performance period; and (ii) the average stock prices for the final month of the performance period.

To reflect the ongoing global economic uncertainty, the Relative Tangible BVPS and AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings goals combine one-year and three-year performance horizons. This dual perspective uses one-year goals to mitigate the risk of setting unrealistic three-year goals while maintaining executives’ focus on three-year performance.

The performance assessment comprises three components as detailed below.

84 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Performance assessed over three one-year periods and a combined three-year performance period

Final score reflects three-year performance, but not less than**TSR calculated in local currency based on (i) the average annualstock prices for the month preceding the performance scores

Rank1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th8th
Payout200%175%150%100%100%75%50%0%
Results weighted 60% for General Insurance and 40% for Life and Retirement, reflecting AIG’s portfolio mix
Relative performance is assessed against two distinct groups of peers (General Insurance peersperiod; and Life and Retirement peers)

Performance is assessed against each group separately to determine(ii) the payout

Theaverage stock prices for the final score is calculated by combining the General Insurance and Life and Retirement payouts on a weighted basis (60/40)

Payout is capped at 75% if AIG ranks 8th on three or moremonth of the six one-year periods (three one-year periods measured relative to eachperformance period. Relative TSR peers comprised of the General InsuranceAXA, Chubb, CNA Financial, The Hartford, Markel, Tokio Marine, Travelers and Life and Retirement peers)

For a list of the General Insurance and Life and Retirement peers, see”—Compensation Design—Use of Market Data—Long-Term Incentive Peer Groups”

Performance assessed over three one-year periods and a combined three-year performance period

Final score reflects three-year performance, but not less than the average annual performance scores

 AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings*
 202020212022
Threshold (50%)$150 M$350 M$700 M
Target (100%)$200 M$450 M$850 M
Stretch (150%)$300 M$600 M$1,000 M
Maximum (200%)n/an/a$1,200 M
Payout is capped at 75% if AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings* by 2022 are below $700M

Performance is assessed relative to this grid to determine the level of payout that has been earned

The maximum payout is only achievable if the three-year AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings* equal or exceed $1,200M

 

ASSESSED OVER JULY 1, 2020 – DECEMBER 31, 2022

Performance assessed from July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022

Shortened measurement period reflects delayed grant date

RankTop QuartileBottom Quartile
Modifier+10%-10%
Performance is assessed relative a single peer group that comprises 19 companies:

General Insurance BVPS peers

Life and Retirement BVPS peers

AIG composite insurer peers

For a complete list of the peers used for this relative TSR metric, see “—Compensation Design—Use of Market Data—Long-Term Incentive Peer Groups”

If AIG ranks in the top quartile, the payout score will be increased by 10%

If AIG ranks in the bottom quartile, the payout score will be reduced by 10%

No modifier will be applied if AIG ranks between the bottom and top quartiles

*We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric to ensure that results properly reflect management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.

2021 Proxy Statement85

W. R. Berkley.
Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The maximum payout opportunity of 200 percent of target reflects ambitious goals that require performance significantly above target. Actual performance relative to the goals approved by the CMRC in 20202023 will be disclosed in 20232026, following the certificationCMRC's assessment of results by the CMRC.performance metrics attainment. PSUs accrue dividend equivalent rights in the form of additionalcash, which are calculated based on the number of PSUs that performance vest and are delivered if andpaid when the underlying PSUs vest.

2020

Stock Options (25%)

Named executives’ 20202023 stock option awards become exercisable followingin equal installments on the completionfirst, second and third anniversaries of a three-yearthe date of grant, subject to continued service through each vesting period.date. All stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the underlying shares on the grant date of grant. Stock options granted in 2020 will vest on January 1, 2023 and haveare subject to a 10-yearten-year term. We view stock options as performance-based compensation assince stock options will only result in a gain to the valueexecutive if the stock price appreciates after the grant date.
Mr. Hogan's 2023 options were granted with respect to shares of a stock option is impacted by the price of AIG common stock at the time of vesting.

2020 Time-Vested Awards

2020 Corebridge.

Restricted Stock Units (25%)

Named executives’ 2020

The Chairman & CEO no longer receives any of his annual LTI award in the form of RSUs. Other current named executives continue to receive 25 percent of their LTI award in the form of RSUs which will vest in equal installments on January 1, 2023the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to continued service through each vesting date. RSU awards to named executives other than Mr. Hogan will be settled in AIG Parent common stock. As with PSUs,Mr. Hogan's RSU award will be settled in shares of Corebridge common stock. RSUs accrue dividend equivalent rights in the form of additional RSUscash that are deliveredis paid if and when the underlying RSUs vest.

Special Awards

The CMRC is committed

In connection with her appointment as Chief Financial Officer, Ms. Purtill received an additional award of RSUs with a value equal to identifying, attracting, motivating, rewarding$1.25 million, which will vest in three equal tranches on the first, second and retaining highly qualified leaders who drive AIG’s long-term success. These goals were particularly important to the CMRC in 2020, where the strength and performance of our senior leaders made them attractive targets in a competitive market for talent with turnaround experience.

The CMRC examined the role of our leadership team in our strategic priority areas and assessed the extraordinary efforts of certain named executives assuming new roles and responsibilities. In recognition of their demonstrated performance, the CMRC approved one-time RSU awards for three of our named executives.

In each case, the vesting schedule for the award was aligned with the rolethird anniversaries of the named executive and the size of the named executive’s award.

Named Executive OfficerTarget ValueDetails
Peter Zaffino$10,000,000

 One-time award

 Reflects promotion to the President role in the first quarter of 2020 and transition into Chief Executive Officer role, effective in March 2021; exceptional leadership in navigating the COVID-19 crisis; contributions and leadership that enabled AIG to announce the transformative separation of Life and Retirement from AIG; desire to increase direct shareholder alignment with successful execution of the transaction and new company strategy and to ensure long-term retention

 Vests in equal thirds on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date

Mark Lyons$3,000,000

 One-time award

 Reflects contributions in 2020 and desire to increase retention power

 Vests on the third anniversary of the grant date

86 2021 Proxy Statement

grant date.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

64AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Executive Compensation


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Named Executive OfficerTarget ValueDetails
Lucy Fato$1,000,000

 One-time award

 Reflects significant contributions beyond her areas of responsibility in 2020 and the expansion of her role to include Global Communications and Government Affairs

 Vests equally on the first and second anniversaries of the grant date 

2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes

Assessment of 20182021 Performance Share Units

The three-year performance period for the 20182021 PSUs ended on December 31, 2020.2023. These awards were subject to three equallyperformance metrics, including a relative TSR modifier:
Relative Tangible
Book Value Per Common Share (TBVPS)*
67%
+
Separation of Life and Retirement
33%
Relative TSR (Modifier) (+/- 25%)
Relative Tangible Book Value Per Common Share* - Payout vs Rank
283
nRelative Tangible Book Value Per Common Share* measured against separate General Insurance and Life and Retirement peer groups, with each group assessed over three one-year periods and a combined three-year performance period
Results are based on a weighted metrics:

average of 60 percent for the General Insurance peer group and 40 percent for the Life and Retirement peer group
Accident Year Combined Ratio, As Adjusted* improvement, measured annually
Relative TBVPS* Peer Groups
General Insurance
1.Chubb Limited
2.CNA Financial Corporation
3.The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
4.Markel Corporation
5.Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
6.The Travelers Companies, Inc.
7.W.R. Berkley Corporation
Life and Retirement
1.Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
2.Lincoln National Corporation
3.MetLife, Inc.
4.Principal Financial Group, Inc.
5.Prudential Financial, Inc.
6.Prudential plc
7.Voya Financial, Inc.
Composite Insurers
1.Allianz SE
2.AXA S.A.
3.Munich Re Group
4.Swiss Re Ltd
5.Zurich Insurance Group Ltd.

Relative TSR Peer Group

Core Normalized BVPS*Final score reflects three-year performance, but not less than the average annual performance scores
If three-year growth measured annuallyis ranked below threshold (7th place) for both business units, final payout is capped at 75 percent

Core NormalizednSeparation of Life & Retirement
Quantitative goals related to the disposition of defined ownership stakes in Life and Retirement combined with considerations related to AIG's financial leverage ratio
nTotal Shareholder Return on Attributed Common Equity*, measuredrelative to a single peer group comprising 19 companies from the date of grant through December 31, 2023
A modifier is applied if AIG ranks in the third year

In response totop quartile (+25 percent) or in the impact of the COVID-19 crisis, during 2020 the CMRC discussed whether it was appropriate to modify the performance metrics and/or goals that applied to the 2018 PSUs. In particular, the continuing relevance of the Core Normalized Return on Attributed Common Equity metric was debated given the bottom quartile (-25 percent)

AIG Board withdrew guidance on Core Normalized Return on Attributed Common Equity during the year. On balance, the CMRC resolved to make no changes to the previously approved metrics or goals for the named executives, given a desire to align outcomes with the experience of our shareholders 2024 PROXY STATEMENT65

Compensation Discussion and the long-term nature of the program.

Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes

In the first quarter of 2021,2024, the CMRC assessed performance over the three-year performance period and certified the results as follows: 

  Performance Goal
(% Payout)
 Actual Performance Earned Performance
(% Target)
 
Performance
Metric
  Threshold
(50%)
  Target
(100%)
  Maximum
(200%)
  FY 2018  FY 2019  FY 2020  FY 2018  FY 2019  FY 2020  Payout
(Weighted)
 
Accident Year Combined Ratio, as Adjusted, including Average Annual Losses*        103.9%  100.4%  98.1%         
Annual Improvement  0.5 pt  1 pt  2 pt  (0.9) pt  3.5 pt  2.3 Pt  0%  200%  200%  133% 
Core Normalized BVPS*       $48.28 $56.20 $63.36         
Annual Growth  5%  10%  15%  6.7%  16.4%  12.7%  67%  200%  155%  141% 
Core Normalized Return on Attributed Common Equity*  9%  10%  11%  N/A  N/A  6.3%  N/A  N/A  0%  0% 
 Combined 2018—2020 Performance Payout:91% 

set forth below in the following table. In addition, the CMRC determined that our Relative TSR over the performance period ranked in the top quartile of our peers, resulting in a +25 percent performance adjustment.
Relative Tangible BVPS* (67%)
Performance Goal (% Payout)Actual PerformanceEarned Performance (% Payout)
Threshold
(50%)
Target
(100%)
Stretch
(150%)
Maximum
(200%)
FY’21AFY’22AFY’23AFY’21AFY’22AFY’23APayout
(Weighted)
7th place4th or 5th place3rd place1st placeGeneral Insurance: 5th place (100%)General Insurance: 2nd place (175%)General Insurance: 2nd place (175%)130%165%175 %168 %
L&R: 2nd place (175%)L&R: 3rd place (150%)L&R: 2nd place (175%)
Separation of Life and Retirement (33%)
Performance Goals (% Payout) Actual Performance
Threshold (50%): Completion of all requirements leading up to a disposition of up to 19.9% of Life and Retirement other than regulatory filings. Implementation of Life & Retirement’s standalone capital structure
üAll necessary steps to execute a disposal complete
üBy December 31, 2023, AIG had disposed of 47.8% of Life and Retirement generating gross proceeds of $3.2 billion for AIG shareholders in 2023
Target (100%): Same as Threshold plus completion of up to a 19.9% sale of Life & Retirement and restructuring of AIG’s financial debt to achieve post-separation target financial leverage*
üAIG’s financial debt successfully restructured with financial leverage on December 31, 2023 of 27.8 percent which is in line with post-separation target
Stretch (150%): Same as Target plus substantially completed operational separation planWe make adjustments
üAdvanced to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposesthe final stages of this performance metric to ensure that results properly reflect management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanationoperational separation
Maximum (200%): Disposition of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.greater than 50% of Life & Retirement with the business being fully operational on a standalone basis×    Not achieved by December 31, 2023
Earned Performance (% Payout): 150%

Relative Total Shareholder Return (+/- 25 percent modifier)
AIG achieved TSR of 85.8percent over the three-year period(1), ranking in the top quartile relative to peers. This results in a positive 25 percent modifier applied to the earned payout.
Relative TBVPS*
(Weighted 67%)
168%
+
Separation of Life & Retirement (Weighted 33%)
150%
=
 Outcome of 2021 Proxy StatementPerformance Metrics
162%
Three-Year Relative TSR Modifier
x 25% modifier applied to the outcome of the 2021 performance metrics based on AIG's TSR top quartile rank among the TSR peer group
=
87x 25%
=
Final PSU Performance Payout(2)
200%

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(1)As reported share prices are adjusted for regular and special dividends paid over the performance period as well as any stock splits and spin-offs. Beginning dividend-adjusted share prices are measured using the average of December 2020 closing prices. Ending dividend adjusted share prices are measured using the average of December 2023 closing prices.

Executive Compensation

(2)PSU payout capped at 200 percent of target.
66AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

As a result of this performance, awards vested as follows: 

Named Executive 2018 PSU
Award
($)
 Target
2018 PSUs
 Earned PSUs
Vesting
 Additional
PSUs earned
from Vesting
Dividend
Equivalent
Rights(1)
 Value of
Total PSUs at Vesting($)
 Difference
Between
Grant and
Vesting
Value($)
 
Brian Duperreault 8,400,000 140,116 127,505 12,549 5,200,205 (3,199,795) 
Mark D. Lyons(2) 137,500 3,166 2,881 227 115,400 (22,100) 
Peter Zaffino 3,187,500 53,169 48,383 4,761 1,973,237 (1,214,263) 
Douglas A. Dachille 3,187,500 53,169 48,383 4,761 1,973,237 (1,214,263) 
Lucy Fato 1,562,500 26,063 23,717 2,334 967,274 (595,226) 

(1)Dividend equivalent rights only accrued on earned PSUs.

(2)Mark Lyons received a prorated award based on the date of his promotion to Chief Financial Officer in December 2018.

Analysis     2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes

Indirect Elements of Compensation

AIG provides

We provide named executives with a limited number of benefits and perquisites. These programs are generally aligned with those available to our other employees.

Welfare and Insurance Benefits

Named executives generally participate in the same broad-based health, life and disability benefit programs as AIG’s other employees.

Retirement Benefits

AIG provides

We provide retirement benefits to eligible employees. The only plan thatin which named executives actively participate in is a tax-qualified 401(k) plan. All participants, including named executives, receive Company contributions from AIG in the form of a match worthequal to 100 percent of the first 6six percent of their eligible compensation up to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)Code (IRC) compensation limit, which in 20202023 was $285,000.$330,000. In accordance with this limit, each named executivesexecutive received matching contributions of up to $17,100$19,800 in 2020. AIG2023. We also providesprovide a contribution of 3three percent of eligible compensation to all employees eligible to participate in the 401(k) plan, in addition to the 6six percent matching contribution, subject to IRSIRC limits.

Perquisites

AIG provides

We provide limited perquisites to employees, including named executives, to facilitate the performance of their management responsibilities. These perquisites include corporate aircraft usage (including by an executive’s spouse when traveling with the executive on business travel), use of companyCompany pool cars and drivers for commuting purposes and legal and financial planning services. In addition, starting in 2023, the Chairman & CEO receives an annual cash perquisite allowance of $35,000. An allowance is providedexecutive medical assessment.
We maintain certain security measures for the Chairman & CEO pursuant to enable named executives to cover costs associated with formerly offered perquisites, such as financial and estate planning.

Theour corporate security policy. Under the policy, the CMRC has approvedrequires the use of AIG-owned corporate aircraft and corporate aircraft owned by a third-party vendorother Company-provided transportation by our Chief Executive OfficerChairman & CEO for business and personal travel, with an allowance of up to $195,000 per year.year for personal flights taken on the corporate aircraft. Any use for personal travel beyond the allowance must be reimbursed to AIG. The calculationthe Company. We do not provide any excise tax payments, reimbursements or "gross ups" in connection with the Chairman & CEO's personal use of corporate aircraft. Use of the cost of any personal corporate aircraft usage is based on the aggregate incremental cost to AIG of theby other senior executives for personal travel whichis generally prohibited, however, exceptions may include, for AIG-owned corporate aircraft, direct operating cost of the aircraft (including with respect to any “deadhead” segments), including fuel, additives and lubricants, maintenance, airport fees and assessments, crew expenses and in-flight supplies and catering,be made in certain circumstances, such as applicable, and for corporate aircraft owned by a third-party vendor, the cost-per-flight-hour charge by the vendor as well as costs of fuel, taxes, crew expenses and airport fees and assessments, as applicable.

88 2021 Proxy Statement

medical emergencies.

Executive Compensation     Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Termination Practices and Policies

AIG provides severance benefits to its

In line with market practice among our peers, we maintain the Executive Severance Plan (ESP) for the benefit of named executives to offer competitive total compensation packages, help ensure executives’ ongoing retention when considering potential transactions that may create uncertainty as to their future employment with AIG and enable AIGus to obtain a release of employment-related claims.

Qualifying
Termination

 Termination by AIG without “cause” 

 Covered named executive terminates for “good reason”, including for qualifying executives after a “change in control” 

Severance Payment

 Pre-determined multiplier applied to: 

 Salary 

 Three-year average of actual STI payments 

 Severance multiple is 1.0 or 1.5 depending on an executive’s grade 

 Severance multiple increases to 1.5 or 2.0 for a qualifying termination within two years following a change in control 

In addition, we have entered into an employment agreement with the Chairman & CEO which provides for severance payments and benefits payable to him upon a qualifying termination of employment. Mr. Zaffino is not a participant in the ESP.

See “—“2023 Executive Compensation—Potential Payments on Termination” for more information on AIG’sour termination benefits and policies, including a description of certain modifications madethe potential severance payments and benefits payable to termination provisions within our compensation plans that went into effect in 2021.

2021 COMPENSATION PROGRAM DESIGN AND DECISIONS

Mr. Zaffino under his employment agreement.

2024 Compensation Program Design and Decisions
The CMRC approved AIG’s 2021our 2024 STI and LTI programs during the first quarter of 2021. The design of our 2021 compensation programs reflect a return to normal course following the pivot that was necessitated in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 crisis.

20212024.

2024 Short-Term Incentive Program Structure

The 2021design of the 2024 STI program followsis simplified to reflect a single consolidated Company Performance scorecard that will be applied to all current named executives in 2024, replacing the business unit specific scorecards assigned to current named executives in 2023. Other features of the STI program design of AIG’s STI programs prior to 2020. As in prior years,remain the same as 2023. STI awards for our named executives in 20212024 will continue to be based on a combination of athe empirical and quantitative Business Performance Scorebusiness results and Individual Performance Score. individual performance.
The BusinessCompany Performance Score will be based on performance against empiricalfour equally weighted metrics (25 percent each):
nAYCR, as adjusted*
nDiluted Normalized AATI Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders Per Share*
nAdjusted ROCE*
nAchievement of AIG Parent Exit Run-Rate General Operating Expenses* targets.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT67

Compensation Discussion and quantitative metrics assigned to the business unit relevant to each of our named executives.

The Headquarters Business Performance Score will be based on (1) a weighted average of the Business Performance Scores for General Insurance, LifeAnalysis     2024 Compensation Program Design and Retirement and Investments, assessed as described below; and (2) an AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings* goal.Decisions

The General Insurance Business Performance Score will be based on (1) Accident Year Combined Ratio, as Adjusted*; and (2) Calendar Year Combined Ratio Improvement Relative to Peers*.

The Life and Retirement Business Performance Score will be based on (1) Normalized Return on Adjusted Segment Common Equity*; and GOE (Net)*.

The Investments Business Performance Score will be based on (1) Performance relative to Benchmark; and (2) Direct GOE*.

These performance metrics are aligned to AIG’s 2021 strategic business objectives.

20212024 Long-Term Incentive Program Structure

The 20212024 LTI award granted to Mr. Zaffino is comprised of 75 percent PSUs and 25 percent stock options. The LTI grants awarded tofor our other current named executives continue to beare comprised of a mix of 50 percent PSUs, 25 percent RSUs and 25 percent stock options. Mr. Hogan's LTI grant is comprised of Corebridge equity in the form of 50 percent RSUs and 50 percent stock options.
The stock options and RSUs issued to our named executives in connection with our 2024 LTI program will vest ratably in thirds on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, subject to each named executive's continued service through each vesting date.
The PSUs issued to our named executives in connection with our 20212024 LTI program continue to be subject to a three-year time horizon, with cliff vesting on January 1, 2027, and will be earned based on performance on two primaryfour equally weighted metrics (25 percent each) over athe three-year performance period:

Relative Tangible BVPS* growthnAYCR, as adjusted* measured annually andagainst goals that represent sustained combined ratio strength year-over-year during the three-year plan period while driving profitable growth
nAchievement of AIG Parent Exit Run-Rate General Operating Expenses* targets
nDiluted Normalized AATI Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders Per Share* growth calculated as a consecutive annual improvement each year in the performance period
nTSR over three one-year periods and a combinedthe three-year performance period similarrelative to the Relative Tangible BVPS* growth metric applied to the 2020 PSUs; anda General Insurance peer group.

A metric relating to achievementAll of the separation of the Life and Retirement business from AIG.

2021 Proxy Statement89

Executive Compensation    Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Both of these core metrics include clearly defined goals associated with the achievement of “threshold,” “target,” “stretch,”"threshold," "target," "stretch," and “maximum.” Additionally, the 2021 PSUs include a relative TSR metric that will adjust the payout up or down 25 percent if our TSR for the performance period is in the top or bottom quartile, respectively, of our peers.

These performance metrics"maximum" and are aligned to AIG’sour strategic company-wide objectives.

Managing Compensation Risk
*
We make adjustmentsremain committed to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposescontinually evaluating and enhancing our risk management control environment, risk management processes and ERM functions. our compensation practices are essential parts of this performance metricour approach to risk management and the CMRC regularly monitors our compensation programs to ensure that results properly reflectthey align with sound risk management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.principles.

Compensation Decisions Relating to the Chief Executive Officer Transition

Effective March 1, 2021, as part of AIG’s well-coordinated Chief Executive Officer succession plan, Mr. Zaffino succeeded Mr. Duperreault as Chief Executive Officer. In recognition of the expansion of Mr. Zaffino’s responsibilities due to his promotion, the CMRC approved the following for Mr. Zaffino: 

Compensation Component Current Effective March 1, 2021  Increase 
Base Salary $1,400,000 $1,500,000  +7.1% 
Target Short-Term Incentive $3,000,000 $4,000,000  +33.3% 
Target Long-Term Incentive $8,600,000 $11,500,000  +33.7% 
Target Direct Compensation $13,000,000 $17,000,000  +30.8% 

Mr. Zaffino will also be entitled to a $195,000 annual allowance for personal use of the corporate aircraft, as was provided to the former Chief Executive Officer, and he will be required to reimburse the Company for personal use in excess of that amount.

On Mr. Zaffino’s appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Duperreault became Executive Chair. In recognition of the nature of his role, which will focus on leading the Board in overseeing AIG through the transition to a new Chief Executive Officer and major transformative transactions, including the planned separation of AIG’s Life and Retirement business from AIG, the CMRC approved a reduced level of target direct compensation that emphasizes equity for alignment with shareholder interests. 

Compensation Component Current Effective March 1, 2021  Change 
Base Salary $1,600,000 $1,000,000  -37.5% 
Target Short-Term Incentive $4,500,000 $750,000  -83.3% 
Target Long-Term Incentive $12,900,000 $11,000,000  -14.7% 
Target Direct Compensation $19,000,000 $12,750,000  -32.9% 

Mr. Duperreault’s 2021 LTI awards were made in the form of 50 percent stock options and 50 percent RSUs. In accordance with our LTI plan, Mr. Duperreault’s stock options will vest on the earlier of his retirement from AIG or January 1, 2024. The shares underlying the RSUs will be delivered no earlier than January 1, 2024.

Mr. Duperreault’s term as Executive Chair will end on December 31, 2021, at which time he will become a non-officer employee of AIG for one year providing assistance and advice to the extent requested by the Chief Executive Officer. He will be remunerated for his service in this capacity.

90 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive Compensation    Compensation Discussion and Analysis

COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE

Role of the CMRC

The CMRC, chaired by Mr. Cornwell, is comprised of five independent directors. The CMRC held nine meetings in 2020.

The role of the CMRC and its interplay with management and the Board as a whole are set forth below.

 

In reaching decisions, the CMRC may invite the opinions of various stakeholders including relevant members of the management team, AIG’s outside counsel and the CMRC’s independent compensation consultant. See “Corporate Governance—Board Committees” for more information on the structure, role and activities of the CMRC.

2021 Proxy Statement91

Executive Compensation    Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Annual Process

The CMRC has an established annual process for executive compensation decision-making. In a typical year, during the first quarter, the CMRC reviews and approves base salaries and target compensation levels against a backdrop of the business and individual performance evaluations for the prior year, in addition to compensation relative to peers with relevant experience and skillsets in the insurance and financial services industries where we compete for talent. The CMRC also reviews and approves the performance metrics and goals that will apply to both STI awards and PSU grants. These metrics and goals are set based on AIG’s rigorous budgeting and strategic planning process.

The onset of COVID-19 in the first quarter of 2020 required the CMRC to pivot and adapt its approach to executive compensation. As is typical, target compensation levels were approved in the first quarter with incentive plan goals due to be approved in March. Due to the significant unknowns at that time about the magnitude of the impact the COVID-19 crisis would have on AIG, the CMRC determined to proceed with the grant of stock options and RSUs to provide some stability, but to delay the finalization of the STI plan and PSU performance metrics. This enabled sufficient time to better assess and project the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on AIG’s short-, medium- and long-term business, and develop metrics that supported our prevailing strategic priorities. The CMRC revisited these topics at four meetings between March and July. In May, the CMRC approved the performance metrics for our STI program, aligned with the three priority focus areas for the company of liquidity, capital preservation and de-risking. The CMRC designed a disciplined discretion framework for the STI program, so that overall business performance and business unit performance would be measured by assessing quantifiable results against internal expectations with respect to AIG’s capital and liquidity position and risk profile in the context of the COVID-19 crisis. In July, as the Company and the CMRC had better insight into the broad range of potential long-term impacts of the COVID-19 crisis on our business, the CMRC approved metrics for the 2020 PSUs, incorporating Relative Tangible BVPS and relative TSR metrics, to mitigate the need to calibrate absolute long-term goals in the midst of continued uncertainty, and an absolute metric relating to GOE savings under AIG 200, a core program. While the operating environment remained uncertain, these areas of focus were integral to AIG’s long-term, sustainable growth.

During the balance of the year, similar to typical years, the CMRC received updates on performance relative to expectations, providing an opportunity to assess potential payouts. As part of these updates, the CMRC discussed the extent to which it would be appropriate to adjust conditions for previously granted PSU awards, ultimately resolving that no changes would be made for the named executives. Additionally, in 2020, the CMRC reviewed compensation arrangements in relation to the planned AIG Chief Executive Officer succession.

Following year-end, the CMRC reviewed and assessed final performance in relation to short-term and long-term expectations and approved payouts. As is typical, discussions regarding individual performance and achievements feed into the start of the process for the following year. The CMRC continues to review any relevant feedback from shareholders received during engagement on an ongoing basis to inform their discussions and decisions.

Additionally, the Board, based on the recommendation of the CMRC after advice from AIG’s outside counsel and the CMRC’s independent compensation consultant, approved the compensation for Messrs. Zaffino and Duperreault following the execution of AIG’s well-coordinated Chief Executive Officer succession plan, effective March 1, 2021. See “—2021 Compensation Program Design and Decisions—Compensation Decisions Relating to the Chief Executive Officer Transition.”

Qualitative Assessment

A central part of the CMRC’s role is applying judgment in making final compensation decisions to ensure outcomes balance rewarding appropriately for performance delivered on a year-on-year basis, equity across the businesses and forward-looking implications. This use of judgment, and where appropriate, application of discretion, ensures appropriate and balanced outcomes once all the facts are known at year-end. Consistent with previous years, the factors that were considered in determining 2020 awards for the named executives included strength of execution, agility to pivot to new priorities and the leadership qualities exhibited in the context of the unusual and challenging circumstances of operating in a pandemic.

92 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive Compensation    Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Input from Independent Compensation Consultants

Since 2005, the CMRC has engaged the services of FW Cook to provide independent advice to the CMRC. In this capacity, FW Cook attends CMRC meetings and:

   Provides views on: 

  How AIG’s compensation program and proposals for senior executives compare to market practices in the insurance industry, financial services and more broadly; 

 “Best practices” and how they apply to AIG; 

  The design and implementation of current and proposed executive compensation programs;

   Responds to questions raised by the CMRC and other stakeholders in the executive compensation process; 

   Participates in discussions pertaining to compensation and risk, assessing the process and conclusions; and 

   Participates in discussions on performance goals that are proposed by management for the CMRC’s approval.

In 2020, FW Cook also supported the CMRC on additional key topics, including: 

Updating the CMRC on emerging investor and proxy advisor views on the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on executive compensation;

Providing advice and recommendations on actions under consideration in response to the COVID-19 crisis;

Participating in discussions on special awards for Mr. Lyons and Ms. Fato proposed by management for the CMRC’s approval; and

Advising the CMRC on Chief Executive Officer succession compensation issues and Mr. Zaffino’s special award.

The CMRC reviews FW Cook’s appointment annually to assess their relationship with AIG, including members of the CMRC and AIG’s executive officers. The CMRC confirmed that neither FW Cook nor any of its affiliates provides any other services to AIG or its management, other than on director compensation, and that FW Cook had no business or personal relationship with any member of the CMRC or executive officer of AIG that raised a conflict of interest regarding FW Cook’s work for the Board. The CMRC also received information on the fees paid to FW Cook by AIG as a percentage of FW Cook’s total revenue and FW Cook’s ownership of any AIG common stock. Considering this information, the CMRC determined that FW Cook is independent and that its work has not raised any conflict of interest.

During 2020, AIG engaged Johnson Associates to prepare reports presenting market comparisons of total compensation levels for existing employees, new hires and promotions for positions within the CMRC’s purview. In their capacity as the CMRC’s independent advisor, FW Cook reviewed the reports prepared by Johnson Associates prior to consideration by the CMRC. The CMRC performed a review of Johnson Associates’ services and other factors similar to the review of FW Cook described above. This review, coupled with the FW Cook review of the analysis, appropriately addressed any conflict of interest raised by Johnson Associates’ work or business relationship with AIG.

Compensation Risk 

AIG remains committed to continually evaluating and enhancing our risk management control environment, risk management processes and ERM functions. AIG’s compensation practices are essential parts of our approach to risk management and the CMRC regularly monitors AIG’s compensation programs to ensure they align with sound risk management principles.

nAnnual risk review
nClawback policy
policies
nStock ownership requirements
nAnti-hedging and pledging policy


2021 Proxy Statement93

Executive Compensation    Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Risk Review

The CMRC’s charter requires the CMRC to periodically discuss and review the relationship between AIG’s risk management policies and practices and the incentive compensation arrangements applicable to senior executives with the Chief Risk Officer of AIG.

No
In September 2023, the CMRC considered the annual risk review findings with the Chief Risk Officer to ensure compensation plans appropriately balance risk and reward. As recommended by the Chief Risk Officer, the CMRC continued to focus its review on incentive-based compensation plans, which totaled 83 active non-salary plans for performance year 2022.
All incentive plans categorizedwith payouts to active employees rated as highlow residual risk in 2020 risk review


In September 2020, the CMRC considered the annual risk review findings with AIG’s Chief Risk Officer to ensure compensation plans appropriately balance risk and reward. As recommended by AIG’s Chief Risk Officer, the CMRC continued to focus its review on incentive-based compensation plans, which totaled 88 active plans, of which 76 plans made payouts for performance year 2019.

ERM conducts thean annual risk assessment to evaluate AIG’s activeof our incentive plans. AIG risk officers have assignedplans and assigns a risk rating of low, medium or high risk to each active incentive plan taking into account:

that considers certain objectives and criteria, including:
nWhether the plan design or administrationof the plan may encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking;risk-taking

nWhether the plan has appropriate safeguards in place to discourage fraudulent behavior;behavior

nWhether the plan incorporates appropriate risk mitigants, to lower risk (includingincluding deferrals, clawback conditions (see Clawback Policy below) and capped payouts); andpayouts to reduce risk

nWhether paymentsincentive awards are based on pre-established performance goals, including risk-adjusted metrics.metrics

For

ERM's 2023 assessment included all active incentive sales plans across General Insurance and Corebridge and concluded that the 2020 annual risk review, ERM reviewed:

Two legacy plans previously rated medium riskwere balanced and a random sample of 11did not promote excessive risk-taking. All plans previously rated low risk (there were no plans previously rated high risk);

2019 incentive payouts versus 2018with payouts to identify any significant variability in payouts that may be indicative of plan features that encourage excessive risk-taking or fraudulent behavior; and

Individual performance goals for the senior executives under the CMRC’s purview to determine if goalsactive employees were set appropriately to avoid excessive risk taking.

As a result of the review, no plans were categorizedrated as high risk and one legacy plan previously rated medium risk was assessed as low"low" risk. As part of this risk review, and as discussed with the CMRC, ERM concluded that AIG’s compensation policies and practices do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking and have the appropriate safeguards in place to discourage fraudulent behavior.

94 2021 Proxy Statement

TABLE OF CONTENTS

68AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Executive Compensation


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2024 Compensation Program Design and Decisions

Clawback Policies
During 2023, the CMRC approved a new Financial Restatement Clawback Policy

that is fully compliant with SEC and NYSE requirements and resolved that it remained appropriate to also maintain the existing Clawback Policy, which affords protections beyond those required by the SEC, with minor amendments as indicated in the table below.

The intent of this policythese policies is to encourage sound risk management and individual accountability with respect to potentially risky behavior or misconduct, in accordance with our compensation principles of paying for performance and aligning the interests of our executives and employees with those of our shareholders.

Financial Restatement Clawback Policy (approved in 2023)
Covered
Employees

All

nCurrent and former Section 16 officers
Covered
Compensation
nIncentive-based compensation awarded on the basis of financial reporting measures, including stock price and TSR, received during the three fiscal years preceding that AIG determined (or reasonably should have determined) that a restatement is necessary
Triggering
Events
nAny financial restatement defined within the policy as "Big R" or "little r"
CMRC
Authority
nAdministering the policy
nApproving the amounts to be recovered
A full copy of the Financial Restatement Clawback Policy is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023. No clawback-related actions pursuant to the Financial Restatement Clawback Policy were required in 2023.
Clawback Policy (amended in 2023)
Covered
Employees
nCurrent and former executive officers

(clarified to include former officers in 2023)

nAll LTI recipients
nAny other employeesemployee at Grade 27 and above, as determined by the CMRC

Covered
Compensation

nGenerally, includes any bonus, equity or equity-based award, or any other incentive compensation granted since 2013,

including time-based awards

nCompensation paid, and awards granted, while a covered employee is subject to this clawback policy 

Triggering
Events

nMaterial financial restatement

nAward or receipt of covered compensation based on materially inaccurate financial statements or performance metrics that are materially inaccurately determined

nFailure of risk management, including a supervisory role or material violation of AIG’sAIG's risk policies

nAn action or omission that results in material financial or reputational harm to AIG

nMaterial failure to abide by any restrictive covenant agreement
CMRC
Authority

nDetermining whether a triggering event has occurred

nDetermining whether recovery would cause a tax-qualified retirement plan to fail to meet requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, noting that in such instances recovery will be limited
nAbility to require forfeiture or repayment of all or any portion of any unpaid covered compensation or covered compensation paid in the 12 months preceding the triggering event

The 12-month time horizon will be extended to a longer period if required by any applicable statute or government regulation

The CMRC will continue

No clawback-related actions pursuant to keep the Clawback Policy underwere required in 2023 based on a review to ensure it affords AIGof material risk events as part of the appropriate power.

annual risk review process.

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT69

Compensation Discussion and Analysis     2024 Compensation Program Design and Decisions
Stock Ownership Guidelines

The CMRC oversees the implementation of stock ownership guidelines that apply to the Chief Executive Officer and named executives,other executive officers, to further align their interests with those of shareholders and to provide a meaningful personal interest in sustainable value creation.

Minimum Guidelines
Ownership
Threshold

nChief Executive Officer: 5-timesfive times base salary

nOther Executive Officers: 3-timesthree times base salary

Counted Equity
Interests

nStock owned outright by the officer or theirthe officer's spouse

Earned

nStock-based awards that have vested but unvested share-based awards 

have not been delivered
Retention Requirement
Until Ownership
Threshold is Reached
nRetention of 50%50 percent of the shares of AIG Parent common stock received upon the exercise, vesting or payment of equity-based awards granted by AIG until minimum guidelineownership threshold level achieved
Post-Employment
Requirement
nExecutive officers must continue to comply with theirthe stock ownership guidelines, including the applicable minimum guidelineretention requirements for six months after they cease to be an executive officer

All named executives are currently in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines.

2021 Proxy Statement95

Executive Compensation    Report of the Compensation and Management Resources Committee

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies

AIG’s

Our Code of Conduct and Insider Trading Policy prohibit all employees, including the named executives, from engaging in hedging transactions with respect to any AIG securities, including by trading in any derivative security relating to AIG’s securities. In particular, other than pursuant to an AIGa Company compensation or benefit plan or dividend distribution, no employee may acquire, write or otherwise enter into an instrument that has a value determined by reference to AIG securities, whether or not the instrument is issued by AIG. Examples include put and call options, forward contracts, collars and equity swaps relating to AIG securities. In addition, AIG’sour Insider Trading Policy prohibits executive officers and directors from pledging AIG securities. None of AIG’sour executive officers or directors have pledged any AIG’sAIG securities.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional Information
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Metrics

Certain performance metrics and their associated goals used in AIG incentive plans thatin which our named executives participate in are “Non-GAAP“non-GAAP financial measures” under SEC rules and regulations.rules. Appendix A explains how these measures are calculated from our audited financial statements.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

The CMRC sets named executive compensation in accordance with our compensation philosophy and continues to believe that retaining, attracting retaining and motivating our employees with a compensation program that supports long-term value creation is in the best interests of our shareholders. In reaching decisions on executive compensation, the CMRC considers the tax and accounting consequences, including that compensation (including performance-based compensation) in excess of $1 million paid to covered executive officers in calendar year 20202023 generally will not be deductible for federal income tax purposes under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT RESOURCES COMMITTEE

1986.

Compensation and Management Resources Committee Report
The CMRC has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management.S-K. Based on suchthat review and discussions,discussion, the CMRC recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Form 10-K.

Compensation and Management Resources Committee

American International Group, Inc.

W. Don Cornwell (Chair)
Henry S. Miller

Linda A. Mills,
Thomas F. Motamed
Therese Chair
Diana
M. Vaughan

Murphy
John G. Rice
70AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT


96 2021 Proxy Statement
2023 Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation    2020 Compensation

2020 COMPENSATION

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following tables contain information with respect to AIG’s named executives. As required by SEC rules, AIG’s named executives include the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the three other most highly paid executive officers, who each served through the end of 2020.

2020

2023 Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal PositionYearSalary ($)Bonus ($)Stock
Awards ($)(1)
Option
Awards ($)(1)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)(2)
Change in
Pension
Value ($)(3)
All Other
Compensation ($)(4)
Total ($)
Brian Duperreault Chief Executive Officer(5)20201,600,00009,060,3313,224,9924,500,000184,309240,74218,810,374
20191,600,0008,613,9662,799,9975,920,000178,306257,36819,369,637
20181,600,00011,757,1894,199,9933,040,0000257,48720,854,669
Mark D. Lyons Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer20201,000,00005,291,393824,9983,059,000061,06510,236,456
20191,000,0002,845,654924,9972,924,000060,4797,755,130
2018453,846178,9423,068,7211,050,00008,3794,759,888
Peter Zaffino President and Global Chief Operating Officer(5)20201,400,000015,952,4722,149,9924,500,000064,52224,066,986
20191,365,3862,396,867(6)6,460,4522,099,9986,000,000065,63118,388,334
20181,250,0002,396,867(6)4,461,3831,593,7422,850,000068,46712,620,459
Douglas A. Dachille Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer20201,250,00002,985,0161,062,5003,300,0001,09067,6618,666,267
20191,250,0003,537,8831,149,9954,525,00059682,14510,545,619
20181,192,3084,461,3831,593,7422,375,00038584,5789,707,396
Lucy Fato Executive Vice President,General Counsel & Global Head of Communications and Government Affairs2020930,00003,741,505987,4972,869,000064,1888,592,190

Footnotes to 2020

Name and Principal
Position as of December 31, 2023
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
Option
Awards
($)(1)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(2)
Change in
Pension
Value
($)(3)
All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
Total
($)
Peter Zaffino
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
20231,500,000 — 10,359,302 3,499,989 9,000,000 — 258,645 24,617,936 
20221,571,923 — 62,422,889 3,224,990 7,830,000 — 264,397 75,314,199 
20211,482,693 — 9,379,956 2,874,994 8,000,000 — 167,577 21,905,220 
Sabra R. Purtill(5)
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
2023975,000 125,000 (6)3,063,217 599,990 2,850,000 — 45,367 7,658,574 
Kevin T. Hogan
Chief Executive Officer,
Corebridge Financial, Inc.
20231,250,000 — 2,927,993 999,997 3,250,000 131,915 72,192 8,632,097 
20221,250,000 — 5,141,177 — 2,400,000 — 90,420 8,881,597 
20211,250,000 — 3,262,558 999,999 2,407,500 — 85,188 8,005,245 
David McElroy
Executive Vice President & Chairman, General Insurance
20231,000,000 — 2,941,641 999,999 4,250,000 — 33,213 9,224,853 
20221,000,000 875,000 3,106,507 999,996 3,250,000 — 68,619 9,300,122 
20211,000,000875,0003,568,4461,093,7394,750,000— 62,71711,349,902
Claude Wade(5)
Executive Vice President & Chief Digital Officer and Global Head of Business Operations
20231,000,000 1,793,000 (6)1,103,095 374,994 3,350,000 — 86,772 7,707,861 
Former Executive Officers
Shane Fitzsimons(7)
Former Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
2023500,000 — 2,515,801 849,986 1,800,000 — 5,464,476 11,130,263 
20221,000,000 500,000 2,174,514 699,997 3,000,000 — 189,106 7,563,617 
Mark D. Lyons
Former Executive Vice President & Interim Chief Financial Officer
202396,154 — — — — — 3,794,573 3,890,727 
20221,000,000 — 5,614,780 824,984 — — 62,723 7,502,487 
20211,000,000 — 3,364,565 1,031,250 3,300,000 — 61,373 8,757,188 
Lucy Fato
Former Vice Chair
20231,000,000 — 2,426,863 2,158,165 2,800,000 — 46,371 8,431,399 
20221,000,000 — 5,614,780 824,984 3,100,000 — 63,536 10,603,300 
20211,000,000 — 3,364,565 1,031,250 3,300,000 — 66,089 8,761,904 
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT71

2023 Executive Compensation     2023Summary Compensation Table

(1)2020 Amounts. The “Stock Awards” column represents the grant date fair value of (i) the 2020 PSUs based on target performance, which was the probable outcome of the performance conditions; and (ii) 2020 RSUs and off-cycle special 2020 RSUs granted to certain named executives that vest based on continued service through the performance period. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2020 Long-Term Incentive Awards.” The 2020 PSUs and 2020 RSUs, together with the 2020 stock options represented in the “Option Awards” column, comprise 2020 LTI awards and were granted under the LTI plan. The following table presents the grant date fair value of the 2020 PSUs at the target and maximum levels of performance:

Name2020 PSUs Target
($)
2020 PSUs Maximum
($)
Brian Duperreault6,292,04112,584,082
Mark D. Lyons1,609,5763,219,152
Peter Zaffino4,194,7048,389,408
Douglas A. Dachille2,072,9554,145,910
Lucy Fato1,918,9893,837,978

See “—

Footnotes to 2023 Summary Compensation DiscussionTable
(1)2023 Stock and Analysis—2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2020 Long-Term Incentive Awards” for further information.

Calculation. The amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards”Option Awards. These columns represent the grant date fair valuevalues of awards(i) the 2023 PSUs based on target performance, which was the probable outcome of the performance conditions; (ii) the 2023 RSUs granted to certain named executives, including 2023 promotion RSUs granted to Ms. Purtill in connection with her appointment as permanent Chief Financial Officer; and (iii) the year,2023 stock options, each as further described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2023 Long-Term Incentive Awards” and determined in accordance with FASB ASCFinancial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC) Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. Ms. Fato’s 2023 stock options also include the incremental fair value remeasurement of outstanding options modified to provide an extension to the exercise period from three years to the remaining original contractual term of such options, pursuant to her Transition Agreement. The amount shown for the awards granted by AIG in 20202023 was calculated using the assumptions described in Note 2019 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in AIG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

2021 Proxy Statement97

2023. The following table presents the grant date fair value of the 2023 PSUs at target and maximum levels of performance:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Name2023 PSUs Target ($)2023 PSUs Maximum ($)
Peter Zaffino10,359,302 20,718,605 
Sabra Purtill1,183,895 2,367,790 
Kevin T. Hogan1,973,162 3,946,307 
David McElroy1,973,162 3,946,307 
Claude Wade739,937 1,479,858 
Former Executive Officers
Shane Fitzsimons2,515,801 5,031,586 
Mark D. Lyons— — 
Lucy Fato1,627,8693,255,722

All awards represented in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns are subject to clawback under AIG's clawback policies.
(2)2023 Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. The amounts in this column represent the awards earned under the STI plan for 2023 performance as determined by the CMRC in the first quarter of 2024. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2023 Short-Term Incentive Awards” for further information.
All awards represented in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column are subject to AIG's clawback policies.
(3)The amounts in this column represent the total change of the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit, including any payments made during the year, under AIG’s defined benefit (pension) plans, including the Qualified Retirement Plan and the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan, as applicable. Negative changes in pension value are indicated as zero. These plans are described in “—Post-Employment Compensation—Pension Benefits.”
(4)(a) Perquisites. This column includes the aggregate incremental costs of perquisites and benefits. The following table details the aggregate incremental cost to the Company of perquisites received by each named executive in 2023.
Perquisites
Name
Personal Use
of Company
Pool Cars ($)(i)
Personal Use
of Aircraft
($)(ii)
Financial Planning
Services
($)(iii)
Other ($)(iv)
Total ($)
Peter Zaffino6,432 79,182 15,500 127,530 228,644 
Sabra R. Purtill3,410 — 5,223 — 8,633 
Kevin T. Hogan14,634 — — 27,585 42,219 
David McElroy3,213 — — — 3,213 
Claude Wade41,484 — 15,288 — 56,772 
Former Executive Officers
Shane Fitzsimons— 21,856 15,500 35,489 72,845 
Mark D. Lyons— — — — — 
Lucy Fato871 — 15,500 — 16,371 
(i)Amounts in this column include the incremental costs of driver overtime compensation, fuel and maintenance attributable to use of Company pool cars for commuting purposes.
(ii)The CMRC requires personal use of corporate aircraft for Mr. Zaffino and has approved an allowance for Mr. Zaffino of up to $195,000 per calendar year. Amounts in this column include personal use by Mr. Zaffino and his spouse of corporate aircraft, calculated based on the aggregate incremental cost of the travel to the Company. For use of corporate aircraft, aggregate incremental cost is calculated based on the direct operating cost of the aircraft, including fuel, maintenance, airport fees and assessments, crew expenses and in-flight supplies and catering, as applicable. If an aircraft traveled empty before picking up or after dropping off Mr. Zaffino and in some cases his spouse in connection with personal travel, the cost associated with this “deadhead” segment would be included in the incremental cost attributable to overall travel. For use of corporate aircraft owned by a third-party vendor, aggregate incremental cost is calculated based on the cost-per-flight-hour charged by the vendor as well as costs of fuel, taxes, crew expenses and airport fees and assessments, as applicable. For Mr. Fitzsimons, the amount represents the aggregate incremental cost of an emergency medical evacuation. For further information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—Indirect Elements of Compensation—Perquisites."
(iii)Amounts in this column reflect the value of financial planning services made available to our named executives.
(iv)Amounts in this column reflect (1) for Mr. Zaffino, residential security ($123,530) and annual executive medical ($4,000), (2) for Mr. Hogan, the cost of tax preparation services related to a prior international assignment, and (3) for Mr. Fitzsimons, the cost of tax preparation services related to his relocation and international business travel.
72AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

2023 Executive Compensation      2020 2023Summary Compensation

Clawback. All awards represented in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns are subject to clawback under the AIG Clawback Policy.

(2)2020 Amounts. The amounts represent the awards earned under the STI plan for 2020 performance as determined by the CMRC in the first quarter of 2021. 100 percent of the award was vested and paid in February 2021. See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2020 Short-Term Incentive Awards” for further information.

Clawback. All awards represented in the column are subject to clawback under the AIG Clawback Policy.

(3)The amounts in this column represent the total change of the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit, including any payments made during the year, under AIG’s defined benefit (pension) plans, including the Qualified Retirement Plan and the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan, as applicable. These Plans are described in “—Post-Employment Compensation—Pension Benefits.” Mr. Duperreault received payments totaling $85,102 during 2020 from the Qualified Retirement Plan.

(4)Perquisites. This column includes the incremental costs of perquisites and benefits. The following table details the incremental cost to AIG of perquisites received by each named executive in 2020.

Perquisites

NamePersonal Use
of Company
Pool Cars ($)(i)
Personal Use
of Aircraft ($)(ii)
Flexible Perquisite
Allowance ($)(iii)
Other ($)Total ($)
Brian Duperreault358179,45535,0000214,813
Mark D. Lyons136035,000035,136
Peter Zaffino3,593035,000038,593
Douglas A. Dachille6,732035,000041,732
Lucy Fato3,259035,000038,259

(i)Includes the incremental costs of driver overtime compensation, fuel and maintenance attributable to personal use of company pool cars.
(ii)Includes personal use by Mr. Duperreault and his spouse of AIG-owned corporate aircraft and corporate aircraft owned by a third-party vendor, calculated based on the aggregate incremental cost of the travel to AIG. For use of AIG-owned corporate aircraft, aggregate incremental cost is calculated based on the direct operating cost of the aircraft, including fuel, additives and lubricants, maintenance, airport fees and assessments, crew expenses and in-flight supplies and catering, as applicable. If an aircraft travels empty before picking up or after dropping off Mr. Duperreault or his spouse in connection with personal travel, the cost associated with this “deadhead” segment would be included in the incremental cost attributable to overall travel. For use of corporate aircraft owned by a third-party vendor, aggregate incremental cost is calculated based on the cost-per-flight-hour charge by the vendor as well as costs of fuel, taxes, crew expenses and airport fees and assessments, as applicable. The CMRC has approved an allowance for Mr. Duperreault’s personal use of corporate aircraft of up to $195,000 per calendar year (calculated based on the aggregate incremental cost to AIG).
(iii)Reflects payment of the annual cash perquisite allowance of $35,000, which the CMRC approved when it eliminated perquisites such as financial and estate planning.

Table

(b) Other Benefits. This column also includes matching contributions and non-elective Company contributions made by AIG and/or Corebridge under their 401(k) plans in the amount of $29,700 for each of the named executives, other than Ms. Purtill who received $25,823 under the AIG plan and $10,615 under the Corebridge plan, and Mr. Lyons who received $11,846 in 2023.
All named executives are covered under the AIG Basic Group Life Insurance Plan. This column also includes life insurance premiums paid for the benefit of the named executives. All named executives are covered under the AIG Basic Group Life Insurance Plan. For group life insurance, the 2020 company-paid costs were $279 for each of the named executives.

This column also includes matching contributions and non-elective company contributions made by AIG under its 401(k) plan in the amount of $25,650 for each of the named executives in 2020.

AIG maintains

We maintain a policy of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for the directors and officers of AIG and its subsidiaries.officers. The premium for this policy for the policy year ended September 22, 20202023 was approximately $18.3$17.2 million and for the policy year ending September 22, 20212024 is approximately $20.5$11.1 million.

(5)Effective March 1, 2021, Mr. Zaffino became President and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Duperreault became Executive Chair. Throughout 2020, Mr. Zaffino served as President and Global Chief Operating Officer. He also served as Chief Executive Officer, General Insurance until August 2020.

(6)Represents the payment of both installments of Mr. Zaffino’s one-time, sign-on cash award paid in February 2018 and February 2019, respectively, in connection with his joining AIG in 2017. Payment of the award was made pursuant to Mr. Zaffino’s offer letter dated July 3, 2017.

98 2021 Proxy Statement

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(c) For Mr. Fitzsimons, the amount in this column also includes his severance payment in the amount of $5,256,000 and $105,769 for unused paid time off. For Mr. Lyons, the amount in this column also includes the first half of his settlement payment of $3,750,000 in connection with his separation from AIG and $32,692 for unused paid time off.

(5)Ms. Purtill and Mr. Wade were not named executive officers prior to 2023.
(6)For Ms. Purtill, this represents a leadership continuity award, which was granted in July 2021 and vested and paid in July 2023. For Mr. Wade, this represents a buy-out of equity foregone from his prior employer.
(7)Mr. Fitzsimons was not a named executive officer prior to 2022.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT73

2023 Executive Compensation    2020 Compensation

2020 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

Total 2020 Grants

The following table details all equity and non-equity plan-based awards granted to each of the named executives in 2020.

20202023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Plan Awards(1)

Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
(Performance Share Units)(2)
All Other
Stock
Awards
(# of
AIG
Shares or
Units)(3)
All
Other
Option
Awards
(# of
Securities
Underlying
Options)(4)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)(4)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards ($)(5)
NameGrant
Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Brian Duperreault
 2020 STI03/11/2004,500,0009,000,000
 2020 PSUs07/01/20105,289210,577421,1546,292,041
 2020 RSUs03/11/2085,3622,768,290
 2020 Options03/11/20377,19232.433,224,992
Mark D. Lyons
 2020 STI03/11/2001,900,0003,800,000
 2020 PSUs07/01/2026,93453,868107,7361,609,576
 2020 RSUs03/11/2021,837708,174
 2020 Special RSUs12/08/2075,2442,973,643
 2020 Options03/11/2096,49132.43824,998
Peter Zaffino
 2020 STI03/11/2003,000,0006,000,000
 2020 PSUs07/01/2070,193140,385280,7704,194,704
 2020 RSUs03/11/2056,9091,845,559
 2020 Special RSUs12/08/20250,8159,912,209
 2020 Options03/11/20251,46132.432,149,992
Douglas A. Dachille
 2020 STI03/11/2002,500,0005,000,000
 2020 PSUs07/01/2034,68869,376138,7522,072,955
 2020 RSUs03/11/2028,124912,061
 2020 Options03/11/20124,26932.431,062,500
Lucy Fato
 2020 STI03/11/2001,750,0003,500,000
 2020 STI09/10/200150,000300,000
 2020 PSUs07/01/2026,52653,052106,1041,585,194
 2020 PSUs09/10/20��5,95011,90023,800333,795
 2020 RSUs03/11/2021,506697,440
 2020 Special RSUs9/10//2039,9531,125,076
 2020 Options03/11/2095,02932.43812,498
 2020 Options09/10/2025,51028.16174,999

(1)Amounts shown reflect the range of possible cash payouts under the STI plan for 2020 performance. Actual amounts earned, as determined by the CMRC (and, in the case of the award granted to Mr. Duperreault, as approved by the Board) in the first quarter of 2021, are reflected in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. For more information

2021 Proxy Statement99

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Plan Awards
(1)

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentives Plan Awards
(# of AIG Shares or Units)
(2)
All Other
Stock
Awards
(# of AIG
Shares or
Units)
(3)
All Other
Option
Awards (# of Securities
Underlying
Options)
(4)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
(4)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
($)
(5)
NameGrant
Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(PSUs)
Target
(PSUs)
Maximum
(PSUs)
Peter Zaffino
2023 STI02/21/23— 4,500,000 9,000,000 — — — — — — — 
2023 PSUs02/21/23— — — 85,144 170,288 340,576 — — — 10,359,302 
2023 Options02/21/23— — — — — — — 232,403 59.72 3,499,989 
Sabra Purtill
2023 STI02/21/23— 1,700,000 3,400,000 — — — — — — — 
2023 PSUs02/21/23— — — 9,730 19,461 38,922 — — — 1,183,895 
2023 RSUs02/21/23— — — — — — 9,730 — — 581,076 
Promotion RSUs(6)
06/19/23— — — — — — 22,657 — — 1,298,246 
2023 Options02/21/23— — — — — — — 39,840 59.72 599,990 
Kevin T. Hogan
2023 STI02/21/23— 2,250,000 4,500,000 — — — — — — — 
2023 AIG PSUs02/21/23— — — 16,217 32,435 64,870 — — — 1,973,162 
2023 CRBG RSUs(7)
02/21/23— — — — — — 47,036 — — 954,831 
2023 CRBG Options(7)
02/21/23— — — — — — — 162,074 20.30 999,997 
David McElroy
2023 STI02/21/23— 2,500,000 5,000,000 — — — — — — — 
2023 PSUs02/21/23— — — 16,217 32,435 64,870 — — — 1,973,162 
2023 RSUs02/21/23— — — — — — 16,217 — — 968,479 
2023 Options02/21/23— — — — — — — 66,401 59.72 999,999 
Claude Wade
2023 STI02/21/23— 2,000,000 4,000,000 — — — — — — — 
2023 PSUs02/21/23— — — 6,081 12,163 24,326 — — — 739,937 
2023 RSUs02/21/23— — — — — — 6,081 — — 363,157 
2023 Options02/21/23— — — — — — — 24,900 59.72 374,994 
Former Executive Officers(8)
Shane Fitzsimons
2023 STI02/21/23— 900,000 1,800,000 — — — — — — 
2023 PSUs02/21/23— — — 20,677 41,355 82,710 — — 2,515,801 
2023 Options02/21/23— — — — — — — 56,440 59.72 849,986 
Lucy Fato
2023 STI02/21/231,900,0003,800,000
2023 PSUs02/21/2313,37926,75953,5181,627,869
2023 RSUs02/21/2313,379798,994
2023 Options02/21/2354,78059.72824,987
2023 Options(9)
09/01/231,333,178
(1)Amounts shown reflect the range of possible cash payouts under the STI plan for 2023 performance. Actual amounts earned, as determined by the CMRC (and, in the case of the award granted to Mr. Zaffino, as approved by the Board) in the first quarter of 2024, are reflected in the 2023 Summary Compensation Table under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. For more information on the 2023 STI awards, including the applicable performance metrics, please see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2023 Short-Term Incentive Awards.”
74AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

2023 Executive Compensation    20202023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
(2)Amounts shown reflect the potential range of 2023 PSUs that were granted and may be earned under the LTI plan. Actual amounts earned are based on achieving pre-established goals across four financial objectives over the 2023-2025 performance period. Results will be certified by the CMRC in the first quarter of 2026. For more information on the 2023 PSUs, including the applicable performance metrics, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2023 Compensation

on the 2020 STI awards, including the applicable performance metrics, please see “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2020 Short-Term Incentive Awards.”

(2)Amounts shown reflect the potential range of 2020 PSUs that were granted and may be earned under the LTI plan. Actual amounts earned are based on achieving pre-established goals across three financial objectives over the 2020-2022 performance period. Results will be certified by the CMRC in the first quarter of 2023. For more information on the 2020 PSUs, including the applicable performance metrics, please see “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2020 Long-Term Incentive Awards.” Holders of 2020 PSUs are also entitled to dividend equivalent rights in the form of additional 2020 PSUs beginning with the first dividend record date following the 2020 PSU grant date, which are subject to the same vesting and performance conditions as the related 2020 PSUs and are paid when such related earned shares of AIG common stock (if any) are delivered.

(3)Amounts shown reflect the grant of 2020 RSUs made under the LTI plan, including transition and special awards granted to Messrs. Zaffino and Lyons and Ms. Fato. For more information on these awards, please see “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2020 Long-Term Incentive Awards” and “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—Special Awards.” Holders of 2020 RSUs and 2020 Special RSUs are also entitled to dividend equivalent rights in the form of additional 2020 RSUs beginning with the first dividend record date following the applicable grant date, which are subject to the same vesting conditions as the related RSUs and are paid when such related shares (if any) are delivered.

(4)Amounts shown reflect the grant of 2020 stock options made under the LTI plan. For more information on these awards, please see “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2020 Long-Term Incentive Awards.” Stock options granted in 2020 have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the underlying shares of AIG common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.

(5)Amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of the awards determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 using the assumptions presented in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in AIG’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

100 2021 Proxy Statement

Decisions and Outcomes—2023 Long-Term Incentive Awards.” Holders of 2023 PSUs are also entitled to dividend equivalent rights beginning with the first dividend record date following the 2023 PSU grant date, which are subject to the same vesting and performance conditions as the related 2023 PSUs and are paid in cash if and when such related earned shares of AIG Parent common stock are delivered.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(3)Amounts shown reflect the grant of 2023 RSUs made under the LTI plan and to Ms. Purtill in connection with her appointment as permanent Chief Financial Officer, except for Mr. Hogan whose 2023 RSUs were issued under the long-term incentive plan of Corebridge, to be settled in Corebridge common stock. For more information on these awards, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2023 Long-Term Incentive Awards.” Holders of 2023 RSUs and special RSUs are also entitled to dividend equivalent rights in the form of cash beginning with the first dividend record date following the applicable grant date, which cash amount is subject to the same vesting conditions as the related RSUs and is paid if and when such related shares are delivered.
Executive Compensation   Holdings of and Vesting of Previously Awarded Equity

HOLDINGS OF AND VESTING OF PREVIOUSLY AWARDED EQUITY

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT DECEMBER

(4)Amounts shown reflect the grant of 2023 stock options made under the LTI plan, except for Kevin T. Hogan whose 2023 options were issued under the Corebridge LTI plan to be settled in Corebridge common stock. For more information on these awards, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2023 Long-Term Incentive Awards" and Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in AIG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020

2023. Stock options granted in 2023 have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the underlying shares of AIG Parent common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.

(5)Amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of the awards determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 using the valuation methods and assumptions presented in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in AIG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023.
(6)Amount represents an additional award granted to Ms. Purtill in connection with her appointment as Chief Financial Officer. See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—2023 Long-Term Incentive Awards—2023 Annual Performance Awards—Restricted Stock Units" for further details on this award.
(7)Mr. Hogan also received 2023 RSUs and 2023 options issued under the Corebridge LTI plan to be settled in Corebridge common stock. The vesting terms of the Corebridge awards are similar to those issued under the AIG LTI plan. For further details see the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2023 Compensation Decision and Outcome—2023 Long-Term Incentive Awards."
(8)Mr. Lyons did not receive any awards in 2023.
(9)Outstanding and unexercised options granted to Ms. Fato in 2018-2023 were modified on September 1, 2023, pursuant to her Transition Agreement. The amount reported under "Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards" also reflects the incremental fair value remeasurement of the modified options on the date of modification. For a description of Ms. Fato's Transition Agreement and any additional payments she is entitled to receive thereunder, see "—Potential Payments on Termination—Fato Transition Agreement."
Holdings of and Vesting of Previously Awarded Equity
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2023
Equity-based awards held at the end of 20202023 by each named executive were issued under the incentive plans and arrangements described below. Shares of AIG Parent common stock deliverable under AIG’s performance-based and time-vested equity and option awards will be delivered under the AIG 2013 Omnibus Plan except as otherwise described below.

The following table sets forth outstanding equity-based awards held by each named executive as(2013 Plan) and the AIG 2021 Omnibus Plan (2021 Plan).

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT75

2023 Executive Compensation     Holdings of December 31, 2020.

Outstandingand Vesting of Previously Awarded Equity Awards at December 31, 2020

             
        Stock Awards
 Option Awards (1) Unvested
(Not Subject to
Performance
Conditions)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
(Unearned
and Unvested)
NameYear
Granted
Number
of Securities
underlying
Unexercised
Options
(Exercisable)
Number
of Securities
underlying
Unexercised
Options
(Unexercisable)
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards
(Number of
Securities
underlying
Unexercised
and
Unearned
Options)
Exercise
Price ($)
Expiration
Date
Award
Type (2)
NumberMarket
Value ($)(3)
 NumberMarket
Value ($)(3)
Brian Duperreault2020377,19232.433/11/20302020 RSUs89,0863,372,795 
 2019343,98044.283/18/20292020 PSUs 107,3544,064,422
 2018351,17055.943/14/20282019 RSUs68,8912,608,213 
 2017500,0001,000,00061.825/15/20242019 PSUs 68,8902,608,175
       2018 RSUs76,9542,913,478 
       2018 PSUs78,2062,960,879 
       Total313,13711,855,365 176,2446,672,597
Mark D. Lyons202096,49132.433/11/20302020 Special RSUs75,8742,872,589 
 2019113,63644.283/18/20292020 RSUs22,789862,791 
 20188,21337.6812/12/20282020 PSUs 27,4621,039,711
 2018104,16652,084143,27855.556/18/20252019 RSUs22,758861,617 
       2019 PSUs 22,757861,580
       2018 RSUs1,70864,664 
       2018 PSUs1,45355,010 
       Total124,582$4,716,671 50,2191,901,291
Peter Zaffino2020251,461$32.433/11/20302020 Special RSUs252,9189,575,475 
 2019257,985$44.283/18/20292020 RSUs59,3912,248,543 
 2018133,256$55.943/13/20282020 PSUs 71,5692,709,602
 2017333,000667,000$64.537/24/20242019 RSUs51,6671,956,112 
 2019 PSUs 51,6671,956,112
       2018 RSUs29,2001,105,512 
       2018 PSUs27,7481,050,539 
       Total420,92415,936,181 123,2364,665,714

2021 Proxy Statement101

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Options Awards(1)

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards
(Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
and Unearned
Options)
Stock Awards
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(Exercisable)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(Unexercisable)
Unvested (Not Subject
to Performance
Conditions)
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards (Unearned and
Unvested)
NameYear
Granted
 Exercise
Price
($)
Expiration
Date
Award Type(2)
NumberMarket Value
($)
Number
Market
Value
($)
(3)
Peter Zaffino2023— 232,403 59.722/21/20332023 PSUs— — 255,432 17,305,518 
202265,349 130,699 — 61.61 2/22/20322022 Special RSUs890,71760,346,076— — 
2021— 245,726 — 44.10 2/22/20312022 RSUs35,5022,405,260— — 
2020251,461 — — 32.43 3/11/20302022 PSUs— — 159,757 10,823,536 
2019257,985 — — 44.28 3/18/20292021 RSUs67,967 4,604,764 — — 
2018133,256 — — 55.94 3/13/20282021 PSUs244,732 16,580,593 — — 
2017333,000 — 667,000 64.53 7/24/20242020 Special RSUs170,806 11,572,106 — — 
Total1,409,724 95,508,799 415,189 28,129,054 
Sabra R. Purtill2023— 39,840— 59.722/21/20332023 Promotion RSUs22,6571,535,011— — 
2021— 22,435— 44.10 2/22/20312023 RSUs9,730659,207— — 
202021,929— — 32.433/11/20302023 PSUs— — 29,1911,977,690
201911,150— — 57.899/19/20292022 CRBG RSUs36,934799,990— — 
2021 CRBG RSUs63,3021,371,121— — 
Total132,6234,365,32929,1911,977,690
Kevin T. Hogan(4)
2023— 162,074 — 20.30 2/21/20332023 PSUs— — 48,652 3,296,173 
2021— 85,470 — 44.10 2/22/20312022 PSUs— — 49,537 3,356,131 
2020116,959 — — 32.43 3/11/20302021 PSUs85,124 5,767,151 — — 
2019122,850 — — 44.28 3/18/20292023 CRBG RSUs47,036 1,018,799 — — 
2018125,418 — — 55.94 3/13/20282022 CRBG RSUs85,235 1,846,190 — — 
2021 CRBG RSUs61,013 1,321,541 — — 
Total278,408 9,953,681 98,189 6,652,304 
David McElroy2023— 66,401 — 59.72 2/21/20332023 RSUs16,217 1,098,701 — — 
202220,263 40,527 — 61.61 2/22/20322023 PSUs— — 48,652 3,296,173 
2021— 93,482 — 44.10 2/22/20312022 RSUs11,008 745,792 — — 
202035,256 — — 30.71 8/13/20302022 PSUs— — 49,537 3,356,131 
202070,175 — — 32.43 3/11/20302021 RSUs25,857 1,751,811 — — 
201912,500 — — 53.32 6/24/20292021 PSUs93,104 6,307,796 — — 
201953,746 — — 44.28 3/18/2029Total146,186 9,904,100 98,189 6,652,304 
201831,362 — — 37.68 12/12/2028
Claude Wade2023— 24,900 — 59.72 2/21/20332023 RSUs6,081 411,987 — — 
20227,598 15,198 — 61.61 2/22/20322023 PSUs— — 18,244 1,236,031 
2022 RSUs4,128 279,672 — — 
2022 PSUs— — 18,576 1,258,524 
Total10,209 691,659 36,820 2,494,555 
Former Executive Officers(5)
Shane Fitzsimons202356,440 — — 59.72 7/1/2026
202242,553 — — 61.61 7/1/2026
202142,735 — — 44.10 7/1/2026
202010,668 — — 29.77 7/1/2026
202032,163 — — 32.43 7/1/2026
201925,369 — — 57.39 7/1/2026
Lucy Fato2023— 54,780 — 59.72 2/21/20332023 RSUs13,379906,427 — — 
202216,717 33,434 — 61.61 2/22/20322023 PSUs— — 40,138 2,719,349 
2021— 88,141 — 44.10 2/22/20312022 Special RSUs33,025 2,237,443 — — 
202025,510 — — 28.16 9/10/20302022 RSUs9,082 615,305 — — 
202095,029 — — 32.43 3/11/20302022 PSUs— — 40,867 2,768,739 
2019119,778 — — 44.28 3/18/20292021 RSUs24,380 1,651,745 — — 
201865,321 — — 55.94 3/13/20282021 PSUs87,784 5,947,366 — — 

Total167,650 11,358,286 81,005 5,488,088 
Executive Compensation    Holdings of and Vesting of Previously Awarded Equity

             
        Stock Awards
 Option Awards (1) Unvested
(Not Subject to
Performance
Conditions)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
(Unearned
and Unvested)
NameYear
Granted
Number
of Securities
underlying
Unexercised
Options
(Exercisable)
Number
of Securities
underlying
Unexercised
Options
(Unexercisable)
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards
(Number of
Securities
underlying
Unexercised
and
Unearned
Options)
Exercise
Price ($)
Expiration
Date
Award
Type (2)
NumberMarket
Value ($)(3)
 NumberMarket
Value ($)(3)
Douglas A. Dachille2020124,26932.433/11/20302020 RSUs29,3511,111,228 
 2019141,27744.283/18/20292020 PSUs 35,3681,339,032
 2018133,25655.943/13/20282019 RSUs28,2941,071,210 
       2019 PSUs 28,2931,071,172
       2018 RSUs29,2001,105,512 
       2018 PSUs26,9701,021,084 
       Total113,8154,309,034 63,6612,410,204
Lucy Fato202025,51028.169/10/20302020 Special RSUs34,6691,312,568 
 202095,02932.433/11/20302020 RSUs28,5111,079,426 
 2019119,77844.283/18/20292020 PSUs 33,1121,253,620
 201865,32155.943/13/20282019 RSUs23,988908,185 
       2019 PSUs 23,987908,147
       2018 RSUs14,314541,928 
       2018 PSUs12,186461,361 
       Total113,6684,303,468 57,0992,161,767

(1)Stock Options. Stock options granted in 2020 have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the underlying shares of AIG common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant. All of the stock options granted in 2020 will vest in full in January 2023 and have a 10-year term from the date of grant.

76AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

2023 Executive Compensation     Holdings of and Vesting of Previously Awarded Equity
(1)Stock Options. Stock options granted in 2019all years have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the underlying shares of AIG Parent common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant, and with the exception of Mr. Zaffino's options as detailed below, have a ten-year term from the date of grant. All of the stock options granted in 20192023 vested as to one-third on February 21, 2024 and will vest as to one-third on each of February 21, 2025 and February 21, 2026. All of the stock options granted in 2022 vested as to one-third on each of February 22, 2023 and February 22, 2024 with the remaining vesting on February 22, 2025. All of the stock options granted in 2021 vested in full in January 2022 and have a 10-year term from2024. All of the date of grant.

Stockstock options granted in 2020, 2019 and 2018 fully vested in January 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Mr. Zaffino received an award of stock options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of AIG Parent common stock upon joining AIG that has a grant date of July 24, 2017. These options have a seven-year term and an exercise price equal to the closing price of the underlying shares of AIG Parent common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant (except Mr. Duperreault’sand vest as follows:
Stock options have the same exercise price as those granted to other named executives in March 2018, but were granted one day later after ratification by the Board). All of the stock options granted in 2018 (except for Mr. Lyons’ sign-on award stock options as described below) fully vested in January 2021 and have a 10-year term from the date of grant.

Each of Messrs. Duperreault, Lyons and Zaffino received a one-time, sign-on award of stock options upon joining AIG. Each of these options has a seven-year term and has an exercise price equal to the closing sale price of AIG common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant. For Mr. Duperreault, his sign-on stock options to purchase 1,500,000333,000 shares of AIG common stock have a grant date of May 15, 2017 and vest as follows:

Stock options for 500,000 shares of AIGParent common stock vested in equal, annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date;

Stock options for 300,000200,000 shares of AIG Parent common stock vest only if, for twenty consecutive trading days, the closing price per share of AIG common stock on the NYSE is at least $70.99, but in no event will these stock options vest faster than in equal, annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date;

Stock options for 300,000 shares of AIG common stock vest only if, for twenty consecutive trading days, the closing price per share of AIG common stock on the NYSE is at least $80.99; and

Stock options for 400,000 shares of AIG common stock vest only if, for twenty consecutive trading days, the closing price per share of AIG common stock on the NYSE is at least $90.99.

For Mr. Lyons, his sign-on stock options to purchase 299,528 shares of AIG common stock have a grant date of June 18, 2018 and vest as follows:

Stock options for 156,250 shares of AIG common stock vest in equal, annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date;

102 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive Compensation   Holdings of and Vesting of Previously Awarded Equity

Stock options for 47,594 shares of AIG common stock vest only if, for twenty consecutive trading days, the closing price per share of AIG common stock on the NYSE is at least $65.55, but in no event will these stock options vest faster than in annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date;

Stock options for 46,904 shares of AIG common stock vest only if, for twenty consecutive trading days, the closing price per share of AIG common stock on the NYSE is at least $75.55; and

Stock options for 48,780 shares of AIG common stock vest only if, for twenty consecutive trading days, the closing price per share of AIG common stock on the NYSE is at least $85.55.

For Mr. Zaffino, his sign-on stock options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of AIG common stock have a grant date of July 24, 2017 and vest as follows:

Stock options for 333,000 shares of AIG common stock vested in equal, annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date;

Stock options for 200,000 shares of AIG common stock vest only if, for twenty consecutive trading days, the closing price per share of AIGParent common stock on the NYSE is at least $74.53, but in no event will these stock options vest faster than in equal, annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date;

Stock options for 200,000 shares of AIG Parent common stock vest only if, for twenty consecutive trading days, the closing price per share of AIG Parent common stock on the NYSE is at least $84.53; and

Stock options for 267,000 shares of AIG Parent common stock vest only if, for twenty consecutive trading days, the closing price per share of AIG Parent common stock on the NYSE is at least $94.53.

The sign-on stock

Vesting of Mr. Fitzsimons' options were granted under the 2013 Plan, except 500,000 stockaccelerated upon his separation on July 1, 2023 and remain exercisable for three years from such date.
Vesting of Ms. Fato's
options grantedwill accelerate upon her termination and will remain exercisable for their respective full scheduled term, pursuant to Mr. Duperreault, which were granted as an “employment inducement award” under NYSE Listing Rule 303A.08, as approved by the Board, and are otherwise governed by the 2013 Plan. The 500,000 stock options granted outside of the 2013 Plan consist of 100,000 stock options that vest if, for twenty consecutive trading days, the closing price per share of AIG common stock on the NYSE is at least $80.99, and 400,000 stock options that vest if, for twenty consecutive trading days, the closing price per share of AIG common stock on the NYSE is at least $90.99, each as described above.

(2)Performance Share Units.

her Transition Agreement.

(2)Performance Share Units.
PSUs accrue dividend equivalent rights inas further described below. Such rights are only payable if and to the form of additionalextent that the related PSUs are earned and vested.
2023, 2022 and 2021 PSUs accrue dividend equivalent rights beginning with the first dividend record date following the PSU grant date, which are subject to the same vesting and performance conditions as the related 2023, 2022 and 2021 PSUs and are paid in cash if and when such related earned shares of AIG Parent common stock (if any) are delivered. The 2018 PSU amounts earned as shown above include the additional PSUs accrued in respect of dividend equivalent rights. 2020 and 2019 PSU amounts also include the additional PSUs accrued in respect ofNo dividend equivalent rights assuming threshold payout.

are included in the 2023, 2022 and 2021 PSU amounts shown above.

The 2021 PSUs vested on January 1, 2024 and are reported as earned as determined by the CMRC in the first quarter of 2024. Please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2023 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—Assessment of 2021 Performance Share Units.”
All 20202023 and 20192022 PSUs are shown at thresholdstretch payout. Whether the 20202023 or 20192022 PSUs (and related dividend equivalents)equivalent rights) will be earned at the level shown or a different level, or at all, depends on AIGAIG's performance against metrics over a three-year performance period. Once earned, 2020the 2023 and 20192022 PSUs (and related dividend equivalents)equivalent rights) will vest on January 1, 20232026 and January 1, 2022,2025, respectively. TheFor Ms. Fato, all outstanding PSUs will vest upon termination pursuant to her Transition Agreement and any earned 2018 PSUs vested on January 1, 2021. Actual amounts earned for the 2018 PSUs were determined by the CMRC in the first quarter of 2021 and 2018 PSUs are shown at actual payout, net of tax withholding.

Restricted Stock Units.

All 2020 and 2019 RSUsshares (and related dividend equivalents) grantedequivalent rights) will be delivered following adjudication.

Restricted Stock Units.
RSUs accrue dividend equivalent rights, as further described below. Such rights are only payable if and to our named executives will vestthe extent that the related RSUs vest.
The 2023 RSUs vested as to one-third of such RSUs on February 21, 2024 with the remaining RSUs vesting in fullequal installments on January 1,each of February 21, 2025 and February 21, 2026. All 2022 RSUs vested as to two-thirds of such RSUs on February 22, 2023 and January 1, 2022, respectively, andFebruary 22, 2024 with the 2018remaining RSUs (and related dividend equivalents)vesting on February 22, 2025. All 2021 RSUs granted to our named executives vested in full on January 1, 2021.

2024.

The 2023, 2022 and 2021 RSUs accrue dividend equivalent rights in the form of additional RSUs beginning with the first dividend record date following the applicablerespective RSU grant date,dates, which are subject to the same vesting conditions as the related 2023, 2022 and 2021 RSUs and are paid in cash if and when such related shares of AIG Parent common stock (if any) are delivered. TheNo dividend equivalent rights are included in the 2023, 2022 and 2021 RSU amounts as shown above include the additional RSUs accrued in respect of dividend equivalent rights.

above.

The 2020 Special RSUs reflect one-timea grant made in 2020 to Mr. Zaffino which vested (along with related dividend equivalent rights) as to one-third of such RSUs on December 8, 2023 with the remaining RSUs vesting in equal one-third installments on December 8, 2024 and December 8, 2025.
The 2022 Special RSUs reflect grants made in 2022 to certain of our named executives during 2020.executives. The 20202022 Special RSUs granted to Mr. Zaffino (and related dividend equivalent rights) will cliff vest in full on November 10, 2027. As to Ms. Fato's 2022 Special RSUs (and related dividend equivalents) granted to Mr. Lyonsequivalent rights), one-third vested on each of February 22, 2023 and February 22, 2024. The final one-third will vest on December 8, 2023. upon her termination pursuant to her Transition Agreement.
The 2020 Special2023 Promotion RSUs (and related dividend equivalents) grantedreflect grants made in 2023 to Mr. ZaffinoMs. Purtill which will vest in equal one-third installments on each of June 19, 2024, June 19, 2025 and June 19, 2026.
(3)Based on the closing sale prices of AIG Parent and Corebridge common stock on the NYSE on December 8, 2023; December 8, 2024;29, 2023 of $67.75 and December 8, 2025. The 2020 Special RSUs (and related dividend equivalents)$21.66 per share, respectively.
(4)Options granted to Ms. Fato will vest fifty percentMr. Hogan in 2023 were issued by Corebridge. In connection with the Corebridge initial public offering (IPO), Mr. Hogan’s (i) outstanding AIG RSUs converted into RSUs with respect to shares of Corebridge common stock, and (ii) 2021, 2022 and 2023 PSUs remain outstanding and eligible to be settled in AIG Parent common stock.
(5)Mr. Fitzsimons does not have outstanding unvested equity because all outstanding equity-based awards vested upon separation from AIG on September 10, 2021July 1, 2023. Mr. Lyons does not have any outstanding equity because all outstanding equity-based awards were forfeited upon his separation from AIG on January 24, 2023.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT77

2023 Executive Compensation     Holdings of and fifty percent on September 10, 2022. For more information on these awards, please see “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2020 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes—Special Awards.”

(3)Based on the closing sale price of AIG common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2020 of $37.86 per share.

2021 Proxy Statement103

Vesting of Previously Awarded Equity
Executive Compensation     Post-Employment Compensation

VESTING OF STOCK-BASED AWARDS DURING 2020

The following table sets forth the amounts realized in accordance with SEC rules by each named executive as a resultVesting of the vesting of stock-based awards in 2020. Stock-Based Awards During 2023

There were no options exercised in 20202023 by any of the named executives.

2020 Vesting of

Stock-Based Awards

 Stock-Based Awards Vested in 2020
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
Value Realized on
Vesting ($)
Brian Duperreault(1)59,3573,072,318
Mark D. Lyons
Peter Zaffino(1)21,3261,103,834
Douglas A. Dachille(1)(2)25,9531,343,327
Lucy Fato(1)12,386641,099

(1)Represents the 2017 RSUs that vested in January 2020 (based on the value of the underlying shares of AIG common stock on the vesting date).

(2)Represents the final tranche of the earned 2015 PSUs that vested in January 2020 (each Vested in 2023(1)
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
Value Realized on
Vesting ($)
Peter Zaffino414,606 26,272,911 
Sabra R. Purtill71,375 1,439,339
Kevin T. Hogan231,716 9,672,231 
David McElroy100,956 6,340,667 
Claude Wade12,863804,783 
Former Executive Officers
Shane Fitzsimons167,022 9,926,708 
Mark D. Lyons23,0861,452,802 
Lucy Fato166,19810,411,052
(1)Represents the 2020 RSUs and 2020 PSUs (and related dividend equivalent rights) that vested in January 2023 and the first tranche of the 2022 RSUs that vested in February 2023. For Mr. Zaffino only, also includes the first tranche of a special RSU award made in 2020 (and related dividend equivalent rights) that vested in December 2023. For Mr. Fitzsimons only, also includes all outstanding 2021, 2022 and 2023 RSUs and PSUs that vested upon his separation on July 1, 2023. The 2021, 2022 and 2023 PSUs reflect target performance. Values presented in the table are based on the value of the underlying shares of AIG common stock on the vesting date).

POST-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

PENSION BENEFITS

AIG doesParent's closing price (and Corebridge's closing price for Ms. Purtill's and Mr. Hogan's RSUs) on the applicable vesting date.

Post-Employment Compensation
Pension Benefits
We do not have any active defined benefit (pension) plans.pension plans in the United States. Effective January 1, 2016, benefit accruals under AIG’sour Qualified Retirement Plan and Non-Qualified Retirement Plan (the Plans) were frozen. At that time, the Plans were closed to new participants and existingactive participants ceased to accrue additional benefits after December 31, 2015. However, as described below, interest credits continue to accrue on existing cash balance accounts, and active participants continue to be able to earn service credits for purposes of vesting and early retirement eligibility subsidies.

In the case of the Qualified Retirement Plan, participants vest after three years of service. Mr. Hogan, who is fully vested in his benefit, became a terminated vested participant under the Qualified Retirement Plan effective September 19, 2022 in connection with the Corebridge IPO and thus became eligible to commence his Qualified Plan benefit as of that date. In the case of the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan, participants vest once they attain either (1) age 60 with five or more years of service, or (2) age 55 with ten or more years of service. Mr. Hogan is fully vested in his benefit under that plan as well, and will be required to commence his Non-Qualified Plan benefit when his service for Corebridge terminates.
Before the Plans were frozen, the benefit formula under the Plans was converted from a final average pay formula to a cash balance formula, effective April 1, 2012. Mr. Hogan accrued benefits under both the final average pay and cash balance formulas.
The Plans’ final average pay formula ranged from 0.925 percent to 1.425 percent times average final salary for each year of credited service accrued since April 1, 1985 up to 44 years and 1.25 percent to 1.75 percent times average final pay for each year of credited service accrued prior to April 1, 1985 up to 40 years.
The Plans’ cash balance formula was comprised of pay credits, which were calculated based on 6six percent of a Plan participant’s annual pensionable compensation, and annual interest credits. Pensionable compensation under the cash balance formula included base salary, commissions, overtime and annual STI awards, with the Qualified Retirement Plan subject to IRS compensation limits and the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan subject to an annual compensation limit of $1,050,000 in 2015. The Non-Qualified Retirement Plan provides a benefit equal to the portion of the benefit that is not permitted to be paid from the Qualified Retirement Plan due to IRS limits. Pay credits ceased under the Plans on December 31, 2015, but annual interest credits continue (2.19(4.02 percent in 2020,2023, based upon the 30-year long-term Treasury rate). This rate is adjusted annually on January 1.

Mr. Duperreault will receive his

Benefits under the Qualified Retirement Plan are paid as an annuity or a lump sum. Benefits under the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan benefit under the final average pay formula for service accrued during his prior period of employment ending in 1994. Mr. Dachille will receive a benefit under the Plans’ cash balance formula. The Plans’ final average pay formula ranges from 0.925 percent to 1.425 percent times average final salary for each year of credited service accrued since April 1, 1985 up to 44 years through December 31, 2015 and 1.25 percent to 1.75 percent times average final pay for each year of credited service accrued prior to April 1, 1985 up to 40 years. For participants who retire2012 are payable as an annuity and benefits accrued on or after the normal retirement age of 65, the retirement benefit is actuarially increased to reflect the later benefit commencement date. In the case of the Qualified Retirement Plan, participants vest after three years of service and, in the case of the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan, participants vest once they attain either (1) age 60 with five or more years of service or (2) age 55 with ten or more years of service.

104 2021 Proxy Statement

April 1, 2012 are payable as a lump sum.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

78AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Executive Compensation    Post-Employment Compensation


2023 Executive Compensation     Post-Employment Compensation
Early Retirement Benefits

Each of the Plans provides for reduced early retirement benefits. These benefits are available to all vestedActively employed participants in the Qualified Retirement Plan. The Non-Qualified Retirement Plan provides reducedPlans continue to receive service credit on and after the freeze date in determining age and length of service for early retirement benefits to participants who have reached age 55 with ten or more years of service or to participants who have reached age 60 with five or more years of service. The early retirement reduction factors in the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan are based upon age as of the retirement datesubsidies and years of credited service. vesting purposes.
In the case of early retirement, participants in the Plans under the final average pay formula, participants in the Plans will receive the plan formula benefit projected to normal retirement at age 65 (using average final salary as of the date of early retirement), but prorated based on years of actual service, then reduced by 3, 4three, four or 5five percent (depending on age and years of credited service at retirement) for each year that retirement precedes age 65. ParticipantsMr. Hogan is eligible for early retirement benefits on his final average pay benefit accrual under the Plans reflecting the five percent reduction.
In the case of early retirement under the cash balance formula, participants in the Plans will continue to receive the value of their cash balance account as of the date of early retirement.
In connection with the Corebridge IPO, Mr. Hogan became a terminated vested participant in the Qualified Plan and ceased receiving service credit on and after the freeze date in determining age and lengthfor purposes of serviceearly retirement at that time. Mr. Hogan is eligible for early retirement subsidies and vesting purposes. Participants inbenefits on his final average pay benefit accrual under the Qualified Retirement Plan with at least three years of service to AIG have a vested reduced retirement benefit pursuant to which, inPlans reflecting the case of termination of employment prior to reaching age 65, such participants may elect to receive a reduced early retirement benefit commencing at any date between their date of termination and age 65.

five percent reduction.

Death and Disability Benefits

Each of the Plans also provides for death and disability benefits. The death benefit payable to a participant’s designated beneficiary under the Plans will generally equal the participant’s lump sum benefit or cash balance account. Under the Plans, participants who become disabled and receive payments under AIG’s long-term disability plan on and after the freeze date continue to receive service credit in determining age and length of service for early retirement subsidies and vesting purposes for a maximum of three additional years and participants whose benefit is determined under the cash balance formula continue to receive interest credits to their cash balance account up to the date they commence their benefit.

2020

In connection with the Corebridge IPO, Mr. Hogan became a terminated vested Participant in the Qualified Plan and ceased receiving service credit for purposes of death and disability benefits at that time.
2023 Pension Benefits

The following table details the accumulated benefits under the pension plansPlans in which each named executive participates. In accordance with SEC rules, these accumulated benefits are presented as if they were payable upon the named executive’s normal retirement at age 65 or current age if older. However, it is important to note that the benefits shown for the
2023 Pension Benefits
NamePlan Name
Years of
Credited Service(1)
Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit 2023 ($)(2)
Payments
During 2023 ($)
Kevin T. HoganQualified Retirement Plan25.917$734,245$0
Non-Qualified Retirement Plan25.917$893,505$0
Total$1,627,750$0
(1)All named executives, are at least partially unvestedother than Mr. Hogan, joined AIG after the Plans were frozen. Mr. Hogan had 34.50 years of service with AIG and could be received at lower levels due to reduced benefits or forfeited entirely if the named executive does not continue to work at AIG for the next several years.

As of year-end 2020, Mr. Dachille was vested in the Qualified Retirement Plan and eligible to commence benefits under such Plan early. Mr. Duperreault was also vested in his Qualified Retirement Plan benefit and elected to commence his benefit under such Plan in September 2017. In addition,Corebridge as of year-end 2020, December 31, 2023.

Mr. Duperreault was eligible for normal retirement benefits and Mr. Dachille was eligible for early retirement benefits under the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan.

2021 Proxy Statement105

Executive Compensation      Post-Employment Compensation

2020 Pension Benefits

NamePlan NameYears of
Credited
Service(1)
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit ($)(2)
Payments
During 2020 ($)
Brian DuperreaultQualified Retirement Plan18.751,244,28485,102
 Non-Qualified Retirement Plan18.75248,1290
 Total 1,492,41385,102
Mark D. LyonsQualified Retirement Plan000
 Non-Qualified Retirement Plan000
 Total 00
Peter ZaffinoQualified Retirement Plan000
 Non-Qualified Retirement Plan000
 Total 00
Douglas A. DachilleQualified Retirement Plan0.33317,8590
 Non-Qualified Retirement Plan0.3332,5360
 Total 20,3950
Lucy FatoQualified Retirement Plan0 00
 Non-Qualified Retirement Plan0 00
 Total  00
     

(1)The named executives had the following years of service with AIG as of December 31, 2020: Mr. Duperreault—25.083; Mr. Lyons—5.500; Mr. Zaffino—3.500; Mr. Dachille—5.333; and Ms. Fato—3.25.

Mr. Duperreault. Mr. DuperreaultHogan has 6.3338.583 fewer years of credited service under the Plans than actual service underwith AIG and Corebridge because the Qualified Retirement PlanPlans were frozen on January 1, 2016 and the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan because at the time he was originallyinitially hired, the Qualified Retirement Plan was contributoryemployees were required to wait one year after commencing employment with AIG before becoming participants in these Plans and employees received creditedcredit for service when they beganretroactive to contribute to the Qualified Retirement Plan.six months of employment. Mr. DuperreaultHogan was employed by AIG starting on May 1, 1973 but did not beginfrom September 1984 to contribute to the Qualified Retirement Plan until January 1, 1976. HeNovember 2008 and accrued pension benefits under the Qualified Retirement Plan and the Non-Qualified Retirement PlanPlans during his employment until his resignation from AIG in September 1994.this employment. Mr. DuperreaultHogan did not receive a distribution from the Qualified Retirement Plan or the Non-Qualified Retirement PlanPlans at the time of his resignationinitial resignation. Upon his rehire in September 1994. Mr. Duperreault was vested in his Qualified Retirement PlanOctober 2013, benefit ataccruals commenced immediately under the time of his resignation in September 1994Plans calculated under the cash balance formula, and elected to commence this benefit in September 2017. He has not received a distribution from the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan. Pursuantprior service, pursuant to the terms of thesethe Plans, prior service iswas recognized for vesting and eligibility to participate. Therefore, upon rejoining AIG in May 2017, his prior service was recognized for vesting purposes under the Qualified and Non-Qualified Retirement Plans. Mr. Duperreault’s credited service under the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan is equal to his credited service under the Qualified Retirement Plan because he was not an employee during the time period in which the freeze on service accrual in the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan was applicable. Benefit accruals did not commence for Mr. Duperreault when he rejoined AIG as the Plans were frozen effective January 1, 2016.

Mr. Lyons. Mr. Lyons has 5.5 fewer years of credited service than actual service under the Qualified Retirement Plan and the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan because Mr. Lyons’ actual years of service reflect his prior period of employment from February 1983 to December 1985, as well as his service after he rejoined AIG in June 2018. During his prior period of employment, he received a $745 lump sum cash-out from a prior contributory qualified pension plan and accrued a small benefit under the Qualified Retirement Plan with respect to his service from April 1985 through December 1985. When Mr. Lyons terminated employment in December 1985, he did not meet the vesting requirements under the Qualified Retirement Plan and did not participate in the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan because it did not exist at that time. Mr. Lyons was not eligible to participate in the Qualified Retirement Plan or the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan when he rejoined AIG in June 2018 because both Plans were frozen.

Mr. Zaffino. Mr. Zaffino has 3.5 fewer years of credited service than actual service under the Qualified Retirement Plan and the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan because he is not a participant in either Plan because he joined AIG after the Plans were frozen effective January 1, 2016.

Mr. Dachille. Mr. Dachille has 5 fewer years of credited service than actual service under the Qualified Retirement Plan and the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan because thepurposes. The Plans were frozen effective January 1, 2016 and credited service accruals ceased under these Plans as of December 31, 2015. Mr. Dachille became

(2)The actuarial present values of the accumulated benefits are based on service and earnings as of December 31, 2023 (the pension plan measurement date for purposes of AIG’s financial statement reporting). The actuarial present values of the accumulated benefits under the Plans are calculated based on payment of a participantlife annuity beginning at age 65, or current age if older, consistent with the assumptions described in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in AIG’s 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As described in that Note, the discount rate assumption is 4.98 percent for the Qualified Retirement Plan andPlan. The discount rate assumption is 4.94 percent for the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan in September 2015 upon joining AIG. He participates inPlan. The mortality assumptions are based on the Qualified Retirement and Non-Qualified Retirement Plans underPri-2012 annuitant white collar mortality table projected using the cash balance formula.2020 AIG recognizes prior service by Mr. Dachille to First Principlesimprovement scale.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT79

2023 Executive Compensation     Potential Payments on Termination
Potential Payments on Termination
The ESP is maintained for purposes of determining vesting and eligibility pursuant to the terms of AIG’s acquisition of First Principles.

Ms. Fato. Ms. Fato has 3.25 fewer years of credited service than actual service under the Qualified Retirement Plan and the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan because she is not a participant in either Plan because she joined AIG after the Plans were frozen effective January 1, 2016.

106 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive CompensationPotential Payments on Termination

(2)The actuarial present values of the accumulated benefits are based on service and earnings as of December 31, 2020 (the pension plan measurement date for purposes of AIG’s financial statement reporting). The actuarial present values of the accumulated benefits under the Plans are calculated based on payment of a life annuity beginning at age 65, or current age if older, consistent with the assumptions described in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in AIG’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As described in that Note, the discount rate assumption is 2.28 percent for the Qualified Retirement Plan. The discount rate assumption is 2.20 percent for the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan. The mortality assumptions are based on the Pri-2012 annuitant white collar mortality table projected using the AIG improvement scale.

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

None of the named executive officers participate in a nonqualified deferred compensation plan.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS ON TERMINATION

EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN

AIG maintains the 2012 Executive Severance Plan (2012 ESP) for AIG executives, in grade level 27 or above, including the named executives.

executives other than Mr. Zaffino and Mr. Hogan. The terms of the ESP are consistent with our compensation design philosophy as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Design.”

Mr. Zaffino’s employment agreement provides for specific payments and benefits upon a termination of his employment.
Mr. Hogan is eligible to receive benefits under Corebridge's executive severance plan, which has terms substantially similar to AIG's ESP.
Executive Severance Plan
Severance Benefits

The 2012 ESP provides for severance payments and benefits upon a termination by AIGthe Company without “Cause” or by a qualifying executive (including all of the participating named executives) for “Good Reason,” including, for qualifying executives, after a “ChangeReason” (as such terms are defined in Control.”the ESP). In the event of a qualifying termination, subject to the participant’s timely execution and non-revocation of a release of claims and agreement to abide by certain restrictive covenants, a participant is generally eligible to receive:

SeverancenFor qualifying terminations not in connection with a Change in Control (as such term is defined in the ESP), severance in an amount equal to the product of a multiplier1.5 times the sum of base salary and the average amount of STI paid for the preceding three completed calendar years. The multiplier is either 1 or 1.5 depending on the executive’s grade level and increases to 1.5 or 2 forFor qualifying terminations within two years following a Change in Control. EachControl, enhanced severance in an amount equal to the product of 2 times the named executives is eligiblesum of base salary and the greater of (i) the average amount of STI paid to the executive for the higher multipliers; andpreceding three completed calendar years, or (ii) the executive’s target STI for the most recently completed calendar year preceding the termination year.

nFor terminations on and after April 1 (or January 1 in the case of a termination following a Change in Control) of the termination year, a pro-rata annual STI award for the year of termination based on the participant’s target amount and actual company (and/or, if applicable, business unit or function) performance, paid at the same time as such STI awards are regularly paid to similarly situated active employees.

If the qualifying termination occurs within twelve months after experiencing a reduction in base salary or annual STI target, the payments described above are calculated as if the qualifying termination occurred immediately prior to the reduction. Severance generally will be paid in a lump sum.

Participants are also entitled to continued health coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA), a $40,000 payment that may be applied towards continued health coverage and life insurance and one year of additional age and service under the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan and the AIG medical plan solely for purposes of determining vesting and eligibility, not benefit accruals. The one year of additional age and service is also used for the purpose of determining eligibility to enroll in retiree medical coverage.

Restrictive Covenants

Pursuant to the release of claims that each participant must execute to receive benefits under the 2012 ESP, each participant is generally prohibited from:

nEngaging in, being employed by, rendering services to or acquiring financial interests in certain businesses that are competitivecompete with AIGthe Company for a period of six months after termination;termination

nInterfering with AIG’sour business relationships with customers, suppliers or consultants for a period of six months after termination;termination

nSoliciting or hiring AIGparticipating in the solicitation or recruitment of our employees for a period of one year after termination; andtermination

nDisclosing AIG’sour confidential information at any time following termination.

2021 Proxy Statement107

termination

TABLE OF CONTENTS

80AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Executive Compensation     Potential Payments on Termination

Definitions


2023 Executive Compensation     Potential Payments on Termination
Zaffino Employment Agreement
Severance Benefits
In the event of a termination of Mr. Zaffino’s employment without “Cause” or by Mr. Zaffino for “Good Reason” (each as defined in his employment agreement), subject to his execution of a release of claims and agreement to abide by certain restrictive covenants, he is generally eligible to receive:
nFor such a termination not in connection with a Change in Control (as defined in Mr. Zaffino's employment agreement), severance in an amount equal to the product of 1.5 times the sum of base salary and the average amount of STI paid for the preceding three completed calendar years. For such a termination within two years following a Change in Control, enhanced severance in an amount equal to the product of a multiplier of 2 times the sum of base salary and the greater of (i) the average amount of STI paid for the preceding three completed calendar years, or (ii) target STI.
nFor such a termination not in connection with a Change in Control, a pro rata bonus for the year of termination based on the number of days employed during the calendar year of termination and actual achievement against the stated performance objectives (with any individual performance objectives deemed to have been achieved at 100 percent of target levels). For such a termination within two years following a Change in Control, then the pro rata bonus will be based on the greater of target STI and actual achievement as described in the preceding sentence. This pro rata bonus is referred to as the “Pro Rata Bonus.”
n Accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards (with any awards subject to performance conditions determined based on actual performance at the end of the applicable performance period). This accelerated vesting is referred to as the “Equity Acceleration.”
nContinued health coverage under COBRA, a $40,000 payment that may be applied towards continued health coverage and life insurance and one year of additional age and service for the purpose of determining eligibility to enroll in retiree medical coverage.
Severance generally will be paid in a lump sum.
In the event of a termination of Mr. Zaffino’s employment due to his death or disability, subject to his (or, if applicable, his representative’s or estate’s)execution of a release of claims and agreement (in the case of his disability) to abide by certain restrictive covenants, he is eligible to receive:
nThe Pro Rata Bonus; provided that if the termination is due to death, then the Pro Rata Bonus will be based on his target STI.
nThe Equity Acceleration; provided that if the termination is due to death, then any applicable performance conditions will be deemed to have been earned at target levels.
In the event of a termination of Mr. Zaffino’s employment due to his retirement or expiration of the initial five-year term of his agreement, subject to his execution of a release of claims and agreement to abide by specified restrictive covenants, he is eligible to receive:
nThe Pro Rata Bonus
n The Equity Acceleration
Restrictive Covenants
Under his agreement, Mr. Zaffino is generally prohibited from:
nEngaging in, being employed by, rendering services to or acquiring a financial interest in certain businesses that compete with us for a period of one year after termination (for any reason other than upon expiration of the five-year term of the agreement)
nInterfering with our business relationships with customers, suppliers or consultants for a period of one year after termination
nSoliciting or participating in the solicitation of our employees for a period of one year after termination
nDisclosing our confidential information at any time following termination
In addition, Mr. Zaffino is required to provide us with at least 12 months’ notice prior to a termination of his employment without good reason or due to this retirement.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT81

2023 Executive Compensation     Potential Payments on Termination
Fato Transition Agreement
On September 1, 2023, Ms. Fato entered into an agreement (the Transition Agreement) with the Company to memorialize certain terms regarding her transition to Vice Chair. Under the 2012 ESP:

“Cause” generally means

the participant’s conviction, whether following trial or by plea of guilty or nolo contendere (or similar plea), in a criminal proceeding (1) on a misdemeanor charge involving fraud, false statements or misleading omissions, wrongful taking, embezzlement, bribery, forgery, counterfeiting or extortion, (2) on a felony charge or (3) on an equivalent charge to those in clauses (1) and (2) in jurisdictions which do not use those designations;

the participant’s engagement in any conduct which constitutes an employment disqualification under applicable law (including statutory disqualification as defined under the Exchange Act);

the participant’s violation of any securities or commodities laws, any rules or regulations issued pursuant to such laws, or the rules and regulations of any securities or commodities exchange or association of which AIG or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates is a member; or

the participant’s material violation of AIG’s codes of conduct or any other AIG policy as in effect from time to time.

“ChangeTransition Agreement, Ms. Fato continued to receive her base salary in Control” generally means

individuals who, on the effective date of the 2012 ESP, constitute the Board of Directors of AIG (or subsequent directors whose election or nomination was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of such directors, including by approval of the proxy statement in which such person is named as a nominee for director) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board;

any person is or becomes a beneficial owner of 50 percent or more of AIG’s voting securities (for this purpose, person is as defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act2023 and as used in Sections 13(d)(3) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act);

consummation of a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or similar form of corporate transaction involving AIG that results in any person becoming the beneficial owner of 50 percent or more of the total voting power of the outstanding voting securities eligible to elect directors of the entity resulting from such transaction;

a sale of all or substantially all of AIG’s assets; or

AIG’s stockholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of AIG.

“Good Reason” generally means a reduction2023 STI award of more than 20 percent$2,800,000. For 2024, Ms. Fato received her base salary through her separation date of March 31, 2024 and a 2024 LTI award of $3,300,000 consisting of 50% PSUs and 50% RSUs. She will also be eligible to receive severance payments and benefits under the ESP. Ms. Fato’s outstanding equity awards will vest and be delivered in accordance with the participant’s annual target direct compensation.

TREATMENT OF LTI AWARDS

Plan provisions with respect to termination without cause (except that her outstanding stock options will remain exercisable for their full scheduled term).

Lyons Separation Agreement
In recognition of Mr. Lyons’ contributions since he joined the Company in 2018, the CMRC and the Board approved the Company’s entry into a settlement agreement with Mr. Lyons, dated January 24, 2023 (the Settlement Agreement). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Lyons forfeited his outstanding equity awards and agreed to a non-mutual release of claims against the Company and restrictive covenants including regarding confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-solicitation and continuing cooperation. In addition, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Lyons received an aggregate cash amount of $7.5 million, which was paid in two equal installments in February 2023 and February 2024.
Treatment of LTI Awards
The LTI plan provides for accelerated vesting of outstanding PSUs, RSUs and 2018, 2019 and 2020 stock options, as applicable, in certain termination scenarios.

In the case of a participant’s involuntary termination without Cause (with or without a Change in Control (defined in the same manner as in the 2012 ESP, as set forth above)), voluntary termination with Good Reason (following a Change in Control only), retirement or disability, the participant’s outstanding LTI awards will vest. Earned PSUs will be determined based on actual performance for the whole performance period. 2018, 2019 and 2020Outstanding stock options will remain exercisable for three years after termination (or retirement or disability). or for the remaining contractual term of the option (if earlier) in the case of (i) retirement, or (ii) following a Change in Control, a participant’s involuntary termination without Cause or voluntary termination with Good Reason. The earned amount of PSUs and full amount of 2019 and 2020 RSUs will be delivered on the normal settlement schedule. Retirement requires attainment of age 60 with five years of service or attainment of age 55 with ten years of service. Pursuant to Mr. Duperreault’s 2017 offer letter, all annual equity awards granted to him provide for retirement eligibility beginning on May 14, 2020, the third anniversary of the effective date of his offer letter.

In the case of a participant’s death during a performance period or prior to adjudication for asuch performance period or involuntary termination without Cause within 24 months following a Change in Control (defined in the same manner as in the 2012 ESP as set forth above) during a performance period, an amount equal to the participant’s target amount of PSUs (unless the CMRC determines to use actual performance through the date of the Change in Control) and the full amount of 2019 and 2020 RSUs will vest and be delivered to the participant by the later of the end of the calendar year or two and a half months following death or termination. 2018, 2019 and 2020

108 2021 Proxy Statement

Executive Compensation Potential Payments on Termination

Outstanding stock options will vest and remain exercisable for three years after death. In no event will any 2018, 2019 or 2020outstanding stock options remain exercisable after the initial ten-year expiration date.

SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENT OF THE 2012 ESP AND LTI PLAN

On February 16, 2021, the CMRC approved the amendment and restatement of the 2012 ESP and the LTI plan to, among other things, effect certain changes to the severance opportunities and

The treatment of LTIMr. Zaffino’s outstanding equity awards in the eventupon his termination of a Change in Control.

As a result of the amendment and restatement of the 2012 ESP:

Going forward, in the event of a covered termination within 24 months following a Change in Control, with respect to the STI portion of their severance, a participant will receive an enhanced proration formula, as well as an adjustment to the calculation of the payment amount equal to the greater of actual performance and target.
In the event of a Change in Control, the definition of Good Reason shall also mean (1) a material diminution in the authority, duties or responsibilities, (2) relocation of greater than 50 miles, or (3) change in reporting for Executive Vice Presidents and above.

As a result of the amendment and restatement of the LTI plan, in the event of a termination for Good Reason following a Change in Control, the participant’s outstanding LTI awards will vest in the same manner as in the case of an involuntary termination without Cause, retirement or disability asemployment is described above underin “—Treatment of LTI Awards,Zaffino Employment Agreement—Severance Benefits. except that under a covered termination following a Change in Control or retirement, stock options will remain exercisable for the remaining life of the option.

As these amendments to the 2012 ESP and LTI plan were made subsequent to December 31, 2020, the as of date of the compensation tables in this Proxy Statement, the amounts shown under “—

82AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

2023 Executive Compensation     Potential Payments on Termination
Quantification of Termination Payments and Benefits—Termination Payments and Benefits for the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2020” do not reflect these amended provisions.

2021 Proxy Statement109

Executive CompensationPotential Payments on Termination

QUANTIFICATION OF TERMINATION PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS

The following table sets forth the compensation and benefits that would have been provided to each of the current named executives if he or she had been terminated on December 31, 20202023 under the circumstances indicated (including following a Change in Control).

For the former executives listed in the table, the amounts show those that were actually payable in connection with the executive's employment termination or transition to non-executive officer during 2023.

Termination Payments and Benefits for the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2020

NameAnnual
Short-Term
Incentive ($)(1)
Severance
($)(2)
Medical
and Life
Insurance ($)(3)
Pension
Plan
Credit ($)(4)
Unvested
Options ($)(5)
Unvested
Stock
Awards ($)(6)
Total ($) 
Brian Duperreault        
By AIG for “Cause”0000000 
By AIG w/o “Cause”4,500,0007,946,66740,00002,048,15327,542,26342,077,083 
By Executive w/o Good Reason0000000 
By Executive with Good Reason4,500,0007,946,66740,00000012,486,667 
Qualifying Termination following a Change in Control(7)4,500,00010,595,55540,00002,048,15327,542,26344,725,971 
Death4,500,0000002,048,15328,066,67834,614,831 
Disability(8)4,500,0000002,048,15327,542,26334,090,416 
Retirement4,500,0000002,048,15327,542,26334,090,416 
Mark D. Lyons        
By AIG for “Cause”0000000 
By AIG w/o “Cause”2,042,5004,480,50040,0000525,4248,582,06915,670,493 
By Executive w/o Good Reason0000000 
By Executive with Good Reason2,042,5004,480,50040,0000006,563,000 
Qualifying Termination following a Change in Control(7)2,042,5005,974,00040,0000525,4248,582,06917,163,993 
Death1,900,000000525,4248,593,69011,019,114 
Disability(8)2,042,500000525,4248,582,06911,149,993 
Retirement0000000 
Peter Zaffino        
By AIG for “Cause”0000000 
By AIG w/o “Cause”3,000,0007,950,00040,00001,365,43326,229,28638,584,719 
By Executive w/o Good Reason0000000 
By Executive with Good Reason3,000,0007,950,00040,00000010,990,000 
Qualifying Termination following a Change in Control(7)3,000,00010,600,00040,00001,365,43326,229,28641,234,719 
Death3,000,0000001,365,43326,428,28730,793,720 
Disability(8)3,000,0000001,365,43326,229,28630,594,719 
Retirement0000000 
Douglas A. Dachille        
By AIG for “Cause”00055200552 
By AIG w/o “Cause”2,687,5006,425,00040,000552674,78110,120,53819,948,371 
By Executive w/o Good Reason00055200552 
By Executive with Good Reason2,687,5006,425,00040,000552009,153,052 
Qualifying Termination following a Change in Control(7)2,687,5008,566,66740,000552674,78110,120,53822,090,038 
Death2,500,00000552674,78110,319,53813,494,871 
Disability(8)2,687,500000674,78110,120,53813,482,819 
Retirement2,687,50000552674,78110,120,53813,483,371 

110 2021 Proxy Statement

2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Name
Annual Short-
Term Incentive
($)
(1)
Severance
($)
(2)
Medical and Life
Insurance ($)
(3)
Pension Plan
Credit ($)
(4)
Unvested
Options ($)
(5)
Unvested
Stock Awards
($)
(6)
Total ($)
Peter Zaffino
By AIG for “Cause”— 
By AIG w/o “Cause”6,615,000 12,415,000 40,000 8,480,108 116,685,873 144,235,981 
By Executive w/o "Good Reason"— 
By Executive with "Good Reason"6,615,000 12,415,000 40,000 8,480,108 116,685,873 144,235,981 
Qualifying Termination following a Change in Control(7)
6,615,000 16,553,333 40,000 8,480,108 116,685,873 148,374,314 
Death4,500,000 8,480,108 107,911,007 120,891,115 
Disability6,615,000 8,480,108 116,685,873 131,780,981 
Retirement(8)
— 
Sabra R. Purtill
By AIG for “Cause”— 
By AIG w/o “Cause”2,499,000 3,272,750 40,000 850,503 6,113,991 12,776,244 
By Executive w/o "Good Reason"— 
By Executive with "Good Reason"2,499,000 3,272,750 40,000 5,811,750 
Qualifying Termination following a Change in Control(7)
2,499,000 5,400,000 40,000 850,503 6,113,991 14,903,494 
Death1,700,000 850,503 6,113,991 8,664,494 
Disability2,499,000 850,503 6,113,991 9,463,494 
Retirement(8)
Kevin T. Hogan
By AIG for “Cause”61,143 61,143 
By AIG w/o “Cause”3,127,500 5,437,500 40,000 61,143 2,241,786 15,515,270 26,423,199 
By Executive w/o "Good Reason"61,143 61,143 
By Executive with "Good Reason"3,127,500 5,437,500 40,000 61,143 8,666,143 
Qualifying Termination following a Change in Control(7)
3,127,500 7,250,000 40,000 61,143 2,241,786 15,515,270 28,235,699 
Death2,250,000 — 2,241,786 12,463,149 16,954,935 
Disability3,127,500 — 2,241,786 15,515,270 20,884,556 
Retirement(8)
3,127,500 61,143 2,241,786 15,515,270 20,945,699 
David McElroy
By AIG for “Cause”— — — — — — — 
By AIG w/o “Cause”3,750,000 7,125,000 40,000 — 2,992,885 14,996,223 28,904,108 
By Executive w/o "Good Reason"— 
By Executive with "Good Reason"3,750,000 7,125,000 40,000 — — — 10,915,000 
Qualifying Termination following a Change in Control(7)
3,750,000 9,500,000 40,000 — 2,992,885 14,996,223 31,279,108 
Death2,500,000 — — — 2,992,885 11,657,979 17,150,864 
Disability3,750,000 — — — 2,992,885 14,996,223 21,739,108 
Retirement(8)
3,750,000 — — — 2,992,885 14,996,223 21,739,108 
Claude Wade
By AIG for “Cause”— — — — — — 
By AIG w/o “Cause”2,940,000 5,730,000 40,000 293,263 2,424,513 11,427,776 
By Executive w/o "Good Reason"— — — — — — 
By Executive with "Good Reason"2,940,000 5,730,000 40,000 — — 8,710,000 
Qualifying Termination following a Change in Control(7)
2,940,000 7,640,000 40,000 293,263 2,424,513 13,337,776 
Death2,000,000 — — 293,263 2,424,513 4,717,776 
Disability2,940,000 — — 293,263 2,424,513 5,657,776 
Retirement(8)
— 
Executive Compensation     Potential Payments on Termination

NameAnnual
Short-Term
Incentive ($)(1)
Severance
($)(2)
Medical
and Life
Insurance ($)(3)
Pension
Plan
Credit ($)(4)
Unvested
Options ($)(5)
Unvested
Stock
Awards ($)(6)
Total ($) 
Lucy Fato        
By AIG for “Cause”0000000 
By AIG w/o “Cause”2,042,5004,452,50040,0000763,4549,152,10016,450,554 
By Executive w/o Good Reason0000000 
By Executive with Good Reason2,042,5004,452,50040,0000006,535,000 
Qualifying Termination following a Change in Control(7)2,042,5005,936,66740,0000763,4549,152,10017,934,721 
Death1,900,000000763,4549,249,65211,913,106 
Disability(8)2,042,500000763,4549,152,10011,958,054 
Retirement0000000 

(1)These amounts represent annual STI payments for which the current named executives would have been eligible pursuant to the 2012 ESP had they been terminated on December 31, 2020. Under the 2012 ESP, earned STI awards are prorated based on the number of full months the executive was employed in the termination year. Except in the case of death, these STI payments are based on the named executive’s target amount and actual business or function performance and paid at the same time such STI awards are regularly paid to similarly situated active employees. In the case of death, a named executive’s STI payment is based on his target amount and paid as soon as administratively possible after the date of death (but in no event later than March 15th of the following year). These amounts would have been solely in lieu of, and not in addition to, the annual STI award for 2020 actually paid to the current named executives as reported in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table.

(2)Severance would have been paid as a lump sum cash payment as soon as practicable and in no event later than 60 days following the termination date. See the description of the 2012 ESP above for more information on severance payments and benefits.

(3)The amounts in this column reflect a lump sum payment of $40,000 that can be used to pay for continued healthcare and life insurance coverage following a qualifying termination. None of the current named executives are eligible for company-subsidized retiree medical benefits. The amounts do not include medical and life insurance benefits upon permanent disability or death to the extent that they are generally available to all salaried employees. All of the current named executives are eligible participants under the AIG medical and life insurance plans.

(4)The amount shown for all of the termination events is the increase, if any, above the accumulated value of pension benefits shown in the 2020 Pension Benefits table, calculated using the same assumptions. Where there is no increase in value, the amount shown in this column is zero. For Messrs. Lyons and Zaffino and Ms. Fato, the amount shown in the column is zero because they are not participants in the Plans. For information on pension benefits generally, see “—Post-Employment Compensation—Pension Benefits.”

(5)The amounts in this column represent the total market value of unvested stock options as of December 31, 2020 that would accelerate upon termination, based on the difference between the exercise price of the options and the closing sale price of shares of AIG common stock on the NYSE of $37.86 on December 31, 2020.

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT83

2023 Executive Compensation     Potential Payments on Termination
Former Executive Officers(9)
Shane Fitzsimons
By AIG w/o “Cause”(10)
1,800,0005,216,00040,000574,3586,893,23614,523,594
Lucy Fato
Pursuant to Transition Agreement(11)
2,800,0006,134,50040,0002,729,70315,703,28527,407,488
(1)These amounts represent annual STI payments for which the named executives would have been eligible had they been terminated on December 31, 2023. Under the ESP, earned STI awards are prorated based on the number of full months the executive was employed in the termination year. Except in the case of death or a qualifying termination following a Change in Control, STI payments under the ESP are based on the named executive’s target amount and actual business or function performance and paid at the same time such STI awards are regularly paid to similarly situated active employees. In the case of death, a named executive’s STI payment is based on his target amount and paid as soon as administratively possible after the date of death (but in no event later than March 15th of the following year). In the case of a qualifying termination following a Change in Control, these STI payments are based on the better of the named executive’s target amount or target amount adjusted for actual business or function performance and paid at the same time such STI awards are regularly paid to similarly situated active employees. These amounts would have been solely in lieu of, and not in addition to, the annual STI award for 2023 actually paid to the current named executives as reported in the 2023 Summary Compensation Table.
(2)Severance would have been paid as a lump sum cash payment as soon as practicable and in no event later than 60 days following the termination date. See descriptions of the ESP and "—Zaffino Employment Agreement" above for more information on severance payments and benefits.
(3)The amounts in this column reflect a lump sum payment of $40,000 that can be used to pay for continued healthcare and life insurance coverage following a qualifying termination. None of the current named executives are eligible for Company-subsidized retiree medical benefits. The amounts do not include medical and life insurance benefits upon permanent disability or death to the extent that they are generally available to all salaried employees. All of the current named executives are eligible participants under the AIG medical and life insurance plans.
(4)The amount shown for all of the termination events is the increase, if any, above the accumulated value of pension benefits shown in the 2023 Pension Benefits table, calculated using the same assumptions. Other than Mr. Hogan, none of the other executive officers participate in the Plans. For information on pension benefits generally, see “—Post-Employment Compensation—Pension Benefits.”
(5)The amounts in this column represent the total value of unvested stock options as of December 31, 2023 that would accelerate upon termination, based on the difference between the exercise price of the options and the closing sale price of shares of AIG Parent common stock on the NYSE of $67.75 on December 29, 2023 (other than Mr. Fitzsimons, as set forth below). For Mr. Hogan, the amounts also include total value of unvested Corebridge stock options that would accelerate upon termination, based on the difference between the exercise price of the options and the closing sale price of shares of Corebridge common stock on the NYSE of $21.66 on December 29, 2023.
For the 2018, 20192021, 2022 and 20202023 stock option awards, the amounts in this column include the stock options vesting inunder the case of a named executive’s involuntary termination without Cause, involuntary termination without Cause within 24 months following a Change in Control, retirement, death or disability. Theevents described above. Generally, the vested 2018, 20192021, 2022 and 20202023 stock options will remain exercisable for three years after each such termination scenario. In no event will any 2018, 20192021, 2022 or 20202023 stock options remain exercisable after the initial ten-year expiration date.

As described above under “—Holdings of and Vesting of Previously Awarded Equity—Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2020”, Messrs. Duperreault, Lyons and Zaffino,

(6)The amounts in connection with joining AIG, were each granted stock options with a seven-year term pursuant to each executive’s stock option award agreement. The time-vesting options portion of each executive’s award (500,000 options for Mr. Duperreault, 156,250 options for Mr. Lyons and 333,000 options for Mr. Zaffino) vest in equal, annual installments on each ofthis column represent the first three anniversaries of the respective award grant date and the remaining portion of each executive’s award (1,000,000 options for Mr. Duperreault, 143,278 options for Mr. Lyons and 667,000 for Mr. Zaffino) vests based on the stock performance of AIG common stock (the Performance-Vesting Options). Upon a termination by AIG without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason, or upon the executive’s death or disability, all time-vesting options will vest and remain exercisable for three years after termination, and the unvested Performance-Vesting Options will continue to be eligible to vest based on stock performance and remain exercisable for three years after termination. Basedtotal market value (based on the closing sale price on the NYSE of $37.86$67.75 on December 31, 202029, 2023, other than Mr. Fitzsimons, as set forth below) of shares of AIG Parent common stock no Performance-Vesting Options would vest upon terminationunderlying unvested equity-based awards as of December 31, 2020. In no event will any stock options remain exercisable after2023. For Mr. Hogan and Ms. Purtill, the initial seven-year expiration date. Upon any other termination, including for Cause by AIG or byamounts also include the executive other than for Good Reason, alltotal market value of Corebridge unvested stock options immediately terminate and are forfeited.

(6)The amounts in this column represent the total market value (based on the closing sale price on the NYSE of $37.86 on December 31, 2020) of shares of AIG common stock underlying unvested equity-based awards as of December 31, 2020.

equity-based awards as of December 31, 2023, based on the closing sale price on the NYSE of $21.66 on December 29, 2023.

For the 20182021 PSU awards, the amounts in this column include the named executive’s actual earned PSUs for the 2018-20212021-2023 performance period that vested in January 2024 (as determined by the CMRC in the first quarter of 2021) that vested2024), other than Mr. Fitzsimons who received shares at target following his death in JanuaryOctober 2023. 2021 PSU award amounts also include the dividend equivalent rights which were paid in cash when the case of a named executive’s involuntary termination without Cause, involuntary termination without Cause within 24 months following a Change in Control, retirement or disability.earned shares were delivered. Target performance is reflected in the case of death.

2021 Proxy Statement111

Executive Compensation        Pay Ratio

In addition, the amounts in this column include, for all of the named executives, the outstanding 20192022 and 20202023 PSU awards assuming target performance and the full amount of their RSU awards. For the 2019The 2022 and 2020 PSU awards, the actual number of PSUs (if any) vesting upon a qualifying termination by AIG without Cause, by executive with Good Reason, disability, retirement and, in certain circumstances, following a Change in Control, would be based on actual performance.

2023 PSU and RSU award amounts include the value of accrued dividend equivalent rights on such awards, which are paid in cash if and when such related shares of AIG Parent common stock are delivered.

For Mr. Zaffino, the amount in this column also includeincludes the outstanding RSUs with respect to his 2020 RSU award. The amount includes (i) any additional PSUs and RSUs accrued through the second quarter of 2021 in respect of dividend equivalent rights, which are subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying RSUs, and (ii) value of accrued dividend equivalents rights which are paid in cash when such related shares of AIG Parent common stock are delivered.
For Ms. Fato, outstanding stock options will remain outstanding for their respective full scheduled term.
(7)This row includes amounts that would be paid under the ESP or the Zaffino Employment Agreement, as applicable, in the case of a named executive’s without Cause or voluntary termination with Good Reason within 24 months following a Change in Control. Under the outstanding PSU and RSU awards, the amount of PSUs performance, conditionsvesting is shown (i) at the actual amounts earned for the 2021 PSUs (as determined by the CMRC in the first quarter of 2024) that vested in January 2024 and (ii) at target for the 2021 and 2022 PSUs.
(8)As of December 31, 2023, none of the named executives other than Mr. Hogan and Mr. McElroy qualified as retirement eligible under any of the relatedapplicable plans or programs in which they participated.
(9)Mr. Lyons was not eligible for a 2023 STI award or severance. All outstanding equity-based awards were forfeited upon his separation from the Company.
(10)Mr. Fitzsimons received the benefits set forth under termination without Cause upon his separation from the Company. The total value of his unvested options and equity-based awards are based on the closing sale price on the NYSE of $57.54 on June 30, 2023. The 2021, 2022 and 2023 PSUs and RSUs, and are paid when such related shares (if any) are delivered. 2018 PSU award amounts include the additional PSUs actually accrued in respect of dividend equivalent rights, which are subject to the same vesting and performance conditions as the related PSUs and were paid when such related earned shares were delivered. 2019 and 2020 PSU amounts include the additional PSUs accrued in respect of dividend equivalent rights assumingreflect target performance.

(7)This row includes amounts that would be paid under the 2012 ESP upon a termination by AIG without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason within 24 months following a Change in Control. Under the outstanding PSU and RSU awards, the amounts in this row include only termination by AIG without Cause within 24 months following a Change in Control, with the amount of PSUs vesting shown (i) at the actual amounts earned for the 2018 PSUs (as determined by the CMRC in the first quarter of 2021) that vested in January 2021 and (ii) at target for the 2019 and 2020 PSUs. However, with respect to the 2019 and 2020 PSUs, for a Change in Control that occurs following a performance period, the actual PSUs vesting, if any, would be based on actual performance, and for a Change in Control that occurs during a performance period, the CMRC may determine to use actual performance through the date of the Change in Control rather than target performance to determine the actual PSUs vesting, if any.

(8)Amounts shown in this row represent the amounts the executive would be entitled to receive upon experiencing a disability.

PAY RATIO

(11)For a description of Ms. Fato's Transition Agreement and any additional payments she is entitled to receive thereunder, see "—Potential Payments on Termination—Fato Transition Agreement."
84AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

2023 Executive Compensation     Pay Ratio
Pay Ratio
The 20202023 annual total compensation of the median employee identified by AIGus (as described below) was $70,926,$88,585, and the 2020 annualMr. Zaffino’s annualized 2023 total compensation of Mr. Duperreault, AIG’sfor his role as Chief Executive Officer during 2020,2023 was $18,810,373.$24,617,936. Accordingly, AIG’sour estimated 20202023 pay ratio was 1 to 265.

278.

As permitted by SEC rules, to identify the median employee, AIGwe used itsour active employee population (including both full-time and part-time employees) as of October 1, 20203, 2022 and used 20192021 annual total compensation for that population comprising (1) annual base salary, (2) overtime payments, (3) target STI and LTI awards, in each case using 20202022 targets for employees hired during 20192021 who were not eligible for 20192021 awards and (4) sales incentives. For employees hired in 20202022 (who therefore did not have 20192021 compensation), AIGwe used 20202022 annual total compensation comprising (1) annual base salary, (2) overtime payments, (3) 20202022 target STI and LTI awards and (4) an estimate of annual sales incentives based on a calculation of median 20192021 sales incentives.

As required by SEC rules, after identifying our median employee (who is located in the U.S.), we calculated 20202023 annual total compensation for both our median employee and Mr. DuperreaultZaffino using the same methodology that we use to determine our named executive officers’ annual total compensation for the Summary Compensation Table.

SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratios reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios. In addition, the median employee’s annual total compensation is unique to that individual and therefore is not an indicator of the annual total compensation of any other individual or group of employees.

employees
.
Pay Versus Performance
We provide the following disclosure regarding executive compensation for our principal executive officers (PEOs) and Non-PEO named executives (NEOs) and Company performance for the fiscal years listed below in accordance with rules adopted by the SEC. The CMRC did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure below in making its pay decisions for any of the years shown.
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Peter Zaffino1
($)
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Brian
Duperreault1 ($)
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Peter
Zaffino1,2,3 ($)
Compensation
Actually
Paid to Brian
Duperreault1,2,3 ($)
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Non-PEO
NEOs1 ($)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
NEOs1,2,3 ($)
Value of Initial Fixed
$100 Investment
based on:4
Net Income
($ Millions)5
Accident Year
Combined
Ratio, as
adjusted6 (%)
YearTSR ($)Peer Group TSR ($)
202324,617,936 — 38,715,733 — 8,096,539 6,186,239 147.43 168.05 3,878 87.7 
202275,314,199 — 90,844,101 — 9,077,342 12,293,363 134.37 151.65 11,273 88.7 
202121,905,220 13,969,537 52,445,392 45,269,700 10,476,911 20,741,560 118.13 127.58 10,906 91.0 
2020— 18,810,374 — 14,041,042 12,890,475 10,890,203 76.75 106.96 (5,829)94.1 
(1)Peter Zaffino has been our PEO since March 2021. Brian Duperreault was our PEO prior to March 2021. The individuals comprising the Non-PEO named executive officers for each year presented are listed below.
2020202120222023
Peter ZaffinoMark LyonsShane FitzsimonsSabra Purtill
Mark LyonsLucy FatoLucy FatoKevin T. Hogan
Lucy FatoKevin T. HoganKevin T. HoganDavid McElroy
Doug DachilleDavid McElroyDavid McElroyClaude Wade
Doug DachilleShane Fitzsimons
Mark Lyons
Lucy Fato
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT85

2023 Executive Compensation     Pay Versus Performance
(2)The amounts shown for Compensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and do not reflect compensation actually earned, realized, or received by the Company’s NEOs. These amounts reflect the Summary Compensation Table Total with certain adjustments as described in footnote 3 below. In September of 2022, AIG completed the initial public offering of Corebridge, at which time Mr. Hogan became an executive officer of Corebridge and his outstanding and unvested RSUs denominated in AIG Parent common stock were converted to unvested RSUs denominated in Corebridge common stock. As a result, the RSUs included in the table above were valued using the stock price of Corebridge as of December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2023, AIG own 52.2 percent of Corebridge common stock.
(3)Compensation Actually Paid reflects the exclusions and inclusions of certain amounts for the PEOs and the Non-PEO NEOs as set forth below. Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Amounts in the Exclusion of Stock Awards and Option Awards column are the totals from the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns set forth in the applicable Summary Compensation Table.
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Peter Zaffino ($)
Exclusion of Change in
Pension Value for
Peter Zaffino ($)
Exclusion of Stock
Awards and
Option Awards for
Peter Zaffino ($)
Inclusion of Pension Service Cost for Peter Zaffino ($)
Inclusion of
Equity Values for
Peter Zaffino ($)
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Peter Zaffino ($)
202324,617,936 (13,859,291)27,957,088 38,715,733 
Year
Average Summary
Compensation Table
Total for Non-PEO
NEOs ($)
Average Exclusion of
Change in Pension
Value for Non-PEO
NEOs ($)
Average Exclusion of
Stock Awards and
Option Awards for
Non-PEO NEOs
($)
Average Inclusion of
Pension Service Cost
for Non-PEO NEOs ($)
Average Inclusion of
Equity Values for
Non-PEO NEOs ($)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO NEOs ($)
20238,096,539 (18,845)(2,994,534)1,103,079 6,186,239 
The amounts in the Inclusion of Equity Values in the tables above are derived from the amounts set forth in the following tables. Please note that any columns included in the calculation of Compensation Actually Paid that contain a “0” did not have an amount in that category for that year.
Year
Year-End Fair Value
of Equity Awards
Granted During Year
That Remained
Unvested as of Last
Day of Year
for Peter Zaffino ($)
Change in Fair Value
from Last Day of Prior
Year to Last Day of
Year of Unvested
Equity Awards
for Peter Zaffino ($)
Average Vesting-Date
Fair Value of Equity
Awards Granted
During Year that
Vested During Year for
Peter Zaffino ($)
Change in Fair Value
from Last Day of Prior
Year to Vesting Date of
Unvested Equity
Awards that Vested
During Year for Peter
Zaffino ($)
Fair Value at Last Day
of Prior Year of Equity
Awards Forfeited
During Year for
Peter Zaffino ($)
Total - Inclusion of
Equity Values for
Peter Zaffino ($)
202318,051,750 10,661,792 (756,454)27,957,088 
Year
Average Year-End Fair
Value of Equity Awards
Granted During Year
That Remained
Unvested as of Last
Day of Year for Non-
PEO NEOs ($)
Average Change in
Fair Value from
Last Day of Prior Year
to Last Day of Year of
Unvested Equity Awards
for Non-PEO NEOs ($)
Average Vesting-Date
Fair Value of Equity
Awards Granted
During Year that
Vested During Year for
Non-PEO NEOs ($)
Average Change
in Fair Value from
Last Day of Prior Year
to Vesting Date of
Unvested Equity
Awards that Vested
During Year for Non-
PEO NEOs ($)
Average Fair Value
at Last Day of Prior Year
of Equity Awards
Forfeited During Year
for Non-PEO NEOs ($)
Total - Average
Inclusion of
Equity Values for
Non-PEO NEOs ($)
20232,854,855 1,332,845 408,409 (408,523)(3,084,507)1,103,079 
(4)The Peer Group TSR set forth in this table utilizes the S&P 500 Property & Casualty Insurance Index (S&P 500 Property & Casualty Insurance Index), which we also utilize in the stock performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K included in AIG's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023. The comparison assumes $100 was invested for the period starting December 31, 2019, through the end of the last listed year, in the Company and in the S&P 500 Property & Casualty Insurance Index, respectively. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance. In accordance with recent SEC guidance and to ensure consistency with Item 201(e) in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Peer Group TSR calculation for fiscal years 2020, 2021 and 2022 reflects rebalancing of the group members at the beginning of each fiscal year. Accordingly, the amounts may differ from those included in our 2023 Proxy Statement.
(5)Net Income as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. In accordance with recent SEC guidance, the amounts for 2021 and 2022 differ from those included in our 2023 Proxy Statement since they have been updated to reflect the Company's implementation of the long-duration targeted improvements accounting standard.
(6)We determined AYCR, as adjusted* to be the most important financial performance measure used to link Company performance to Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and Non-PEO NEOs in 2023. We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.
86AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

2023 Executive Compensation     Pay Versus Performance
Relationship Between PEO and Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and the cumulative TSR over the four most recently completed fiscal years for the Company and the Peer Group.
03_424782_1_Chart_CompensationversusTSR (002).jpg
Relationship Between PEO and Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income
The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and our Net Income during the four most recently completed fiscal years.
03_424782-1_bar_PEOandAverageNon-PEO NEOCompensationActuallyPaidVersusNetIncome.jpg
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT87

2023 Executive Compensation     Pay Versus Performance
Relationship Between PEO and Non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Company-Selected Measure
The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and our AYCR, as adjusted*, during the four most recently completed fiscal years.
03 424782-1_bar_ex_CATs.jpg
Tabular List of Most Important Financial Performance Measures
The following table presents the financial performance measures that the Company considers to have been the most important in linking Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs and other NEOs for 2023 to Company performance. The measures in this table are not ranked.
112
Accident Year Combined Ratio, as adjusted* Diluted Normalized Adjusted After-tax Income Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders Per Share*2021 Proxy StatementRelative Tangible Book Value Per Common Share* GrowthRelative Total Shareholder Return 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

*    We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.
Equity Compensation Plan Information

Equity Compensation Plan Information

88AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

2023 Executive Compensation     Equity Compensation Plan Information
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information about shares of AIG Parent common stock that may be issued under compensation plans as of December 31, 2020.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

Plan Category Plan Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Rights(1)(2)
 Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of Outstanding Options and Rights ($)(1)
 Number of Securities
Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans(Excluding Securities Reflected in the Third Column)
Equity compensation 2010 Stock Incentive Plan 20,247(3)  0(4)
plans approved by 2013 Plan 31,403,866(5) 47.03(6) 22,275,746(7)
security holders        
Equity compensation
plans not approved by
security holders
 Inducement Option Award 500,000(8) 61.82(6) 0
Total   31,924,113 47.67(6) 22,275,746

(1)Shares underlying RSUs and PSUs are deliverable without the payment of any consideration, and therefore these awards have not been taken into account in calculating the weighted-average exercise price.

(2)At December 31, 2020, AIG was also obligated to issue 42,130 shares in connection with previous exercises of options with delivery deferred.

(3)Represents shares reserved for issuance in connection with DSUs.

(4)No future awards will be made under these plans.

(5)Represents shares reserved for issuance in connection with time-vested DSUs and in connection with 2018 PSUs (at actual amounts earned, including related dividend equivalents, and net of shares withheld for the payment of taxes), 2019 and 2020 PSUs (at target level of performance and including related dividend equivalents), RSUs (and related dividend equivalents) and options.

(6)Represents the weighted average exercise price of outstanding options.

(7)Represents shares reserved for future issuance under the 20132023.
Plan CategoryPlan
Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options and Rights
(1)(2)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options and Rights ($)
(1)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected in the Third Column)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders2010 Stock Incentive Plan 21,283(3)— (4)
2013 Plan 13,258,785(5)47.29(6)(4)
2021 Plan 8,566,681(7)60.57(6) 23,836,222(8)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holdersInducement Option Award500,000(9)61.82(6)
Total 22,346,749 50.69(6) 23,836,222
(1)Shares underlying DSUs, RSUs and PSUs are deliverable without the payment of any consideration, and therefore these awards have not been taken into account in calculating the weighted-average exercise price.
(2)At December 31, 2023, AIG was also obligated to issue 42,130 shares in connection with previous exercises of stock options with delivery deferred.
(3)Represents shares reserved for issuance in connection with DSUs.
(4)No future awards will be made under these plans.
(5)Represents shares reserved for issuance in connection with outstanding (i) time-vested DSUs, (ii) 2021 PSUs (at target level of performance), (iii) RSUs (including related dividend equivalents accrued through the second quarter of 2021 in the form of additional RSUs) and (v) stock options.
(6)Represents the weighted average exercise price of outstanding stock options.
(7)Represents shares reserved for issuance in connection with outstanding (i) time-vested DSUs, (ii) RSUs (including related dividend equivalents accrued through the fourth quarter of 2023 in the form of additional RSUs that will be settled in cash), (iii) 2022 and 2023 PSUs (at target level of performance) and (iv) stock options.
(8)Represents shares reserved for future issuance under the 2021 Plan (which replaced the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan for awards granted on or after May 15, 2013). The number of shares available for issuance under the 2013 Plan for awards granted on or after May 12, 2021). The number of shares available for issuance under the 2021 Plan would increase if and to the extent that (i) outstanding awards under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan are forfeited, expire, terminate or otherwise lapse or are settled in cash in whole or in part or (ii) outstanding awards under the 2013 Plan are forfeited, expire or are settled in cash in whole or in part, each as provided by the 2013 Plan. In addition, the number of shares available for issuance under the 2013 Plan could increase or decrease depending on actual performance and the number of 2019 and 2020 PSUs earned. As noted in this Proxy Statement, the Board has adopted, subject to shareholder approval the 2021 Plan which, if approved, will replace the 2013 Plan and no further shares will be issued under the 2013 Plan.

(8)Represents shares reserved for future issuance in connection with options granted to Mr. Duperreault outside of the 2013 Plan as an “employment inducement award” under NYSE Listing Rule 303A.08. See “Executive Compensation—Holdings of and Vesting of Previously Awarded Equity” for further information on this award.

2021 Proxy Statement113

Proposal 2—Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

Proposal 2—Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

Proposal 2—Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say on Pay)

What am I voting on?

We are asking shareholders to approve the 2020 compensation of AIG’s named executives as disclosed in the Proxy Statement.

Voting Recommendation

✓ FORthe 2020 compensation of AIG’s named executives.

Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, AIG must submit to shareholders at least once every three years a non-binding shareholder advisory vote to approve the compensation of AIG’s executives as disclosed in the annual Proxy Statement. In 2019, our Board unanimously recommended, and our shareholders agreed, that the say-on-pay advisory vote occur annually as a corporate governance best practice. Accordingly, this Proposal 2 gives holders of AIG common stock the opportunity to vote for or against the following resolution:

RESOLVED: that the holders of the common stock of American International Group, Inc. (the Company) approve the compensation of the Company’s named executives, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 2020 Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure contained in the Proxy Statement.

Because this resolution relates to the information about executive compensation contained in this Proxy Statement, under “Executive Compensation” beginning on page 51, shareholders should review that information in considering their vote on this Proposal.

The results of the vote on this resolution will not be binding on AIG’s Board, will not overrule any decisions the Board has made and will not create any duty for the Board to take any action in response to the outcome of the vote. However, the CMRC values the feedback received from this advisory vote and may, in its sole discretion, take into account the outcome of the vote in analyzing and evaluating future compensation opportunities. We will include an advisory vote on executive compensation on an annual basis at least until the next shareholder advisory vote on the frequency of such votes (no later than our 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders).

AIG STATEMENT IN SUPPORT

The Board and CMRC support this resolution because they believe that AIG’s compensation program is appropriately designed to incentivize and reward performance that supports long-term, sustained value creation, while taking into account the experience and feedback of our shareholders. This is achieved through a balanced pay mix that is weighted towards at-risk pay, featuring variable and performance-based pay and a combination of STI and LTI performance metrics that are aligned with AIG’s strategic priorities.

The onset of the COVID-19 crisis and its collateral effects on the global economy in the first quarter of 2020 required the CMRC to pivot and adapt its approach to executive compensation to address AIG’s changing priorities, while continuing to reinforce the importance of AIG’s in-flight transformation initiatives. Accordingly, the CMRC approved performance metrics for our 2020 STI program which were aligned with three priority focus areas for the company of liquidity, capital preservation and de-risking. The CMRC also approved metrics for the PSUs awarded as part of our 2020 LTI awards to our named executives, incorporating Relative Tangible BVPS* and relative TSR metrics, to mitigate the need to calibrate absolute long-term goals in the midst of continued uncertainty, and an absolute metric relating to AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate GOE Savings*. While the operating environment remained uncertain, these areas of focus are integral to AIG’s long-term, sustainable growth and resiliency.

*We make adjustments to U.S. GAAP financial measures for purposes of this performance metric to ensure that results properly reflect management contributions. See Appendix A for an explanation of how this metric is calculated from our audited financial statements.

114 2021 Proxy Statement

Proposal 2—Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

The Board believes that our 2020 compensation programs and the decisions made by the CMRC and the Board with respect to 2020 pay appropriately balanced rewarding AIG’s named executives for their extraordinary leadership through the unprecedented COVID-19 crisis with taking into account the experience of our shareholders in a year of significant global market volatility.

The Board remains committed to executive compensation programs that attract, retain, motivate, reward and incentivize highly qualified leaders as AIG continues its transformation to become a leading insurance franchise and a top performing company. Our 2020 compensation program and pay decisions are described in more detail under the heading “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 52.

RECOMMENDATION

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FORthis resolution.

2021 Proxy Statement115

Proposal 3—Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Proposal 3—Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Proposal 3—Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

What am I voting on?

We are asking shareholders to approve the American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Voting Recommendation

✓ FORthe approval of the American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

On March 11, 2021, upon the recommendation of the CMRC, the Board unanimously approved the 2021 Plan. The 2021 Plan will be effective on May 12, 2021 if it is approved by the holders of AIG common stock at the 2021 Annual Meeting (the Effective Date). If the 2021 Plan is not approved by our shareholders, the Effective Date will not occur and no awards will be made under the 2021 Plan.

The 2021 Plan will apply only to awards granted on or after the Effective Date and will replace the 2013 Plan for all awards granted on or after the Effective Date. The terms and conditions of awards granted under the 2013 Plan prior to the Effective Date of the 2021 Plan will not be affected by the adoption or approval of the 2021 Plan, and the 2013 Plan will remain effective with respect to such awards. No new grants will be made under the 2013 Plan after the Effective Date.

In assessing the appropriate terms of the 2021 Plan, the CMRC considered, among other items, the existing terms of the 2013 Plan, our compensation philosophy and practices, as well as feedback from our shareholders. The following summary of the material terms of the 2021 Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the 2021 Plan, which is attached hereto as Appendix B.

BEST PRACTICES 

The 2021 Plan includes several features designed to protect shareholder interests and appropriately reflect our compensation philosophy and developments in our compensation practices in recent years, including:

No equity grants below 100 percent of fair market value

No “evergreen” provision (i.e., no automatic increase in the number of shares available under the plan)

No single-trigger change-in-control

Minimum one-year vesting (except under specific termination conditions)

No repricing or cash buyout of underwater stock options or stock appreciation rights

No hedging or pledging transactions or transfer to an unrelated party for value

No dividends or dividend equivalents paid on equity awards until vesting requirements are met

No liberal share recycling

AVAILABLE SHARES 

The 2021 Plan provides for the issuance of cash-based awards and stock-based awards. The total number of shares of AIG common stock that may be granted under the 2021 Plan is the sum of (1) 8.1 million shares, plus (2) the number of authorized shares of AIG common stock remaining available under the 2013 Plan at the Effective Date (16.45 million shares as of March 2, 2021), plus (3) the number of shares of AIG common stock relating to outstanding awards under the 2013 Plan at the Effective Date that subsequently are forfeited, expire, terminate or otherwise lapse or are settled forin cash in whole or in part or (ii) outstanding awards under the 2021 Plan are forfeited, expire or are settled in cash in whole or in part, each as provided by the 2021 Plan (collectively, the Available Shares).

116 2021 Proxy Statement

Proposal 3—Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

BURN RATE AND POTENTIAL DILUTION

AIG believes that the Available Shares under the 2021 Plan will provide sufficient shares for equity-based compensation needs of AIG for approximately two years following the Effective Date. This estimate is based on our historical share usage under the 2013 Plan.

The table below shows our historic burn rate over the past three years.

  2018 2019 2020 Average
(a) Full value awards granted 4,723,606(1) 6,640,713 8,147,150 6,503,823
(b) Stock options granted 2,752,098 3,235,290 3,303,587 3,096,992
(c) Weighted average shares outstanding (basic) 898,405,537 876,750,264 869,309,458 881,488,420
(d) Burn rate (a + b) / c 0.83% 1.13% 1.32% 1.09%
(1)Full value awards associated with the Validus acquisition as disclosed in the 2018 10-K are excluded from this amount.

The table below shows our overhang as of March 2, 2021.

(a) Outstanding full value awards19,368,943
(b) Outstanding stock options13,745,858
Weighted average exercise price$47.18
Weighted average remaining term6.81 years
(c) Shares remaining under the 2013 Plan16,449,458
(d) Proposed share reserve under the 2021 Plan8,100,000
(e) Basic shares of common stock outstanding (February 28, 2021)864,173,953
(f) Basic overhang (a + b + c + d) / e6.67%
(g) Fully diluted overhang (a + b + c + d) / (a + b + c + d + e)6.26%

As commonly calculated, the total potential dilution or “overhang” from the adoption of the 2021 Plan would be 6.26 percent on a fully diluted basis. However, AIG also takes into account the relevant accounting and tax impact of all potential forms of equity awards in designing our grants. We believe that the benefits to the holders of AIG common stock resulting from equity award grants to our employees, officers and directors, including interest alignment and mitigation of incentives to take inappropriate business risks, outweigh the potential dilutive effect of expected grants under the 2021 Plan. The CMRC believes that long-term incentives, primarily delivered through equity grants, are an effective vehicle to align the interests of executives with those of our shareholders, encourage ownership in AIG and serve as a risk management tool. For additional information with respect to our outstanding stock-based awards, please see Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in AIG’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We project that we will use up the available shares under the 2013 Plan in 2022, and the 2013 Plan will terminate automatically on May 15, 2023. Therefore, if our shareholders do not approve the 2021 Plan, our future ability to issue equity-based awards other than cash-settled awards after 2022 will be limited. This could have negative consequences, including:

Limiting pay for performance and alignment with shareholder interests. A key element of our compensation philosophy (as described under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Design—Our Philosophy”) is to align the long-term economic interests of key employees with those of our shareholders by ensuring that a meaningful component of their compensation is provided in the form of equity awards. At least 53 percent of each named executive’s annual target direct compensation in 2020 was delivered in the form of equity awards. We believe that equity-based compensation aligns our employees and directors’ interests with shareholders by rewarding for long-term value creation and performance achievements as well as stock price appreciation. These interests are further aligned through our robust clawback policy and stock ownership guidelines applicable to all of our named executives and other executive officers.

2021 Proxy Statement117

Proposal 3—Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Impede ability to attract and retain talent. The attraction and retention of talented employees is critical to executing our business strategy successfully, and we believe that equity awards are a competitive tool to recruit and motivate key employees. If the 2021 Plan is not approved, we would be limited in our ability to use a valuable incentive tool and would be at a significant disadvantage in attracting new talent after 2022.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the 2021 Plan is:

to attract, and motivate and retain officers, directors and key employees of AIG, compensate them for their contributions to AIG and encourage them to acquire a proprietary interest in AIG;

to align the interests of officers, directors and key employees with those of AIG’s shareholders; and

to assist AIG in ensuring that its compensation program does not provide incentives to take imprudent risks.

ADMINISTRATION 

The 2021 Plan generally will be administered by the CMRC (and its delegates) unless the Board determines otherwise. Among other things, the CMRC (or its delegates) will determine the persons who will receive awards under the 2021 Plan, the time when awards will be granted, the terms of such awards andIn addition, the number of shares of AIG common stock, if any, which will be subject to the awards. The Board, in its sole discretion, also may grant awards or administer the 2021 Plan.

ELIGIBILITY 

The CMRC (or its delegates) may grant awards to current employees or directors of AIG and its consolidated subsidiaries or, solely with respect to their final year of service, former employees. The basis of participation in the 2021 Plan is the CMRC's (or its delegates') decision, in its sole discretion, that an award to an eligible participant will further the 2021 Plan’s stated purpose (as described above). As of March 2, 2021, approximately 45,000 employees, 11 executive officers and 11 non-employee directors would have been eligible to receive awards under the 2021 Plan as compensation for their service to AIG.

TYPES OF AWARDS 

The 2021 Plan provides for grants of cash-based awards and stock-based awards. Stock-based awards comprise stock options (both stock options intended to be “incentive stock options” under Sections 421 or 422 of the Code and non-qualified stock options), stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, dividend equivalent rights and other equity-based or equity-related awards pursuant to which AIG common stock, cash or other property may be delivered. Cash-based awards may be performance-based awards or take such other form (including, for example, retainers and meeting-based fees) that the CMRC (or its delegates) determines to be consistent with the purposes of the 2021 Plan and the interests of AIG. Each stock-based award and, to the extent determined appropriate by the CMRC (or its delegates), cash-based award will be evidenced by an award agreement, which will govern that award’s terms and conditions.

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR AWARDS 

The 2021 Plan allows for grants of cash-based and stock-based awards to non-employee directors of AIG and its consolidated subsidiaries for their service as directors. The aggregate value of any such awards granted to any one director in respect of a particular calendar year may not exceed $900,000, based on the fair market value of stock-based awards and the value of cash awards, in each case determined on the date of grant.

STOCK OPTIONS 

A stock option entitles the recipient to purchase shares of AIG common stock at a fixed exercise price. The exercise price per share will be determined by the CMRC (or its delegates) but will not be less than the fair market value of AIG common stock on the date of grant. Fair market value will be the closing price of AIG common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant unless otherwise set forth in the applicable award agreement. Subject to the 2021 Plan’s minimum vesting rules, stock options may not be exercised for one year after the date on which the stock option is granted (except in the case of termination of employment due to death, disability or retirement) and must be exercised within 10 years from the date of grant. The 2021 Plan provides that AIG may not reset the exercise price for stock options (other than certain awards that are assumed, converted or substituted under the 2021 Plan as a result of AIG’s acquisition of another company).

118 2021 Proxy Statement

Proposal 3—Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

A stock appreciation right may entitle the recipient to receive shares of AIG common stock, cash or other property equal in value to the appreciation of the AIG common stock over the exercise price specified in the award agreement. The exercise price per share will be determined by the CMRC (or its delegates) but will not be less than the fair market value of AIG common stock on the date of grant. Fair market value will be the closing price of AIG common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant unless otherwise set forth in the applicable award agreement. Subject to the 2021 Plan’s minimum vesting rules, stock appreciation rights may not be exercised for one year after the date on which the stock appreciation right is granted (except in the case of termination of employment due to death, disability or retirement) and must be exercised within 10 years from the date of grant. The 2021 Plan provides that AIG may not reset the exercise price for stock appreciation rights (other than certain awards that are assumed, converted or substituted under the 2021 Plan as a result of AIG’s acquisition of another company).

RESTRICTED SHARES

A restricted share is a share of AIG common stock that is subject to transfer and/or forfeiture restrictions. The recipient of a restricted share will have the rights of a shareholder, including voting and dividend rights, subject to any restrictions and conditions specified in the award agreement. No dividends, however, will be paid at a time when any performance-based goals or time-based vesting requirements that apply to an award of restricted shares have not been satisfied.

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

A restricted stock unit is an unfunded, unsecured right to receive a share of AIG common stock (or cash or other securities or property) at a future date upon satisfaction of the conditions specified in the award agreement. The recipient will have only the rights of a general unsecured creditor of AIG and no rights as a stockholder of AIG until the AIG common stock underlying the restricted stock units, if any, is delivered.

OTHER STOCK-BASED AWARDS

The CMRC (or its delegates) may grant other types of equity-based or equity-related awards (including, without limitation, the grant or offer for sale of unrestricted shares of AIG common stock) in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the CMRC (or its delegates) may determine. Such awards may entail the transfer of actual shares of AIG common stock to award recipients or may be settled in cash and may include awards designed to comply with or take advantage of the applicable local laws of jurisdictions other than the U.S.

DIVIDEND EQUIVALENT RIGHTS

A dividend equivalent right represents an unfunded and unsecured promise to pay to the recipient an amount equal to all or any portion of the regular cash dividends that would be paid on a specified number of shares of AIG common stock if those shares were owned by the recipient. The conditions and restrictions for payments in connection with dividend equivalent rights will be specified in the award agreement, provided that in no event may such payments be made unless and until the award to which they relate vests. A dividend equivalent right may be granted alone or in connection with another award. Under the 2021 Plan, no payments will be made in respect of dividend equivalent rights at a time when any applicable performance goals or time-based vesting requirements relating to the dividend equivalent right or the related award have not been satisfied.

CASH-BASED AWARDS

The CMRC (or its delegates) may grant cash-based awards in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the CMRC (or its delegates) may determine. Cash-based awards may be in the form of performance-based awards and other cash awards, including retainers and meeting-based fees.

SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN; OTHER LIMITATIONS OF AWARDS

Available Shares may be authorized but unissued shares or shares previously issued and reacquired by AIG. If any award that is granted under the 2021 Plan is forfeited, expires or is settled for cash, then the shares covered by such forfeited, expired or settled award will again become available to be delivered pursuant to awards granted under the 2021 Plan. In the case of an acquisition, any shares of AIG common stock issued in connection with awards that are assumed, converted or substituted as a result of AIG’s acquisition of another

2021 Proxy Statement119

Proposal 3—Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

company will not count against the number of Available Shares that may be issued under the 2021 Plan. Available shares under a stockholder approved plan of an acquired company may be used for awards under the 2021 Plan and do not reduce the number of shares available, subject to applicable stock exchange requirements. The payment of dividend equivalent rights in cash in conjunction with any outstanding award shall not be counted against the shares available for issuance under the 2021 Plan.

In no event willPlan could increase or decrease depending on actual performance and the followingnumber of 2021, 2022 and 2023 PSUs earned.

(9)Represents shares of AIG common stock become availablereserved for future issuance in connection with awards issued under the 2021 Plan: (1) shares of AIG common stock tendered or withheld as payment of the exercise price of an option; (2) shares of AIG common stock tendered or withheld as payment of withholding taxes with respect to an award; (3) any shares reserved for issuance under a stock appreciation right that exceed the number of shares actually issued upon exercise; and (4) shares of AIG common stock reacquired by AIG using amounts received upon the exercise of an option.

The number of shares of AIG common stock available under the 2021 Plan for the grant of500,000 stock options intended to be incentive stock options for the purposes of compliance with Sections 421 and 422 of the Code will be 8.1 million.

The CMRC (or its delegates) will adjust the number of shares of AIG common stock issuable under the 2021 Plan (and any limits on the number of stock-based awards that may be granted to a particular individual under the 2021 Plan) and the terms of any outstanding awardsMr. Brian Duperreault in such manner as it deems appropriate to prevent the enlargement or dilution of rights, for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of AIG common stock (or issuance of shares of stock other than shares of AIG common stock) resulting from certain corporate transactions that affect the capitalization of AIG.

MINIMUM VESTING REQUIREMENT

All awards under the 2021 Plan will be subject to a minimum vesting schedule of at least twelve months following the date of grant of the award, provided that the following awards will not be subject to the foregoing minimum vesting requirement: (i) any shares of AIG common stock issued in connection with awards that are assumed, converted or substituted as a result of AIG’s acquisition of another company, (ii) shares of common stock delivered in lieu of fully vested cash obligations, (iii) awards to non-employee directors that vest on the earlier of the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and the next annual meeting of shareholders that is at least 50 weeks after the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting, and (iv) any additional awards the CMRC (or its delegates) may grant, up to a maximum of five percent of the available share reserve authorized for issuance under the 2021 Plan; and provided further that vesting may accelerate in connection with death, disability, retirement, a Change in Control (as described below) or other involuntary termination.

DOUBLE-TRIGGER CHANGE IN CONTROL

Except as otherwise provided in an award agreement, in the event that:

a Change in Control occurs; and

the recipient’s employment is terminated by AIG without “cause” (as defined in the applicable award agreement) or by the recipient for “good reason” (as defined in the applicable award agreement) within two years following the Change in Control,

then any outstanding unvested award held by such recipient shall vest as with respect to any service-based vesting requirement. Except as otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, following a Change in Control any performance goals with respect to an outstanding award and for which the performance period ends after the Change in Control shall be deemed to have been achieved at target level. Additionally, in the event of a Change in Control, the CMRC (or its delegates) may, in its sole discretion, terminate stock options or stock appreciation rights for which the exercise price is equal to or exceeds the per share value of the consideration to be paid in the Change in Control transaction without payment of consideration.

For purposes of the 2021 Plan, “Change in Control” generally means:

Individuals who constitute the Board on the Effective Date (or subsequent directors whose election or nomination was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of such directors, including by approval of the proxy statement in which such person is named as a nominee for director) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board;

120 2021 Proxy Statement

Proposal 3—Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

any person is or becomes a beneficial owner of 50 percent or more of AIG’s voting securities (for this purpose, person is as defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act and as used in Sections 13(d)(3) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act);

consummation of a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or similar form of corporate transaction involving AIG that results in any person becoming the beneficial owner of 50 percent or more of the total voting power of the outstanding voting securities eligible to elect directors of the entity resulting from such transaction;

a sale of all or substantially all of AIG’s assets; or

AIG’s shareholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of AIG.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control will not be deemed to occur solely because (1) any person holds or acquires beneficial ownership of more than 50 percent of the AIG’s voting securities as a result of a “share repurchase program” or similar acquisition of AIG’s voting securities by AIG; provided that if after such acquisition by AIG such person becomes the beneficial owner of additional AIG’s voting securities that increases the percentage of outstanding AIG’s voting securities beneficially owned by such person, a Change in Control shall then occur, or (2) the consummation of a sale of all or substantially all (or a subset) of the assets and/or operations of the Life and Retirement business (or any similar transaction).

AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION

The Board may from time to time suspend, discontinue, revise or amend the 2021 Plan in any respect whatsoever, including in any manner that adversely affects the rights, duties or obligations of any grantee of an award. Unless otherwise determined by the Board, shareholder approval of any suspension, discontinuance, revision or amendment will be obtained only to the extent necessary to comply with any applicable laws, regulations or rules of a securities exchange or self-regulatory agency, except that shareholder approval shall be required for any amendment to the 2021 Plan that materially increases the benefits available under the 2021 Plan or any amendment to permit the sale or other disposition of an award to an unrelated third party for value or if the amendment would reduce the exercise price of outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights.

Unless previously terminated by the Board, the 2021 Plan (if approved by the holders of AIG common stock) will terminate, and no more awards will be granted under the 2021 Plan, on or after the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date, but any outstanding award will remain in effect until the underlying shares are delivered or the award lapses.

CLAWBACK

Awards under the 2021 Plan will be subject to the AIG Clawback Policy and any other clawback or recapture policy that AIG may adopt from time to time to the extent provided in such policy or as may be required by applicable law.

RIGHT OF OFFSET

We have the right to offset against our obligation to deliver shares of AIG common stock (or cash, other securities or other property) under the 2021 Plan or any award agreement any outstanding amounts the recipient then owes to AIG and any amounts the CMRC (or its delegates) otherwise deems appropriate pursuant to any tax equalization policy or agreement. Our right of offset is subject to the constraints of Section 409A of the Code.

NONASSIGNABILITY; NO HEDGING OR PLEDGING

Except to the extent otherwise provided in any award agreement, no award (or any rights or obligations thereunder) granted to any person under the 2021 Plan may be sold, exchanged, transferred, assigned, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of or hedged, in any manner (including through the use of any cash-settled instrument), other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. As described above, any amendment of the 2021 Plan to permit the sale or other disposition of an award to an unrelated third party for value will require shareholder approval. All awards (and any rights thereunder) will be exercisable during the life of the recipient only by the recipient or by the recipient’s legal representative.

2021 Proxy Statement121

Proposal 3—Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan 

OTHER TERMS OF AWARDS

No recipient of any award under the 2021 Plan will have any of the rights of a holder of AIG common stock with respect to shares subject to an award until the delivery of the shares (or in the case of an award of restricted or unrestricted shares of AIG common stock, the grant or registration in the name of the grantee of such shares pursuant to the applicable award agreement, but then only as the CMRC (or its delegates) may include in the applicable award agreement). Awards under the 2021 Plan may be granted in lieu of, or determined by reference to, cash incentive and/or other compensation.

NEW PLAN BENEFITS

Awards granted under the 2021 Plan will be subject to the discretion of the CMRC (or its delegates), and the CMRC has not determined future awards or who might receive them. As a result, the benefits that will be awarded or paid under the 2021 Plan are not currently determinable. The awards granted for the 2020 fiscal year would not have changed if the 2021 Plan had been in place instead2017 outside of the 2013 Plan as an “employment inducement award” under NYSE Listing Rule 303A.08, as approved by the Board and governed by the 2013 Plan. The 500,000 stock options consist of 100,000 stock options that vest if, for twenty consecutive trading days, the closing price per share of AIG Parent common stock on the NYSE is at least $80.99, and 400,000 stock options that vest if, for twenty consecutive trading days, the closing price per share of AIG Parent common stock on the NYSE is at least $90.99.

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT89

2023 Executive Compensation     Compensation Glossary
Compensation Glossary
TermMeaning
BoardBoard of Directors
CMRCThe Compensation and Management Resources Committee
LTILong-term incentive
PSUA performance share unit is an unfunded and unsecured promise to deliver one share of stock, subject to time-based and performance-based vesting conditions
RSUA restricted stock unit is an unfunded and unsecured promise to deliver one share of stock, subject to time-based vesting conditions
STIShort-term incentive
Stock optionAn option to buy a specific number of shares of stock at a pre-set price
TSRTotal Shareholder Return which is a measure of financial performance indicating the total amount an investor reaps from an investment
90AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT


Report of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of:
nThe integrity of our financial statements
nOur compliance with legal and regulatory requirements
nThe independent auditor’s qualifications and independence
nThe performance of our internal audit function
The Audit Committee’s specific duties and responsibilities are set forth in the following table and, for our named executives, in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table and 2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table above.

 Stock-Based Awards
Name and PositionDollar Value
($)
Number of
Shares/Units
Brian Duperreault
Chief Executive Officer(1)
12,285,322673,131
Mark D. Lyons
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
6,116,391247,440
Peter Zaffino
President and Global Chief Operating Officer(1)
18,102,463699,570
Douglas A. Dachille
Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer
4,047,516221,769
Lucy Fato
Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Global Head of
Communications and Government Affairs
4,729,001246,950
Executive Group17,446,789950,537
Non-Executive Director Group2,446,21594,062
Non-Executive Officer Employee Group219,887,4788,317,278
(1)Effective March 1, 2021, Mr. Zaffino became President and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Duperreault became Executive Chair. Throughout 2020, Mr. Zaffino served as President and Global Chief Operating Officer. He also served as Chief Executive Officer, General Insurance until August 2020.

U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX ASPECTS 

The followingits charter, which is a brief description of the current federal income tax treatment generally arising with respect to grants of awards under the 2021 Plan for grantees subject to taxation in the U.S. This summary is not intended to constitute tax advice, is not intended to be exhaustive and, among other things, does not describe state, local or foreign tax consequences.

NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS 

A grantee will not realize taxable income, and AIG will not be entitled to a deduction, upon the grant of a nonqualified stock option. Upon exercising a nonqualified stock option, a grantee will realize ordinary income, and AIG will generally be entitled to a corresponding deduction, in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the acquired shares on the exercise date minus the exercise price of the option. The grantee will have a basis, for purposes of computing capital gain or loss on a future sale or exchange, in the shares acquired as a result of the exercise equal to the fair market value of those shares on the exercise date.

122 2021 Proxy Statement

Proposal 3—Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

INCENTIVE STOCK OPTIONS

A grantee will not realize taxable income, and AIG will not be entitled to a deduction, when an incentive stock option is granted under the 2021 Plan or when an incentive stock option is exercised. If the grantee of an incentive stock option holds the shares acquired under the option for at least two years from the date the option is granted and for at least one year from the date the option is exercised, any gain realized by the grantee when the shares are sold will be taxable to the grantee as capital gain.

The difference between the exercise price of an incentive stock option and the fair market value of the acquired shares at the time of exercise is an item of tax preference which may result in the grantee being subject to the alternative minimum tax. Whether a grantee is subject to the alternative minimum tax will depend on the grantee’s facts and circumstances.

If the grantee does not hold the shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option for the one-year and the two-year periods described above, the grantee will realize ordinary income in the year of disposition of the shares in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise (or the proceeds of the disposition, if lower) over the exercise price, and AIG will generally be entitled to a corresponding deduction. Any remaining gain or loss will be capital in nature.

A grantee who pays for shares acquired upon the exercise of a stock option with shares he or she already owns will not realize any taxable gain or loss on the shares delivered as payment. If the option is not an incentive stock option, the grantee will not be subject to tax upon exercise with respect to the number of shares acquired equal to the number of shares delivered for payment. If the option is an incentive stock option, the grantee will not be subject to tax upon exercise with respect to any of the shares acquired, and the number of shares received on exercise of the option equal to the number of previously owned shares surrendered will have the same basis and holding period for purposes of computing capital gain or loss as the previously owned shares. If the option is not an incentive stock option, the additional shares received will have a basis equal to the sum of the cash paid on exercise and the ordinary income taxable to the employee as a result of the exercise. If the option is an incentive stock option, the additional shares will have a basis equal to the cash, if any, paid on exercise. In either case, the holding period with respect to the additional shares will begin on the day after the date the option is exercised.

The use of shares previously acquired through the exercise of an incentive stock option in satisfaction of all or a part of the exercise for another option (whether or not an incentive stock option) is a disposition of the previously acquired shares for purposes of the one-year and two-year holding periods described above. All shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option are considered to have been acquired upon the date of exercise for purposes of the one-year and two-year holding periods, even if previously acquired shares were used in satisfaction of all or a part of the exercise price.

Any gain on shares which have been held for more than twelve months may be eligible for tax at preferential long-term capital gain rates.

STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS 

A grantee will not be subject to tax, and AIG will not be entitled to a deduction, upon the grant of a stock appreciation right. Upon exercise of a stock appreciation right, an amount equal to the fair market value of the AIG common stock on the date of exercise minus the exercise price will be taxable to the grantee as ordinary income. AIG will generally be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount included in a grantee’s ordinary income. A grantee’s basis in any shares received will be equal to the fair market value of such shares on the exercise date, and the grantee’s holding period will begin on the day following the exercise date.

RESTRICTED SHARES

A grantee of restricted shares that are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture will not be subject to ordinary income or Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) (Social Security and Medicare) taxation in respect of his or her award at grant, unless he or she makes a Section 83(b) election described below. Upon the lapse of the risk of forfeiture, the grantee will be subject to ordinary income and FICA tax on an amount equal to the fair market value of the AIG common stock at the time the risk lapses (even if some transfer restrictions continue). The grantee’s tax basis for purposes of determining gain or loss on subsequent sales will be equal to the fair

2021 Proxy Statement123

Proposal 3—Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

market value of the AIG common stock on the date the risk of forfeiture lapses. Any gain or loss resulting from any sale of AIG common stock delivered to a grantee will be treated as long-or short-term capital gain or loss, depending upon how long he or she holds the AIG common stock after the date the restrictions lapse. Dividends paidavailable on the AIG common stock subject to restrictions are reportable by the grantee, during the restricted period, as additional ordinary income.

If permitted by the applicable award agreement, a grantee may elect, within thirty days after the effective date of an award of restricted shares that are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, to recognize the fair market value of the AIG common stock subject to restrictions awarded, determined (without regard to the restrictions) at the effective date of the award, as ordinary income in the year of such effective date (a Section 83(b) election)website (www.aig.com). If such election is made, the grantee’s holding period will begin the day after the effective date of the award, and no additional income will be recognized by the grantee upon the lapse of restrictions. Any gain or loss resulting from any sale of such AIG common stock delivered to a grantee will be treated as long- or short-term capital gain or loss, depending upon how long he or she holds the AIG common stock after the effective date of the award. However, should the grantee forfeit the restricted shares, no deduction would be available to him or herManagement has primary responsibility for the value of the restricted shares previously recognized as income.

A grantee of restricted shares that are subject only to transfer restrictions, and not a substantial risk of forfeiture, will be subject to ordinary income and FICA tax at grant on an amount equal to the fair market value of the AIG common stock on the grant date.

Following the lapse of the transfer restrictions, the grantee’s tax basis for purposes of determining gain or loss on subsequent sales will be equal to the fair market value of the AIG common stock on the grant date. Any gain or loss resulting from any sale of AIG common stock delivered to a grantee will be treated as long- or short-term capital gain or loss, depending upon how long he or she holds the AIG common stock after the grant date. Dividends paid on the AIG common stock subject to transfer restrictions are reportable by the grantee, during the restricted period, as additional dividend income.

In the taxable year in which a grantee recognizes ordinary income on account of restricted shares awarded to such grantee, AIG will generally be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the grantee. In the event that a restricted share award is forfeited by the grantee after having made a Section 83(b) election, AIG will include in its income the amount of its original deduction.

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

A grantee of a restricted stock unit award (whether time-vested or subject to achievement of performance goals) will not be subject to ordinary income or FICA taxation at grant. Instead, a grantee will be subject to FICA tax at the time any portion of such award vests and will be subject to income tax at ordinary rates on the fair market value of the AIG common stock (or the amount of cash) received on the date of delivery. AIG generally will be entitled to a deduction in an amount equal to the amount included in a grantee’s ordinary income. The fair market value of the AIG common stock (if any) received on the delivery date will be a grantee’s tax basis for purposes of determining any subsequent gain or loss from the sale of the AIG common stock. Gain or loss resulting from any sale of AIG common stock delivered to a grantee will be treated as long- or short-term capital gain or loss depending upon how long he or she holds the AIG common stock after the delivery date of the award.

SECTION 409A

The terms of the 2021 Plan and each award granted under the 2021 Plan are intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code, which imposes specific restrictions on nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements, whether by reason of such awards qualifying as short-term deferral or otherwise. Failure to satisfy the applicable requirements under these provisions for awards considered deferred compensation would result in the acceleration of income and additional income tax liability to the recipient, including certain penalties.

124 2021 Proxy Statement

Proposal 3—Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

This Proposal 3 gives holders of AIG common stock the opportunity to vote for or against the following resolution:

RESOLVED: that the holders of Common Stock of the Company approve the American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in Appendix B.

AIG STATEMENT IN SUPPORT

The Board believes that the future success of AIG depends, in large part, upon the ability of the company to maintain a competitive position in attracting, motivating, rewarding and retaining key employees, officers and directors. The 2021 Plan is designed to aid AIG in attracting, motivating, rewarding and retaining these key individuals through grants of cash-based and various types of stock-based compensation. The ability to grant awards under the 2021 Plan will allow AIG to offer these individuals performance incentives and a proprietary interest in AIG. In addition, stock-based awards will further encourage the efforts of AIG employees, officers and directors to enhance shareholder value and provide incentives against taking imprudent risks, further fostering an ownership culture focused on long-term performance.

RECOMMENDATION

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR this resolution.

2021 Proxy Statement125

Report of the Audit Committee and Ratification of Selection of Accountants

Report of the Audit Committee and Ratification of Selection of Accountants

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of AIG’sCompany's financial statements, for its accounting andmaintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, principles and for the establishment and effectivenessits assessment of internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of the financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), expressing an opinion as to the conformity of such financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. and expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. PwC, the Audit Committee-appointed independent auditor for the year ended December 31, 2023, is responsible for expressing opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on its audits. PwC is also expected to discuss with the Audit Committee any other matters it deems appropriate.

In performing its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and PwC, our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023, and our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023. During the year, the Audit Committee also discussed with PwC and our internal auditor the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The independent auditorsAudit Committee regularly meets with management and with PwC and holds executive sessions, including with PwC, the chief financial officer and chief internal auditor, to discuss their reviews, the evaluation of internal control over financial reporting and the overall quality of our financial reporting.
The Audit Committee has discussed with PwC the matters required by the SEC and the Public Company Accounting and Oversight Board’s (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees. The Audit Committee and PwC have free accessalso discussed PwC's independence from management, including communications from PwC required by the PCAOB’s Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, Rule 3524, Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Certain Tax Services, and Rule 3525, Audit Committee Pre-approval of Non-Audit Services Related to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
As discussed in Proposal 3, the Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services to be provided by PwC, and the related fees for those services. The Audit Committee has concluded that PwC’s provision of non-audit services does not impair PwC’s independence as the external auditor.
PwC has reported to the Audit Committee to discuss any matters they deem appropriate.

AUDIT COMMITTEE ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION

that our audited financial statements are fairly presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee’s function is to assistCommittee reviewed management’s assessment and report on the Board in its oversight of:

The integrityeffectiveness of AIG’s financial statements;

AIG’sour internal control over financial reporting;

AIG’s compliancereporting, as well as PwC’s audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, which were both included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023. Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board — and the Board approved — the inclusion of the audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed with legalthe SEC.
The Audit Committee recommended to the Board — and regulatory requirements;the Board approved — the appointment of PwC as our independent auditor for 2024.

Audit Committee
Peter R. Porrino, Chair
Paola Bergamaschi
W. Don Cornwell
Vanessa A. Wittman
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT91


Proposal 3
Ratify Appointment of PwC to Serve as Independent Auditor for 2024
What am I voting on?
We are asking shareholders to vote on a proposal to ratify the appointment of PwC to serve as our independent auditor until the next annual meeting.
Voting Recommendation  pg83-graphics_votingcheck.jpg
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment of PwC to serve as independent auditor for 2024.
While ratification of the appointment of PwC is not required by our By-Laws, Certificate of Incorporation, or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of PwC to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. The Board will take into consideration the shareholder vote, but the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may retain PwC (or select a different independent registered public accounting firm) at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.
Retention and Review of Auditor
The Audit Committee evaluates, at least annually, the independent accountants’auditor’s qualifications, performance and independence, and performance;every five years (or more frequently if the Audit Committee deems it appropriate), considers whether to select a different independent auditor. PwC, or one of its predecessor firms, has been our independent audit firm since 1980.
At this time, the Audit Committee and

The performance the Board believe that the continued retention of AIG’s internalPwC as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.
Audit Partner Rotation
In accordance with SEC rules and PwC policies, audit function.

partners are subject to rotation requirements that limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may provide service to AIG. For lead and concurring audit partners, the limit is five years. The Audit Committee is also authorized to approve regular, periodic cash dividends on AIG common stock and preferred stock consistent with any Board-approved dividend policies.involved in the selection of the lead audit partner. The Audit Committee’s duties and responsibilities include reviewing periodically with management any significant legal, compliance and regulatory matters that have arisen or that may have a material impact on AIG’s business, financial statements or compliance policies, and AIG’s relations with regulators and governmental agencies. The Audit Committee also coordinatesselection process includes meetings with the Risk and Capital Committee to (1) support the Audit Committee’s approval of regular, periodic cash dividends on AIG common and preferred stock consistent with Board-approved dividend policies and (2) help ensure the Board and each Board Committee has received the information it needs to carry out their responsibilities with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee is also directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of AIG’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee’s charter is available in the About Us—Leadership and Governance—Corporate Governance Documents section of AIG’s corporate website at www.aig.com.

The Audit Committee held 7 meetings during 2020. The Audit Committee Chaircandidate and members of the Audit Committee, also held numerous additional sessions throughout 2020including the chair, as well as consideration of the candidate by the full Audit Committee with membersinput from management. PwC’s most recent lead audit partner assumed the role in connection with the audit of AIG’s corporate, business segmentour December 31, 2019 financial statements and internalcompleted his service with the audit management and with AIG’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. of the December 31, 2023 financial statements. A new lead audit partner assumed the role in January 2024.

Auditor Independence
The Audit Committee believes that these meetings were helpful in dischargingassesses PwC’s independence throughout the year. This ongoing assessment includes:
nReviewing with PwC its oversight responsibilities, including with respect to financial reportingpractices for maintaining independence and disclosure, risk management and internal controls.

Independence

The Board, onensuring the recommendationrotation of the NCGC, has determinedlead and concurring audit partners

nReviewing and pre-approving all engagements with PwC for non-audit services to ensure that all memberssuch services are compatible with maintaining the firm’s independence
nRegularly reviewing the hiring of the Audit Committee are independent, as required by NYSE listing standardsPwC partners and SEC rules.

Expertise

The Board has also determined, on the recommendation of the NCGC,other professionals to help ensure that all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate and have accounting or related financial management expertise, each as defined by NYSE listing standards, and that Messrs. Fitzpatrick, Lynch, Porrino and Steenland (as an ex-officio, non-voting member) are audit committee financial experts, as defined under SEC rules. Although designated as audit committee financial experts, no member of the Audit Committee is an accountant for AIG or, under

126 2021 Proxy Statement

Report of the Audit Committee and Ratification of Selection of Accountants

SEC rules, an “expert” for purposes of the liability provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) or for any other purpose.

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee has considered and discussed the 2020 audited financial statements with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, including a discussion of the quality, and not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, clarity of the disclosures and the condition of internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has reviewed with the Chief Auditor (Head of Internal Audit) and the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP engagement team the scope and plans for their respective audits and has met with each of the Chief Auditor and senior engagement partners of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, with and without management present, to discuss audit results, their evaluations of AIG’s internal controls and the overall quality of AIG’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee has also discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required to be discussed byPwC observes the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC. Finally, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as required by the PCAOB’sindependence rules regarding such hiring practices

92AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Proposal 3 – Ratify Appointment of PwC to Serve as Independent Auditor for 2023
Auditor Attendance at the auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence.

CONCLUSION

Based upon the reports and discussion described in this report, the Audit Committee, in accordance with its responsibilities, recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, inclusion of the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 in AIG’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Audit Committee
American International Group, Inc.
Peter R. Porrino, Chair
John H. Fitzpatrick
Christopher S. Lynch
Linda A. Mills
Amy L. Schioldager

2021 Proxy Statement127

Meeting

Proposal 4—Ratification of Selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Proposal 4—Ratification of Selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Proposal 4—Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2021

What am I voting on?

We are asking shareholders to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021.

Voting Recommendation

ü FORthe ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021.

The Audit Committee and the Board have approved the engagement of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as AIG’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2021. Representatives of that firmfrom PwC are expected to be present duringparticipate in the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Ratificationquestions from shareholders.

2023 and 2022 Fees
(in millions)Audit Fees
Audit-Related
Fees
Tax
Fees
All Other
Fees
Total
2022$49.2 $44.9 $3.0 $0.3 $97.4 
2023$66.0 $26.1 $1.7 $0.2 $94.1 
Audit Fees. Audit fees consisted of the selection of accountants requires approval by a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders of AIG common stock, which votes are cast “for” or “against” the ratification. Neither AIG’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation nor AIG’s By-laws require that the shareholders ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as its independent registered public accounting firm. AIG’s Board is requesting shareholder ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the shareholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that such change would be in the best interests of AIG and its shareholders.

The Audit Committee evaluates the qualifications, performance, and independence of the independent auditor, including the lead partner, on an annual basis (in each case, in light of SEC and PCAOB standards then in effect). The Audit Committee ensures the regular rotation of the lead audit partner as required by law and is involved in the selection of the lead audit partner. The selection processfees for the lead audit partner includes meetings among the Audit Committee Chair, members of the Audit Committee and the candidate for lead audit partnerour consolidated financial statements as well as discussion by the full Audit Committeesubsidiary and with management. The current lead audit partner assumed the role in connection with the audit of AIG’s December 31, 2019 financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee receives periodic reports on the hiring of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP partners and other professionals to help ensure PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP satisfies applicable independence rules.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has served as AIG’s independent registered public accounting firm since 1980 and reportsstatutory audits directly related to the Audit Committee. In selecting PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as AIG’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2021, the Audit Committee considered a number of factors, including:

the quality of its ongoing discussions with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP including the resolution of accounting and financial reporting matters with the national office;
the professional qualifications of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the lead audit partner and other key engagement partners;
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s depth of understanding of AIG’s global businesses, accounting policies and practices and internal control over financial reporting;
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s expertise and capabilities in handling the breadth and complexity of AIG’s businesses and global footprint including approximately 290 audit, statutory, and other audit-related reports;
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence program and its processes for maintaining its independence;

128 2021 Proxy Statement

Proposal 4—Ratification of Selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

the appropriateness of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s fees for audit and non-audit services (on both an absolute basis and as compared to fees charged to AIG peer companies of comparable size and complexity by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and its peer firms);
consideration of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s known legal risks and significant proceedings that may impair their ability to perform AIG’s annual audit, if any;
the most recent PCAOB inspection report on PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the results of the most recent American Institute of Certified Public Accountants peer review and self-review examinations; and
the results of management’s and the Audit Committee’s annual evaluations of the qualifications, performance and independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

In addition, the Audit Committee periodically considers the appropriateness of a rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm. At this time, theconsolidated audit. Audit Committeefees include out-of-pocket expenses of $0.9 million in 2023 and the Board believe that the continued retention of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as AIG’s independent registered public accounting firm is$1.0 million in 2022.

PwC also provides audit services to certain unconsolidated private equity and real estate funds managed and advised by our subsidiaries. Fees related to those audits were $4.1 million and $4.2 million in 2023 and 2022, respectively, and are not reflected in the best interests of AIGtable above.
Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees include assurance and its shareholders.

Under AIG’s policy for pre-approval of audit and permitted non-auditrelated services that are traditionally performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit Committee approves categories of services and fees for each category. The pre-approved services include: audit services, such as financial statement audits and regulatory filings; audit-related services, such asindependent accountants, including: audit and pre- and post-implementation reviews of systems, processes and controls,controls; regulatory and compliance attestations,attestations; employee benefit plan audits,audits; due diligence related to acquisitions and divestituresdivestitures; statutory audits not directly related to the performance of the consolidated audit and financial accounting and reporting accounting consultations; tax services, such asconsultations. The audit-related fees pertaining to the separation of Corebridge were $14.0 million in 2022.

Tax Fees. Tax fees are fees for tax return preparation, transaction-based tax reviews, review of tax accounting matters and other tax planning;planning and consultations.
All Other Fees. All other permitted non-audit services, such asfees include fees related to regulatory compliance reviews, information technology reviews, information resources, risk management services, business function reviews and other compliance reviews.
Review of Non-Audit Services
The Audit Committee evaluatesreviews and pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services by PwC. It also considers proposed fees — and regularly monitors approved non-audit fees — to determine whether the services are compatible with maintaining the firm’s independence. Fees may not exceed the dollar caps without the Audit Committee’s approval. The Audit Committee approved all of PwC’s engagements and associated fees for 2022 and 2023.
Factors Considered in Proposal
The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of PwC as the Company’s independent external auditor is in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. In reaching this conclusion, the Audit Committee considered a number of factors, including:
nThe firm’s performance and that of the lead audit and other key engagement partners, including those engagements related to taxthe quality of their audit work and accounting advice
nThe firm’s demonstrated understanding of our global businesses, accounting policies and practices and internal control over financial reporting considering the nature of such services in light of auditor
nThe firm’s demonstrated commitment to maintaining its independence in accordance with the rulesfrom management
nThe ongoing evaluation and monitoring of the PCAOB. No expenditure may exceedappropriateness of the dollar caps withoutfirm’s fees for audit and non-audit services
nThe most recent PCAOB inspection report on the separate specific approvalfirm’s audit practices and the firm’s quality control efforts
nThe results of the Audit Committee.

RECOMMENDATION

Your BoardCommittee’s ongoing and annual evaluation of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the proposal to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

FEES PAID TO PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

The table below shows the fees paid by PwC’s performance


AIG to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in 2020 and 2019.

 2020
($ in millions)
2019
($ in millions)
Fees paid by AIG:  
Audit fees(1)48.949.0
Audit-related fees(2)23.419.4
Tax fees(3)1.31.0
All other fees(4)1.31.7
2024 PROXY STATEMENT93


(1)Audit fees include fees for the audit of AIG’s consolidated financial statements, as well as subsidiary and statutory audits directly related to the performance of the AIG consolidated audit. Audit fees include out-of-pocket expenses of $1.1 million in 2020 and $2.0 million in 2019.

(2)Audit-related fees include fees for assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by independent accountants, including: audit and pre- and post-implementation reviews of systems, processes and controls; regulatory and compliance attestations; employee benefit plan audits; due diligence related to acquisitions and divestitures; statutory audits not directly related to the performance of the AIG consolidated audit and financial accounting and reporting consultations.

(3)Tax fees are fees for tax return preparation, transaction-based tax reviews, review of tax accounting matters, and other tax planning and consultations.

(4)All other fees include fees related to regulatory compliance reviews, information technology reviews, information resources, risk management services, business function reviews and other compliance reviews.

2021 Proxy Statement129

Proposal 4

Proposal 4—Ratification of Selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

The services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the fees paid by AIG were authorized and approved by the Audit Committee in compliance with the pre-approval policy and procedures described above. The Audit Committee considers the non-audit services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during the most recently completed fiscal year in its annual independence evaluation.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP also provides audit services to certain unconsolidated private equity and real estate funds managed and advised by AIG subsidiaries. Fees related to these audits were $5.5 million and $5.4 million in 2020 and 2019, respectively, and are not reflected in the fees in the table above.

130 2021 Proxy Statement

Proposal 5—Shareholder Proposal on Special Shareholder Meetings

Proposal 5—Shareholder Proposal on Special Shareholder Meetings

Proposal 5—Shareholder Proposal Relating to Special Meeting RightRequesting an Independent Board Chair Policy

What am I voting on?

Proposal 5 is a shareholder proposal to give shareholders who hold

We have been advised by Kenneth Steiner, 14 Stoner Avenue, No. 2M, Great Neck, NY, 11021, that he has continuously owned at least 10 percent$2,000 in market value of our outstandingAIG Parent common stock entitled to vote on the rightproposal for at least three years, and that he intends for John Chevedden to call special meetings.

present the proposal and supporting statement set forth below for consideration at the 2024 Annual Meeting. AIG is not responsible for the accuracy or content of the proposal and supporting statement.

Voting Recommendation  

X pg85-graphics_votingcross.jpg

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINSTthe shareholder proposal for- see the reasons set forth below under “—AIG"AIG Statement in Opposition”

Opposition" beginning on page 95 below.

The following shareholder proposal will be voted on during the Annual Meeting only if properly presented by, or on behalf of, the shareholder proponent. In accordance with SEC rules, the shareholder proposal is presented below as submitted by the shareholder proponent. AIG disclaims all responsibility for the content of the proposal and its supporting statement, including other sources referenced in the supporting statement. Names, addresses and shareholdings of the shareholder proponent will be supplied promptly upon oral or written

Proposal 4 – Independent Board Chairman
image.jpg
Shareholders request made to AIG’s Corporate Secretary.

Yourthat the Board of Directors unanimously recommendsadopt an enduring policy, and amend the governing documents as necessary in order that 2 separate people hold the office of the Chairman and the office of the CEO.

Whenever possible, the Chairman of the Board shall be an Independent Director.
The Board has the discretion to select a vote AGAINSTTemporary Chairman of the proposalBoard who is not an Independent Director to serve while the Board is seeking an Independent Chairman of the Board on an accelerated basis.
It is a best practice to adopt this policy soon. However this policy could be phased in when there is a contract renewal for our current CEO or for the reasons set forth followingnext CEO transition.
This proposal topic won outstanding 45%-support at the proposal.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

Proposal 5—Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement

Shareholders ask our board to take the steps necessary to amend the appropriate company governing documents to give the owners of a combined 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareholder meeting.

It currently takes 30% of the shares that normally vote at the2023 American International Group annual meeting with Mr. Peter Zaffino as a relatively new Chairman/CEO. This is all the more impressive because the AIG Board of Directors was against the 2023 proposal and it takes a lot more shareholder conviction to callvote against a special shareholder meeting.

A special shareholder meeting is a means shareholders can useBOD recommendation than to raise important matters outside the normal annual meeting cycle like the election of a new director. Consequently the mere presence of this proposal in our bylaws will be an added incentive for better director performance.

For instance the 2020 edition of this shareholder proposal stated:

“Adoption of this proposal could createsimply go along with it. This 45%-support likely represented more of an incentive for 3 of our directors on our Executive Pay Committee (Douglas Steenland, Chairman, Henry Miller and Wyllie Don Cornwell) to do better than being rejected by 10-times as many votes as certain other AIG directors [in 2019].” In 2020 director voting performance was improved following this text in the 2020 shareholder proposal.

This proposal topic won 44%-support at the 2020 AIG annual meeting. This 44% was close to or greater than 51%50%-support from the shares thatprofessional investors who have access to independent proxy voting advice. Unfortunately most retail shareholders do

Mr. John Rice, AIG lead director, seems to have gotten off to a rocky start as lead director which is a weak substitute for an Independent Board Chairman. For example, executive pay was rejected by an overwhelming 67% of shares at the 2023 AIG annual meeting.
Ms. Linda Mills, chair of the executive pay committee, was rejected by 77 million against votes. By comparison 4 AIG directors received less than 3 million against votes each.
It appears that the AIG lead director does not have accessmuch of a role in regard to executive pay or the performance of each directors.
A lead director is no substitute for an independent proxy voting advice.

2021 Proxy Statement131

Proposal 5—Shareholder Proposal on Special Shareholder Meetings

And since the 2020 AIG annual meeting there has been a dramatic development that makes shareholder meetings so much easier for management with a substantial cost reduction. Cost was a big cornerstone to the 2020 management resistance to this proposal topic.

Management entrenchment is so well defended at an online shareholder meeting that shareholders should have a corresponding greater flexibility in calling forboard chairman. A lead director cannot call a special shareholder meeting.

It is astounding what management can get away with at an online shareholder meeting. At a bare bones online shareholder meeting almost everything is optional. For instance a management narrative on the state of the company is optional. Also management answers to shareholder questions are optionaland cannot even if management asks for questions.

Management hardly needs to prepare for an online shareholder meeting. Thus shareholders should rightfully have more flexibility in requesting a special shareholder meeting. The core purpose of such a meeting can simply be the announcement of the vote. And there is no management transparency on how little an online shareholder meeting costs.

The Goodyear online shareholder meeting was spoiled by a trigger-happy management mute button for shareholders that was used to quash constructive criticism. AT&T would not even allow shareholders to speak at its online shareholder meeting.

Shareholders thus need greater flexibility in calling for a special shareholder meeting. Please vote yes:

Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement—Proposal 5

132 2021 Proxy Statement

Proposal 5—Shareholder Proposal on Special Shareholder Meetings

AIG STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION

The Board has considered the shareholder proposal and unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST the proposal. We believe that this proposal is not in the best interests of our shareholders, and that AIG’s existing corporate governance practices, including the right of shareholders to call a special meeting ensure Boardof the board. A lead director can delegate most of his lead director duties to others and management accountability to our shareholders. Ourthen simply rubber-stamp it. There is no way shareholders voted down nearly identical proposals at both our 2019 and 2020 Annual Meetings.

Key Reasons to vote against this proposal:
•      Shareholders already have a meaningful right to call a special meeting—as few as three shareholders could reach our 25 percent threshold based on our current ownership composition
•       The proposed 10 percent threshold is lower than the vast majority of S&P 500 companies that offer shareholders the right to call special meetings
•       The proposed 10 percent threshold could be reached by as few as two shareholders based on our current ownership composition, which could lead to abuse or unnecessary disruption
•      Special meetings require substantial expenses and resources that should only be called upon in extraordinary circumstances
•       AIG has strong corporate governance practices, including proxy access and an existing special meeting right, which afford shareholders powerful levers to hold directors accountable and pursue appropriate matters when necessary

OUR SHAREHOLDERS ALREADY HAVE A MEANINGFUL RIGHT TO CALL A SPECIAL MEETING

AIG’s By-laws already provide that any shareholders who together own an aggregate of at least 25 percent of AIG’s outstanding common stock may call a special meeting. This threshold can be achieved by as few as three shareholders based on our current ownership composition. We believe this 25 percent threshold is appropriate and aligned with our shareholders’ interests and is within the mainstreamsure of special meeting rights at S&P 500 companies.

what goes on. The 25 percent threshold is designed to strike the proper balance between ensuring that shareholders have the ability to call a special meeting while protecting against the risk that a small minority of shareholders could trigger the expense and disruption of a special meeting. A lower threshold could allow shareholders with narrow or special interests to pursue matters that are not widely viewed as requiring immediate attention or that are being pursued for reasons that may not be in the best interests of AIG or our shareholders generally.

AIG’s current 25 percent threshold is in line with other large public companies that offer shareholders the right to call special meetings, and the vast majority of S&P 500 companies that allow shareholders to call special meetings do not have an ownership threshold as low as ten percent.

AT A LOWER THRESHOLD, SPECIAL-INTEREST GROUPS COULD ABUSE THE SHAREHOLDER RIGHT TO CALL A SPECIAL MEETING

Given our heavily institutional and concentrated stock ownership, the failure by a special meeting proponent to convince holders of at least 25 percent of our common stock to support a special meeting would be a strong indicator that most shareholders do not believe that a special meeting is warranted. Lowering the threshold for calling special meetings could allow disruptions by special-interest shareholder groups with agendas that are not in the best interests of AIG or other shareholders generally.

Moreover, in addition to our 25 percent ownership threshold for special meetings to be called by AIG’s shareholders, special meetings of shareholders may be called by the Board, the ChairChairman of the Board can override advice from the Chief Executive Officerlead director.

Please vote yes:
Independent Board Chairman – Proposal 4
94AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Proposal 4 – Shareholder Proposal Requesting an Independent Board Chair Policy     AIG Statement in Opposition
AIG Statement in Opposition
The Board believes that, currently, the Company and its shareholders are best served by Peter Zaffino as both Chairman & CEO and John Rice as Lead Independent Director.
We have recently conducted extensive outreach with our shareholders which specifically included discussions regarding our current Board leadership structure. There was not a consensus view that we should change our current structure. In response to the feedback we did receive, we enhanced the duties and responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director (see page 24). Our shareholders, in fact, expressed high regard for the performance of Peter Zaffino, our Chairman & CEO. Mr. Zaffino has provided strong leadership since joining the Company in 2017, including designing and successfully delivering on multiple complex initiatives resulting in sustainable, profitable growth, as well as recruiting talent throughout the organization. Mr. Zaffino has deep insurance expertise and is highly respected in the global insurance industry and by the Company’s many stakeholders, including shareholders and the investment community more broadly. In 2023, Mr. Zaffino led efforts to broaden and diversify the skills and experience of the Board through the successful recruitment of three new independent directors: Diana Murphy, Vanessa Wittman and Jimmy Dunne.
The Board is responsible for establishing and maintaining an effective leadership structure for the Company. The Board believes that, currently, the most effective leadership structure for the Company is achieved through the combination of the extensive knowledge and experience of Mr. Zaffino and the active, independent leadership of John Rice.
Because our Chair is not independent, the Board selected a non-management director to serve as Lead Independent Director as required by AIG's By-Laws and Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board believes that a Lead Independent Director with well-defined responsibilities enhances the effectiveness of the independent directors, improves risk management and oversight, and provides a channel for independent directors to candidly raise issues or AIG’sconcerns for the Board’s consideration. Mr. Rice speaks with Mr. Zaffino regularly, and the Board believes that Mr. Rice’s professional experience positions him well for working collaboratively with Mr. Zaffino while simultaneously providing independent oversight of management.
Our Lead Independent Director role is robust with substantive leadership responsibilities that help to ensure effective independent oversight.
Our Board is aligned with, and accountable to, our shareholders, and recently adopted several updates to the Corporate Secretary,Governance Guidelines, including expanding upon the role of the Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director has the following duties and responsibilities:
nProviding advice, guidance and assistance to the Chair;
nCalling and chairing executive sessions of the Independent Directors, in conjunction with each regularly scheduled meeting of whomthe Board and calling and chairing additional executive sessions and meetings of the Independent Directors as needed;
nApproving the agenda for each Board meeting;
nApproving Board meeting schedules;
nCoordinating with the Chair and the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to identify and evaluate candidates qualified to serve as directors on the Board;
nCoordinating with the Chair and the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee with respect to the format and process for the performance evaluations of the Board and its committees;
nChairing meetings of the Board in the absence of the Chair;
nServing as a liaison and facilitating communication between the Chair and the Independent Directors;
nAdvising and providing feedback to the Chair regarding the quality, quantity, appropriateness and timeliness of information provided to the Board;
nBeing available for communications with shareholders, government officials, and other stakeholders, as necessary, upon reasonable request;
nConferring regularly with the Chair on matters of importance that may require action or oversight by the Board; and
nCarrying out such other duties as are requested by the Independent Directors, the Board or any of its committees from time to time.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT95

Proposal 4 – Shareholder Proposal Requesting an Independent Board Chair Policy    AIG Statement in Opposition
The Board believes it is important to preserve the flexibility to determine the most effective leadership structure based on an assessment of the Company’s needs and circumstances at any given time.
The Board believes our Company and our shareholders benefit from this flexibility, as our directors are well positioned to determine our leadership structure given their in-depth knowledge of our leadership team, our strategic goals and the opportunities and challenges we face. Moreover, our Lead Independent Director role, as well as our other corporate governance practices, already provide robust independent leadership and the level of leadership and oversight requested by this proposal. The Board has concluded that, rather than taking a “one-size-fits-all” approach to its leadership structure, the Board’s fiduciary duty underresponsibilities are best fulfilled by retaining flexibility to determine the law to act inleadership structure that serves the best interests of AIG and its shareholders, as a whole. considering the Company’s needs and circumstances at any given time.
The proposal’s tenBoard does not believe that any single leadership model is appropriate in all circumstances. This view is supported by the diversity of practice at U.S. public companies: according to the 2023 U.S. Spencer Stuart Board Index, only 39 percent ownership threshold would permit a small group of shareholders whoS&P 500 companies have no duty to act inan independent chair and 41 percent of S&P 500 companies have combined the best interestsboard chairperson and CEO roles.
Our current leadership structure provides strong, independent Board oversight of AIG or our shareholders at-large to use the extraordinary measure of a special meeting to serve a potentially narrow self-interest. Such

2021 Proxy Statement133

Proposal 5—Shareholder Proposal on Special Shareholder Meetings

a low threshold gives a small minority of shareholders the unlimited power to call a special meeting and opens the door to potential abuse and waste of corporate resources.

SPECIAL MEETINGS REQUIRE SUBSTANTIAL EXPENSES AND RESOURCES

Special meetings are generally intended for extraordinary company business, such as when fiduciary or strategic considerations require that the matter be addressed on an expeditious basis that cannot wait until the next annual meeting. Given the size of AIGmanagement, and our number of shareholders, a special shareholder meeting is a significant undertaking that requires substantial company expense and Board and management resources. These expenses and resources are required whether AIG holds a special meeting in-person or virtually.

AIG must pay to prepare, print and distribute disclosure documents to shareholders, solicit proxies, hold the meeting and tabulate votes, costs that are substantially similar regardless of whether a meeting is held in-person or virtually. In addition, the Board and management must divert time and focus from their responsibility of managing the company on behalf of all shareholders to prepare for and conduct the special meeting. Such time and focus are appropriate if a reasonably large representation of our shareholders support holding a special meeting. But a low ten percent threshold risks that special meetings will be called for reasons not in the best interests of our shareholders generally, therefore detracting from our Board’s and management’s primary focus of leading and operating our business.

AIG’S EXISTING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND POLICIES ENSURE BOARD ACCOUNTABILITY AND ARE RESPONSIVE TO THE CONCERNS OF OUR SHAREHOLDERS

The proposed ten percent threshold not only enables a small minority of the AIG’s ownership to force the company to take what is an extraordinary action, but such a low threshold is unnecessary in light of AIG’s existingrobust corporate governance practices and its demonstrated, ongoing commitmentmechanisms seek to engagement with our shareholders.

Robust shareholder engagement
Strong shareholder rights
Existing special meeting right

As discussed in “Corporate Governance” beginning on page 21ensure accountability.

Except for Mr. Zaffino, all director nominees are independent, and each committee is comprised entirely of independent directors – ensuring that independent directors have oversight of critical matters, such as the integrity of AIG’s financial statements (including internal control over financial reporting), AIG’s currentrisk management, the compensation of executive officers, the nomination of directors, and the development of corporate governance practices reflectprinciples. In addition, under the Board’s dedication to being responsiveCorporate Governance Guidelines and accountable to shareholders. Fostering long-term relationships with our shareholders and maintainingeach committee’s charter, independent directors may, in their trust is a priority for the Board. Engagement with shareholders helps the Board gain useful feedback on a wide variety of topics, including corporate governance, as well as executive compensation, corporate social responsibility, business strategy and performance and related matters. In 2020, we solicited engagement meetings with 57 of our top shareholderssole discretion, retain separate legal, accounting, and other key stakeholders representing over 79 percent of our shares outstanding. We held 34 meetings with shareholders representing over 50 percent of our shares outstanding. Independent representatives of our Board participatedadvisors, as they deem necessary or appropriate. The independent directors regularly meet in five of these engagement meetings. These meetings strengthen AIG’s relationship with our shareholders and reinforce our commitment to incorporate shareholder feedback into various decisions made by theprivate sessions without management during Board and management.

In 2020,committee meetings, and the Lead Independent Director is empowered to call additional private sessions as a result of the COVID-19 crisis, AIG held its Annual Meeting in a virtual-only format, which we intend to do again in 2021. AIGneeded. The Board believes that the virtual meeting format affords shareholder engagement and an opportunity for meaningful shareholder participation, including the ability to hear from company leadership and ask questions electronically during the meeting. Similar to the practice at our prior in-person meetings, at AIG’s virtual 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, both our Chief Executive Officer and Chair addressed shareholders on the company’s strategy, recent performance and outlook. Those remarks were followed by a robust general question and answer session during which they responded to every question submitted by shareholders, evidencing meaningful shareholder participation. Whether held in-person or virtually, AIG’s annual meetings of shareholders continue to serve as a key component of our consistent engagement with shareholders.

134 2021 Proxy Statement

Proposal 5—Shareholder Proposal on Special Shareholder Meetings

The Board is committed to goodCompany’s overall corporate governance and regularly reviews our practices, corporate governance developments and shareholder feedback to ensure continued effectiveness. These corporate governance practices include:

All our directors are elected annually.
All our directors are elected by a majority of votes cast (in uncontested elections).
All our directors, with the exception of our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chair, are independent, and each of the Audit Committee, CMRC, NCGC, Risk and Capital Committee and Technology Committee are entirely composed of independent directors.
We align our directors’ interests with those of our shareholders through robust stock ownership requirements.
We have an extensive shareholder engagement program with independent director participation.
Shareholders have a proxy access right under AIG’s By-laws pursuant to which shareholders can nominate a director candidate to stand for election, and have that nominee included in AIG’s proxy materials.
As mentioned above, shareholders already have the ability to call a special meeting under AIG’s By-laws.

In light offramework already satisfies the strongproposal’s stated objectives. Existing corporate governance practices and shareholder rights AIG hasmechanisms include:

nA diverse and experienced Board elected annually
nMajority voting for directors in place, includinguncontested elections
nIndependent directors meet regularly without management in conjunction with regularly scheduled Board and committee meetings
nThe Board annually evaluates the right for shareholders holding 25 percentCEO performance
nThe Board reviews the selection of our outstanding shares to call a special meeting, the Lead Independent Director annually
The Board believes that, adoption of this shareholder proposal is unnecessary and is notgiven the robust independent oversight framework in place, shareholders are best served by the long-term interests of our shareholders.

RECOMMENDATION

YourBoard retaining the flexibility to determine, from time to time, the most appropriate leadership structure based on the Company’s needs under the circumstances existing at the time.

Voting Recommendation  pg85-graphics_votingcross.jpg
For the reasons set forth above, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINSTthis resolution.

the shareholder proposal requesting an independent Board chair policy.
96AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT


2021 Proxy
Proposal 5
Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Director Resignation By-Law
What am I voting on?
We have been advised by the New York City Carpenters Pension Fund, 395 Hudson Street, 9th Floor, New York, New York, 10014, that it has continuously owned at least $25,000 in market value of AIG Parent common stock entitled to vote on the proposal for at least one year, and that it intends to present the proposal and supporting statement set forth below for consideration at the 2024 Annual Meeting. AIG is not responsible for the accuracy or content of the proposal and supporting statement.
Voting Recommendation  pg85-graphics_votingcross.jpg
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST the shareholder proposal - see the "AIG Statement
135 in Opposition" beginning on page 98 below.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proposal 5 - Director Resignation By-Law

Voting Instructions

Resolved: That the shareholders of American International Group ("Company") hereby request that the board of directors take the necessary action to adopt a director election resignation bylaw that requires each director nominee to submit an irrevocable conditional resignation to the Company to be effective upon the director's failure to receive the required shareholder majority vote support in an uncontested election. The proposed resignation bylaw shall require the Board to accept a tendered resignation absent the finding of a compelling reason or reasons to not accept the resignation. Further, if the Board does not accept a tendered resignation and Information

Voting Instructionsthe director remains as a "holdover" director, the resignation bylaw shall stipulate that should a "holdover" director fail to be re-elected at the next annual election of directors, that director's new tendered resignation will be automatically effective 30 days after the certification of the election vote. The Board shall report the reasons for its actions to accept or reject a tendered resignation in a Form 8-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Information

Exchange Commission.

Supporting Statement: The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of AIG’sProposal requests that the Board establish a director resignation bylaw to enhance director accountability. The Company has established in its bylaws a majority vote standard for use duringin an uncontested director election, an election in which the number of nominees equal the number of open board seats. Under applicable state corporate law, a director's term extends until his or her successor is elected and qualified, or until he or she resigns or is removed from office. Therefore, an incumbent director who fails to receive the required vote for election under majority vote standards continues to serve as a "holdover" director until the next annual meeting. A Company governance policy currently addresses the continued status of an incumbent director who fails to be re-elected by requiring such director to tender his or her resignation for Board consideration.
The new director resignation bylaw will set a more demanding standard of review for addressing director resignations then that contained in the Company's resignation governance policy. The resignation bylaw will require the reviewing directors to articulate a compelling reason or reasons for not accepting a tendered resignation and allowing an unelected director to continue to serve as a "holdover" director. Importantly, if a director's resignation is not accepted and he or she continues as a "holdover" director but again fails to be elected at the next annual meeting of shareholders, that director's new tendered resignation will be automatically effective 30 days following the election vote certification. While providing the Board latitude to accept or not accept the initial resignation of an incumbent director that fails to receive majority vote support, the amended bylaw will establish the shareholder vote as the final word when a continuing "holdover" director is not re-elected. The Proposal's enhancement of the director resignation process will establish shareholder voting in director elections as a more consequential governance right.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT97

Proposal 5 – Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Director Resignation By-Law    Shareholder Proposal
AIG Statement in Opposition
AIG’s Corporate Governance Guidelines Already Provide for Mandatory Director Resignation
The Board has considered the above proposal carefully and believes it to be unnecessary. Incumbent directors are already required to submit irrevocable resignations prior to being nominated for re-election which would be triggered if a director fails to receive a majority of votes cast for the director’s election. Specifically, under AIG’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, an incumbent director can only be nominated for re-election provided that, prior to the mailing of the proxy statement for the annual meeting at which the director is to be re-elected, the director has tendered an irrevocable resignation that will be effective upon (i) the director’s failure to receive a majority of votes cast at any annual meeting at which the director is nominated for re-election and (ii) the Board decides to accept such resignation.
The Board believes this proposal is overbroad, has the potential to harm shareholder interests, and ultimately is unnecessary given the Company’s strong governance practices. Further, imposing a uncompromising standard that forces a board to accept an irrevocable resignation on file without regard to the specific circumstances strips the Board of its discretion in determining the board composition that serves the best interests of AIG and our shareholders in light of the Company’s needs and circumstances at the time.
The Board Must Maintain the Ability to Exercise its Judgment
The Board believes it is critically important to maintain the flexibility to choose the right mix of skills, expertise and experience represented on the Board to best fit the Company’s strategic goals. By requiring a mandatory director resignation without regard to the circumstances, the Board’s effectiveness is unilaterally constrained, which ultimately harms shareholders. Further, the shareholder proposal would eliminate the Board’s ability to act in the interests of AIG and its shareholders by limiting its decision-making authority. The Board believes that our Company and our shareholders benefit from the Board’s judgment in exercising its discretion as to whether to accept a director’s irrevocable resignation on file based on the facts and circumstances at the time.
Our Strong Corporate Governance Practices Promote Board Accountability and Responsiveness to Shareholders
Our Board recognizes that it is accountable to our shareholders and believes that our current corporate governance practices demonstrate and promote accountability and advance long-term value creation. Our key substantive shareholder rights and strong corporate governance practices include:
nIrrevocable Resignation Letter: Each director nominee has submitted an irrevocable resignation that becomes effective upon (1) the nominee’s failure to receive the required vote and (2) the Board's acceptance of the resignation.
nActive Shareholder Engagement Program: We regularly engage with our shareholders to solicit their feedback regarding issues including executive compensation and corporate governance.
nLead Independent Director: Our Lead Independent Director has well-defined responsibilities that enhance the effectiveness of the independent directors, improves risk management and oversight, and provides a channel for independent directors to candidly raise issues or concerns for the Board’s consideration.
nIndependent Board: 9 of 10 director nominees are independent and have deep expertise in insurance, financial services, risk management and corporate governance.
nStrong Director Succession and Refreshment Practices: Our Board takes a thoughtful approach to refreshment, considering the characteristics and qualifications of existing directors, potential director departures and the Company's evolving strategic objectives when evaluating Board composition.
nDiverse Board of Directors: Our Board reflects diversity in experience, skills, race, ethnicity, age and gender. Fifty percent of our Board identifies as female or an underrepresented minority.
nProxy Access: We have adopted a proxy access right applying corporate best practices, allowing shareholders to include director nominations in our proxy statement.
nAnnual Board Self-Evaluations: Our Board annually reviews the qualifications, experiences and contributions of its directors to provide for a Board that is comprised of the right mix to achieve AIG’s strategic goals.
nCommunication with the Board: Shareholders may communicate with any individual director or the full Board.
Voting Recommendation  pg85-graphics_votingcross.jpg
For the reasons set forth above, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST the shareholder proposal requesting a director election resignation by-Law.
98AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT


Frequently Asked Questions About the Annual Meeting
Why Am I Receiving These Materials?
We are providing these proxy materials to you in connection with the solicitation by the AIG Board of Directors of proxies to be voted at our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and at any postponed or reconvened meeting.
When and Where is the Annual Meeting.

WHEN AND WHERE IS OUR ANNUAL MEETING? 

Meeting?

We will hold our Annual Meeting virtually via the Internetin a virtual format on Wednesday, May 12, 202115, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. You may accessThe virtual meeting website is www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2024.
Who Can Participate in the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2021. In light of COVID-19, forMeeting?
Because the safety and well-being of our shareholders and employees, and taking into account the protocols of local, state and federal governments, we have determined that the 2021 Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format, only, via the Internet, with no physical in-person meeting. We believe that the virtual meeting format affords our shareholders an opportunity for meaningful participation, while mitigating these safety concerns. At our virtual Annual Meeting, shareholders will be able to attend, vote and submit questions via the Internet.

HOW ARE WE DISTRIBUTING OUR PROXY MATERIALS? 

We are using the SEC rule that allows companies to furnish proxy materials to their shareholders over the Internet. In accordance with this rule, on or about March 30, 2021, we sent shareholdersholding AIG Parent common stock as of record at the close of business on March 17, 202118, 2024, which is referred to as the “record date,” may participate from any geographic location with internet connectivity through a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (Notice) or a full set of proxy materials. The Notice contains instructionslive audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2024. Once on how to access our Proxy Statement and 2020 Annual Report via the Internet and how to vote. If you receive a Notice,that website, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail. Instead, the Notice instructs you on howneed to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials. The Notice also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy via the Internet. If you received a Notice and would like to receive a copy of our proxy materials, follow the instructions contained in the Notice to request a copy electronically or in paper form on a one-time or ongoing basis. Shareholders who do not receive the Notice will receive either a paper or electronic copy of our Proxy Statement and 2020 Annual Report, which will be sent on or about March 30, 2021.

WHO CAN VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING? 

You are entitled to vote or direct the voting of your shares of AIG common stock if you were a shareholder of record or if you held AIG common stock in “street name” at the close of business on March 17, 2021. On that date, 862,344,587 shares of AIG common stock (exclusive of shares held by AIG and certain subsidiaries) were outstanding, held by 21,225 shareholders of record. Each share of AIG common stock held by you on the record date is entitled to one vote.

WHO IS A SHAREHOLDER OF RECORD?

During the ten days prior to the Annual Meeting, a list of the shareholders will be available for inspection at the offices of AIG at 175 Water Street, New York, New York 10038. A list of shareholders will also be available for viewing during the Annual Meeting by those who log in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2021 and enterusing the 16-digit control number providedfound on your proxy card, voting instruction form, notice of internet availability of proxy materials or Notice.

If you hold AIG common stock that is registered in your nameemail notification. You may log into the meeting’s website beginning at 10:45 a.m. Eastern Time on May 15, 2024.
Who Can Vote During the records of AIG maintained by AIG’s transfer agent, EQ Shareowner Services (formerly known as Wells Fargo Shareowner Services), youAnnual Meeting?
All shareholders are a shareholder of record.

If you hold AIG common stock indirectly through a broker, bankentitled to vote before or similar institution, you are not a shareholder of record, but instead hold shares in “street name.”

WHAT DO I NEED TO PARTICIPATE IN, AND VOTE AT, THE ANNUAL MEETING?

You can participate induring the Annual Meeting if they owned shares of AIG Parent common stock on the record date. Please see “How Do I Vote?” on page 100 for more information about voting before or during the Annual Meeting. A list of shareholders of record as of the record date will be available for inspection by logging inshareholders for any purpose that is germane to the meeting from May 3, 2024 to May 14, 2024. Shareholders may request the list by emailing AIGCorporateSecretary@AIG.com. A list of shareholders of record will also be available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2021. To log in, shareholders (or their authorized representatives)AIG2024 during the Annual Meeting.

Will There be an Opportunity to Ask Questions During the Annual Meeting?
Time will be allotted after the adjournment of the formal meeting for a Question-and-Answer period. Shareholders will be able to submit questions relevant to the business of the meeting during the meeting through www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2024 by typing the question into the indicated question box and clicking “Submit.” You will need theyour 16-digit control number providedfound on theiryour proxy card, voting instruction form, notice of internet availability of proxy materials or Notice. We recommend that you log in at least 15 minutes in advance of the Annual Meeting.

136 2021 Proxy Statement

email notification.

Voting Instructions and Information

CAN I ASK QUESTIONS AT THE VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING?

Shareholders as of our record date who attend and participate in our virtual annual meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2021 will have an opportunity to submit written questions live via the Internet during the meeting. In order to do so, shareholders must first join the meeting by entering their control number as described above under “What Do I Need to Participate In, and Vote At, the Annual Meeting?” Once you have joined the meeting, you can submit a question by clicking on the “Q&A” tab, typing the question into the “Submit a question” field, and clicking “Submit”. Shareholders will be required to identify themselves before they will be able to submit a question during the meeting.

Consistent with the rules of conduct for our Annual Meeting, and in order to allow us to answer questions from as many shareholders as possible, eachEach shareholder may submit a maximum of two questions. We ask that questions be succinct and cover only one topic per question. Time may not permit the answering of every question. Questions from multiple shareholders on the same topic or that are otherwise related may be grouped and answered together to avoid repetition.

We welcome questions from our shareholders and intend to answer all pertinent questions from shareholders as time allows during

What Can I do if I Have Trouble Logging Into the Annual Meeting. Conducting the business of the Annual Meeting for the benefit of all shareholders will be paramount. Accordingly, questions that are irrelevant to the business of the meeting or AIG’s operations, contain derogatory remarks about individuals, use offensive language, are in furtherance of the questioner’s personal business needs or are otherwise disruptive or inappropriate for the conduct of the Annual Meeting will not be addressed.

WHAT IF I HAVE TROUBLE ACCESSING, OR TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES DURING, THE ANNUAL MEETING?

We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing or participating in the Annual Meeting. Meeting?

If you encounter any technical difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the Annual Meeting log inlogin page at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2021.

HOW DOES THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMEND I VOTE AND WHAT ARE THE VOTE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROPOSALS DURING THE ANNUAL MEETING?

ProposalBoard Vote
Recommendation
Vote
Requirement
for Approval
Effect of
Abstentions
Broker
Discretionary
Voting
Allowed?
1.Election of thirteen directorsFOR EACH DIRECTOR NOMINEEMajority of votes castNo effectNo
2.Advisory vote on executive compensationFORMajority of votes castNo effectNo
3.Approval of American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive PlanFORMajority of votes castCounts as a vote AGAINSTNo
4.Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021FORMajority of votes castNo effectYes
5.Shareholder proposal to give shareholders who hold at least 10 percent of our outstanding common stock the right to call special meetingsAGAINSTMajority of votes castNo effectNo

2021 Proxy Statement137

www.proxyvote.com.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

What is the Quorum Requirement for the Annual Meeting?

Voting Instructions

Under the Company's By-Laws, a quorum is required to transact business at the Annual Meeting. A quorum is defined as a majority of the outstanding shares of AIG Parent common stock as of the record date, present either virtually or in person or represented by proxy and Information

HOW DO I VOTE?

You may castentitled to vote. As of the record date, 674,031,796 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding. Abstentions and "broker non-votes" are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Each share of AIG Parent common stock is entitled to one vote for each matter to be voted on at our Annual Meeting.

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT99

Frequently Asked Questions About the Annual Meeting
What is the Difference Between Holding Shares as a Shareholder of Record and as a Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name?
If your voteshares of AIG Parent common stock are registered directly in oneyour name with our transfer agent, EQ Shareowner Services, you are considered a “shareholder of four ways:

By Submitting a Proxy by Internet. Go to the following website: www.proxyvote.com. You may submit a proxy by Internet 24 hours a day. To be valid, your proxy by Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 11, 2021. Please have your Notice or your proxy card in hand whenrecord” of those shares.
If your shares are held in an account at a bank, brokerage firm or other intermediary, you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name. In that case, you will have received these proxy materials, as well as a voting instruction form, from the intermediary holding your shares and, as a beneficial owner, you access the website and follow the instructions to create an electronic voting instruction form.

By Submitting a Proxy by Telephone. To submit a proxy using the telephone, call 1-800-690-6903 any time on a touch-tone telephone. There is NO CHARGE to you for the call in the U.S. or Canada. International calling charges apply outside the U.S. and Canada. You may submit a proxy by telephone 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Please have your proxy card in hand when you call and follow the simple instructions provided by the recorded message. To be valid, your proxy by telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 11, 2021.

By Submitting a Proxy by Mail. Mark your proxy card, sign and date it, and return it in the prepaid envelope that has been provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. To be valid, your proxy by mail must be received by 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 12, 2021.

During the Annual Meeting. You can vote your shares during the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2021. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice, proxy card or voting instruction form.

HOW CAN I REVOKE MY PROXY OR SUBSTITUTE A NEW PROXY OR CHANGE MY VOTE?

You have the powerright to revokedirect the intermediary as to how to vote them. Most individual shareholders are beneficial owners of shares held in street name.

How Do I Vote?
By Internet
You can vote online at www.proxyvote.com.
By Telephone
In the United States or Canada, you can vote by telephone. Easy-to-follow prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.
You can find the telephone number on your proxy card, voting instruction form, or substituteother communications.
Internet and telephone voting facilities will be available 24 hours a newday until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 14, 2024. To authenticate your internet or telephone vote, you will need to enter your 16-digit control number found on you proxy by:

FOR A PROXY SUBMITTED BY INTERNET OR TELEPHONE 

Subsequently submitting in a timely manner, a newcard, voting instruction form, notice of internet availability of proxy through the Internetmaterials, or email notification. If you vote online or by telephone, you do not need to return a proxy card or voting instruction form. Please note that is receivedparticipants in a 401(k) plan sponsored by the Company must vote by internet or telephone by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 11, 2021; or

Executing and mailing a later-dated proxy card that is received prior to 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time on May 12, 2021; or2024.

During
By Mail
You can mail the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2021.

FOR A PROXY SUBMITTED BY MAIL 

Subsequently executing and mailing another proxy card bearing a lateror voting instruction form enclosed with your printed proxy materials. Mark, sign and date your proxy card or voting instruction form, and return it in the prepaid envelope that ishas been provided or return it to:
Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge Financial Solutions, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717
To be valid, your proxy card or voting instruction form must be received prior toby 10:00 a.m., Eastern DaylightTime, on May 15, 2024 or, if your shares are held in a 401(k) plan sponsored by the Company, by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 12, 2021; or2024.

Giving written noticeDuring the Annual Meeting
Shareholders as of revocationthe close of business on the record date, March 18, 2024, are entitled to AIG’s Corporate Secretaryvirtually attend and vote during the Annual Meeting online at 175 Water Street, New York, New York 10038 that is received by AIG prior to 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 12, 2021; orwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2024.

During the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2021.

IF I SUBMIT A PROXY BY INTERNET, TELEPHONE OR MAIL, HOW WILL MY SHARES BE VOTED? 

If you properly submithave already voted online, by telephone or by mail, your vote during the Annual Meeting will supersede your earlier vote.
How Can I Revoke My Proxy or Change My Vote?
nIf you voted by telephone or internet, access the method you used and follow the instructions for revoking a proxy
nIf you mailed a proxy bycard, mail a new proxy card with a later date, which will override your earlier proxy card, or
nVote virtually during the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2024.
How Will My Shares Be Voted?
Each share of AIG Parent common stock is entitled to one of these methods, and you do not subsequently revoke your proxy, yourvote. Your shares will be voted in accordance with your instructions.

In addition, if you have returned a signed proxy card or submitted voting instructions by telephone or the internet, the proxy holders will have, and intend to exercise, discretion to vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment on any matters not identified in this Proxy Statement that are brought to a vote at the Annual Meeting.

If your shares are registered in your name and you sign date and return youra proxy card or vote by telephone or the internet but do not give voting instructions on a particular proposal, the proxy holders will be authorized to vote your shares will be voted as follows: FOR the election of AIG’s director nominees specified under “Proposal 1—Election of Directors”; FOR the proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, executive compensation; FOR the approval of the 2021 Plan; FOR the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as AIG’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2021; AGAINST the shareholder proposal to give shareholders who hold at least 10 percent of our outstanding common stock the right to call special meetings; and otherwisethat matter in accordance with the judgmentBoard’s recommendation. If you hold your shares in street name and do not give voting instructions on a proposal, your broker is only permitted under the NYSE rules to vote your shares in its discretion on Proposal 3 (ratification of the appointment of the
100AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Frequently Asked Questions About the Annual Meeting
independent auditor) and is required to withhold a vote on each of the other proposals, resulting in a so-called “broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes will not be treated as a vote “for” or “against” the proposals and therefore will have no effect on the vote. Although the Board does not anticipate that any of the director nominees will be unable to stand for election as a director nominee at the Annual Meeting, if this occurs, the persons votingnamed as proxies on the proxy on anycard will vote your shares in favor of such other matter properly brought beforeperson or persons as may be recommended by the Annual Meeting.

138 2021 Proxy Statement

NCGC and nominated by the Board. Alternatively, the Board may reduce its size.

Voting Instructions and Information

IF I HOLD MY SHARES IN “STREET NAME” AND DO NOT PROVIDE VOTING INSTRUCTIONS, CAN MY BROKER STILL VOTE MY SHARES?

UnderIf you own shares held in an AIG-sponsored 401(k) plan, you can direct the rulesvoting of your proportionate interest in shares of AIG Parent common stock held within an AIG-sponsored 401(k) plan by returning a voting instruction card or providing voting instructions by the NYSE, brokersinternet or by telephone to the trustee. In the event that the trustee does not receive voting instructions from you, your shares of AIG Parent common stock held in an AIG-sponsored 401(k) plan shall be voted by the trustee proportionally in the same manner as it votes AIG Parent common stock as to which the trustee or its agent have not received voting instructions from their customers ten days prior toparticipants.

How Do Abstentions Affect the Annual Meeting date may vote their customers’ sharesVoting Results?
ProposalVote Required for ApprovalEffect of Abstentions
Election of DirectorsMajority of votes castNo effect
Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer CompensationMajority of votes castNo effect
Ratify Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to Serve as Independent Auditor
for 2024
Majority of votes castNo effect
Shareholder Proposal Requesting an Independent Board Chair PolicyMajority of votes castNo effect
Shareholder Proposal Requesting a Director Resignation By-LawMajority of votes castNo effect
What Happens if a Director in the brokers’ discretion on the proposal regarding the ratification of the selection of independent auditors because this is considered “discretionary” under NYSE rules. If your broker is an affiliate of AIG, in the absence of your specific voting instructions, your shares may only be voted in the same proportion as all other shares are voted with respect to that proposal.

Uncontested Election Receives More Votes “Against” than “For”?

Under NYSE rules, each other proposal—the election of directors, the non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation, the approval of the 2021 Plan and the shareholder proposal on special shareholder meetings—is a “non-discretionary” item, which means that member brokers who have not received instructions from the beneficial owners of AIG common stock do not have discretion to vote the shares of AIG common stock held by those beneficial owners on any of those proposals.

HOW ARE VOTES COUNTED AND CONSIDERED?

Proposal 1—Election of Directors.AIG’s By-laws provide that in uncontested elections, directors must receive a majority of the votes cast by the holders of AIG common stock. In other words,our By-Laws, directors in an uncontested election must receive more votes “for” their election than “against” their election. Pursuant to AIG’s By-laws and“against.” Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, each nominee who is currently a director has submitted to the Board an irrevocable resignation from the Board that would becomebecomes effective upon (1) the nominee’s failure of such nominee to receive the required vote at the Annual Meeting and (2) Boardthe Board's acceptance of such resignation. In the event that a nominee fails to receive the required vote at the Annual Meeting, the NCGC will then make a recommendation to the Board on the action to be taken with respect to the resignation. The Board will accept suchthat resignation unless the NCGC recommends, and the Board determines, that the best interests of AIGthe Company and its shareholders would not be served by doing so.

Proposal 2—Non-binding Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation.Adoption of

Who Counts the resolution onVotes?
Broadridge Financial Solutions (Broadridge), an independent entity, will tabulate the non-binding advisory vote to approve executive compensation requires a “for” vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of AIG common stock, which votes cast are either “for” or “against” the resolution. The results of the vote on this resolution will not be binding on AIG’s Board, will not overrule any decisions the Board has made and will not create any duty for the Board to take any action in response to the outcome of the vote. However, the CMRC values the feedback received from this advisory vote and may, in its sole discretion, take into account the outcome of the vote in analyzing and evaluating future compensation opportunities.

Proposal 3—Approval of the American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Approval of the 2021 Plan requires a “for” vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of AIG common stock, which votes cast are either “for” or “against” the proposal. Under NYSE rules, abstentions have the effect of a vote against Proposal 3.

Proposal 4—Ratification of the Selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Ratification of the selection of accountants requires a “for” vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of AIG common stock, which votes cast are either “for” or “against” the ratification. Neither AIG’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation nor AIG’s By-laws require that the shareholders ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as its independent registered public accounting firm. AIG’s Board is requesting shareholder ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the shareholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP but may still retain PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may change the selection at any time during the year if it determines that such change would be in the best interests of AIG and its shareholders.

Proposal 5—Shareholder Proposal on Special Shareholder Meetings. Approval of the shareholder proposal requires a “for” vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of AIG common stock, which votes cast are either “for” or “against” the resolution.

2021 Proxy Statement139

Voting Instructions and Information

Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions. In the case of the proposals on the election of directors, the non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation, the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the shareholder proposal—only votes cast “for” or “against” the proposal will be considered; abstentions and broker non-votes will not be treated as a vote “for” or “against” the proposal and therefore will have no effect on the vote. With respect to the proposal on the approval of the 2021 Plan, under NYSE rules, abstentions will have the effect of a vote against that proposal.

HOW MANY VOTES ARE REQUIRED TO TRANSACT BUSINESS AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?

A quorum is required to transact business at the Annual Meeting. The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of AIG common stock entitled to vote will constitute a quorum. Virtual attendance atvotes. At the Annual Meeting, constitutes presencea representative of Broadridge will act as the independent Inspector of Election and in person for purposesthis capacity will supervise the voting, decide the validity of quorum atproxies, and certify the Annual Meeting. Proxies marked as abstaining, and any broker “non-votes” on behalf of shares held in street name because beneficial owners’ discretion has not been exercised, will be treated as present for purposes of determining a quorumresults.

Who Pays for the Annual Meeting.

HOW DO I OBTAIN MORE INFORMATION ABOUT AIG?

A copy of AIG’s 2020 Annual Report, which includes AIG’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed withProxy Solicitation and How May the SEC, has been delivered or made available to shareholders. You also may obtain, free of charge, a copy of the 2020 Annual Report and AIG’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K by writing to American International Group, Inc., 175 Water Street, New York, New York 10038, Attention: Investor Relations. These documents also are available in the Investors section of AIG’s corporate website at www.aig.com.

WHO PAYS FOR THE EXPENSES OF THIS PROXY SOLICITATION?

AIGCompany Solicit My Proxy?

We will bearpay the cost of the solicitation ofsoliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited by mail, email, personal interview, telephone and facsimile transmissionon our behalf by directors, their associates, and certain officers and regularor employees of AIG and its subsidiaries without additional compensation. In addition to the foregoing, AIG hasin person or by telephone, facsimile or other electronic means. We have retained Morrow Sodali LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of approximately $20,000 plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and disbursements of that firm. AIGdisbursements. As required by the SEC and the NYSE, we also will reimburse brokersbrokerage firms and others holding AIGother custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their expenses incurred in sending proxies and proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stockstock.
Why Did I Receive a Notice of Internet Availability?
To conserve resources and reduce costs, we are sending most shareholders — as we are permitted to do under the SEC’s rules — a notice of internet availability of proxy materials. The notice explains how you can access proxy materials on the internet and how to obtain printed copies if you prefer. It also explains how you can choose either electronic or print delivery of proxy materials for future annual meetings.
How Can I Receive My Proxy Materials Electronically?
To conserve resources and reduce costs, we encourage shareholders to access their proxy materials electronically.
Before the Annual Meeting, you can sign up for electronic access when voting online at www.proxyvote.com. If you are a registered shareholder or a beneficial owner of shares held in their names,street name, you can sign up at enroll.icsdelivery.com/aig to get electronic access to proxy materials for future meetings, rather than receiving them in the mail. Once you sign up, you will receive an email each year
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT101

Frequently Asked Questions About the Annual Meeting
explaining how to access our Annual Report and Proxy Statement, and how to vote online. Your enrollment for electronic access will remain in effect unless you cancel it, which you can do up to two weeks before the record date for any future meeting.
What if I Share the Same Address as Another Shareholder?
If you share an address with one or more shareholders, you may have received only a single copy of the Annual Report, Proxy Statement or notice of internet availability of proxy materials for your entire household. This practice, known as “householding,” is intended to reduce printing and mailing costs. If you are a registered shareholder and you prefer to receive a separate Annual Report, Proxy Statement or notice of internet availability of proxy materials this year or in the namesfuture, or if you are receiving multiple copies at your address and would like to enroll in “householding” and receive a single copy, contact EQ Shareholder Services at (888) 899-8293, or by mail to 1110 Centre Pointe Curve #101, Mendota Heights, MN 55120 or email stocktransfer@equiniti.com. If you are a beneficial owner of nominees,shares held in street name, please contact your bank, brokerage firm or other intermediary to make your request. There is no charge for forwarding proxy materialsseparate copies.
How Can I Receive a Copy of the Company’s 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K?
We will provide, without charge, a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 to their principals.

140 2021 Proxy Statement

any shareholder upon a request directed to Investor Relations (see page 103 for contact information).

Will Any Other MattersOther Matters toBusiness be Presented duringat the 2021 Annual MeetingMeeting?

As of Shareholders

Other Matters 

OTHER MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED DURING THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Thethe date of this Proxy Statement, the Board knows of no other matters tomatter that will be properly presented duringfor shareholder action at the Annual Meeting. IfMeeting other than those matters discussed in this Proxy Statement. However, if any other mattersmatter requiring a vote of the shareholders properly comecomes before the Annual Meeting, it isthen the intention ofindividuals acting under the persons namedproxies solicited by the Board will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

How Do I Submit Proposals and Nominations for the 2025 Annual Meeting?
Shareholder Proposals to be Included in the accompanying proxyProxy Statement
To submit a shareholder proposal to vote the proxy in accordance with their judgment on such matters.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING

All suggestions from shareholders are given careful attention. Proposals intendedbe considered for inclusion in next year’sour Proxy Statement pursuant tofor the 2025 Annual Meeting under Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, you must send the proposal to our Corporate Secretary by mail or email (see page 103 for contact information). The Corporate Secretary must receive the proposal in writing by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on December 3, 2024.

Shareholder Proposals to be Introduced at the 2025 Annual Meeting
To introduce a proposal for vote at the 2025 Annual Meeting (other than a shareholder proposal included in the Proxy Statement under Rule 14a-8 should be sentof the Exchange Act), our By-Laws require that you send advance written notice to theour Corporate Secretary of AIG by mail at 175 Water Street, New York, New York 10038 or by e-mail at AIGCorporateSecretary@aig.com and must be received by November 30, 2021.

AIG’s By-laws permit a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning three percent or more of our outstanding shares of AIG common stock continuously(see page 103 for at least three years to nominate and include in AIG’s annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20 percent of the Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in AIG’s By-laws. Notice of director nominees submitted pursuant to this proxy access by-law must be delivered to or, if sent by mail, received by the Corporate Secretary of AIG at 175 Water Street, New York, New York 10038 and must be receivedcontact information) for receipt no earlier than October 31, 2021January 15, 2025, and no later than November 30, 2021. The11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on February 14, 2025. This notice of director nominees must include all of the information required by AIG’s By-laws.

Under AIG’s By-laws, noticespecified in our By-Laws, a copy of any otherwhich is available on our website at www.aig.com.

Director Nominations at the 2025 Annual Meeting
Our By-Laws require that a shareholder proposal or the nomination ofwho wishes to nominate a candidate for election as a director to be made duringat the 20222025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and not submitted for inclusion in next year’s Proxy Statement (either(other than pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 or the proxy access“proxy access” provisions of AIG’s By-laws)the By-Laws) must be deliveredsend advance written notice to the Corporate Secretary by mail (see page 103 for contact information) for receipt no earlier than January 15, 2025, and no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on February 14, 2025. This notice must include the information specified in our By-Laws, a copy of AIGwhich is available on our website at 175 Water Street, New York, New York 10038 not less than 90 nor more than 120 days priorwww.aig.com. In addition to May 12, 2022, unlesscomplying with the 2022 Annual Meetingadvance notice provisions of Shareholders is not scheduledour By-Laws, to be held onnominate a date between April 12, 2022candidate for election, shareholders must give timely notice that complies with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19 of the Exchange Act, and June 11, 2022, in which case notice must be received no later than March 17, 2025.
Director Nominations by Proxy Access
An eligible shareholder who wishes to have a nominee of that shareholder included in our Proxy Statement for the later of 90 days prior2025 Annual Meeting pursuant to the date“proxy access” provisions of our By-Laws must send advance written notice to the Corporate Secretary (see page 103 for contact information) for receipt no earlier than November 3, 2024, and no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on which such meeting is scheduled or 10 days after the date on which such meeting date is first publicly announced. TheDecember 3, 2024. This notice must include allthe information specified by the By-Laws, a copy of which is available on our website at www.aig.com.
102AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Frequently Asked Questions About the Annual Meeting
How Do I Contact the Corporate Secretary’s Office?
Shareholders may contact the Corporate Secretary’s Office in one of two methods:
Write a Letter
American International Group, Inc.
Attn: Corporate Secretary
1271 Ave of the Americas
New York, NY 10020-1304
Send an Email
AIGCorporateSecretary@AIG.com
How Do I Contact Investor Relations?
Shareholders may contact AIG’s Investor Relations in one of two methods:
Write a Letter
American International Group, Inc.
Attn: Investor Relations
1271 Ave of the Americas
New York, NY 10020-1304
Send an Email
IR@AIG.com
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT103


Other Important Information
Cautionary Note Concerning Factors That May Affect Future Results
This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements which, to the extent they are not statements of historical or present fact, may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are intended to provide management’s current expectations or plans for AIG’s future operating and financial performance based on assumptions currently believed to be valid and accurate. Forward-looking statements are often preceded by, followed by or include words such as “will,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “expectations,” “intend,” “plan,” “strategy,” “prospects,” “project,” “anticipate,” “should,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “confident,” “focused on achieving,” “view,” “target,” “goal,” “estimate,” and other words of similar meaning.
Forward-looking statements provide our current expectations or forecasts of future events, circumstances, results or aspirations, and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in such forward-looking statements. Certain of those risks and uncertainties are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Proxy Statement. We are not under any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by AIG’s By-laws. A copyapplicable law. Additional information as to factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements is disclosed from time to time in our SEC filings.
How to Communicate with the Board
Shareholders and other interested persons may communicate with the Board, the Lead Independent Director, or with one or more directors by:
nWriting a letter in care of AIG’s current By-laws is available in the About Us—Leadership and Governance—Corporate Governance Documents section of AIG’s websiteSecretary (see page 103 for contact information);
nEmailing BoardofDirectors@AIG.com; or
nContacting the Compliance Help Line at www.aig.com.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 

1-877-244-2110, menu item #3 (to access the AIG has adopted procedures onCompliance Help Line from outside the reporting of concerns regarding AIG’sUnited States, dial the appropriate country code, wait for the prompt, then dial the number).

Communications relating to accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and other matters and on communicating with independent directors. These procedures are available incan be sent by:
nWriting a letter to the About Us—Leadership and Governance—Corporate Governance Documents section of AIG’s corporate website at www.aig.com.

Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with anyChair of the independent directors, includingAudit Committee in care of the Lead Independent Director and Board Committee Chairs, or the independent directors as a group, by:

writing to them c/o Corporate Secretary American International Group, Inc., 175 Water Street, New York, New York 10038;(see page 103 for contact information); or

emailing boardofdirectors@aig.com

nEmailing BoardofDirectors@AIG.com.
The Corporate Secretary opens all communications and forwards them, as appropriate, pursuant to the appropriate recipient.Corporate Governance Guidelines. However, at the discretion of the Corporate Secretary, items unrelated to the directors’ duties and responsibilities as members of the Board may not be forwarded, including solicitations and advertising materials, unsolicited publications, job or product inquiries, invitations to conferences and other materials considered to be illegal, incoherent, trivial, irrelevant, inappropriate, harassing, unsolicited advertisements and/or promotional materialsharassing.
Corporate Governance Information
Our By-Laws, Certificate of Incorporation, Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters for each Board committee, the Director, Officer and invitations to conferences.

2021 Proxy Statement141

Other MattersElectronic DeliverySenior Financial Officer Code of Proxy Materials

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF PROXY MATERIALS 

In an effort to reduce paper mailed to your homeBusiness Conduct and help lower printingEthics (and any amendments of or waivers from the code), the Employee Code of Conduct and postage costs, weSupplier Code of Conduct are offering shareholders the convenience of viewing online proxy statements, annual reports and related materials. With your consent, we can stop sending future paperavailable on our website (www.aig.com). Printed copies of these documents. To elect this convenience,documents will be provided, without charge, to any shareholder upon a request addressed to Investor Relations through the contact information provided on page 103.

104AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Other Important Information
Transactions With Related Persons
We have a written policy requiring that the NCGC (or, in certain circumstances, the chair of the NCGC) determine whether to approve or ratify transactions exceeding $120,000 in which the Company is a participant and in which a related person — a director, nominee for director, executive officer, their respective immediate family members, and 5 percent shareholders may followand their immediate family members— has a direct or indirect material interest. Under the instructions when voting online at www.proxyvote.com. Followingpolicy, the Annual Meeting, you may continueNCGC determines whether each transaction presented to register for electronic deliveryit should be approved (or, where applicable, ratified) based on whether the transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of future documentsthe Company and its shareholders. Certain types of transactions are considered pre-approved by visiting http://enroll.icsdelivery.com/aig. If you own shares indirectly through a broker, bank, or other nominee, please contact yourthe NCGC, such as insurance and financial institution for additional information regarding enrolling for electronic delivery.

We are pleased to be usingservices transactions (including the SEC’s rule that allows companies to furnish proxy materials to their shareholders overpurchase and sale of our products and services) entered into in the Internet. In accordance with this rule, on or about March 30, 2021, we sent shareholders of record at the closeordinary course of business on March 17, 2021,terms and conditions generally available in the marketplace and in accordance with applicable law.

We did not have any related persons transactions in 2023.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10 percent of our common stock to file reports with the SEC indicating their holdings of, and transactions in, AIG Parent common stock. Based on a Noticereview of these reports, and upon written representations from the reporting persons, we believe that the only filing deficiency under Section 16(a) by our directors, officers and greater than 10 percent holders during 2023 was a late Form 4 filed on July 26, 2023 for William G. Jurgensen to report transactions conducted by a third-party investment advisor in its sole discretion without his direction or a full set of proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and 2020 Annual Report via the Internet and how to vote.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materialsknowledge, which had been inadvertently omitted from prior reported holdings for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholdersyears 2014 to be held virtually via the Internet on May 12, 2021. Our 2021 Proxy Statement and 2020 Annual Report2020.

Incorporation by Reference
No reports, documents or websites that are available free of charge on our website at www.aig.com.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS

The SEC’s rules permit us to deliver a single Noticecited or set of Annual Meeting materials to a single address shared by two or more of our shareholders. We have delivered only one Notice or set of Annual Meeting materials to multiple shareholders who share that address unless AIG received contrary instructions from any shareholder at that address. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce printing and postage costs. However, if any shareholder residing at such address wishes to receive a separate copy of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, proxy materials, Proxy Statement or 2020 Annual Report, he or she may contact Investor Relations at 175 Water Street, New York, New York 10038, 212-770-6293, and AIG will deliver those documents to such shareholder promptly upon receiving the request. Any such shareholder may also contact Investor Relations if he or she would like to receive separate proxy materials and annual reports in the future. If a shareholder receives multiple copies of AIG’s proxy materials and annual reports, he or she may request householding in the future by contacting Investor Relations.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

Information and reports on our website that we referreferred to in this Proxy Statement will notshall be deemed ato form part of, or otherwiseto be incorporated by reference into, this Proxy Statement.

To the extent that this Proxy Statement has been or will be specifically incorporated by reference into any other filing by AIGus under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, the Letter to Shareholders from Messrs. Duperreault and SteenlandMr. Zaffino, the Letter to Shareholders from Mr. Rice and the sections of this Proxy Statement entitled “Letter from the Compensation and Management Resources Committee,” “Report of the Compensation and Management Resources Committee” and “Report of the Audit Committee” (to the extent permitted by the SEC rules), shall not be deemed to be so incorporated, unless specifically otherwise provided in such filing.

142 2021 Proxy Statement

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Information

This Proxy StatementThe section titled “Directors, Executive Officers and other publicly available documents may include, and officers and representatives of AIG may from time to time make and discuss, projections, goals, assumptions and statements that may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These projections, goals, assumptions and statements are not historical facts but instead represent only a belief regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside AIG’s control. These projections, goals, assumptions and statements include statements preceded by, followed by or including words such as “will,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “focused on achieving,” “view,” “target,” “goal” or “estimate.” These projections, goals, assumptions and statements may relate to future actions, prospective services or products, future performance or results of current and anticipated services or products, sales efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings, anticipated organizational, business or regulatory changes, the effect of catastrophes, such as the COVID-19 crisis, and macroeconomic events, anticipated dispositions, monetization and/or acquisitions of businesses or assets, or successful integration of acquired businesses, management succession and retention plans, exposure to risk, trends in operations and financial results.

It is possible that AIG’s actual results and financial condition will differ, possibly materially, from the results and financial condition indicated in these projections, goals, assumptions and statements. Factors that could cause AIG’s actual results to differ, possibly materially, from those in the specific projections, goals, assumptions and statements include:

the adverse impact of COVID-19, including with respect to AIG’s business, financial condition and results of operations;

changes in market and industry conditions, including the significant global economic downturn, volatility in financial and capital markets, prolonged economic recovery and disruptions to AIG’s operations driven by COVID-19 and responses thereto, including new or changed governmental policy and regulatory actions;

the occurrence of catastrophic events, both natural and man-made, including COVID-19, other pandemics, civil unrest and the effects of climate change;

AIG’s ability to successfully dispose of, monetize and/or acquire businesses or assets or successfully integrate acquired businesses, including any separation of the Life and Retirement business from AIG and the impact any separation may have on AIG, its businesses, employees, contracts and customers;

AIG’s ability to effectively execute on AIG 200 transformational programs designed to achieve underwriting excellence, modernization of AIG’s operating infrastructure, enhanced user and customer experiences and unification of AIG;

the impact of potential information technology, cybersecurity or data security breaches, including as a result of cyber-attacks or security vulnerabilities, the likelihood of which may increase due to extended remote business operations as a result of COVID-19;

disruptions in the availability of AIG’s electronic data systems or those of third parties;

availability and affordability of reinsurance;

the effectivenessCorporate Governance” of our risk management policies and procedures, including with respect to our business continuity and disaster recovery plans;

nonperformance or defaults by counterparties, including Fortitude Reinsurance Company Ltd;

changes in judgments concerning potential cost-saving opportunities;

concentrations in AIG’s investment portfolios;

changes to the valuation of AIG’s investments;

changes to our sources of or access to liquidity;

actions by rating agencies with respect to our credit and financial strength ratings;

changes in judgments or assumptions concerning insurance underwriting and insurance liabilities;

2021 Proxy Statement143

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

the effectiveness of strategies to recruit and retain key personnel and to implement effective succession plans;

the requirements, which may change from time to time, of the global regulatory framework to which AIG is subject;

significant legal, regulatory or governmental proceedings;

changes in judgments concerning the recognition of deferred tax assets and the impairment of goodwill and

such other factors discussed in:

Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in AIG’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K; and

Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in AIG’s 2020 Annual Report10-K filed with the SEC on Form 10-K.

AIGFebruary 14, 2024 is not under any obligation (and expressly disclaims any obligation)incorporated by reference to update or alter any projections, goals, assumptions or other statements, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

this Proxy Statement.

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT105




















This page intentionally left blank



144 2021 Proxy Statement
Appendix A
Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Appendix A Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Appendix A 

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Certain of the operating performance measurements used by AIGour management are “non-GAAP financial measures” under Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations. GAAP is the acronym for “generally accepted accounting principles” in the U.S. The non-GAAP financial measures presented may not be comparable to similarly named measures reported by other companies.

We use the following operating performance measures because we believe they enhance the understanding of the underlying profitability of continuing operations and trends of our business segments. We believe they also allow for more meaningful comparisons with our insurance competitors.
nAdjusted Pre-tax Income (APTI)is derived by excluding the items set forth below from income from continuing operations before income tax. This definition is consistent across our segments. These items generally fall into one or more of the following broad categories: legacy matters having no relevance to our current businesses or operating performance; adjustments to enhance transparency to the underlying economics of transactions; and measures that we believe to be common to the industry. APTI is a GAAP measure for our segments. Excluded items include the following:

changes in fair value of securities used to hedge guaranteed living benefits;

net change in market risk benefits (MRBs);
changes in benefit reserves and deferred policy acquisition costs, value of business acquired, and sales inducement assets related to net realized capital gains and losses;

changes in the fair value of equity securities;

net investment income on Fortitude Reinsurance Company Ltd. (Fortitude Re) funds withheld assets post deconsolidation of Fortitude Re;

following deconsolidation of Fortitude Re, net realized capital gains and losses on Fortitude Re funds withheld assets held by AIG in support of Fortitude Re’s reinsurance obligations to AIG post deconsolidation of Fortitude Re (Fortitude Re funds withheld assets);

following deconsolidation of Fortitude Re, net realized gains and losses on Fortitude Re funds withheld assets;
loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt;

all net realized capital gains and losses except earned income (periodic settlements and changes in settlement accruals) on derivative instruments used for non-qualifying (economic) hedging or for asset replication. Earned income on such economic hedges is reclassified from net realized capital gains and losses to specific APTI line items based on the economic risk being hedged (e.g. net investment income and interest credited to policyholder account balances);

income or loss from discontinued operations;

net loss reserve discount benefit (charge);

pension expense related to a one-time lump sum paymentpayments to former employees;

incomenet gain or loss on divestitures and loss from divested businesses;other;

non-operating litigation reserves and settlements;

restructuring and other costs related to initiatives designed to reduce operating expenses, improve efficiency and simplify our organization;

the portion of favorable or unfavorable prior year reserve development for which we have ceded the risk under retroactive reinsurance agreements and related changes in amortization of the deferred gain;

integration and transaction costs associated with acquiring or divesting businesses;

losses from the impairment of goodwill; and

non-recurring costs associated with the implementation of non-ordinary course legal or regulatory changes or changes to accounting principles.principles; and

income from elimination of the international reporting lag.
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENTA-1

Appendix A – Non-GAAP Financial Measures
nAdjusted After-tax Income Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders (AATI) is derived by excluding the tax effected APTI adjustments described above, dividends on preferred stock, noncontrolling interest on net realized gains (losses), other non-operating expenses and the following tax items from net income attributable to AIG:

deferred income tax valuation allowance releases and charges;

changes in uncertain tax positions and other tax items related to legacy matters having no relevance to our current businesses or operating performance; and

net tax charge related to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act;Act.


20232022
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions, except per common share data)
Pre-taxTotal Tax
(Benefit)
Charge
Non-
controlling
Interests(5)
After
Tax
Pre-taxTotal Tax
(Benefit)
Charge
Non-
controlling
Interests(5)
After
Tax
Pre-tax income/net income, including noncontrolling interests$3,858 $(20)$ $3,878 $14,299 $3,025 $— $11,273 
Noncontrolling interests(235)(235)(1,046)(1,046)
Pre-tax income/net income attributable to AIG$3,858 $(20)$(235)$3,643 $14,299 $3,025 $(1,046)$10,227 
Dividends on preferred stock29 29 
Net income attributable to AIG common shareholders$3,614 $10,198 
Changes in uncertain tax positions and other tax adjustments230  (230)22 — (22)
Deferred income tax valuation allowance (releases) charges(1)357  (357)25 — (25)
Changes in fair value of securities used to hedge guaranteed living benefits16 3  13 (30)(6)— (24)
Change in the fair value of market risk benefits, net(2)2   2 (958)(202)— (756)
Changes in benefit reserves related to net realized gains (losses)(6)(1) (5)(14)(3)— (11)
Changes in the fair value of equity securities(94)(20) (74)53 11 — 42 
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt(37)(8) (29)303 64 — 239 
Net investment income on Fortitude Re funds withheld assets(1,544)(324) (1,220)(943)(198)— (745)
Net realized losses on Fortitude Re funds withheld assets295 62  233 486 102 — 384 
Net realized (gains) losses on Fortitude Re funds withheld embedded derivative2,007 422  1,585 (7,481)(1,571)— (5,910)
Net realized (gains) losses(3)2,496 534  1,962 173 38 — 135 
Loss from discontinued operations 
Net loss (gain) on divestitures and other(643)247  (890)82 17 — 65 
Non-operating litigation reserves and settlements1   1 (41)(9)— (32)
Favorable prior year development and related amortization changes ceded under retroactive reinsurance agreements(62)(13) (49)(160)(34)— (126)
Net loss reserve discount (benefit) charge195 41  154 (703)(148)— (555)
Pension expense related to a one-time lump sum payment to former employees84 18  66 60 13 — 47 
Integration and transaction costs associated with acquiring or divesting businesses252 53  199 194 41 — 153 
Restructuring and other costs553 116  437 570 120 — 450 
Non-recurring costs related to regulatory or accounting changes40 8  32 37 — 29 
Net impact from elimination of international reporting lag(4)(12)(3) (9)(127)(27)— (100)
Noncontrolling interests(5)(514)(514)599 599 
Adjusted pre-tax income/Adjusted after-tax income attributable to AIG common shareholders$7,401 $1,702 $(749)$4,921 $5,800 $1,288 $(447)$4,036 
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding725.2 787.9 
Income per common share attributable to AIG common shareholders (diluted)$4.98 $12.94 
Adjusted after-tax income per common share attributable to AIG common shareholders (diluted)$6.79 $5.12 
(1)The year ended December 31, 2023 includes a valuation allowance release related to a portion of certain tax attribute carryforwards of AIG's U.S. federal consolidated income tax group, as well as valuation allowance changes in certain foreign jurisdictions.
(2)Includes realized gains and losses on certain derivative instruments used for non-qualifying (economic) hedging.
(3)Includes all net realized gains and losses except earned income (periodic settlements and changes in settlement accruals) on derivative instruments used for non-qualifying (economic) hedging or for asset replication and net realized gains and losses on Fortitude Re funds withheld assets.
A-2AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Appendix A – Non-GAAP Financial Measures
(4)Effective in the quarter ended December 31, 2022, the foreign property and casualty subsidiaries report on a calendar year ending December 31. We determined that the effect of not retroactively applying this change was immaterial to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the current and prior periods. Therefore, we reported the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle within the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the year ended December 31, 2022 and did not retrospectively apply the effects of this change to prior periods.
(5)Includes the portion of equity interest of non-operating income of Corebridge and consolidated investment entities that AIG does not own.
nDiluted Normalized Adjusted After-tax Income (AATI) Attributable to AIG Common Shareholders Per Share further adjusts diluted AATI attributable to AIG common shareholders per share for the effects of certain volatile or market-related items. We believe this measure is useful to investors for performance management because it presents the trends in diluted AATI attributable to AIG common shareholders per share without the impact of certain items that can experience volatility in our short-term results. Diluted normalized AATI attributable to AIG common shareholders per share is derived by excluding the following from AATI attributable to AIG common shareholders per share: the difference between actual and expected (1) catastrophe losses, net realized capital gains (losses)of reinsurance, (2) alternative investment returns, (3) fair value changes on fixed maturity securities, and other charges from noncontrolling interests.

2021 Proxy StatementA-1

(4) return on business transactions; Life and Retirement update of actuarial assumptions; prior year loss reserve development, net of reinsurance and premium adjustments; and COVID-19 mortality. General Insurance EPS is further adjusted for certain business factors related to neutralizing Corebridge’s impact on AIG’s earnings per share.

Appendix ANon-GAAP Financial Measures

nAIG Return on Common Equity (ROCE)—Adjusted After-tax Income Excluding Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) adjusted for the cumulative unrealized gains and losses related to Fortitude Re’s Funds Withheld AssetsRe funds withheld assets and Deferred Tax Assets (DTA) (Adjusted Return on Common Equity)is used to show the rate of return on common shareholders’ equity. We believe this measure is useful to investors because it eliminates items that can fluctuate significantly from period to period, including changes in fair value (1) of ourAIG’s available for sale securities portfolio, (2) of market risk benefits attributable to our own credit risk and (3) due to discount rates used to measure traditional and limited payment long-duration insurance contracts, foreign currency translation adjustments and U.S. tax attribute deferred tax assets. This measure also eliminates the asymmetrical impact resulting from changes in fair value of our available for sale securities portfolio wherein there is largely no offsetting impact for certain related insurance liabilities. In addition, we adjust for the cumulative unrealized gains and losses related to Fortitude Re’s Funds Withheld AssetsRe funds withheld assets since these fair value movements are economically transferred to Fortitude Re. We exclude deferred tax assets representing U.S. tax attributes related to net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credits as they have not yet been utilized. Amounts for interim periods are estimates based on projections of full-year attribute utilization. As net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credits are utilized, the portion of the DTA utilized is included in Adjusted Returnreturn on Common Equity.common equity. Adjusted Returnreturn on Common Equitycommon equity is derived by dividing actual or annualized adjusted after-tax income attributable to AIG common shareholders by average AIGAdjusted common shareholders’ equity,equity.
nCorebridge Adjusted Pre-tax Operating Income (APTOI) is derived by excluding the items set forth below from income from operations before income tax. These items generally fall into one or more of the following broad categories: legacy matters having no relevance to Corebridge's current businesses or operating performance; adjustments to enhance transparency to the underlying economics of transactions; and recording adjustments to APTOI that Corebridge believes to be common in Corebridge's industry. Corebridge believes the adjustments to pre-tax income are useful for gaining an understanding of Corebridge's overall results of operations.
APTOI excludes the impact of the following items:
FORTITUDE RE RELATED ADJUSTMENTS:
The modco reinsurance agreements with Fortitude Re transfer the economics of the invested assets supporting the reinsurance agreements to Fortitude Re. Accordingly, the net investment income on Fortitude Re funds withheld assets and the net realized gains (losses) on Fortitude Re funds withheld assets are excluded from APTOI. Similarly, changes in the Fortitude Re funds withheld embedded derivative are also excluded from APTOI.
The ongoing results associated with the reinsurance agreement with Fortitude Re have been excluded from APTOI as these are not indicative of our ongoing business operations.
INVESTMENT RELATED ADJUSTMENTS:
APTOI excludes “Net realized gains (losses)”, except for gains (losses) related to the disposition of real estate investments. Net realized gains (losses), except for gains (losses) related to the disposition of real estate investments, are excluded as the timing of sales on invested assets or changes in allowances depend largely on market credit cycles and can vary considerably across periods. In addition, changes in interest rates may create opportunistic scenarios to buy or sell invested assets. Corebridge's derivative results, including those used to economically hedge insurance liabilities or are recognized as embedded derivatives at fair value are also included in Net realized gains (losses) and are similarly excluded from APTOI except earned income (periodic settlements and changes in settlement accruals) on derivative instruments used for non-qualifying (economic) hedges or for asset
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENTA-3

Appendix A – Non-GAAP Financial Measures
replication. Earned income on such economic hedges is reclassified from Net realized gains and losses to specific APTOI line items based on the economic risk being hedged (e.g., Net investment income and Interest credited to policyholder account balances).
MARKET RISK BENEFIT ADJUSTMENTS:
Certain of Corebridge's variable annuity, fixed annuity and fixed index annuity contracts contain guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits and/or guaranteed minimum death benefits which are accounted for as market risk benefits (MRBs). Changes in the fair value of these MRBs (excluding changes related to Corebridge's own credit risk), including certain rider fees attributed to the MRBs, along with changes in the fair value of derivatives used to hedge MRBs are recorded through “Change in the fair value of MRBs, net” and are excluded from APTOI.
Changes in the fair value of securities used to economically hedge MRBs are excluded from APTOI.
OTHER ADJUSTMENTS:
Other adjustments represent all other adjustments that are excluded from APTOI and includes the net pre-tax operating income (losses) from noncontrolling interests related to consolidated investment entities. The excluded adjustments include, as applicable:
restructuring and other costs related to initiatives designed to reduce operating expenses, improve efficiency and simplify Corebridge's organization;
non-recurring costs associated with the implementation of non-ordinary course legal or regulatory changes or changes to accounting principles;
separation costs;
non-operating litigation reserves and settlements;
loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, if any;
losses from the impairment of goodwill, if any; and
income and loss from divested or run-off business, if any.
nCorebridge Adjusted After-tax Operating Income Attributable to Corebridge’s Common Shareholders (Adjusted After-tax Operating Income or AATOI) is derived by excluding the tax effected APTOI adjustments described above, as well as the following tax items from net income attributable to Corebridge:
reclassifications of disproportionate tax effects from AOCI, adjustedchanges in uncertain tax positions and other tax items related to legacy matters having no relevance to Corebridge's current businesses or operating performance; and
deferred income tax valuation allowance releases and charges.
nCorebridge Operating Earnings per Common Share is derived by dividing AATOI by weighted average diluted shares.

20232022
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)
Pre-taxTotal Tax
(Benefit)
Charge
Non-
controlling
Interests
After TaxPre-taxTotal Tax
(Benefit)
Charge
Non-
controlling
Interests
After Tax
Pre-tax income/net income, including noncontrolling interests$940$(96)$$1,036$10,491$2,012$$8,479
Noncontrolling interests6868(320)(320)
Pre-tax income/net income attributable to Corebridge940(96)681,10410,4912,012(320)8,159
Fortitude Re related items
Net investment income on Fortitude Re funds withheld assets(1,368)(291)(1,077)(891)(187)(704)
Net realized (gains) losses on Fortitude Re funds withheld assets2244817639783314
Net realized (gains) losses on Fortitude Re funds withheld embedded derivative1,7343691,365(6,347)(1,370)(4,977)
Subtotal Fortitude Re related items590126464(6,841)(1,474)(5,367)
Other Reconciling Items:
Reclassification of disproportionate tax effects from AOCI and other tax adjustments89(89)95(95)
Deferred income tax valuation allowance (releases) charges(11)11(157)157
Changes in fair value of market risk benefits, net(6)(1)(5)(958)(199)(759)
Changes in fair value of securities used to hedge guaranteed living benefits16313(30)(6)(24)
Changes in benefit reserves related to net realized gains (losses)(6)(1)(5)(15)(3)(12)
Net realized (gains) losses(1)
1,7923811,41121144167
A-4AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Appendix A – Non-GAAP Financial Measures

20232022
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)
Pre-taxTotal Tax
(Benefit)
Charge
Non-
controlling
Interests
After TaxPre-taxTotal Tax
(Benefit)
Charge
Non-
controlling
Interests
After Tax
Non-operating litigation reserves and settlements(25)(5)(20)
Separation costs2455119418014238
Restructuring and other costs1974115614731116
Non-recurring costs related to regulatory or accounting changes184141239
Net (gain) loss on divestiture(676)(43)(633)11
Pension expense - non operating1531211
Noncontrolling interests68(68)(320)320
Subtotal: Other non-Fortitude Re reconciling items1,663516(68)1,079(796)(55)320(421)
Total adjustments2,253642(68)1,543(7,637)(1,529)320(5,788)
Adjusted pre-tax operating income (loss)/Adjusted after-tax operating income (loss) attributable to Corebridge common shareholders$3,193$546$—$2,647$2,854$483$—$2,371
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted645.2647.4
Income per common share attributable to Corebridge common shareholders$1.71$12.60
Corebridge Operating Earnings per Common Share$4.10$3.66
(1)Includes all net realized gains and losses except earned income (periodic settlements and changes in settlement accruals) on derivative instruments used for non-qualifying (economic) hedging or for asset replication. Additionally, gains (losses) related to the disposition of real estate investments are also excluded from this adjustment.
nCorebridge Adjusted Return on Average Equity (Adjusted RoAE) is derived by dividing AATOI by average Adjusted Book Value and is used by management to evaluate Corebridge's recurring profitability and evaluate trends in Corebridge's business. Corebridge believes this measure is useful to investors as it eliminates the asymmetrical impact resulting from changes in fair value of Corebridge's available-for-sale securities portfolio for which there is largely no offsetting impact for certain related insurance liabilities that are not recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded through Other comprehensive income (OCI). It also eliminates asymmetrical impacts where Corebridge's own credit non-performance risk is recorded through OCI. In addition, Corebridge adjusts for the cumulative unrealized gains and losses related to Fortitude Re’s Funds Withheld Assets, and DTA (Adjusted Common Shareholders’ Equity).

Adjusted After-tax Income Attributablefunds withheld assets since these fair value movements are economically transferred to Life and Retirementis derived by subtracting attributed interest expense, income tax expense and attributed dividends on preferred stock from APTI. Attributed debt and the related interest expense and dividends on preferred stock are calculated based on our internal allocation model. Tax expense or benefit is calculated based on an internal attribution methodology that considers among other things the taxing jurisdiction in which the segments conduct business, as well as the deductibility of expenses in those jurisdictions.Fortitude Re.

Core Adjusted Attributed Common Equityis an attribution of AIG’s Adjusted Common Shareholders’ Equity to these segments based on our internal capital model, which incorporates the segments’ respective risk profiles. Adjusted Attributed Common Equity represents our best estimates based on current facts and circumstances and will change over time.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions, unless otherwise noted)20232022
Actual or annualized net income (loss) attributable to Corebridge shareholders (a)$1,104 $8,159 
Actual or annualized adjusted after-tax operating income attributable to Corebridge shareholders (b)2,647 2,371 
Average Corebridge shareholders’ equity (c)10,326 15,497 
Less: Average AOCI(15,773)(8,143)
Add: Average cumulative unrealized gains and losses related to Fortitude Re funds withheld assets(2,702)(919)
Average Adjusted Book Value (d)$23,397 $22,721 
Return on Average Equity (a/c)10.7 %52.6 %
Adjusted RoAE (b/d)11.3 %10.4 %

Life and Retirement Adjusted Segment Common Equityis based on segment equity adjusted for the attribution of debt and preferred stock (Segment Common Equity) and is consistent with AIG’s Adjusted Common Shareholders’ Equity definition.

Core Return on Common Equity—Adjusted After-tax Income (Adjusted Return on Attributed Common Equity)is used to show the rate of return on Adjusted Attributed Common Equity.nCorebridge Normalized Adjusted Return on Attributed CommonAverage Equity (RoAE) is derived by dividing actual or annualized Adjusted After-tax IncomeAATOI by average Adjusted Attributed Common Equity.

LifeBook Value. AATOI and Retirement Return onaverage Adjusted Segment Common Equity—Adjusted After-tax Income (Return on Adjusted Segment Common Equity)is used to show the rate ofBook Value are normalized for annual actuarial assumptions update, litigation matters, and (better)/ worse than expected return on Adjusted Segment Common Equity. Return on Adjusted Segment Common Equity is derived by dividing actual or annualized Adjusted After-tax Income by Average Adjusted Segment Common Equity.

Core Normalized Return on Attributed Common Equity further adjusts Adjusted Return on Attributed Common Equitybusiness transactions. The measures are also adjusted for the effects of certain volatile or market-related items. We believe this measure is useful to investors for performance management because it presents the trends in Adjusted Return on Attributed Common Equity without the impact of certain items that can experience volatility in our short-term results. Normalized Returnmacroeconomic and market factors such as variances to expected return on Attributed Common Equity is derived by excluding the following tax-adjusted effects from Adjusted Return on Attributed Common Equity: the difference between actual andalternative investments, expected (1) catastrophe losses, (2) alternative investment returns, (3) Direct Investment Book and Global Capital Markets returns, (4) fair value changes on fixed maturity securities;securities, foreign exchange gains (losses), embedded derivative gains (losses), and changes in fair value for market risk benefits.
nCorebridge Diluted Normalized AATOI per Share The measure will be and is normalized for annual actuarial assumptions update, of actuarial assumptions;litigation matters, and prior year loss reserve development.

Life and Retirement Normalized Return(better)/ worse than expected return on Adjusted Segment Common Equityfurther adjusts Return on Adjusted Segment Common Equity for the effects of certain volatile or market-related items. We believe thisbusiness transactions. The measure is useful to investorsalso adjusted for performance management because it presents the trends in Return on Adjusted Segment Common Equity without the impact of certain items that can experience volatility in our short-term results. Normalized Returnmacroeconomic and market factors such as variances to expected return on Adjusted Segment Common Equity is derived by excluding the following tax-adjusted effects from Return on Adjusted Segment Common Equity: the difference between

A-2 2021 Proxy Statement

Appendix ANon-GAAP Financial Measures

actual andalternative investments, expected (1) alternative investment returns, (2) fair value changes on fixed maturity securities;securities, foreign exchange gains (losses), embedded derivative gains (losses), and update of actuarial assumptions. We also excluded COVID-19 mortality,changes in fair value for market risk benefits.

nCorebridge GOErepresents Corebridge GOE on an adjusted pre-tax operating income basis less certain legal settlements and other business factors in 2020.

one-time non-
recurring items.
Ratios:
AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENTA-5

Appendix A – Non-GAAP Financial Measures
nRatios: We, along with most property and casualty insurance companies, use the loss ratio, the expense ratio and the combined ratio as measures of underwriting performance. These ratios are relative measurements that describe, for every $100 of net premiums earned, the amount of losses and loss adjustment expenses (which for General Insurance excludes net loss reserve discount), and the amount of other underwriting expenses that would be incurred. A combined ratio of less than 100 indicates underwriting income and a combined ratio of over 100 indicates an underwriting loss. Our ratios are calculated using the relevant segment information calculated under GAAP, and thus may not be comparable to similar ratios calculated for regulatory reporting purposes. The underwriting environment varies across countries and products, as does the degree of litigation activity, all of which affect such ratios. In addition, investment returns, local taxes, cost of capital, regulation, product type and competition can have an effect on pricing and consequently on profitability as reflected in underwriting income and associated ratios.

nAccident Year Loss and Accident Year Combined Ratios, as Adjusted (Accident Year Loss Ratio, ex-CATs and Accident Year Combined Ratio, As Adjustedexcludesex-CATs) exclude catastrophe losses (CATs) and related reinstatement premiums, prior year development (PYD), net of premium adjustments, and the impact of reserve discounting. Natural catastrophe losses are generally weather or seismic events, in each case, having a net impact on AIG in excess of $10 million and man-made catastrophe losses, such as terrorism and civil disorders that exceed the $10 million threshold. We believe that as adjusted ratios are meaningful measures of our underwriting results on an ongoing basis as they exclude catastrophes and the impact of reserve discounting which are outside of management’s control. We also exclude prior year development to provide transparency related to current accident year results. Underwriting ratios are computed as follows:

Loss Ratio= Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred ÷ Net premiums earned (NPE)

Acquisition Ratio= Total acquisition expenses ÷ NPE

General Operating Expense Ratio= General operating expenses ÷ NPE

Expense Ratio = Acquisition ratio+ General operating expense ratio

Combined Ratio= Loss ratio + Expense ratio

CATs and Reinstatement Premiums Ratio = [Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred – (CATs)] ÷ [NPE +/(-) Reinstatement premiums related to catastrophes] – Loss ratio
Accident Year Loss Ratio, Asas Adjusted (AYLR)(AYLR, ex-CATs)= [Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred – CATs – PYD] ÷ [NPE +/(-) Reinstatement premiums related to catastrophes (CYRIPs) +/(-) RIPs related to priorPrior year catastrophes (PYRIPs) + (Additional) returned premium related to PYD on loss sensitive business ((AP)RP)premiums + Adjustment for ceded premiumspremium under reinsurance contracts related to prior accident years]

Accident Year Combined Ratio, Asas Adjusted (AYCR, ex-CATs)= AYLR ex-CATs + Expense ratio

Catastrophe Losses (CATs) and Reinstatement Premiums= [Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred – (CATs)] ÷ [NPE +/(-) CYRIPs] – Loss ratio

Prior Year Development net of (Additional) Return Premium Related to PYD on Loss Sensitive Businessreinsurance and prior year premiums Ratio = [Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred – CATs – PYD] ÷ [NPE +/(-) CYRIPsReinstatement premiums related to catastrophes +/(-) PYRIPs + (AP)RP]Prior year premiums] – Loss ratio – CATCATs and reinstatement premiums ratio

  Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
 
          
Underwriting Ratios  2020   2019   2018 
Loss ratio  71.0   65.2   75.7 
Catastrophe losses and reinstatement premiums  (10.3)  (4.8)  (10.5)
Prior year development  0.1   1.1   (1.5)
Adjustments for ceded premium under reinsurance contracts
and other
     0.1   0.3 
Accident year loss ratio, as adjusted  60.8   61.6   64.0 
Acquisition ratio  20.4   21.8   21.7 
General operating expense ratio  12.9   12.6   14.0 
Expense ratio  33.3   34.4   35.7 
Combined ratio  104.3   99.6   111.4 
Accident year combined ratio, as adjusted  94.1   96.0   99.7 

2021 Proxy StatementA-3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Underwriting Ratios General InsuranceYears Ended December 31,
2023202220212020
Loss ratio58.9 60.8 64.2 71.0 
Catastrophe losses and reinstatement premiums(4.3)(5.0)(5.4)(10.3)
Prior year development, net of reinsurance and prior year premiums1.4 1.8 0.6 0.1 
Accident year loss ratio, as Adjusted56.0 57.6 59.4 60.8 
Acquisition ratio19.5 19.3 19.6 20.4 
General operating expense ratio12.2 11.8 12.0 12.9 
Expense ratio31.7 31.1 31.6 33.3 
Combined ratio90.6 91.9 95.8 104.3 
AYCR, ex-CATs87.7 88.7 91.0 94.1 

A-6AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENT

Appendix ANon-GAAP Financial Measures

Accident Year Combined Ratio, As Adjusted, including Average Annual Lossesis derived by adding the average annual losses (AAL) expressed as a percentage of net premiums earned, to the Accident Year Combined Ratio, As Adjusted. The AAL is the mean of the probabilistic expected catastrophe loss distribution that is calculated based on our catastrophe model.
Underwriting Ratios Commercial InsuranceYears Ended December 31,
20232022
Loss ratio60.3 63.5 
Catastrophe losses and reinstatement premiums(5.0)(6.1)
Prior year development, net of reinsurance and prior year premiums1.2 1.0 
Accident year loss ratio, as Adjusted56.5 58.4 
Acquisition ratio15.9 15.8 
General operating expense ratio10.9 10.3 
Expense ratio26.8 26.1 
Combined ratio87.1 89.6 
Accident Year Combined Ratio, ex-CATs83.3 84.5 

Calendar Year Combined Ratio Improvement Relative to Peersrepresents General Insurance’s calendar year combined ratio compared to peers’ calendar year combined ratio computed using a weighted average based on the respective net earned premiums for each peer.

Headquarters DirectnAIG Parent Exit Run-rate General Operating Expenses (GOE): represents AIG operating costs that can be categorized into three buckets: (1) Activity driven services – represents activities that are centrally managed to gain efficiency and are charged to businesses on a usage basis; (2) Centralized support groups – Support groups needed by AIG to run the business or protect stakeholder needs and would be allocated to the business on some overall driver methodology (e.g., is technology security groups); and (3) Retained Costs – costs that are not allocated to the businesses as such costs are incurred generally on the basisParent GOE inclusive of AIG being a public company. In 2020, we excluded the one-time COVID-19 assistance payments to employees and refund of business unit deductibles for Corporate insurance programs.

AIG 200 Cumulative Run-rate Net GOE Savings: exit run-rate savings that will emerge over time astime.
nNet Premiums Written on a direct result of actions taken under the AIG 200 program.

Life and Retirement GOE (Net)represents GOEComparable Basis reflects year-over-year comparison on an adjusted pre-tax incomea constant dollar basis excluding the impact of resegmentation, normalized for certain legal settlements and other business factors.

Investments Direct GOErepresents the direct costs associated with the day-to-day activities of directly managing AIG’s invested assets. Examples of costs include portfolio management and administration.

Core Normalized Book Value per Common Shareis derived by dividing Core Adjusted Attributed Common Equity adjusted for cumulative dividends paid to common shareholders over the three-year LTI performance periodInternational lag elimination, the sale of CRS and the tax-adjusted effectssale of (1) inception to date changes in the Adverse Development Cover reinsurance agreement deferred gain (including inception to date amortization related to the deferred gain) resulting from changes in the underlying loss reserves, (2) the difference between actual and expected catastrophe losses, and (3) the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, by total common shares outstanding.Validus Re.

Year Ended December 31, 2023
Net Premiums Written - Comparable BasisGeneral
Insurance
Global
Commercial
Lines
Increase (decrease) as reported in U.S. dollars4.7 %4.4 %
Foreign exchange effect1.5 0.6 
Lag elimination impact0.4 0.6 
Validus Re(1.8)(2.6)
CRS1.8 2.4 
Increase (decrease) on comparable basis6.6 %5.4 %
nRelative Tangible Book Value Per Common Share (BVPS)represents Tangible book value per common share compared to peers’ Tangible book value per common share. Tangible book value per common share is derived by dividing Total AIG common shareholders’ equity, excluding goodwill, value of business acquired, value of distribution channel acquired and other intangible assets, by total common shares outstanding.

A-4 2021 Proxy Statement

Appendix BAmerican International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Appendix B 

AIG 2024 PROXY STATEMENTA-7

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

2021 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

2021 Proxy StatementB-1

Appendix BAmerican International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan



AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
2021 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

ARTICLE I
GENERAL

1.1PurposeB-3
1.2DefinitionsB-3
1.3AdministrationB-5
1.4Persons Eligible for AwardsB-6
1.5Types of AwardsB-6
1.6Shares of Common Stock Available for Stock-Based AwardsB-6

ARTICLE II
AWARDS UNDER THE PLAN

2.1Agreements Evidencing AwardsB-7
2.2No Rights as a ShareholderB-7
2.3OptionsB-8
2.4Stock Appreciation RightsB-9
2.5Restricted SharesB-9
2.6Restricted Stock UnitsB-10
2.7Other Stock-Based AwardsB-10
2.8Cash-Based AwardsB-10
2.9Dividend Equivalent RightsB-10
2.10Related Option TransactionsB-10
2.11Change in Control ProvisionsB-10
2.12Minimum VestingB-11

ARTICLE III
MISCELLANEOUS

3.1Amendment of the PlanB-11
3.2Tax WithholdingB-11
3.3Required Consents and LegendsB-12
3.4ClawbackB-12
3.5Right of OffsetB-12
3.6Nonassignability; No HedgingB-12
3.7Successor EntityB-12
3.8Right of Discharge ReservedB-13
3.9Nature of PaymentsB-13
3.10Non-Uniform DeterminationsB-13
3.11Other Payments or AwardsB-13
3.12Plan HeadingsB-13
3.13Termination of PlanB-13
3.14Section 409AB-13
3.15Governing LawB-14
3.16Severability; Entire AgreementB-14
3.17Waiver of ClaimsB-14
3.18No Liability With Respect to Tax Qualification or Adverse Tax TreatmentB-15
3.19No Third Party BeneficiariesB-15
3.20Successors and Assigns of AIGB-15
3.21Date of Adoption and Approval of ShareholdersB-15

B-2 2021 Proxy Statement

01_424782-1_Covers_V2_IBC.jpg

Appendix BAmerican International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan


AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
2021 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

ARTICLE I

GENERAL

1.1 Purpose. The purpose of the American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan is (1) to attract, retain and motivate officers, directors and key employees of the Company (as defined below), compensate them for their contributions to the Company and encourage them to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company, (2) to align the interests of officers, directors and key employees with those of shareholders of the Company and (3) to assist the Company in ensuring that its compensation program does not provide incentives to take imprudent risks.

This 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan replaces the American International Group, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (as amended to the Effective Date, the “2013 Plan”) for Awards granted on or after the Effective Date. Awards may not be granted under the 2013 Plan beginning on the Effective Date, but this 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan will not affect the terms or conditions of any stock appreciation right, restricted stock, restricted stock unit or other award made under the 2013 Plan before the Effective Date.

1.2 Definitions. For purposes of this 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the following terms have the meanings set forth below:

2013 Plan” has the meaning set forth in Section 1.1.

Acquisition Awards” has the meaning set forth in Section 1.6.2.

AIG” means American International Group, Inc. or a successor entity contemplated by Section 3.7.

Award” means an award made pursuant to the Plan.

Award Agreement” means the written or electronic document that evidences each Award and sets forth its terms and conditions. As determined by the Committee, an Award Agreement may be required to be executed or acknowledged by a Grantee as a condition to receiving an Award or the benefits under an Award.

Board” means the Board of Directors of AIG.

Business Combination” means a merger, consolidation, mandatory share exchange or similar form of corporate transaction involving AIG.

Certificate” means a stock certificate (or other appropriate document or evidence of ownership) representing shares of Common Stock.

Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) the Incumbent Directors cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board, provided that any person becoming a Director subsequent to the Effective Date, whose election or nomination for election was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Incumbent Directors then on the Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee for director, without written objection to such nomination) shall be an Incumbent Director; provided, however, that no individual initially elected or nominated as a Director as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to directors or as a result of any other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of any person other than the Board shall be deemed to be an Incumbent Director; (b) any “person” (as such term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act and as used in Sections 13(d)(3) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act), is or becomes a “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of the Company Voting Securities; provided, however, that the event described in this clause (b) shall not be deemed to be a Change in Control by virtue of an acquisition of Company Voting Securities: (i) by AIG or any subsidiary of AIG; (ii) by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by AIG or any subsidiary of AIG; or (iii) by any underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such

2021 Proxy StatementB-3



Appendix BAmerican International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan


securities; (c) the consummation of a Business Combination that results in any person becoming the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of the total voting power of the outstanding voting securities eligible to elect directors of the entity resulting from such Business Combination; (d) the consummation of a sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets (other than to an affiliate of the Company); or (e) the approval by AIG’s shareholders of a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control shall not be deemed to occur solely because (A) any person holds or acquires beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the Company Voting Securities as a result of a “Company share repurchase program” or other acquisition of Company Voting Securities by the Company which reduces the total number of Company Voting Securities outstanding; provided that if after such acquisition by the Company such person becomes the beneficial owner of additional Company Voting Securities that increases the percentage of outstanding Company Voting Securities beneficially owned by such person, a Change in Control shall then occur or (B) the consummation of a sale of all or substantially all (or a subset) of the assets and/or operations of the Life and Retirement business (or any similar transaction).

Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, or any successor thereto, and the applicable rulings and regulations thereunder.

Committee” means the committee appointed by the Board to administer the Plan pursuant to Section 1.3, and, to the extent the Board determines it is appropriate for Awards under the Plan to qualify for the exemption available under Rule 16b-3(d)(1) or Rule 16b-3(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, shall be a committee or subcommittee of the Board composed of two or more members, each of whom is a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3. Unless otherwise determined by the Board, the Committee shall be the Compensation and Management Resources Committee of the Board.

Common Stock” means the common stock of AIG, par value $2.50 per share, and any other securities or property issued in exchange therefor or in lieu thereof pursuant to Section 1.6.4.

Company” means AIG and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Company Voting Securities” means, as of a given date, AIG’s then outstanding securities eligible to vote for the election of the Board.

Consent” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.3.2.

Covered Person” has the meaning set forth in Section 1.3.3.

Director” means a member of the Board or a member of the board of directors of a consolidated subsidiary of AIG.

Effective Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.21.

Employee” means an employee of the Company.

Employment” means a Grantee’s performance of services for the Company, as an Employee, as determined by the Committee. The terms “employ” and “employed” will have correlative meanings.

Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, or any successor thereto, and the applicable rules and regulations thereunder.

Fair Market Value” means, with respect to a share of Common Stock (or option or stock appreciation right in respect of a share of Common Stock) on any day, the fair market value as determined in accordance with a valuation methodology approved by the Committee.

Grantee” means a person who receives an Award.

Incentive Stock Option” means an option to purchase shares of Common Stock that is intended to be designated as an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of Sections 421 and 422 of the Code, as now

B-4 2021 Proxy Statement

Appendix BAmerican International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan



constituted or subsequently amended, or pursuant to a successor of the Code, and which is designated as an Incentive Stock Option in the applicable Award Agreement.

Incumbent Directors” means the individuals who constitute the Board on the Effective Date.

Officer” means an Employee who is an “officer” of AIG within the meaning of Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act.

Plan” means this American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time.

Plan Action” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.3.1.

Section 409A” means Section 409A of the Code, including any amendments or successor provisions to that section, and any regulations and other administrative guidance relating thereto, in each case as they may be from time to time amended or interpreted through further administrative guidance.

Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended from time to time, or any successor thereto, and the applicable rules and regulations thereunder.

Successor entity” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.7.

1.3 Administration.

1.3.1 The Committee will administer the Plan. The Committee is authorized, subject to the provisions of the Plan, to establish such rules and regulations as it deems necessary for the proper administration of the Plan and to make such determinations and interpretations and to take such action in connection with the Plan and any Award granted thereunder as it deems necessary or advisable. All determinations and interpretations made by the Committee will be final, binding and conclusive on all Grantees and on their legal representatives and beneficiaries. The Committee will have the authority, in its absolute discretion, to determine the persons who will receive Awards, the time when Awards will be granted, the terms of such Awards and the number of shares of Common Stock, if any, which will be subject to such Awards. Unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, the Committee reserves the authority, in its absolute discretion, (a) to amend any outstanding Award Agreement in any respect, whether or not the rights of the Grantee of such Award are adversely affected (but subject to Sections 2.3.6, 2.4.5, and 3.14.1), including, without limitation, to accelerate the time or times at which the Award becomes vested, unrestricted or may be exercised, to waive or amend any restrictions or conditions set forth in such Award Agreement, or to impose new restrictions and conditions, or to reflect a change in the Grantee’s circumstances or to modify, amend or adjust the terms and conditions of performance goals, and (b) to determine whether, to what extent and under what circumstances and method or methods (i) Awards may be (A) settled in cash, shares of Common Stock, other securities, other Awards or other property, (B) exercised or (C) canceled, forfeited or suspended, (ii) shares of Common Stock, other securities, other Awards or other property, and other amounts payable with respect to an Award may be deferred either automatically or at the election of the Grantee thereof or of the Committee and (iii) Awards may be settled by the Company or any of its designees. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Board may, in its sole discretion, at any time and from time to time, grant Awards or administer the Plan, in which case the Board will have all of the authority and responsibility granted to the Committee herein.

1.3.2 Actions of the Committee may be taken by the vote of a majority of its members. To the extent not inconsistent with applicable law and applicable rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange, (a) the Committee may delegate any of its powers under the Plan to a subcommittee of the Committee or to one of its members, (b) the Committee may allocate among its members any of its administrative responsibilities and (c) notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Committee may delegate to one or more officers of AIG designated by the Committee from time to time the determination of Awards (and related administrative responsibilities) to Employees who are not Officers.

1.3.3 No Director or Employee exercising each such person’s responsibilities under the Plan (each such person, a “Covered Person”) will have any liability to any person (including any Grantee) for any action taken or

2021 Proxy StatementB-5


Appendix BAmerican International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan


omitted to be taken or any determination made in good faith with respect to the Plan or any Award. Each Covered Person will be indemnified and held harmless by AIG against and from any loss, cost, liability or expense (including attorneys’ fees) that may be imposed upon or incurred by such Covered Person in connection with or resulting from any action, suit or proceeding to which such Covered Person may be a party or in which such Covered Person may be involved by reason of any action taken or omitted to be taken under the Plan or any Award Agreement and against and from any and all amounts paid by such Covered Person, with AIG’s approval, in settlement thereof, or paid by such Covered Person in satisfaction of any judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding against such Covered Person, provided that AIG will have the right, at its own expense, to assume and defend any such action, suit or proceeding and, once AIG gives notice of its intent to assume the defense, AIG will have sole control over such defense with counsel of AIG’s choice. To the extent any taxable expense reimbursement under this paragraph is subject to Section 409A, (a) the amount thereof eligible in one taxable year shall not affect the amount eligible in any other taxable year; (b) in no event shall any expenses be reimbursed after the last day of the taxable year following the taxable year in which the Covered Person incurred such expenses; and (c) in no event shall any right to reimbursement be subject to liquidation or exchange for another benefit. The foregoing right of indemnification will not be available to a Covered Person to the extent that a court of competent jurisdiction in a final judgment or other final adjudication, in either case, not subject to further appeal, determines that the acts or omissions of such Covered Person giving rise to the indemnification claim resulted from such Covered Person’s bad faith, fraud or willful misconduct. The foregoing right of indemnification will not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which Covered Persons may be entitled under AIG’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation or By-laws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any other power that AIG may have to indemnify such persons or hold them harmless.

1.4 Persons Eligible for Awards. Awards under the Plan may be made to current Employees or Directors or, solely with respect to their final year of service, former Employees.

1.5 Types of Awards. Awards under the Plan may be cash-based or stock-based. Stock-based Awards may be in the form of any of the following, in each case in respect of Common Stock: (a) stock options, (b) stock appreciation rights, (c) restricted shares (including performance restricted shares), (d) restricted stock units (including performance restricted stock units), (e) dividend equivalent rights and (f) other equity-based or equity-related Awards (including, without limitation, the grant or offer for sale of unrestricted shares of Common Stock) that the Committee determines to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan and the interests of the Company. Cash-based Awards may be in the form of performance-based awards and other cash awards (including, without limitation, retainers and meeting-based fees) that the Committee determines to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan and the interests of the Company.

1.6 Shares of Common Stock Available for Stock-Based Awards.

1.6.1 Common Stock Subject to the Plan. Subject to the other provisions of this Section 1.6, the total number of shares of Common Stock that may be granted under the Plan is eight million, one hundred thousand (8,100,000) plus the number of authorized shares of Common Stock remaining available under the 2013 Plan as of the Effective Date and any additional shares that become available for issuance under the 2013 Plan in accordance with Section 1.6.2. Such shares of Common Stock may, in the discretion of the Committee, be either authorized but unissued shares or shares previously issued and reacquired by AIG. Solely for the purpose of determining the number of shares of Common Stock available for grant of Incentive Stock Options under the Plan, the total number of shares of Common Stock shall be eight million, one hundred thousand (8,100,000) without regard to the share counting provisions contained in Section 1.6.2.

1.6.2 Share Counting. Each share underlying a stock option, stock appreciation right, restricted share, restricted stock unit and other equity-based Award or equity-related Award will count as one share of Common Stock. Shares of Common Stock subject to awards that are assumed, converted or substituted under the Plan as a result of the Company’s acquisition of another company (including by way of merger, combination or similar transaction) (“Acquisition Awards”) will not count against the number of shares that may be granted under the Plan. Available shares under a shareholder approved plan of an acquired company (as appropriately adjusted to reflect the transaction) may be used for Awards under the Plan and do not reduce the maximum number of shares available for grant under the Plan, subject to applicable stock exchange requirements.

B-6 2021 Proxy Statement



Appendix B American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan


Shares subject to an Award that is forfeited, expires or is settled for cash (in whole or in part), to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration or cash settlement shall be available for future grants of Awards under the Plan and shall be added back in the same number of shares as were deducted in respect of the grant of such Award. In addition, the number of shares of Common Stock underlying awards granted and outstanding under the 2013 Plan that are forfeited, expire, terminate or otherwise lapse or are settled for cash on or after the Effective Date, in whole or in part, without the delivery of Common Stock will be added to the number of shares available for grant under the Plan. The payment of dividend equivalent rights in cash in conjunction with any outstanding Awards shall not be counted against the shares available for issuance under the Plan.

In no event shall the following shares of Common Stock become available for issuance in connection with Awards issued under the Plan: (i) shares of Common Stock tendered or withheld as payment of the exercise price of an option; (b) shares of Common Stock tendered or withheld as payment of withholding taxes with respect to an Award; (c) any shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under a stock appreciation right that exceed the number of shares actually issued upon exercise; and (d) shares of Common Stock reacquired by the Company using amounts received upon the exercise of an option.

1.6.3 Director Awards. In order to retain and compensate Directors for their services, and to strengthen the alignment of their interests with those of the shareholders of the Company, the Plan permits the grant of cash-based and stock-based awards to Directors. Aggregate Awards to any one non-employee Director in respect of any calendar year, solely with respect to his or her service as a Director, may not exceed $900,000 based on aggregate value of cash Awards and Fair Market Value of stock-based Awards, in each case determined as of the date of grant.

1.6.4 Adjustments. The Committee shall adjust the number of shares of Common Stock authorized pursuant to Section 1.6.1 (and any limits on the number of stock-based Awards that may be granted to any Grantee under this Plan) and adjust equitably the terms of any outstanding Awards (including, without limitation, the number of shares of Common Stock covered by each outstanding Award, the type of property to which the Award is subject and the exercise or strike price of any Award), in each case in such manner as it deems appropriate (including, without limitation, unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, by payment of cash) to preserve and prevent the enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available to Grantees, for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock resulting from a recapitalization, spin-off, split-off, stock split, stock dividend, extraordinary cash dividend, combination or exchange of shares of Common Stock, merger, consolidation, rights offering, separation, reorganization or liquidation, or any other change in the corporate structure or shares of AIG; provided that no such adjustment shall be made if or to the extent that it would cause any outstanding Award to fail to comply with Section 409A. After any adjustment made pursuant to this Section 1.6.4, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to each outstanding Award will be rounded down to the nearest whole number. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, decline to adjust the terms of any outstanding Award if it determines that such adjustment would violate applicable law or result in adverse tax consequences to the Grantee or to the Company.

ARTICLE II

AWARDS UNDER THE PLAN

2.1 Agreements Evidencing Awards. Each stock-based Award and, to the extent determined appropriate by the Committee, cash-based Award granted under the Plan will be evidenced by an Award Agreement that will contain such provisions and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate. Unless otherwise provided herein, the Committee may grant Awards in tandem with or, subject to Sections 2.3.6, 2.4.5 and 3.14.1, in substitution for or satisfaction of any other Award or Awards granted under the Plan or any award granted under any other plan of AIG. By accepting an Award pursuant to the Plan, a Grantee thereby agrees that the Award will be subject to all of the terms and provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement.

2.2 No Rights as a Shareholder. No Grantee (or other person potentially having rights pursuant to an Award) shall have any of the rights of a shareholder of AIG with respect to shares of Common Stock subject to an Award until the delivery of such shares (or in the case of an Award of restricted or unrestricted shares of

2021 Proxy StatementB-7



Appendix BAmerican International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan


Common Stock, the grant or registration in the name of the Grantee of such shares pursuant to the applicable Award Agreement, but then only as the Committee may include in the applicable Award Agreement). Except as otherwise provided in Section 1.6.4 or pursuant to the applicable Award Agreement, no adjustments will be made for dividends, distributions or other rights (whether ordinary or extraordinary, and whether in cash, Common Stock, other securities or other property) for which the record date is before the date the Certificates for the shares are delivered.

2.3 Options.

2.3.1 Grant. Stock options may be granted to eligible recipients in such number and at such times during the term of the Plan as the Committee or the Board may determine, subject to the limits on grants set forth in Section 2.3.7.

2.3.2 Incentive Stock Options. At the time of grant, the Committee will determine (a) whether all or any part of a stock option granted to an eligible employee will be an Incentive Stock Option and (b) the number of shares subject to such Incentive Stock Option; provided, however, that (i) the aggregate fair market value (determined as of the time the option is granted) of the stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by an eligible employee during any calendar year (under all such plans of AIG and of any subsidiary corporation of AIG) will not exceed $100,000 and (ii) no Incentive Stock Option (other than an Incentive Stock Option that may be assumed or issued by the Company in connection with a transaction to which Section 424(a) of the Code applies) may be granted to a person who is not eligible to receive an Incentive Stock Option under the Code. The form of any stock option which is entirely or in part an Incentive Stock Option will clearly indicate that such stock option is an Incentive Stock Option or, if applicable, the number of shares subject to the Incentive Stock Option.

2.3.3 Exercise Price. The exercise price per share with respect to each stock option will be determined by the Committee, but, except as otherwise permitted by Section 1.6.4 or in the case of an Acquisition Award, may never be less than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock. Unless otherwise noted in the Award Agreement, the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock will be its closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant of the Award of stock options.

2.3.4 Term of Stock Option. In no event will any stock option be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date on which the stock option is granted.

2.3.5 Exercise of Stock Option and Payment for Shares. Subject to Section 2.12, the shares of Common Stock covered by each stock option may not be purchased for one year after the date on which the stock option is granted (except in the case of termination of Employment due to death, disability or retirement), but thereafter may be purchased in such installments as will be determined in the Award Agreement at the time the stock option is granted. Subject to any limitations in the applicable Award Agreement, any shares not purchased on the applicable installment date may be purchased thereafter at any time before the final expiration of the stock option. To exercise a stock option, the Grantee must give written notice to AIG specifying the number of shares to be purchased and accompanied by payment of the full purchase price therefor in cash or by certified or official bank check or in another form as determined by the Company, including: (a) personal check, (b) shares of Common Stock, valued as of the exercise date, of the same class as those to be granted by exercise of the stock option, (c) any other form of consideration approved by the Company and permitted by applicable law and (d) any combination of the foregoing. Any person exercising a stock option will make such representations and agreements and furnish such information as the Committee may in its discretion deem necessary or desirable to assure compliance by AIG, on terms acceptable to AIG, with the provisions of the Securities Act, and any other applicable legal requirements. If a Grantee so requests, shares purchased may be issued in the name of the Grantee and another jointly with the right of survivorship.

2.3.6 Repricing. Except as otherwise permitted by Section 1.6.4, reducing the exercise price of stock options issued and outstanding under the Plan, including through amendment, cancellation in exchange for the grant of a substitute Award or repurchase for cash or other consideration (in each case that has the effect of reducing the exercise price), will require approval of the shareholders.

B-8 2021 Proxy Statement

Appendix B American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

2.4 Stock Appreciation Rights.

2.4.1 Grant. Stock appreciation rights may be granted to eligible recipients in such number and at such times during the term of the Plan as the Committee or the Board may determine, subject to the limits on grants set forth in Section 2.4.6.

2.4.2 Exercise Price. The exercise price per share with respect to each stock appreciation right will be determined by the Committee but, except as otherwise permitted by Section 1.6.4 or in the case of an Acquisition Award, may never be less than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock. Unless otherwise noted in the Award Agreement, the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock will be its closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant of the Award of stock appreciation rights.

2.4.3 Term of Stock Appreciation Right. In no event will any stock appreciation right be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date on which the stock appreciation right is granted.

2.4.4 Exercise of Stock Appreciation Right and Delivery of Shares. Subject to Section 2.12, each stock appreciation right may not be exercised for one year after the date on which the stock appreciation right is granted (except in the case of termination of Employment due to death, disability or retirement), but thereafter may be exercised in such installments as may be determined in the Award Agreement at the time the stock appreciation right is granted. Subject to any limitations in the applicable Award Agreement, any stock appreciation rights not exercised on the applicable installment date may be exercised thereafter at any time before the final expiration of the stock appreciation right. To exercise a stock appreciation right, the Grantee must give written notice to AIG specifying the number of stock appreciation rights to be exercised. Upon exercise of stock appreciation rights, subject to any limitations in the applicable Award Agreement, shares of Common Stock or cash, in the Committee’s discretion, with a Fair Market Value or in an amount equal to (a) the excess of (i) the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the date of exercise over (ii) the exercise price of such stock appreciation right multiplied by (b) the number of stock appreciation rights exercised will be delivered to the Grantee. Any person exercising a stock appreciation right will make such representations and agreements and furnish such information as the Committee may, in its discretion, deem necessary or desirable to assure compliance by AIG, on terms acceptable to AIG, with the provisions of the Securities Act and any other applicable legal requirements. If a Grantee so requests, shares purchased may be issued in the name of the Grantee and another jointly with the right of survivorship.

2.4.5 Repricing. Except as otherwise permitted by Section 1.6.4, reducing the exercise price of stock appreciation rights issued and outstanding under the Plan, including through amendment, cancellation in exchange for the grant of a substitute Award or repurchase for cash or other consideration (in each case that has the effect of reducing the exercise price), will require approval of the shareholders.

2.5 Restricted Shares.

2.5.1 Grants. The Committee may grant or offer for sale restricted shares in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine, including, without limitation, the achievement of performance goals. In the event that a Certificate is issued in respect of restricted shares, such Certificate may be registered in the name of the Grantee but will be held by AIG or its designated agent until the time the restrictions lapse.

2.5.2 Right to Vote and Receive Dividends on Restricted Shares. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 2.5.2, no dividends will be paid at a time when any performance-based goals or time-based vesting requirements that apply to an Award of restricted shares have not been satisfied. Unless the applicable Award Agreement provides otherwise, each Grantee of an Award of restricted shares will, during the period of restriction, have all of the rights of a shareholder holding the class or series of Common Stock that is the subject of the restricted shares, except as otherwise provided herein, including full voting rights. During the period of restriction, all ordinary cash dividends (if any, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion) paid upon any restricted share will be retained by the Company for the account of the relevant Grantee. Such dividends will revert back to the Company if for any reason the restricted share upon which such dividends

2021 Proxy StatementB-9

Appendix BAmerican International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

were paid reverts back to the Company. Upon the expiration of the period of restriction, all such dividends made on such restricted share and retained by the Company will be paid to the relevant Grantee. Additional shares or other property distributed to the Grantee in respect of restricted shares, as dividends or otherwise, will be subject to the same restrictions applicable to such restricted shares.

2.6 Restricted Stock Units. The Committee may grant Awards of restricted stock units in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine, including, without limitation, the achievement of performance goals. A Grantee of a restricted stock unit will have only the rights of a general unsecured creditor of AIG until delivery of shares of Common Stock, cash or other securities or property is made as specified in the applicable Award Agreement. On the delivery date specified in the Award Agreement, the Grantee of each restricted stock unit not previously forfeited or terminated will receive one share of Common Stock, or cash, securities or other property equal in value to a share of Common Stock or a combination thereof, as specified by the Committee.

2.7 Other Stock-Based Awards. The Committee may grant other types of equity-based or equity-related Awards (including, without limitation, the grant or offer for sale of unrestricted shares of Common Stock) in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine. Such Awards may entail the transfer of actual shares of Common Stock to Award recipients or may be settled in cash, and may include Awards designed to comply with or take advantage of the applicable local laws of jurisdictions other than the United States.

2.8 Cash-Based Awards. The Committee may grant cash-based Awards in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine.

2.9 Dividend Equivalent Rights. The Committee may include in the Award Agreement with respect to any Award, other than stock options and stock appreciation rights, a dividend equivalent right entitling the Grantee to receive amounts equal to all or any portion of the dividends that would be paid on the shares of Common Stock covered by such Award if such shares had been delivered pursuant to such Award. The grantee of a dividend equivalent right will have only the rights of a general unsecured creditor of AIG until payment of such amounts is made as specified in the applicable Award Agreement. In the event such a provision is included in an Award Agreement, the Committee will, subject to Section 3.14.1, determine whether such payments will be made in cash, in shares of Common Stock or in another form, whether they will be conditioned upon the exercise or vesting of the Award to which they relate (provided that in no event may such payments be made unless and until the Award to which they relate vests), the time or times at which they will be made, and such other terms and conditions as the Committee may deem appropriate. No payments will be made in respect of any dividend equivalent right at a time when any performance-based goals or time-based vesting requirements that apply to the dividend equivalent right or Award that is granted in connection with a dividend equivalent right have not been satisfied.

2.10 Related Option Transactions. The Committee may grant put options and enter into call options relating to Awards, including an Award of unrestricted Common Stock. The put options may permit the Grantee, at the Grantee’s option, to sell the Award back to the Company at such times, on such terms and conditions and at such prices as the Committee or the Board may determine. The call options may require the Grantee, at the Company’s election, to sell the Award back to the Company at such times, on such terms and conditions and at such prices as the Committee or the Board may determine. The Committee may determine to issue an Award and any related put option and enter into any related call option as a single non-separable unit.

2.11 Change in Control Provisions.

2.11.1 Except as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, in the event that within two years following a Change in Control a Grantee’s Employment is terminated by AIG without “cause” (as defined in the Award Agreement) or by the Grantee for “good reason” (as defined in the Award Agreement), any outstanding unvested Award held by such Grantee shall vest as with respect to any service-based vesting requirement. Except as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, following a Change in Control any performance goals with respect to an outstanding Award and for which the performance period ends after the Change in Control shall be deemed achieved at target level. In addition, in the event of a Change in Control

B-10 2021 Proxy Statement

Appendix B American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

where all stock options and stock appreciation rights are settled for an amount (as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee) of cash or securities, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, terminate any stock option or stock appreciation right for which the exercise price is equal to or exceeds the per share value of the consideration to be paid in the Change in Control transaction without payment of consideration therefor.

2.11.2 Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement and except as otherwise determined by the Committee, in the event of a Business Combination of AIG with or into any successor entity or any transaction in which another person or entity acquires all of the issued and outstanding Common Stock of AIG, or all or substantially all of the assets of AIG as an entirety, outstanding Awards may be assumed or a substantially equivalent Award may be substituted by such successor entity or a parent or subsidiary of such successor entity, and such an assumption or substitution shall not be deemed to violate this Plan or any provision of any Award Agreement.

2.12 Minimum Vesting. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, Awards granted under the Plan (other than cash-based awards) shall vest no earlier than the first anniversary of the date on which the Award is granted; provided, however, that the following Awards shall not be subject to the foregoing minimum vesting requirement: any (i) Acquisition Awards, (ii) shares of Common Stock delivered in lieu of fully vested cash obligations, (iii) Awards to Non-Employee Directors that vest on the earlier of the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and the next annual meeting of shareholders which is at least 50 weeks after the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting, and (iv) any additional Awards the Committee may grant, up to a maximum of five percent (5%) of the available share reserve authorized for issuance under the Plan pursuant to Section 1.6.1 (subject to adjustment under Section 1.6.4); provided, further, that vesting may accelerate in connection with death, disability, retirement, a Change in Control or other involuntary termination.

ARTICLE III

MISCELLANEOUS

3.1 Amendment of the Plan.

3.1.1 Unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, the Board may from time to time suspend, discontinue, revise or amend the Plan in any respect whatsoever, including in any manner that adversely affects the rights, duties or obligations of any Grantee of an Award.

3.1.2 Unless otherwise determined by the Board, shareholder approval of any suspension, discontinuance, revision or amendment will be obtained only to the extent necessary to comply with any applicable laws, regulations or rules of a securities exchange or self-regulatory agency, except that shareholder approval shall be required for any amendment to the Plan (i) that materially increases the benefits available under the Plan, (ii) to reduce the exercise price of stock options or stock appreciation rights issued and outstanding under the Plan, including through amendment, cancellation in exchange for the grant of a substitute Award or repurchase for cash or other consideration (in each case that has the effect of reducing the exercise price) or (iii) to permit the sale or other disposition of an Award of a stock option or a stock appreciation right to an unrelated third party for value.

3.2 Tax Withholding. Grantees shall be solely responsible for any applicable taxes (including, without limitation, income and excise taxes) and penalties, and any interest that accrues thereon, that they incur in connection with the receipt, vesting or exercise of any Award. As a condition to the delivery of any shares of Common Stock pursuant to any Award or the lifting or lapse of restrictions on any Award, or in connection with any other event that gives rise to a federal or other governmental tax withholding obligation on the part of the Company relating to an Award (including, without limitation, FICA tax), unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, (a) the Company may deduct or withhold (or cause to be deducted or withheld) from any payment or distribution to a Grantee whether or not pursuant to the Plan (including shares of Common Stock otherwise deliverable) the minimum required to meet the tax withholding obligation up to the maximum statutory rate or (b) the Committee will be entitled to require that the Grantee remit cash to the Company (through payroll deduction or otherwise) or previously owned shares of Common Stock or other property, in each case in an amount sufficient in the opinion of the Company to satisfy such withholding obligation.

2021 Proxy StatementB-11

Appendix B American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

3.3 Required Consents and Legends.

3.3.1 If the Committee at any time determines that any Consent (as hereinafter defined) is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the granting of any Award, the delivery of shares of Common Stock or the delivery of any cash, securities or other property under the Plan, or the taking of any other action thereunder (each such action a “Plan Action”), then, subject to Section 3.14.2, such Plan Action will not be taken, in whole or in part, unless and until such Consent will have been effected or obtained to the full satisfaction of the Committee. The Committee may direct that any Certificate evidencing shares delivered pursuant to the Plan will bear a legend setting forth such restrictions on transferability as the Committee may determine to be necessary or desirable, and may advise the transfer agent to place a stop transfer order against any legended shares.

3.3.2 The term “Consent” as used in this Article III with respect to any Plan Action includes (a) any and all listings, registrations or qualifications in respect thereof upon any securities exchange or under any federal, state, or local law, or law, rule or regulation of a jurisdiction outside the United States, or any other matter, which the Committee may deem necessary or desirable to comply with the terms of any such listing, registration or qualification or to obtain an exemption from the requirement that any such listing, qualification or registration be made, (b) any and all other consents, clearances and approvals in respect of a Plan Action by any governmental or other regulatory body or any stock exchange or self-regulatory agency, (c) any applicable requirement of the Code, (d) any and all consents or authorizations required to comply with, or required to be obtained under, applicable local law, (e) any and all consents by the Grantee to the Company’s supplying to any third party recordkeeper of the Plan such personal information as the Committee deems advisable to administer the Plan and (f) any and all consents or other documentation required by the Committee. Nothing herein will require the Company to list, register or qualify the shares of Common Stock on any securities exchange.

3.4 Clawback. Awards under the Plan shall be subject to the clawback or recapture policy, if any, that the Company may adopt from time to time to the extent provided in such policy and, in accordance with such policy, may be subject to the requirement that the Awards be repaid to the Company after they have been distributed or paid to the Grantee.

3.5 Right of Offset. Except with respect to Awards that are intended to be “deferred compensation” subject to Section 409A, the Company will have the right to offset against its obligation to deliver shares of Common Stock (or cash, other securities or other property) under the Plan or any Award Agreement any outstanding amounts (including, without limitation, travel and entertainment or advance account balances, loans, repayment obligations under any Awards, or amounts repayable to the Company pursuant to tax equalization, housing, automobile or other employee programs) that the Grantee then owes to the Company and any amounts the Committee otherwise deems appropriate pursuant to any tax equalization policy or agreement.

3.6 Nonassignability; No Hedging. No Award (or any rights and obligations thereunder) granted to any person under the Plan may be sold, exchanged, transferred, assigned, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of or hedged, in any manner (including through the use of any cash-settled instrument), whether voluntarily or involuntarily and whether by operation of law or otherwise, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, except as may be otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, consistent with Section 3.1.2. Any sale, exchange, transfer, assignment, pledge, hypothecation, or other disposition in violation of the provisions of this Section 3.6 will be null and void and any Award which is hedged in any manner will immediately be forfeited. All of the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Award Agreements will be binding upon any permitted successors and assigns.

3.7 Successor Entity. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement and except as otherwise determined by the Committee, in the event of a Business Combination of AIG with or into any other entity (“successor entity”) or any transaction in which another person or entity acquires all of the issued and outstanding Common Stock of AIG, or all or substantially all of the assets of AIG, outstanding Awards may be assumed or a substantially equivalent award may be substituted by such successor entity or a parent or subsidiary of such successor entity.

B-12 2021 Proxy Statement

Appendix B American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

3.8 Right of Discharge Reserved. Nothing in the Plan or in any Award Agreement will confer upon any Grantee the right to continued Employment by the Company or affect any right which the Company may have to terminate such Employment.

3.9 Nature of Payments.

3.9.1 Any and all grants of Awards and deliveries of Common Stock, cash, securities or other property under the Plan will be in consideration of services performed or to be performed for the Company by the Grantee. Awards under the Plan may, in the discretion of the Committee, and subject to Section 3.14.1, be made in substitution in whole or in part for cash or other compensation otherwise payable to a participant in the Plan. Only whole shares of Common Stock will be delivered under the Plan. Awards will, to the extent reasonably practicable, be aggregated in order to eliminate any fractional shares. Fractional shares may, in the discretion of the Committee, be forfeited or be settled in cash or otherwise as the Committee may determine.

3.9.2 All such grants and deliveries will constitute a special discretionary payment to the Grantee and, unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement or the Committee specifically provides otherwise, will not be required to be taken into account in computing the amount of salary or compensation of the Grantee for the purpose of determining any contributions to or any benefits under any pension, retirement, profit-sharing, bonus, life insurance, severance or other benefit plan of the Company or under any agreement with the Grantee.

3.10 Non-Uniform Determinations.

3.10.1 The Committee’s determinations under the Plan and Award Agreements need not be uniform and may be made by it selectively among persons who receive, or are eligible to receive, Awards under the Plan (whether or not such persons are similarly situated). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee will be entitled, among other things, to make non-uniform and selective determinations under Award Agreements, and to enter into non-uniform and selective Award Agreements, as to (a) the persons to receive Awards, (b) the terms and provisions of Awards and (c) whether a Grantee’s Employment has been terminated for purposes of the Plan.

3.10.2 To the extent the Committee deems it necessary, appropriate or desirable to comply with foreign law or practices and to further the purposes of the Plan, the Committee may, without amending the Plan, establish special rules applicable to Awards to Grantees who are foreign nationals, are employed outside the United States or both and grant Awards (or amend existing Awards) in accordance with those rules.

3.11 Other Payments or Awards. Nothing contained in the Plan will be deemed in any way to limit or restrict the Company from making any award or payment to any person under any other plan, arrangement or understanding, whether now existing or hereafter in effect. In addition, Section 1.6.1 (as adjusted by Section 1.6.4) sets forth the only limit on the amount of cash, securities or other property that may be delivered pursuant to this Plan.

3.12 Plan Headings. The headings in the Plan are for the purpose of convenience only and are not intended to define or limit the construction of the provisions hereof.

3.13 Termination of Plan. The Board reserves the right to terminate the Plan at any time; provided, however, that in any case, the Plan will terminate on the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Effective Date, and provided further, that all Awards made under the Plan before its termination will remain in effect until such Awards have been satisfied or terminated in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreements.

3.14 Section 409A.

3.14.1 The Board and the Committee shall have full authority to give effect to any statement in an Award Agreement to the effect that an Award is intended to be “deferred compensation” subject to Section 409A, to be exempt from Section 409A or to have other intended treatment under Section 409A and/or other provision of

2021 Proxy StatementB-13

Appendix B American International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

the Code. To the extent necessary to give effect to this authority, in the case of any conflict or potential inconsistency between the Plan and a provision of any Award or Award Agreement with respect to the subject matter of this paragraph, the Plan shall govern.

3.14.2 Without limiting the generality of Section 3.14.1, with respect to any Award made under the Plan that is intended to be “deferred compensation” subject to Section 409A: (a) references to termination of the Grantee’s employment will mean the Grantee’s separation from service with the Company within the meaning of Section 409A; (b) any payment to be made with respect to such Award in connection with the Grantee’s separation from service with the Company within the meaning of Section 409A that would be subject to the limitations in Section 409A(a)(2)(b) of the Code shall be delayed until six months after the Grantee’s separation from service (or earlier death) in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A; (c) to the extent necessary to comply with Section 409A, any cash, other securities, other Awards or other property that the Company may deliver in lieu of shares of Common Stock in respect of an Award shall not have the effect of deferring delivery or payment beyond the date on which such delivery or payment would occur with respect to the shares of Common Stock that would otherwise have been deliverable (unless the Committee elects a later date for this purpose in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A); (d) with respect to any required Consent described in Section 3.3 or the applicable Award Agreement, if such Consent has not been effected or obtained as of the latest date provided by such Award Agreement for payment in respect of such Award and further delay of payment is not permitted in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A, such Award or portion thereof, as applicable, will be forfeited and terminated notwithstanding any prior earning or vesting; (e) if the Award includes a “series of installment payments” (within the meaning of Section 1.409A-2(b)(2)(iii) of the regulations promulgated under the Code), the Grantee’s right to the series of installment payments shall be treated as a right to a series of separate payments and not as a right to a single payment; (f) if the Award includes “dividend equivalents” (within the meaning of Section 1.409A-3(e) of the regulations promulgated under the Code), the Grantee’s right to the dividend equivalents shall be treated separately from the right to other amounts under the Award; and (g) unless the Committee determines otherwise, for purposes of determining whether the Grantee has experienced a separation from service with the Company within the meaning of Section 409A, “subsidiary” shall mean a corporation or other entity in a chain of corporations or other entities in which each corporation or other entity, starting with AIG, has a controlling interest in another corporation or other entity in the chain, ending with such corporation or other entity. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term “controlling interest” has the same meaning as provided in Section 1.414(c)-2(b)(2)(i) of the regulations promulgated under the Code, provided that the language “at least 20 percent” is used instead of “at least 80 percent” each place it appears in Section 1.414(c)-2(b)(2)(i) of the regulations promulgated under the Code.

3.15 Governing Law. THE PLAN WILL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT REGARD TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS.

3.16 Severability; Entire Agreement. If any of the provisions of the Plan or any Award Agreement is finally held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable (whether in whole or in part), such provision will be deemed modified to the extent, but only to the extent, of such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability and the remaining provisions will not be affected thereby; provided that if any of such provisions is finally held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable because it exceeds the maximum scope determined to be acceptable to permit such provision to be enforceable, such provision will be deemed to be modified to the minimum extent necessary to modify such scope in order to make such provision enforceable hereunder. The Plan and any Award Agreements contain the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter thereof and supersede all prior agreements, promises, covenants, arrangements, communications, representations and warranties between them, whether written or oral with respect to the subject matter thereof.

3.17 Waiver of Claims. Each Grantee of an Award recognizes and agrees that before being selected by the Committee to receive an Award he or she has no right to any benefits hereunder. Accordingly, in consideration of the Grantee’s receipt of any Award hereunder, he or she expressly waives any right to contest the amount of any Award, the terms of any Award Agreement, any determination, action or omission hereunder or under any Award Agreement by the Committee, the Company or the Board, or any amendment to the Plan or any Award Agreement (other than an amendment to the Plan or an Award Agreement to which his or her consent is expressly required by the express terms of an Award Agreement).

B-14 2021 Proxy Statement

Appendix BAmerican International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

3.18 No Liability With Respect to Tax Qualification or Adverse Tax Treatment. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall the Company be liable to a Grantee on account of an Award’s failure to (a) qualify for favorable United States or foreign tax treatment or (b) avoid adverse tax treatment under United States or foreign law, including, without limitation, Section 409A.

3.19 No Third Party Beneficiaries. Except as expressly provided therein, neither the Plan nor any Award Agreement will confer on any person other than the Company and the Grantee of any Award any rights or remedies thereunder. The exculpation and indemnification provisions of Section 1.3.3 will inure to the benefit of a Covered Person’s estate and beneficiaries and legatees.

3.20 Successors and Assigns of AIG. The terms of the Plan will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of AIG and any successor entity contemplated by Section 3.7.

3.21 Date of Adoption and Approval of Shareholders. The Plan was adopted on March 11, 2021 by the Board and is subject to, and will become effective upon receipt of, approval by the shareholders of AIG (the “Effective Date”).

2021 Proxy StatementB-15

  

American International Group, Inc.

www.aig.com

Printed on recycled paper

 

VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 11, 2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. 175 WATER STREET During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2021 NEW YORK, NY 10038 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by AIG in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 11, 2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. To be valid, your proxy by mail must be received by 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 12, 2021. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: D36782-P48714 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR each of the Nominees for Election, FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4, and AGAINST Proposal 5. 1. Election of Directors Nominees: For Against Abstain 1a. JAMES COLE, JR. ! ! ! For Against Abstain 2. To vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, to approve 1b. W. DON CORNWELL ! ! ! ! ! ! executive compensation. 1c. BRIAN DUPERREAULT ! ! ! 3. To vote on a proposal to approve the American 1d. JOHN H. FITZPATRICK ! ! ! ! ! ! International Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan. 1e. WILLIAM G. JURGENSEN ! ! ! 4. To act upon a proposal to ratify the selection of 1f. CHRISTOPHER S. LYNCH ! ! ! PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as AIG’s independent ! ! ! registered public accounting firm for 2021. 1g. LINDA A. MILLS ! ! ! 5. To vote on a shareholder proposal to give shareholders 1h. THOMAS F. MOTAMED ! ! ! who hold at least 10 percent of AIG’s outstanding ! ! ! common stock the right to call special meetings. 1i. PETER R. PORRINO ! ! ! 1j. AMY L. SCHIOLDAGER ! ! ! 1k. DOUGLAS M. STEENLAND ! ! ! 1l. THERESE M. VAUGHAN ! ! ! 1m. PETER S. ZAFFINO ! ! ! Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. D36783-P48714 AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. Annual Meeting of Shareholders Wednesday, May 12, 2021 American International Group, Inc. 175 Water Street New York, NY 10038 Proxy Proxy solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting - May 12, 2021. Peter Zaffino, Mark Lyons and Lucy Fato, or any of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of American International Group, Inc. to be held virtually via the Internet at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on May 12, 2021 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof. Shares represented by this proxy will be voted in accordance with the instructions provided by the shareholder. If no such instructions are provided, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR each of the Nominees for election, FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4, AGAINST Proposal 5 and otherwise as determined in their discretion. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AIG2021. Continued and to be signed on the reverse side.